Comparison of High Hip Center versus Anatomical Reconstruction Technique in Crowe Types II and III Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: a Retrospective Clinical Study.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The literature is conflicting as to whether the high hip center (HHC) reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an ideal option for patients with severe developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This study aimed to compare the mid-term functional and radiographic outcomes of THA using HHC versus anatomical hip center (AHC) technique in Crowe types II and III DDH. Our hypothesis was that there may be no differences in terms of functional and radiographic outcomes between patients who underwent THA using HHC or AHC. MATERIAL AND METHODS Fifty-seven patients who underwent a primary THA due to Crowe type-II or type-III DDH were retrospectively reviewed and included. Patients were divided into two groups as per the hip center reconstruction: Group A (AHC technique) and group H (HHC technique). A cementless cup was inserted in 25 hips (19 female, 6 male; mean age = 51 years, age range = 28-67)) at near-AHC in group A and 32 hips (22 female, 10 male; mean age = 53 years, age range = 29-68) at HHC position in group H. To assess clinical status, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used at the final follow-up. In radiographical assessment, component loosening and osseointegration of the acetabular cup were examined on follow-up radiographs. Complications were also recorded. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 41 months (range, 25-84) in group A and 40 months (range, 24-86) in group H. The mean HHS was 83 (range, 74-91) in group A and 83.6 (range, 73-94) in group H (p = 0.741). Osteolysis was determined in three patients from each group. The other 51 cups demonstrated a minimum of one radiographic sign of osseointegration. Although the overall complication rate was higher in group A (64%) than in group H (46%), this difference reached no statistical significance (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS The HHC technique using cementless acetabular fixation seems to be a valuable alternative option to AHC technique in cases of Crowe types II and III DDH. Key words: High hip center; anatomical hip center; center of rotation; total hip arthroplasty; dysplastic hip; developmental dysplasia of the hip; Crowe type II; Crowe Type III.

A comparison of external fixation and locked intramedullary nailing in the treatment of femoral diaphysis fractures from gunshot injuries.

INTRODUCTION: We studied the safety and incidence of complications from the treatment of gunshot-induced femur diaphysis fractures with locked intramedullary nailing in comparison to external fixation. METHODS: Patients who had femoral diaphysis fracture operations due to gunshot injuries (107 femurs of 99 patients) between 2003 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed, and 66 femurs of 60 patients were place into two groups (Group A: intramedullary nailing-38 femurs of the 36 patients; Group B: external fixator-28 femurs of 24 patients). The mean follow-up was 76.3 months (22-131). The study outcomes were patient complications, infection rate, union time, need for secondary surgery, functional assessment with lower extremity functional scale, and radiological evaluation with orthoroentgenograms. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 37.3 ± 7.4 years in Group A and 39 ± 6.1 years in Group B. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender or follow-up. There were two deep infections (5.2%) in Group A and one deep infection (3.5%) in Group B. Delayed union was observed in four patients (10.5%) in Group A and in two patients (7.1%) in Group B. There was one non-union (2.6%) and one non-union (3.5%) in Group A and Group B, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in incidence of union, delayed union or deep infection. The mean union time was 3.1 ± 2.5 months in Group A and 5.8 ± 1.4 months in Group B. The union time was significantly lower in the intramedullary nailing group (p = 0.023). There were no significant differences between the two groups in regards to radiological and functional evaluation. DISCUSSION: This study showed similar complication rates and functional results both for external fixator and intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral diaphysis fractures due to gunshot injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 retrospective comparative clinical study.