Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 107
Filtrar
1.
J Anim Sci ; 90(8): 2727-32, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22408084

RESUMEN

An experiment was conducted to determine whether using ruminally cannulated cattle affects the estimate of enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions when using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF(6)) tracer technique with samples taken from a head canister. Eleven beef cattle were surgically fitted with several types of ruminal cannula (2C, 3C, 3C+washer, 9C; Bar Diamond, Parma, ID). The 2C and 3C models (outer and inner flanges with opposite curvature) had medium to high leakage, whereas the 9C models (outer and inner flanges with the same curvature) provided minimum to moderate leakage of gas. A total of 48 cow-day measurements were conducted. For each animal, a permeation tube containing sulfur hexafluoride (SF(6)) was placed in the rumen, and a sample of air from around the nose and mouth was drawn through tubing into an evacuated canister (head canister). A second sample of air was collected from outside the rumen near the cannula into another canister (cannula canister). Background concentrations were also monitored. The methane (CH(4)) emission was estimated from the daily CH(4) and SF(6) concentrations in the head canister (uncorrected). The permeation SF(6) release rate was then partitioned based on the proportion of the SF(6) concentration measured in the head vs. the cannula canister. The CH(4) emissions at each site were calculated using the two release rates and the two CH(4):SF(6) concentration ratios. The head and cannula emissions were summed to obtain the total emission (corrected). The difference (corrected - uncorrected) in CH4 emission was attributed to the differences in CH(4):SF(6) ratio at the 2 exit locations. The proportions of CH(4) and SF(6) recovered at the head were greater (P < 0.001) for the 9C cannulas (64% and 66%) compared with the other cannulas, which were similar (P > 0.05; 2C, 6% and 4%; 3C, 17% and 15%; 3C+washer, 19% and 14%). Uncorrected CH(4) emissions were ± 10% of corrected emissions for 53% of the cow-day measurements. Only when more than 80% of the SF(6) escaped via the rumen did the difference between the uncorrected and corrected CH(4) emissions exceed 20%. We concluded that using cannulated cattle introduces more variability into the SF(6) technique used with a head canister, a technique that is already highly variable. Thus, use of cannulated animals is not recommended when using the SF(6) technique with head canister. However, if cannulated cattle are used, the cannulas need to be tight-fitting to minimize leakage, and large animal numbers are needed to overcome the additional variability.


Asunto(s)
Bovinos/fisiología , Metano/metabolismo , Rumen/fisiología , Hexafluoruro de Azufre/metabolismo , Animales , Biomarcadores , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Hexafluoruro de Azufre/química
2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 137(12): 1679-83, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19874637

RESUMEN

This study evaluated whether antibiotic cycling programmes using broad-spectrum agents including carbapenems were associated with increased rates of colonization or infection by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Retrospective analyses of colonization or infection by S. maltophilia from 1992 to 2002 were conducted using University of Virginia Hospital clinical microbiology records of patients with any culture positive for S. maltophilia and hospital epidemiology records of nosocomial S. maltophilia infections. Incidence rates were calculated and compared for cycling and non-cycling periods. No significant differences were found in incidence rates of S. maltophilia isolates between cycling and non-cycling periods, but there was a significant secular increase in the hospital-wide rate of infections caused by S. maltophilia (P=0.01728). Antibiotic cycling protocols were not associated with a significantly increased rate of colonization of S. maltophilia as determined by the frequency of patients having at least one positive routine clinical culture in this hospital.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/aislamiento & purificación , Portador Sano , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
3.
J Hosp Infect ; 55(1): 26-32, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14505606

RESUMEN

An abrupt and persistent 30% increase in the rate of nosocomial infections was detected at a university teaching hospital after a prolonged period with a relatively constant nosocomial infection rate. Demographic data, risk factors for nosocomial infection, features of reported cases of nosocomial infection, and policy and procedure changes were evaluated for the periods of 1 January 1997 to 30 April 1998 (endemic period) and 1 May to 31 December 1998 (epidemic period). An extensive outbreak investigation revealed no evidence of a true outbreak of nosocomial infection. The apparent outbreak involved all four major body sites, began during the same month that an antibiotic management programme was started, involved the same adult medical and surgical units where antibiotics were being controlled, and occurred months before any significant change in antibiotic usage. A greater proportion of nosocomial infection during the epidemic period was reported by the nosocomial infection surveillance nurses, based on a treating physician's diagnosis rather than on specific clinical criteria. In an attempt to justify existing antibiotic prescribing practices after the implementation of an antibiotic management programme, clinicians altered the threshold at which they documented the presence of nosocomial infection. This change in documentation produced a large pseudo-outbreak of nosocomial infection.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Recolección de Datos , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Virginia
4.
J Hosp Infect ; 51(2): 126-32, 2002 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12090800

