Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(10)2024 May 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38792527

RESUMEN

Background: The inhibition of PCSK9 lowered LDL cholesterol levels, reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. However, the effect on patients who have undergone surgical myocardial revascularization has not yet been evaluated. Methods: From January 2017 to December 2022, 180 dyslipidemic patients who underwent coronary artery bypass were included in the study. Until December 2019, 100 patients optimized therapy with statin ± ezetimibe (SG). Since January 2020, 80 matched patients added treatment with Evolocumab every 2 weeks (EG). All 180 patients were followed-up at 3 and 12 months, comparing outcomes. Results: The two groups are homogenous. At 3 months and 1 year, a significant decrease in the parameter mean levels of LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol is detected in the Evolocumab group compared to the standard group. No mortality was detected in either group. No complications or drug discontinuation were recorded. In the SG group, five patients (5%) suffered a myocardial infarction during the 1-year follow-up. In the EG group, two patients (2.5%) underwent PTCA due to myocardial infarction. There is no significant difference in overall survival according to the new treatment (p-value = 0.9), and the hazard ratio is equal to 0.94 (95% C.I.: [0.16-5.43]; p-value = 0.9397). Conclusions: The use of Evolocumab, which was started immediately after coronary artery bypass graft surgery, significantly reduced LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol levels compared to statin treatment alone and is completely safe. However, at one year of follow-up, this result did not have impact on the reduction in major clinical events.

2.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 142(11): 3265-3270, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34482424

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of intracapsular femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in the elderly is usually based on hip replacement, both total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA). Recently, several tissue-sparing approaches for hip arthroplasty had been described with promising results in terms of hospitalization length, blood loss and dislocation rate. The aim of the present study was to compare the blood loss and the transfusion rate in a cohort of patients with FNF treated using an HA through both the SuperPath (SP) and the traditional posterolateral (PL) approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients affected by FNFs between January 2018 and February 2020. All patients with intracapsular FNF treated with a single HA implant (Profemur L, MicroPort Orthopedics Inc., USA) via PL or SP approaches were included. Exclusion criteria were pathological fractures, polytrauma and preoperatively transfused patients. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included and analysed in the present study. 17 patients were classified in the SP group, and 18 in the PL one. The rate of antithrombotic therapy was higher in the SP group compared with the PL group [10 (58, 82%) vs 4 (22, 2%)]. While the two groups did not differ in terms of preoperative haemoglobin (Hb), 48 h postoperative Hb and Hb reduction, a significative difference was observed in terms of blood transfusion rate (1 SP vs 9 PL, p = 0.0072). CONCLUSIONS: The SuperPath approach in patients with FNF under antithrombotic therapy assures lower transfusion rate, potentially reducing complication rates and improving patients' outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral , Hemiartroplastia , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/etiología , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Fibrinolíticos , Anciano Frágil , Hemiartroplastia/métodos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 105(6): 1490-1497, 2021 10 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34662857

RESUMEN

Lung ultrasound (LUS) can be used to assess loss of aeration, which is associated with outcome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting to the emergency department. We hypothesized that LUS scores are associated with outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving invasive ventilation. This retrospective international multicenter study evaluated patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with at least one LUS study within 5 days after invasive mechanical ventilation initiation. The global LUS score was calculated by summing the 12 regional scores (range 0-36). Pleural line abnormalities and subpleural consolidations were also scored. The outcomes were successful liberation from the ventilator and intensive care mortality within 28 days, analyzed with multistate, competing risk proportional hazard models. One hundred thirty-seven patients with COVID-19-related ARDS were included in our study. The global LUS score was associated with successful liberation from mechanical ventilation (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.91 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.96; P = 0.0007) independently of the ARDS severity, but not with 28 days mortality (HR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.97-1.08; P = 0.36). Subpleural consolidation and pleural line abnormalities did not add to the prognostic value of the global LUS score. Examinations within 24 hours of intubation showed no prognostic value. To conclude, a lower global LUS score 24 hours after invasive ventilation initiation is associated with increased probability of liberation from the mechanical ventilator COVID-19 ARDS patients, independently of the ARDS severity.


Asunto(s)
Extubación Traqueal , COVID-19/patología , COVID-19/terapia , Pulmón/patología , SARS-CoV-2 , Ultrasonografía , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Med Glas (Zenica) ; 17(1): 163-169, 2020 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31994857

RESUMEN

Aim Distal femoral shaft fractures are characterized by increasing incidence and complexity and are still considered a challenging problem. No consensus on best surgical option has been achieved. The aim of this study is to investigate mineral bone densitometry, radiographic and clinical outcomes of locking retrograde intramedullary nailing (LRN) and non-locking retrograde intramedullary nailing (NLRN) regarding surgical treatment of distal femoral shaft fractures in adults based on the hypothesis that there is no statistical difference among the results of both surgical options. Methods Retrospective study: 30 patients divided into 2 groups (Group 1 LRN, Group 2 NLRN). Average age was 42.67±18.32 for Group 1 and 44.27±15.11 for Group 2 (range of age 18-65 for both groups). Gender ratio (male:female) was 2.75 (11:4) for both groups. AO Classification, Non Union Scoring System (NUSS) and Radiographic Union Score Hip (RUSH), Visual Analogic Score (VAS), Dexa scans, plain radiographs were used. Evaluation endpoint: 12 months after surgery. Results No statistical difference was obtained in terms of surgery time, transfusions or wound healing. There were similar results regarding average time of bone healing, RUSH scores, VAS, regression between RUSH and VAS, average correlation clinical-radiographic results and patients outcomes. Only one patient of LRN group had reduction of mineral bone densitometry values. Conclusion No statistical difference in terms of radiographic, bone densitometry and clinical outcomes among LNR and NLNR for the treatment of distal femur fractures was found. The presence of no statistical difference regarding radiological findings is the main factor supporting our hypothesis given their strong objectivity.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Absorciometría de Fotón , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Clavos Ortopédicos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Curación de Fractura , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
BJU Int ; 104(7): 991-5, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19426191

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the early oncological, perioperative and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) vs open retropubic RP (RRP) in a laparoscopically naive centre, as robotic assistance aids the laparoscopically naive surgeon in minimally invasive prostate surgery, by offering magnification and superior dexterity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1 November 2006 to 31 December 2007, 120 patients had RARP; this group was followed prospectively and evaluated for early oncological, perioperative and functional outcomes (measured at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery), and compared to a historical control group of consecutive patients who had RRP from 20 May 2004 to 28 February 2007. All patients were operated by the same laparoscopically naive surgeons. The comparison was by matched-pair analysis. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were equivalent, although there was a higher percentage of patients with pT3/pT4 disease in the RRP group. As a proxy for oncological outcome, positive surgical margins were equivalent in the two groups (22% RARP vs 25% RRP, P = 0.77). The overall mean (range) surgical duration was significantly longer in RARP group, at 215 (165-450) min vs 160 (90-240) min in the RRP group (P < 0.001). However, RARP had a statistically significant advantage over RRP for estimated blood loss, of 200 vs 800 mL (P < 0.001), duration of catheterization (6 vs 7 days P < 0.001) and length of stay (3 vs 6 days, P < 0.001) The 3, 6 and 12-month continence rates were 70%, 93% and 97% vs 63%, 83% and 88% after RARP and RRP, respectively (P = 0.15, 0.011 and 0.014). The 3, 6 and 12 month overall potency recovery rate was 31%, 43% and 61% vs 18%, 31% and 41%, after RARP and RRP, respectively (P = 0.006, 0.045 and 0.003). CONCLUSION: Our initial experience showed the feasibility of RARP in a laparoscopically naive centre. RRP seems to be a faster procedure, whereas RARP provided better results in terms of estimated blood loss, hospitalization and functional results. The early oncological outcome seemed to be equivalent in the two groups.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía/métodos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Robótica , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Competencia Clínica/normas , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Erección Peniana , Resultado del Tratamiento , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología
6.
J. bras. urol ; 6(4): 254, out.-dez. 1980. tab
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: lil-102916

RESUMEN

Os autores relatam e tecem consideraçöes sobre 4 complicaçöes urológicas ocorridas em 40 transplantes renais, sendo assim distribuídos: 2 casos de fístula anastomótica, 1 caso de necrose uretral e 1 caso de ureter curto. Apresentam sua conduta terapêutica e "follow-up


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Brasil
7.
J. bras. urol ; 6(3): 216-7, jul.-set. 1980. tab
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: lil-100083

RESUMEN

Os autores analisam 75 prostatectomias retropúblicas pela técnica de Millin. Comenta-se as complicaçöes e os resultados dos casos operados


Asunto(s)
Persona de Mediana Edad , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Prostatectomía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA