RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a serious medical condition associated with high mortality and disability rates. Surgical interventions, including neuroendoscopic surgery (NES) and craniotomy, are employed to manage ICH and improve patient outcomes. This meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of NES versus craniotomy in treating ICH. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies comparing NES with craniotomy for ICH. Inclusion criteria encompassed primary or secondary results from randomized controlled trials or observational studies for confirmed supratentorial ICH. Data were extracted, and methodological quality was assessed using appropriate tools. Statistical analysis was performed using meta-analysis software. RESULTS: The analysis included 26studies (N = 3237 patients). NES was associated with significantly lower mortality compared with craniotomy (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33 to 0.60, P < 0.00001). Hematoma evacuation rates were higher with NES (standardized mean difference 1.505, 95% CI 0.835 to 2.160, P < 0.00001). NES also showed better functional outcomes (odds ratio 3.31, 95% CI 1.78 to 6.17, P = 0.0002) and reduced blood loss (standardized mean difference -3.06, 95% CI -3.979 to -2.141, P = 0.000). Additionally, NES was associated with shorter hospital and intensive care unit stays, shorter operative times, and fewer complications such as infection and rebleeding. CONCLUSIONS: NES is a promising alternative to craniotomy for treating ICH, offering advantages in terms of reduced mortality, improved functional outcomes, and fewer complications. Future studies should explore advances in neuroendoscopic techniques to optimize patient outcomes further.
RESUMEN
Histotripsy is a noninvasive medical technique that uses high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) to treat liver tumours. The two main histotripsy methods are boiling histotripsy and cavitation cloud histotripsy. Boiling histotripsy uses prolonged ultrasound pulses to create small boiling bubbles in the tissue, which leads to the breakdown of the tissue into smaller subcellular fragments. Cavitation cloud histotripsy uses the ultrasonic cavitation effect to disintegrate target tissue into precisely defined liquefied lesions. Both methods show similar treatment effectiveness; however, boiling histotripsy ensures treatment stability by producing a stable boiling bubble with each pulse. The therapeutic effect is ascribed to mechanical damage at the subcellular level rather than thermal damage. This article discusses the mechanisms, treatment parameters, and potential of histotripsy as a minimally invasive procedure that provides precise and controlled subcellular damage.
RESUMEN
Background: Blood transfusion intervention has been proven to be a crucial therapeutic aid for preterm infants with serious morbidities such as sepsis, intraventricular hemorrhage, and cardiopulmonary insufficiencies. However, blood transfusion practices have also been shown to cause significant adverse outcomes, which may negate the therapeutic effect of the intervention. To address the varying policies regarding the administration of blood products, healthcare professionals have adopted a consensus-based approach. The absence of a standard protocol has resulted in conflicting outcomes in previous clinical studies. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of blood transfusion practices in preterm infants by analyzing past clinical research and identifying the current trends that have emerged as a result of recent trials. Results: Recent trials have demonstrated comparable trends in mortality rates and other primary outcomes, including retinopathy of prematurity, intraventricular hemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and brain injury, following transfusion of blood products in both groups. Nevertheless, employing restrictive thresholds rather than adopting a liberal approach can reduce these outcomes. Conclusion: The current literature does not provide clear support for either technique as opposing and contradictory results are evident. However, there is a slight inclination toward the restrictive transfusion threshold due to recent trials, which warrants further in-depth investigation into this issue.