Correlation between in vitro and in vivo activities of GM 237354, a new sordarin derivative, against Candida albicans in an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model and influence of protein binding.

The antifungal effect of GM 237354, a sordarin derivative, was studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic dynamic system (bioreactor) which reproduces PK profiles observed in a previously described model of drug efficacy against murine systemic candidiasis. Immunocompetent mice infected intravenously with 10(5) CFU of Candida albicans were treated with GM 237354 at 2.5, 10, and 40 mg/kg of body weight every 8 h subcutaneously for 7 days. Free concentrations in serum were calculated by multiplying total concentrations measured in vivo by 0.05, the free fraction determined in vitro by equilibrium dialysis. In the bioreactor the inoculum was approximately 10(6) CFU/ml; and a one-compartment PK model was used to reproduce the PK profiles of free and total GM 237354 in serum obtained in mice, and clearance of C. albicans was measured over 48 h. A good correlation was observed when the in vivo fungal kidney burden and the area under the survival time curve were compared with the in vitro broth "burden," although only when free in vivo levels in serum were reproduced in vitro. GM 237354 displayed a 3-log decrease effect both in vivo and in vitro. The very few reports available on in vitro-in vivo correlations have been obtained with antibiotics. The good in vitro-in vivo correlation obtained with an antifungal agent shows that the in vitro dynamic system could constitute a powerful investigational tool prior to assessment of the efficacy of an anti-infective agent in animals and humans.

Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate given as a combination. Lack of systemic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential for systemic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone propionate when repeat doses of the two drugs are given in combination to healthy subjects. METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy subjects received salmeterol 100 microg, salmeterol 100 microg/fluticasone propionate 500 microg and fluticasone propionate 500 microg via a Diskus dry powder inhaler twice daily for 11 days according to a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. Subjects in the placebo group also received a single dose of salmeterol 100 microg on the morning of day 10. On day 10, the systemic effects of salmeterol [on pulse rate, blood pressure, corrected QT (QTc) interval and serum potassium and glucose levels] and fluticasone propionate (on 24-h urinary cortisol and morning plasma cortisol levels) were assessed. Maximal number and affinity of lymphocyte beta2-adrenoceptors and beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphism at loci 16 and 27 were also determined. Plasma pharmacokinetics of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate were determined after the morning dose on day 10. Dosing continued on the evening of day 10 and on day 11, and on day 12 the effect of repeat-dose treatment with salmeterol and salmeterol/fluticasone propionate on the systemic effects of cumulative doses of inhaled salbutamol (up to a total dosage of 3,200 microg) was evaluated. RESULTS: All treatments were safe and well tolerated. With the exception of a higher pulse rate after repeat administration of salmeterol [66.2 beats per minute (bpm) versus 63.6 bpm], there were no significant differences between the single-dose and repeat-dose salmeterol groups. The systemic pharmacodynamic effects of inhaled salmeterol were not affected by the co-administration of fluticasone propionate. Eleven days of treatment with salmeterol induced tachyphylaxis to the systemic effects of cumulative doses of salbutamol; however, co-administration of fluticasone propionate did not affect the response to salbutamol. Fluticasone propionate reduced 24-h urinary cortisol excretion (22.4 microg compared with 48.6 microg with placebo), but this was unaffected by the co-administration of salmeterol. Morning plasma cortisol levels were not reduced compared with placebo. There was no significant treatment effect on lymphocyte beta2-adrenoceptors and no correlation of beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphism at loci 16 and 27 with the development of tachyphylaxis. Salmeterol plasma concentrations were measurable only during the first half-hour after dosing. Co-administration of fluticasone propionate did not affect the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of salmeterol. For fluticasone propionate, there were no statistically significant differences between salmeterol/fluticasone propionate and fluticasone propionate with respect to Cmax, plasma concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Ct), terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) or time to Cmax (tmax). The area under the concentration-time curve within a dosing interval (AUCt) for fluticasone propionate after inhalation of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate was statistically significantly higher (about 8%) than after inhalation of fluticasone propionate alone (P=0.0135). However, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the AUCt and Cmax ratios for the two treatments were within the accepted limits for bioequivalence (1.03, 1.13 and 0.97, 1.12, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results in healthy subjects indicate that there is no systemic pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic interaction between inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone propionate when given in combination.

Single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of therapeutically clinically equivalent doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide, given as Diskus or Turbohaler dry-powder inhalers to healthy subjects.

Direct comparisons of the pharmacokinetic (PK) and systemic pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of inhaled corticosteroids after single and multiple dosing in the same subjects are scarce. The objective of this study was to compare thePK/PDproperties of clinically equivalent, single, and multiple doses of dry-powder formulations of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP 200 and 500 microg via Diskus) and budesonide (BUD, 400 and 1,000 microg via Turbohaler). Fourteen healthy subjects completed a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, five-way crossover study consisting of a single dose administered at 8 a.m. on day 1 followed by 4 days of twice-daily dosing at 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. on days 2 to 5. Serum concentrations of FP and BUD were measured using validated liquid chromatography/ mass spectrometry assays. The 24-hour cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) in serum was monitored as the pharmacodynamic surrogate marker. Peak serum concentrations following single and multiple dosing were observed 10 to 30 minutes after inhalation for BUD and 30 to 90 minutes afterinhalation of FP with no influence of dose ordosingregimen. After a single dose of 1000 microg BUD and 500 microg FP the median estimates of terminal half-life and mean residence time were 3.5 and 3.9 hours for BUD and 10.1 and 12.0 hours for FP, respectively. Using previously reported intravenous data, the mean absorption times (MAT) were calculated to be around 2 hours and 7 hours for BUD and FP respectively. On average, the area under the curve (A UC) at steady state (day 5) was up to 30% higher for BUD compared to that over a 12-hour period following the first dose on day 1, whereas A UC estimates were 50% to 80% higherforFP at steady state, indicating accumulation. However, the steady-state Cmax values were seven to eight times and AUC values three to four times higher for BUD than for FP. Comparison of active treatment data with placebo showed that CCS after a single dose was not pronounced for any of the doses/drugs studied. On day 5, both doses of BUD caused statistically significant suppression (CCS of 19% for the 400 microg dose and 36% for the 1,000 microg dose). For FP only the high dose had a statistically significant effect on serum cortisol (CCS of 14% for the 200 microg dose and 27% for the 500 microg dose). Compared to BUD, FP has slower pulmonary absorption and slower elimination kinetics. However, following inhalation of therapeutically equipotent, multiple twice-daily doses in healthy subjects, the systemic effects of FP delivered via Diskus on AUC24 serum cortisol were relatively low and similar to those of BUD delivered via Turbohaler.

Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of a sordarin derivative (GM 237354) in a murine model of lethal candidiasis.

Sordarins are a new class of antifungal agents which selectively inhibit fungal protein synthesis (FPS) by impairing the function of elongation factor 2. The present study investigates possible correlations between sordarin pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and therapeutic efficacy, based on a murine model of invasive systemic candidiasis, and provides a rationale for dose selection in the first study of efficacy in humans. A significant correlation between PK parameters and the in vivo activity of GM 237354, taken as a representative FPS inhibitor, was demonstrated in a murine model of lethal systemic candidiasis. Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)) over 24 h were determined after a single GM 237354 subcutaneous (s.c.) dose (50 mg/kg of body weight) in healthy animals (no significant PK changes with infection were observed for other sordarin derivatives). These results have been used to simulate PK profiles obtained after several doses and/or schedules in animal therapy. A PK-pharmacodynamic (PD) parameter such as the time that serum drug concentrations remain above the MIC (t > MIC) was also determined. Treatment efficacies were evaluated in terms of the area under the survival time curve (AUSTC), using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and in terms of kidney fungal burden (log CFU/gram) after s.c. doses of 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg every 4, 8, or 12 h (corresponding to total daily doses of 5 to 240 mg/kg). The results show all treatments to significantly prolong survival versus that of infected and nontreated controls (P < 0.05). Relationships between simulated PK and PK-PD parameters and efficacy were explored. A good correlation independent of the dosing interval was observed with AUC (but not C(max) or t > MIC) and both AUSTC and kidney burden. Following repeated dosing every 8 h, AUC(50) (AUC at which 50% of the maximum therapeutic efficacy is obtained) was estimated as 21.7 and 37.1 microg. h/ml (total concentrations) for AUSTC and kidney burden using a sigmoid E(max) and an inhibitory sigmoid E(max) PK-PD model, respectively. For an efficacy target of 90% survival, AUC was predicted as 67 microg. h/ml. We conclude that the PK-PD approach is useful for evaluating relationships between PK parameters and efficacy in antifungal research. Moreover, the results obtained with this approach could be successfully applied to clinical studies.

Absorption kinetics after inhalation of fluticasone propionate via the Diskhaler, Diskus and metered-dose inhaler in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this analysis was to assess the rate and extent of systemic availability of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) from 2 dry powder systems (Diskhaler and Diskus) and a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) by deconvolution analysis. METHODS: The inhalation devices were evaluated in 3 separate studies with identical protocols. 12 healthy male volunteers were randomised to receive FP given as a 1000 microg inhaled dose and 250 microg by intravenous infusion according to a double-blind double-dummy crossover design. The bioavailability of FP after inhalation represents absorption of the drug from the lungs, since the bioavailability of the swallowed portion of the inhaled dose is negligible. RESULTS: When corrected for the bioavailability (of FP) achieved by each inhalation device, the rate of absorption of FP over the first 2 hours was rapid from all devices. The mean time for absorption of 50% of the bioavailable dose was 1.6, 2.4, and 2.2 hours for the Diskhaler, Diskus and MDI, respectively. Thereafter, absorption from each device was prolonged, with approximately 10% of the dose remaining in the lungs 12 hours after inhalation. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of the inhalation device used, the prolonged absorption of FP into the systemic circulation indicates a long residence time in the lungs.

Pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate inhaled via the Diskhaler and Diskus powder devices in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of these studies was to determine the absolute bioavailability in healthy volunteers of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) administered as a single dose via the Diskhaler and Diskus powder devices, and the pharmacokinetics of inhaled FP after repeated administration via the Diskhaler device. METHODS: In 2 of the studies, single inhaled doses of FP were administered via the Diskhaler and the Diskus powder devices, and, in the third study, repeated doses of FP were administered via the Diskhaler. In the single dose studies, 12 healthy volunteers were randomised to receive FP 1000 microg by inhalation and FP 250 microg intravenously, using a double-blind crossover design. In the repeated dose study, 24 healthy volunteers received FP 1000 microg twice daily for 7.5 days. RESULTS: Systemic exposure to FP after administration of a single 1000 microg inhaled dose of FP via the 2 powder devices was similar; the area under the plasma FP concentration-time curve (AUC) to infinite time (AUCinfinity) was 2.08 microg/L x h [95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.63-2.64] for Diskhaler and 2.49 microg/L x h (95% CI: 2.09-2.96) for Diskus. Maximum plasma FP concentration (Cmax) was 0.34 microg/L for both devices. Mean bioavailability values via the Diskhaler and Diskus were 11.9% (95% CI: 9.0-15.7%) and 16.6% (95% CI: 13.6-20.3%), respectively. No clinically significant reductions in urinary cortisol excretion were recorded in these 2 studies. After repeated administration with the Diskhaler, steady state was achieved by dose 3 (i.e. day 2) onwards. After dose 15, the AUC up to 12 hours (AUC12h) was 2.25 microg/L x h and Cmax was 0.38 microg/L. The mean steady-state to single dose accumulation ratio after twice-daily administration was 1.49 (95% CI: 1.36-1.62). CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of FP administered by the 2 powder devices are similar in healthy volunteers, although systemic bioavailability was greater with the Diskus.

Systemic exposure to fluticasone propionate administered via metered-dose inhaler containing chlorofluorocarbon or hydrofluoroalkane propellant.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetic profile of a single dose of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) administered via a metered-dose inhaler (MDI), containing either a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) or hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellant was investigated in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Two randomised, double-blind, crossover studies were conducted, each in 12 male volunteers. Both studies compared pharmacokinetic data after a single inhaled dose of FP 1000 microg from a MDI containing either CFC (CFC MDI) or HFA (HFA MDI) with a single intravenous dose of FP 250 microg. RESULTS: The maximum plasma FP concentrations after inhalation via the 2 types of MDI were almost identical (0.56 and 0.54 microg/L for CFC MDI and HFA MDI, respectively); bioavailability values of inhaled FP from the 2 MDIs were also similar (geometric mean values: 26.4% via the CFC MDI and 28.6% via the HFA MDI). Inhalation of FP via both MDI formulations produced similar reductions in urinary cortisol excretion over 12 and 24 hours postdose. CONCLUSION: The bioavailability values of FP after inhalation via a CFC MDI and an HFA MDI are similar. The 2 formulations deliver comparable amounts of FP, and systemic exposures to FP from the 2 devices, measured by urinary cortisol excretion, are not significantly different.

Pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate inhaled via the Diskhaler and Diskus powder devices in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of these studies was to compare the pharmacokinetics of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) after repeated administration via the Diskus or Diskhaler dry powder inhalers (DPIs) to patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. METHODS: Both studies evaluated the pharmacokinetics of inhaled administration of FP via a DPI to patients with mild-to-moderate asthma, according to a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. In the first study, FP 100 microg or 500 microg was administered twice daily via the Diskhaler for 6 weeks and, in the second, FP 500 microg was administered via the Diskus or Diskhaler for 12 weeks. RESULTS: In the first study, plasma FP concentrations could be detected consistently only with the higher dose; the lower dose produced concentrations close to or below the 0.025 microg/L quantification limit of the radioimmunoassay used. From detailed analysis of a subgroup of patients receiving the 500 microg dosage, steady-state plasma FP concentrations were attained within one week of commencing treatment. After 4 weeks, the maximum plasma FP concentration (Cmax) in this subgroup was 0.096 microg/L [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.066-0.141] and the area under the plasma FP concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) was 0.491 microg/L x h (95% CI: 0.256-0.940). The steady-state to single dose accumulation ratio for FP after twice-daily administration varied between patients: a ratio of approximately 1.7 was recorded after comparison of Cmax at week 4 and day 1. In the second study, the point estimate of the Diskus to Diskhaler ratio for Cmax in all patients was 0.91 (90% CI: 0.76-1.10) after 4 weeks' treatment. From a detailed analysis of a subgroup of patients, the corresponding ratio for AUClast at the same time point was 1.15 (90% CI: 0.69-1.94), indicating no significant difference in systemic exposure to FP between the 2 devices. Steady-state kinetics were achieved by week 1: the point estimate ratios of Cmax and AUClast at week 4 compared with week 1 were 0.88 (90% CI: 0.66-1.16) and 0.95 (90% CI: 0.66-1.36), respectively. Administration of FP via either DPI had no effect on plasma cortisol levels over the 12-hour postdose period. CONCLUSION: In patients with asthma receiving repeated inhaled doses of FP, the systemic exposure (AUC) after inhalation from the Diskus was similar to that from the Diskhaler, with no difference between the DPIs in the effects on cortisol suppression. The 2 DPIs therefore have very similar pharmacokinetic profiles.

Bioavailability of orally administered micronised fluticasone propionate.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the absolute oral bioavailability of fluticasone propionate (FP) in healthy volunteers. METHODS: A 3-period incomplete block crossover design was used. On separate occasions, 21 male volunteers received a single 250 microg intravenous dose of FP (n = 21) and twice daily oral doses of either micronised FP 0.1 mg (n = 9), 1 mg (n = 12), 10 mg (n = 11) or placebo (n = 9) for 4 days. RESULTS: FP was not measurable in the plasma after twice daily oral administration of a 0.1 mg dose. FP concentrations just above the limit of quantification could be measured in only 5 volunteers, and only at some time points, after administration of FP 1 mg twice daily. At a dose of 10 mg twice daily the absolute oral bioavailability of the drug was <1% when a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay was used to assess plasma concentrations. Only oral doses of FP 10 mg twice daily, 10 times greater than the recommended maximum inhaled dose, produced any detectable change in urinary cortisol excretion. CONCLUSION: The results of this study confirm that oral absorption of FP into the systemic circulation is negligible. The swallowed portion of an inhaled dose of FP is unlikely to increase the systemic exposure to the drug, thus decreasing the likelihood of adverse systemic effects.

The Bayesian analysis of a pivotal pharmacokinetic study.

The aim of this paper is to carry out a detailed Bayesian population pharmacokinetic analysis of a three-period cross-over study of the drug fluticasone propionate carried out in 12 healthy male volunteers. The study was carried out to characterize the pharmacokinetics of the drug, in particular to investigate dose proportionality. We examine the appropriateness of modelling assumptions via a variety of diagnostic techniques. We also examine the effect of deleting time points at which the concentration was recorded as below the limit of quantification, as opposed to including these points as censored observations. We assess dose proportionality before carrying out a final combined analysis of data from all three doses.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of fluticasone propionate after inhaled administration.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic and systemic pharmacodynamic properties of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP). METHODS: Single doses of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 3.0 mg FP were administered to groups of six healthy subjects. Serum concentration profiles of FP were monitored over 24 h by means of high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS). Systemic pharmacodynamic effects were evaluated by measuring endogenous serum cortisol and circulating white blood cells, and analyzed with previously developed integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models. RESULTS: FP showed a dose-independent terminal half-life with a mean (SD) of 6.0 (0.7) h. Maximum serum concentrations occurred 1.0 (0.5) h after administration, ranging from 90 pg.ml(-1) for the 0.25 mg dose to 400 pg.ml(-1) for the 3.0 mg dose. This, together with an estimated mean absorption time of nearly 5 h and a known oral bioavailability of less than 1%, indicates prolonged residence at and slow absorption from the lungs. In the investigated dose range, the cumulative systemic effect was dose-dependent for both markers of pharmacodynamic activity. For doses of 0.25, 0.50, 1.0 and 3.0 mg FP, the PK/PD-based cumulative systemic-effect parameters were 159, 186, 257 and 372% .h for lymphocyte suppression, 107, 186, 202 and 348% .h for granulocyte induction and 23.6%, 33.8%, 51.0% and 73.6% for cortisol reduction, respectively. The time courses of lymphocytes, granulocytes and endogenous cortisol could be sufficiently characterized with the applied PK/PD models. The measured in vivo EC50 values, 30 pg.ml(-1) and 7.3 pg.ml(-1) for white blood cells and cortisol, respectively, were in good agreement with predictions based on the in vitro relative receptor affinity of FP. CONCLUSION: After inhalation, FP follows linear pharmacokinetics and exhibits dose-dependent systemic pharmacodynamic effects that can be described by PK/PD modeling.

Dynamic modeling of cortisol reduction after inhaled administration of fluticasone propionate.

Fluticasone propionate (FP) is a new corticosteroid that has been developed for the treatment of asthma. The compound has a very high receptor affinity, 18 times that of dexamethasone. After inhalation, FP is systemically available because of inhaled bioavailability. In healthy subjects this may lead to measurable systemic effects, such as cortisol reduction. A clinical study was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers to determine the systemic effects after inhaled administration of single 500-micrograms, 1,000-micrograms, and 2,000-micrograms doses of FP. Blood samples were collected over a 24-hour period after administration. Concentrations of FP and cortisol were measured in plasma by immunoassay. Cortisol reduction was chosen as the pharmacodynamic parameter. A novel linear release rate model was used to parameterize the cortisol data. The pharmacokinetics of FP were linear over the dose range studied. The cortisol release parameters were determined from baseline data (before drug administration). Based on these results, the E50 values for cortisol reduction were then determined for each dose of FP. The average E50 was 0.134 ng/mL for total FP concentrations and 0.013 ng/mL for unbound FP concentrations; these results were not dose dependent. These in vivo pharmacodynamic values measured in healthy subjects are in good agreement with the relatively high receptor affinity of FP.

Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in renal failure.

By using a highly specific chromatographic technique, the effect of renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of the six main components of teicoplanin, taken individually or as a whole, was assessed for over 120 h after administration of a 3-mg/kg intravenous dose to healthy volunteers (group 1, n = 6) and to noninfected patients with moderate (group 2, n = 6) or severe (group 3, n = 7) renal failure. In subjects with normal renal function, total teicoplanin was mainly excreted in urine and its concentrations in plasma could be adequately fitted to a three-compartment model. Renal failure did not affect the model or the distribution of teicoplanin but strongly decreased its renal clearance (9.3, 3.2, and 0.6 ml/h per kg, respectively, for the three groups of subjects), in close relationship with the creatinine clearance (r = 0.973, n = 18, P less than 0.001). The cumulative urinary excretion of unchanged total teicoplanin was decreased (50, 21, and 5% of the given dose for groups 1 to 3) and the terminal half-life was enhanced (62, 96, and 111 h for groups 1 to 3) by renal impairment. The relative behavior of the six major components was only slightly affected by renal failure. Consequently, the dosage regimen adjustment could be based on the total teicoplanin concentration, and simulations with the mean estimated pharmacokinetic parameters suggest that the 6-mg/kg daily dose, known to be effective in patients with normal renal function, could be given every 2 and 3 days in patients with moderate and severe renal insufficiency, respectively.

Disposition of 1,2,3-trichloropropane in the Fischer 344 rat: conventional and physiological pharmacokinetics.

To investigate the disposition of 1,2,3-trichloropropane (TCP), [14C]-TCP was administered iv to male Fischer 344 rats. Unchanged TCP and total radiolabel were determined in tissues and excreta at varying intervals after administration. The compound was distributed and eliminated rapidly. Initial and terminal half-lives of unchanged TCP in the blood were 0.29 and 23 hr. Adipose tissue accumulated 37% of the dose within 15 min and retained more of the dose than any other tissue until 4 hr; most (69%) of the radiolabel in adipose tissue through 4 hr was unchanged TCP. After 4 hr, the liver contained the largest fraction of the dose, primarily as metabolites. Thus TCP disappeared from adipose tissue while metabolites appeared in liver and other tissues. Excretion was nearly complete (90% of the dose) in 24 hr and was predominantly via the urine (47% of the dose). Expiration was the only route by which unchanged TCP (5% of the dose) was excreted. In addition, 25% of the dose was expired as carbon dioxide. There were numerous other metabolites, none accounting for more than 10% of the dose. Nonvolatile metabolites were longer lived than the parent compound. On the basis of high water solubility, reaction with 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene, and diminished radiolabel in bile of glycidol-treated rats, glutathione conjugation is suggested as an important metabolic route for TCP. A physiological pharmacokinetic model was developed to describe the time course of trichloropropane concentration in tissues. The model demonstrates the possibility of using physiological and pharmacokinetic data to predict concentration-time relations for toxic compounds.

Distribution, metabolism, and elimination of phenobarbital in rats: physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.

The distribution, metabolism, and elimination kinetics at two different doses of phenobarbital were examined in rats. After intravenous injection, phenobarbital distributed very rapidly to the liver and kidneys, less rapidly to the muscle and gut, and much more slowly to the brain. At the higher dose, a concentration rebound was observed 1 hr after injection. In addition, phenobarbital distributed unevenly in various organs as a result of a different extent of drug binding. A physiologically based model, including enterohepatic cycling and diffusion resistances between blood and tissue, is proposed for phenobarbital pharmacokinetics. It satisfactorily describes phenobarbital distribution in rats at the two doses and allows an evaluation of fundamental physicobiochemical parameters such as drug-tissue binding constants, blood-tissue transport coefficients, metabolism, and elimination rate constants.