Reproductive Surgery in Females with Obesity: Reproductive Consequences of Obesity and Applications for Surgical Care.

Obesity is the most common medical problem in women of reproductive age. The surgical applications for this population, many of who are interested in current or future fertility, are critical to safe and effective evaluation and management of issues that impact the reproductive system. As rates of obesity continue to rise worldwide, it is projected that one in two individuals will have obesity by 2030 leading to increasing numbers of individuals affected by a disease process that has implications for their gynecologic surgical care, fertility-related assessment, and infertility treatment. Offering patients with obesity access to safe reproductive surgery is a cornerstone of reproductive autonomy. This review will summarize current recommendations regarding surgical concepts for the operating room, office hysteroscopy, oocyte retrieval, and embryo transfer in female patients with obesity.

Oil-based or saline contrast for sono-hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a pilot randomized controlled double blind trial.

Objective: To determine the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of an oil-based, iodinated contrast using office-based, ultrasound-imaged hysterosalpingography in women with infertility. Design: Randomized Controlled Double Blind Clinical Trial. Setting: Academic health center. Interventions: Tubal flushing with oil-based contrast medium (Lipiodol UF) versus saline. Main Outcome Measures: Ongoing pregnancy rate, pain, quality of life, and thyroid function. Results: Forty-eight patients (24 in each group) were analyzed. The groups were well-matched at baseline. Ongoing pregnancy was noted in 17% (4/24) of the oil-contrast group versus 37% (9/24) in the saline group. Saline group patients more frequently initiated infertility therapy in the six-month follow-up period (saline, 67% vs. oil, 33%), and no serious adverse events in either group. There were no differences in pain from the procedure between groups. There were no differences in thyroid function tests postprocedure between groups, but within the oil-contrast group, there was a slight increase in thyroid-stimulating hormone (post vs. preratio of geometric means: 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.38) and decrease in Free T4 (postdifference vs. predifference in means: 0.08 ng/dL; 95% CI, -0.14 to -0.01). Immediately after the test, the physicians correctly guessed 79% of oil and 71% of saline randomization assignments, whereas patients correctly guessed 63% of oil and 38% of saline. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of giving an oil-based contrast medium during ultrasound-imaged hysterosalpingography. Pregnancies were seen after oil-based administration, and this contrast is associated with minor thyroid function impairment.

A discrete-choice experiment study of physicians' prioritization of attributes of medical treatments for endometriosis-associated pain.

BACKGROUND: Physicians' preferences for attributes of medical treatments for endometriosis-associated pain have not previously been quantified. METHODS: US obstetrician-gynecologists completed an online discrete-choice experiment survey. In a series of questions, physicians chose a medical treatment for a hypothetical patient with endometriosis experiencing severe, persistent dysmenorrhea, nonmenstrual pelvic pain, and/or dyspareunia. Each question presented two hypothetical medical treatments for endometriosis-associated pain, defined by seven attributes with varying levels. Preferences weights and conditional relative importance (CRI) were calculated using a random-parameters logit model. RESULTS: Respondents (N = 250) had an average age of 53 years; 36% were female. The most important attribute, conditional on the attributes and levels evaluated, was risk of moderate-to-severe hot flashes (CRI, 3.34). In descending order of importance, the CRIs of the other attributes were 2.13 for improvement in nonmenstrual pelvic pain, 2.04 for improvement in dyspareunia, 1.88 for improvement in dysmenorrhea, 1.16 for risk of pregnancy-related complications if pregnancy occurs during treatment, 0.62 for increased risk of bone fracture later in life, and 0.48 for mode of administration. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to valuing pain reduction, respondents prioritized avoiding moderate-to-severe hot flashes, followed by less common and less immediate risks of pregnancy-related complications and bone fracture.