RESUMEN

Some have reported that adopting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines requiring contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) had no impact on rates of nosocomial spread or infection, and may therefore waste money. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of active surveillance cultures and barrier precautions for controlling MRSA. Estimated costs of surveillance cultures and isolation measures used during an MRSA outbreak at this hospital were compared with the estimated attributable excess costs of methicillin resistance (i.e., the difference between MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus costs) for bacteraemias occurring during an MRSA outbreak not promptly controlled at another hospital. The study was set in the neonatal intensive care units of two tertiary care hospitals. Estimated costs of controlling the 10.5-month outbreak in this neonatal intensive care unit that resulted in 18 colonized and four infected infants ranged from $48 617 to $68 637. The estimated attributable excess cost of 75 MRSA bacteraemias in a second neonatal intensive care unit outbreak that resulted in 14 deaths and lasted 51 months was $1 306 600. Weekly active surveillance cultures and isolation of patients with MRSA halted an outbreak at this hospital, and cost 19- to 27-fold less than the attributable costs of MRSA bacteraemias in another outbreak that was not promptly controlled. The costs of infections at other body sites and the human cost of deaths from infection were not estimated but would further help to justify the cost of identifying colonized patients and implementing effective preventive measures.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Brotes de Enfermedades/economía , Control de Infecciones/economía , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/economía , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/economía , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Virginia/epidemiología
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 33(10): 1733-8, 2001 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11595992

RESUMEN

Prevention of vascular catheter-related infection remains an important priority. This review focuses on salient controversies regarding optimal preventive methods. Intensity of surveillance for nosocomial infections was the single most important predictor of prevention in the Study of the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control (SENIC). Used suboptimally by most hospitals in the SENIC study, surveillance is probably conducted even less today. There has been one randomized trial of the optimal method of aseptic insertion for central venous catheters and none comparing the 2 most frequently used sites. Scheduled replacement did not prevent infection in multiple randomized trials but, according to a recent survey, was still being used frequently. Chlorhexidine preparation of skin before and during catheterization has significantly reduced colonization of catheters in multiple randomized trials and should be used. Impregnation of catheter and/or hub surfaces with antiseptics raises less concern about fostering the development of antibiotic resistance than does the use of antibiotics for this purpose.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Infecciones/etiología , Infecciones/microbiología
6.
J Intraven Nurs ; 24(3): 180-205, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11530364

RESUMEN

These guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American College of Critical Care Medicine (for the Society of Critical Care Medicine), and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America contain recommendations for the management of adults and children with, and diagnosis of infections related to, peripheral and nontunneled central venous catheters (CVCs), pulmonary artery catheters, tunneled central catheters, and implantable devices. The guidelines, written for clinicians, contain IDSA evidence-based recommendations for assessment of the quality and strength of the data. Recommendations are presented according to the type of catheter, the infecting organism, and the associated complications. Intravascular catheter-related infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, aerobic gram-negative bacilli, and Candida albicans most commonly cause catheter-related bloodstream infection. Management of catheter-related infection varies according to the type of catheter involved. After appropriate cultures of blood and catheter samples are done, empirical i.v. antimicrobial therapy should be initiated on the basis of clinical clues, the severity of the patient's acute illness, underlying disease, and the potential pathogen(s) involved. In most cases of nontunneled CVC-related bacteremia and fungemia, the CVC should be removed. For management of bacteremia and fungemia from a tunneled catheter or implantable device, such as a port, the decision to remove the catheter or device should be based on the severity of the patient's illness, documentation that the vascular-access device is infected, assessment of the specific pathogen involved, and presence of complications, such as endocarditis, septic thrombosis, tunnel infection, or metastatic seeding. When a catheter-related infection is documented and a specific pathogen is identified, systemic antimicrobial therapy should be narrowed and consideration given for antibiotic lock therapy, if the CVC or implantable device is not removed. These guidelines address the issues related to the management of catheter-related bacteremia and associated complications. Separate guidelines will address specific issues related to the prevention of catheter-related infections. Performance indicators for the management of catheter-related infection are included at the end of the document. Because the pathogenesis of catheter-related infections is complicated, the virulence of the pathogens is variable, and the host factors have not been well defined, there is a notable absence of compelling clinical data to make firm recommendations for an individual patient. Therefore, the recommendations in these guidelines are intended to support, and not replace, good clinical judgment. Also, a section on selected, unresolved clinical issues that require further study and research has been included. There is an urgent need for large, well-designed clinical studies to delineate management strategies more effectively, which will improve clinical outcomes and save precious health care resources.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Fungemia , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Contaminación de Equipos , Fungemia/diagnóstico , Fungemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Fungemia/etiología , Humanos
8.
J Infect Dis ; 183(12): 1787-93, 2001 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11372032

RESUMEN

Amebiasis is the third leading parasitic cause of death worldwide, and it is not known whether immunity is acquired from a previous infection. An investigation was done to determine whether protection from intestinal infection correlated with mucosal or systemic antibody responses to the Entamoeba histolytica GalNAc adherence lectin. E. histolytica colonization was present in 0% (0/64) of children with and 13.4% (33/246) of children without stool IgA anti-GalNAc lectin antibodies (P= .001). Children with stool IgA lectin-specific antibodies at the beginning of the study had 64% fewer new E. histolytica infections by 5 months (3/42 IgA(+) vs. 47/227 IgA(-); P= .03). A stool antilectin IgA response was detected near the time of resolution of infection in 67% (12/18) of closely monitored new infections. It was concluded that a mucosal IgA antilectin antibody response is associated with immune protection against E. histolytica colonization. The demonstration of naturally acquired immunity offers hope for a vaccine to prevent amebiasis.


Asunto(s)
Disentería Amebiana/inmunología , Entamoeba histolytica/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina A Secretora/biosíntesis , Mucosa Intestinal/inmunología , Animales , Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/biosíntesis , Bangladesh , Adhesión Celular , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Disentería Amebiana/prevención & control , Heces/parasitología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunidad Activa , Inmunoglobulina A/biosíntesis , Inmunoglobulina A/sangre , Lectinas/inmunología , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
9.
Am J Infect Control ; 29(2): 104-8, 2001 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11287878

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Streptococcus pyogenes has recently re-emerged as a significant pathogen causing disease ranging from pharyngitis to lethal systemic infection. Six hospital pharmacy employees were diagnosed as having streptococcal pharyngitis during 1 week, and antibiotic prophylaxis was requested to halt the outbreak. OBJECTIVE: Outbreak investigation. DESIGN: Review of initial cases and prospective evaluation of the remaining pharmacy employees and the antigen detection test being used. SETTING: Pharmacy and occupational health department of a university hospital. POPULATION: Sixteen employees of the hospital pharmacy and 19 other employees of the hospital. RESULTS: The 6 pharmacy employees who had positive streptococcal antigen detection tests did not have symptoms suggesting streptococcal pharyngitis. Of the 10 remaining pharmacy employees, none had a positive throat culture for S pyogenes. Specificity of the antigen detection test being used was 53% (95% CI, 30%-75%) in prospective evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: This was believed to represent a pseudoepidemic because none of the 6 cases had signs or symptoms typical of streptococcal pharyngitis, none of the remaining 10 pharmacy employees had positive throat cultures, and prospective evaluation found low specificity of the antigen detection test. Whereas use of an accurate test in such a low prevalence setting could have resulted in a higher percentage of results being false-positive, the low specificity of the antigen detection test being used also contributed to the pseudoepidemic.


Asunto(s)
Errores Diagnósticos , Brotes de Enfermedades , Personal de Hospital , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital , Faringitis/diagnóstico , Faringitis/microbiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/microbiología , Streptococcus pyogenes , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Inmunoensayo/normas , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Pruebas de Fijación de Látex/normas , Salud Laboral , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Faringitis/epidemiología , Faringitis/etiología , Faringitis/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/etiología , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/prevención & control , Recursos Humanos
10.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 22(3): 140-7, 2001 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11310691

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine risk factors for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization during a hospital outbreak and to evaluate Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-recommended control measures. DESIGN: Epidemiological study involving prospective identification of colonization and a case-control study. SETTING: A university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients on eight wards involved in outbreak from late 1994 through early 1995. METHODS: Cases were matched by ward and culture date with up to two controls. Risk factors were evaluated with four multivariate models using conditional logistic regression. The first evaluated proximity to other VRE patients and isolation status. The second evaluated proximity to unisolated VRE cases and three variables independently predictive after adjustment for proximity. The third evaluated seven significant univariate predictors in addition to proximity to unisolated VRE in backward, stepwise logistic regression. The fourth assessed proximity to VRE with all other variables collected, clustered in a principal components analysis. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was performed to assess clonality of two outbreak strains. RESULTS: The incidence of transmission declined significantly after CDC guidelines were implemented. Proximity to unisolated VRE cases during the prior week was a significant predictor of acquisition in each of four multivariate models. Other significant risk factors in multivariate models included a history of major trauma and treatment with metronidazole. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis confirmed the clonality of two outbreak strains. CONCLUSIONS: VRE was transmitted between patients during a hospital epidemic, with proximity to previously unisolated VRE patients being an important risk factor. Weekly surveillance cultures and contact isolation of colonized patients significantly reduced spread


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Enterococcus faecalis/aislamiento & purificación , Enterococcus faecium/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Virginia/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA