Methods Used to Obtain Pediatric Patient Weights, Their Accuracy and Associated Drug Dosing Errors in 142 Simulated Prehospital Pediatric Patient Encounters.

Background: Prehospital pediatric drug dosing errors occur at a high rate. Multiple factors contribute to these errors. The contribution of weight estimation errors to drug dosing errors is unknown. We describe methods used to obtain weights and resulting drug dosing errors. Methods: As part of a quality improvement study in 16 EMS agencies, we conducted four simulated pediatric scenarios: seizing, hypoglycemic infant, infant cardiac arrest, 18-month old burn and a 5-year old with anaphylactic shock. Crews used their regular drug bags and equipment. Simulations were observed by study team members with video review and scored on a standardized scoring sheet. Results: 142 scenarios were completed. Methods to obtain patient weights were: asking parent 17/142 (12.0%), patient age 35/142 (24.8%) and Broselow-Luten Tape (BLT) 89/142 (63.1%). There were 19 (13.4% 95% CI 8.5, 20.0) incorrect weight estimations resulting in 18 (12.7% 95% CI 8.2, 19.2) dosing errors (1 asking parent, 9 patient age and 8 BLT). Ten dosing errors were directly caused by weight estimation errors. In 41/89 (46.1% 95%CI 36.1, 56.4) BLT uses there was a near-miss error that did not result in a dosing error. One pound to kilogram conversion error occurred. Conclusions: BLT is the most frequently used method to obtain a patient weight. Drug dosing errors were most frequent with patient age, followed by BLT and asking the parent. System-based solutions-weight determination hierarchy, not using the BLT on seated patients, and more frequent training and practice with the BLT-are needed to improve drug-dosing accuracy.

Dosing Errors Made by Paramedics During Pediatric Patient Simulations After Implementation of a State-Wide Pediatric Drug Dosing Reference.

Background: Drug dosing errors occur at a high rate for prehospital pediatric patients. To reduce errors, Michigan implemented a state-wide pediatric dosing reference (PDR), with doses listed in milliliters, the requirement that doses be drawn into a smaller syringe from a pre-loaded syringe using a stopcock, and dilution of certain drugs to different concentrations.Purpose: To evaluate the rate of medication errors, including errors of omission and commission, after implementation of a state-wide PDR.Methods: EMS crews from 15 agencies completed 4 validated, simulation scenarios: an infant seizing, an infant cardiac arrest, an 18-month-old with a burn, and 5-year-old with anaphylactic shock. Agencies were private, public, not-for-profit, for-profit, urban, rural, fire-based, and third service. EMS crews used their regular equipment and were required to carry out all the steps to administer a drug dose. Two evaluators scored crew performance via direct observation and video review. An error was defined as [Formula: see text]20% difference compared to the weight-appropriate dose. Descriptive statistics were utilized.Results: A total of 142 simulations were completed. The majority of crews were (58.3%) Emergency Medical Technician-Paramedic (EMTP)/EMTP. For the cardiac arrest scenario, 51/70 (72.9%; 95% CI: 60.9%, 82.8%) epinephrine doses were correct. There were 6 (8.6%, 95% CI: 2.0%, 15.1%) 10-fold overdoses and one (1.4%; 95% CI: -1.4%, 4.2%), 10-fold under dose. In the seizure scenario, 28/50 (56.0%; 95% CI: 42.2%, 69.8%) benzodiazepine doses were correct; 6/18 (33.3%; 95% CI: 11.5%, 55.1%) drug dilutions were incorrect resulting in dosing errors. Unrecognized air was frequently entrained into the administration syringe resulting in under doses. Overall, 31.2% (95% CI: 25.5%, 36.6%) of drug doses were incorrect. Obtaining an incorrect weight led to a drug dosing error in 18/142 (12.7%, 95% CI: 7.2%, 18.2%) cases. Errors of omission included failure to check blood sugar in the seizure scenario and failure to administer epinephrine and a fluid bolus in anaphylactic shock.Conclusion: Despite implementation of a PDR, dosing errors, including 10-fold errors, still occur at a high rate. Errors occur with dilution and length-based tape use. Further error reduction strategies, beyond a PDR and that target errors of omission, are needed for pediatric prehospital drug administration.

Pediatric Prehospital Medication Dosing Errors: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Prehospital dosing errors affect approximately 56,000 US children yearly. To decrease these errors, barriers, enablers and solutions from the paramedic (EMT-P) and medical director (MD) standpoint need to be understood. We conducted a mixed-methods study of EMT-P and MDs in Michigan utilizing focus groups (FG). FGs were held at EMS agencies and state EMS conferences. Questions focused on the drug dose delivery process, barriers and enablers to correct dosing and possible solutions to decrease errors. Responses were coded by the research team for themes and number of response mentions. Participants completed a pre-FG survey on pediatric experience and agency characteristics. There were 35 EMT-P and 9 MD participants: 43% of EMT-Ps had been practicing > 10 years, 11% had been practicing < 1 year; and 25% reported they had not administered a drug dose to a child in the last 12 months. EMT-Ps who were "very comfortable" with their ability to administer a correct drug dose to infants, toddlers, school-aged, and adolescents were: 5%, 7%, 10%, and 54%, respectively. FGs identified themes of: difficulty obtaining weight, infrequent pediatric encounters, infrequent/inadequate pediatric training, difficulties with drug packaging, drug bags that were not "EMS friendly," difficulty with drug calculations, and lack of dosing aids. Simplification of dose delivery, an improved length based tape for EMS, pediatric checklists, and dose cards in mL were given as solutions. This mixed-methods study identified barriers and potential solutions to reducing prehospital pediatric drug dosing errors. Solutions should be thoroughly tested prior to implementation.