Effects of Oral Contraception and Lifestyle Modification on Incretins and TGF-ß Superfamily Hormones in PCOS.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of common treatments for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) on a panel of hormones (reproductive/metabolic). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of blood from a randomized controlled trial of three 16-week preconception interventions designed to improve PCOS-related abnormalities: continuous oral contraceptive pills (OCPs, N = 34 subjects), intensive lifestyle modification (Lifestyle, N = 31), or a combination of both (Combined, N = 29). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Post-treatment levels of activin A and B, inhibin B, and follistatin (FST), as well as Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP-2), glucagon, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and 2, and oxyntomodulin were compared to baseline, and the change from baseline in these parameters were correlated with outcomes. RESULTS: Oral contraceptive pill use was associated with a significant suppression in activin A, inhibin A, and anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), but a significant increase in FST. IGF-1, IGFBP-2, glucagon, and GLP-2 levels were significantly decreased. Oxyntomodulin was profoundly suppressed by OCPs (ratio of geometric means: 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05, 0.18, P < 0.001). None of the analytes were significantly affected by Lifestyle, whereas the effects of Combined were similar to OCPs alone, although attenuated. Oxyntomodulin was significantly positively associated with the change in total ovarian volume (rs = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.48; P = 0.03) and insulin sensitivity index (rs = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.64; P < 0.001), and it was inversely correlated with change in area under the curve (AUC) glucose [rs = -0.38; 95% CI: -0.57, -0.16; P = 0.001]. None of the hormonal changes were associated with live birth, only Activin A was associated with ovulation (risk ratio per 1 ng/mL increase in change in Activin A: 6.0 [2.2, 16.2]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In women with PCOS, OCPs (and not Lifestyle) affect a wide variety of reproductive/metabolic hormones, but their treatment response does not correlate with live birth.

A Clinician's Guide to the Treatment of Endometriosis with Elagolix.

Pain associated with endometriosis is a considerable burden for women, permeating all aspects of their lives, from their ability to perform daily activities to their quality of life. Although there are many options for endometriosis-associated pain management, they are often limited by insufficient efficacy, inconvenient routes of administration, and/or intolerable side effects. Elagolix, a nonpeptide, small-molecule gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, is the first new oral therapy to be approved for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain in the United States in more than a decade. Modulation of estradiol with elagolix is dose dependent and ranges from partial to full suppression. Clinical evidence has shown that elagolix at both approved doses (150 mg once daily and 200 mg twice daily) is effective for reducing symptoms of pelvic pain (dysmenorrhea, nonmenstrual pelvic pain, and dyspareunia), improving quality of life, and decreasing use of rescue analgesics (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or opioids). The availability of two dosing options allows for individualization of treatment based on baseline clinical factors and response to therapy. Elagolix is well tolerated, with less pronounced hypoestrogenic effects compared with GnRH agonists. This review provides an overview of elagolix, highlighting currently available treatment options and the application of this new treatment for women with endometriosis-associated pain.

Depression, Anxiety, and Self-Directed Violence in Women With Endometriosis: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Study.

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of mental health outcomes in women in the United States with and without documented endometriosis. In a retrospective matched-cohort study using administrative health claims data from Optum's Clinformatics DataMart from May 1, 2000, through March 31, 2019, women aged 18-50 years with endometriosis (n = 72,677), identified by International Classification of Disease diagnosis codes (revisions 9 or 10), were matched 1:2 on age and calendar time to women without endometriosis (n = 147,251), with a median follow-up of 529 days (interquartile range, 195, 1,164). The rate per 1,000 person-years of anxiety, depression, and self-directed violence among women with endometriosis was 57.1, 47.7, and 0.9, respectively. Comparing women with endometriosis to those without, the adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were 1.38 (1.34, 1.42) for anxiety, 1.48 (1.44, 1.53) for depression, and 2.03 (1.60, 2.58) for self-directed violence. The association with depression was stronger among women younger than 35 years (P for heterogeneity < 0.01). Risk factors for incident depression, anxiety, and self-directed violence among women with endometriosis included endometriosis-related pain symptoms and prevalence of other chronic conditions associated with pain. The identification of risk factors for mental health conditions among women with endometriosis may improve patient-centered disease management.

Impact of pain and nonpain co-morbidities on opioid use in women with endometriosis.

Aim: To evaluate impact of co-morbidities on opioid use in endometriosis. Patients & methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data obtained from the Symphony Health database (July 2015-June 2018), which contains medical and pharmacy claims information on 79,947 women with endometriosis. Relative risk (RR) of postdiagnosis opioid use and supply duration associated with baseline co-morbidities were determined. Results: Women with endometriosis using opioids at baseline were 61% more likely to receive opioids postdiagnosis (RR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.59-1.63). Risk of prolonged opioid supply postdiagnosis was highest for those with prolonged supply at baseline (RR: 21.14; 20.14-22.19), and was 1.32 (1.26-1.38) for patients with ≥1 co-morbidity, 1.37 (1.31-1.43) for pain co-morbidities and 1.07 (1.04-1.11) for psychiatric co-morbidities. Conclusion: Risk of opioid use after endometriosis diagnosis was greater in patients who used opioids before diagnosis. Risk of prolonged opioid use was greater if co-morbidities existed before diagnosis.

The impact of high-risk and chronic opioid use among commercially insured endometriosis patients on health care resource utilization and costs in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate all-cause and endometriosis-related health care resource utilization and costs among newly diagnosed endometriosis patients with high-risk versus low-risk opioid use or patients with chronic versus non-chronic opioid use. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of IBM MarketScan® Commercial Claims data from 2009 to 2018 was performed for females aged 18 to 49 with newly diagnosed endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition code: 617.xx; International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition code: N80.xx). Two sub-cohorts were identified: high-risk (⩾1 day with ⩾90 morphine milligram equivalents per day or ⩾1-day concomitant benzodiazepine use) or chronic opioid utilization (⩾90-day supply prescribed or ⩾10 opioid prescriptions). High-risk or chronic utilization was evaluated during the 12-month assessment period after the index date. Index date was the first opioid prescription within 12 months following endometriosis diagnosis. All outcomes were assessed over 12-month post-assessment period while adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Out of 61,019 patients identified, 18,239 had high-risk opioid use and 5001 chronic opioid use. Health care resource utilization drivers were outpatient visits and pharmacy fills, which were higher among high-risk versus low-risk patients (outpatient visits: 17.49 vs 15.51; pharmacy fills: 19.58 vs 16.88, p < 0.0001). Chronic opioid users had a higher number of outpatient visits (19.53 vs 15.00, p < 0.0001) and pharmacy fills (23.18 vs 16.43, p < 0.0001) compared to non-chronic opioid users. High-risk opioid users had significantly higher all-cause health care costs compared to low-risk opioid users (US$16,377 vs US$13,153; p < 0.0001). Chronic opioid users also had significantly higher all-cause health care costs compared to non-chronic opioid users (US$20,930 vs US$12,272; p < 0.0001). Similar patterns were observed among endometriosis-related HCRU, except pharmacy fills among high-risk and chronic sub-cohorts. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates significantly higher all-cause and endometriosis-related health care resource utilization and total costs for high-risk opioid users compared to low-risk opioid users among newly diagnosed endometriosis patients over 1 year. Similar trends were observed for comparing chronic opioid users with non-chronic opioid users, except for endometriosis-related pharmacy fills and associated costs.

Healthcare Resource Use and Costs Associated with Opioid Initiation Among Patients with Newly Diagnosed Endometriosis with Commercial Insurance in the USA.

INTRODUCTION: To compare all-cause and endometriosis-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and healthcare costs by service categories (outpatient, inpatient, emergency room [ER], pharmacy) among patients with newly diagnosed endometriosis using opioids compared to patients with endometriosis not using opioids. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Claims data from 2009 to 2018 was performed for women aged 18-49 with newly diagnosed endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 code 617.xx; ICD-10 code N80.xx) over 24 months follow-up. Patients were stratified on the basis of opioid use within 12 months post first endometriosis diagnosis date. Patients with opioid use were 1:1 matched to patients without opioid use using propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 85,329 female patients with a new endometriosis diagnosis were identified and 48,470 patients (24,235 opioid and 24,235 non-opioid users) remained after inclusion-exclusion criteria and matching. Opioid patients had an estimated mean 30.33 outpatient visits, 29.59 pharmacy fills, 0.28 inpatient visits, 0.65 ER visits, and total length of stay (LOS) was 1.01 days. Non-opioid patients had an estimated mean 27.94 outpatient visits, 22.06 pharmacy fills, 0.23 inpatient visits, 0.42 ER visits, and total LOS was 0.82 days. On average, opioid patients had significantly greater all-cause HCRU compared to non-opioid patients (all p < 0.0001). Among endometriosis-related healthcare utilization, there were similar ER visits, but lower outpatient visits, inpatient visits, and total LOS and higher pharmacy fills among opioid and non-opioid patients. Estimated mean all-cause costs were higher among opioid ($26,755) vs. non-opioid ($19,302) users (p < 0.0001). A similar trend was observed for estimated mean endometriosis-related costs. CONCLUSION: This analysis observed significantly higher all-cause HCRU and costs for opioid users compared to non-opioid users among patients with newly diagnosed endometriosis. While observed endometriosis-related costs were significantly higher in opioid users compared to non-opioid users during a 24-month follow-up period, endometriosis-related HCRU varied by service categories for these two populations over this time period.

Pregnancy registry: three-year follow-up of children conceived from letrozole, clomiphene, or gonadotropins.

OBJECTIVE: To study the development of children conceived from non-IVF infertility treatments consisting of gonadotropins, clomiphene, or letrozole. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: U.S. academic health centers. PATIENT(S): Children of women with polycystic ovary syndrome who conceived with letrozole (LTZ) or clomiphene (CC) in the PPCOS II study or women with unexplained infertility (AMIGOS study) who conceived with LTZ, CC, or gonadotropin (GN). INTERVENTION(S): Longitudinal annual follow-up from birth to age 3. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Scores from Ages and Stages Developmental Questionnaire (ASQ), MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MCDI), and annual growth. RESULT(S): One hundred eighty-five children from 160 families participated in at least one follow-up evaluation from the two infertility trials. Most multiple gestations in the follow-up study resulted from GN treatment (n = 14) followed by CC (n = 6) and LTZ (n = 3). There were no significant differences among the three groups at any time point with respect to abnormal scores on the ASQ. On the MCDI Words and Gestures, the LTZ group scored significantly higher than the GN group for most items (phrases, early gestures, later gestures, and total gestures). Children in the CC group scored significantly higher than the GN group for the later gestures and total gestures items. CONCLUSION(S): Differences in growth and cognitive developmental rates among children conceived with first-line infertility therapies, including LTZ, are relatively minor and likely due to differences in multiple pregnancy rates.

A Longitudinal Assessment of the Impact of Endometriosis on Patients' Salary Growth and Risk of Leaving the Workforce.

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of endometriosis on the risks of work loss events and salary/growth over a 5-year period. METHODS: Women aged 18-49 years with ≥ 1 endometriosis diagnosis were identified in a claims database and matched 1:1 to women without endometriosis (controls). The index date was the first endometriosis diagnosis date (endometriosis cohort) or a random date during the period of continuous eligibility (controls). Baseline characteristics were compared between cohorts descriptively. Average annual salaries were compared over the 5 years post-index using generalized estimating equations accounting for matching. Time-to-event analyses assessed risk of short-term disability, long-term disability, leave of absence, early retirement, and any event of leaving the workforce (Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests). RESULTS: A total of 6851 matched pairs (mean age at index date: 38.7 years) were included in the salary growth analysis, with a subset of 1981 pairs in the risk of leaving the workforce analysis. In year 1, the endometriosis cohort had a lower average annual salary ($61,322) than controls ($64,720); salaries were lower in years 2-5 by $3697-$6600 (all p < 0.01). The endometriosis cohort experienced smaller salary growth than controls in all years, ranging from $438 vs. $1058 in year 1 to $4906 vs. $7074 in year 5 (all p < 0.05). In the Kaplan-Meier analyses, patients with endometriosis were significantly more likely than controls to leave the workforce for any reason, take a leave of absence, and use short-term disability (all log-rank tests p < 0.001). Additionally, the median number of years to each of these events was lower for the endometriosis cohort relative to the matched controls. Sensitivity analyses among patients with moderate-to-severe endometriosis and by salary brackets confirmed the primary analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with endometriosis experienced lower annual salary and salary growth, as well as higher risks of work loss events, compared with matched controls.

Surgical simulation supplements reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship training.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if a surgical boot camp improves laparoscopic skill among reproduction endocrinology and infertility (REI) fellows and increases fellow desire to incorporate surgical skills into practice and to examine whether fellowship in vitro fertilization (IVF) volume correlates with surgical efficiency. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation. SETTING: Simulation Center. PATIENTS: Forty REI fellows. INTERVENTIONS: Fellows were timed before and after training in laparoscopic suturing and knot tying and while using virtual simulators. Fellows were surveyed before boot camp on prior experience with IVF and reproductive surgery, and immediately and 1 month after boot camp on their desire to incorporate surgical skills into practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficiency of laparoscopic suturing and knot tying before and after boot camp; likelihood and persistence of incorporating surgical skills into practice immediately and 1 month after boot camp; and correlation between fellowship IVF volume and fellow surgical efficiency. RESULTS: Fellows experienced significant improvement in laparoscopic suturing (44 sec), intracorporeal knot tying (82 sec), and extracorporeal knot tying (71 sec). Fellows reported being more likely to incorporate operative hysteroscopy (89%), operative laparoscopy (87%), and laparoscopic suturing (84%) into practice immediately following boot camp with no difference 1 month later. Fifty-four percent of fellows reported being more likely to perform robotic surgery after the boot camp, increasing to 70% 1 month later. There were weak correlations between IVF case volume and efficiency in laparoscopic suturing or hysteroscopic polypectomy (Spearman correlation coefficients, -0.14 and -0.03). CONCLUSIONS: An intensive surgical boot camp enhances surgical skill among REI fellows.

National trends in inpatient endometriosis admissions: Patients, procedures and outcomes, 2006-2015.

INTRODUCTION: Despite guidance towards minimally invasive, outpatient procedures for endometriosis, many patients nonetheless receive inpatient care. Our objective was to assess trends in patient and hospital characteristics, surgical complications and hospital charges for women with an endometriosis-related inpatient admission in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a pooled cross-sectional analysis of Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample data. Visits were stratified into three time-period-defined cohorts (2006-2007, 2010-2011, and 2014 through the first three quarters of 2015). Visits were included if the patient was aged 18-49 years and the primary diagnosis code was for endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code 617.xx). We evaluated counts of inpatient admissions and rates of patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: The number of inpatient admissions with a primary diagnosis code for endometriosis decreased by 72.8% from 2006 to 2015. At the same time, among those admitted for inpatient care for endometriosis, the proportions who had Medicaid insurance and multiple documented comorbidities increased. From 2006 to 2015, mean total hospital charges increased by 75% to $39,662 in 2015 US dollars, although average length of stay increased by <1 day. CONCLUSIONS: The number of inpatient admissions with a primary diagnosis of endometriosis decreased over the past decade, while surgical complications and associated hospital charges increased. The share of patients with multiple comorbidities increased and an increasing proportion of inpatient endometriosis admissions were covered by Medicaid and occurred at urban teaching hospitals. These findings suggest a demographic shift in patients receiving inpatient care for endometriosis towards more complex, vulnerable patients.

Reproductive surgery: glimpses into the past and thoughts for the future (part 2).

This month's Views and Reviews continues with part two of the series regarding reproductive surgery. The roles of reproductive surgery in müllerian anomalies, tubal and pelvic disease, fertility preservation, and male reproductive surgery are included. Augmenting each contribution, authors have added images and videos to their reflections.

Introduction: Reproductive surgery: glimpses into the past and thoughts for the future (part 1).

This month's Views and Reviews sets the stage for a two part series regarding reproductive surgery. The development, importance, and implications for reproductive surgery in the setting of assisted reproductive technology is discussed. Images and videos augment the authors' reflections of the past, present, and/or future. This series will not include a focus on uterine transplantation as this will be a future topic of its own.