Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 65
Filtrar
1.
Public Health ; 225: 182-190, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37939459

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of state-level lack of health insurance among women of reproductive age with variation in state low birth weight (LBW) rates. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-section study analyzes data from the 2016-2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Survey for respondents with singleton, live births. METHODS: Respondents were divided into groups by state-level percent of uninsured women aged 19-44 years. Poisson regression was used to model the association between state percent uninsured and likelihood of LBW, controlling for individual sociodemographic and clinical risk factors. Sensitivity analyses were done for Medicaid and non-Hispanic Black subpopulations and alternative state characteristics, including Gini coefficients, total and public welfare expenditures, and state reproductive rights rankings. RESULTS: In adjusted multiple regression analyses, compared to respondents from states with <7% uninsured, respondents from states with 7% or more uninsured had an increased risk of LBW status (7-8.99% uninsured: adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.18; 9-11.99% uninsured: aIRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.17; >11.99% uninsured: aIRR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08-1.22). However, there was no evident dose-response gradient. Sensitivity analyses produced virtually identical findings for subpopulations, and no other state characteristics were significant. CONCLUSION: States with the highest level of insurance coverage had a significantly lower LBW rate than other states. However, there was little evidence for greater odds of LBW with the highest levels of uninsured. Individual risk factors dominated LBW models, while state differences in income inequality, reproductive health policy, and per capita spending explained little of the variance in LBW.


Asunto(s)
Seguro de Salud , Pacientes no Asegurados , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Femenino , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Medicaid , Medición de Riesgo
2.
Public Health ; 198: 114-117, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34416573

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the association between United States county-level COVID-19 mortality and changes in presidential voting between 2016 and 2020. STUDY DESIGN: The study design is a county-level ecological study. METHODS: We analysed county-level population-weighted differences in partisan vote change, voter turnout and sociodemographic and health status characteristics across pre-election COVID-19 mortality quartiles. We estimated a population-weighted linear regression of the 2020-2016 Democratic vote change testing the significance of differences between quartiles of COVID-19 mortality, controlling for other county characteristics. RESULTS: The overall change in the 2020-2016 Democratic vote was +2.9% but ranged from a +4.3% increase in the lowest mortality quartile counties to +0.9% in the highest mortality quartile counties. Change in turnout ranged from +9.1% in the lowest mortality counties to only +6.2% in highest mortality counties. In regression estimates, the highest mortality quartile was associated with a -1.26% change in the Democratic 2020-2016 vote compared with the lowest quartile (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher county-level COVID-19 mortality was associated with smaller increases in Democratic vote share in 2020 compared with 2016. Possible explanations to be explored in future research could include fear of in-person voting in heavily Democratic, high-mortality counties, fear of the economic effects of perceived Democratic support for tighter lockdowns and stay-at-home orders and general exhaustion that lowered political participation in hard-hit counties.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Humanos , Política , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 20(4): 442, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29125150

RESUMEN

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2017.5.

4.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 20(3): 283-288, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28631720

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgery and radiation-based therapies are standard management options for men with clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Contemporary patterns of care are unknown. We hypothesize the use of surgery has steadily increased in more recent years. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base for 2004-2013, all men diagnosed with high-risk localized PCa were identified using National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria. Temporal trends in initial management were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate demographic and clinical factors associated with undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). RESULTS: In total, 127 391 men were identified. Use of RP increased from 26% in 2004 to 42% in 2013 (adjusted risk ratio (RR) 1.51, 95% CI 1.42-1.60, P<0.001), while external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) decreased from 49% to 42% (P<0.001). African American men had lower odds of undergoing RP (unadjusted rate of 28%, adjusted RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.66-0.72, <0.001) compared to White men (37%). Age was inversely associated with likelihood of receiving RP. Having private insurance was significantly associated with the increased use of RP (vs Medicare, adjusted odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, P=0.015). Biopsy Gleason scores 8-10 with and without any primary Gleason 5 pattern were associated with decreased odds of RP (vs Gleason score ⩽6, both P<0.001). Academic and comprehensive cancer centers were more likely to perform RP compared to community hospitals (both P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The likelihood of receiving RP for high-risk PCa dramatically increased from 2004 to 2013. By 2013, the use of RP and EBRT were similar. African American men, elderly men and those without private insurance were less likely to receive RP.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Anciano , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Prostatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Estados Unidos
5.
Qual Saf Health Care ; 15(3): 184-90, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16751468

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adverse events (AEs) occur with alarming frequency in health care and can have a significant impact on both patients and caregivers. There is a pressing need to understand better the frequency, nature, and etiology of AEs, but currently available methodologies to identify AEs have significant limitations. We hypothesized that it would be possible to design a method to conduct real time active surveillance and conducted a pilot study to identify adverse events and medical errors. METHODS: Records were selected based on 21 electronically obtained triggers, including abnormal laboratory values and high risk and antidote medications. Triggers were chosen based on their expected potential to signal AEs occurring during hospital admissions. Each AE was rated for preventability and severity and categorized by type of event. Reviews were performed by an interdisciplinary patient safety team. RESULTS: Over a 3 month period 327 medical records were reviewed; at least one AE or medical error was identified in 243 (74%). There were 163 preventable AEs (events in which there was a medical error that resulted in patient harm) and 138 medical errors that did not lead to patient harm. Interventions to prevent or ameliorate harm were made following review of the medical records of 47 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This methodology of active surveillance allows for the identification and assessment of adverse events among hospitalized patients. It provides a unique opportunity to review events at or near the time of their occurrence and to intervene and prevent harm.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Información en Hospital , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Laboratorios de Hospital/normas , Auditoría Médica/métodos , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/normas , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Vigilancia de Guardia , Centros Médicos Académicos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Chicago , Revisión Concurrente/métodos , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Errores Médicos/clasificación , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Tiempo de Tromboplastina Parcial , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Software
6.
J Wound Care ; 12(7): 272-5, 2003 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12894699

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This US study set out to examine the relationship between pressure-ulcer risk and sedation. The researchers examined the frequency of sedative use and the severity of pressure ulceration among older patients hospitalised for skin-ulcer treatment. They compared 91 patients who had been sedated before admission to hospital with 101 who had not. METHOD: A retrospective chart-review study was carried out between August 1994 and September 2001 in a tertiary-care metropolitan teaching hospital in the US. A total of 278 patients were identified from computerised discharge records. They were aged 60 years or more and had been discharged with medically treated skin ulcers, skin grafts, debridements or cellulitis. They had a principal or secondary diagnosis of chronic skin ulceration. RESULTS: Of the patients with pressure ulcers, 45.5% had been on sedation before admission. They were only slightly more likely to have come from nursing homes and there were no significant differences in prevalence of conditions such as oncological diseases or spinal-cord injury between them and non-sedated patients. However, patients sedated before admission were more likely to be female (67.1%, p = 0.04) and had almost a fivefold higher incidence of extremely severe ulceration (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Almost half of the older patients hospitalised with pressure ulcers had been taking sedatives before admission. They were more likely to have extremely severe ulcers with necrotic tissue, pressure ulcers in multiple sites, and the largest and deepest ulcers.


Asunto(s)
Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera por Presión/clasificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos
7.
Surgery ; 130(4): 561-7; discussion 567-9, 2001 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11602885

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether hospitals with a high capability for vascular operations have lower rates of inpatient mortality, major complication, and major amputation with lower extremity arterial bypass (LEAB) procedures than do less well-equipped hospitals after controlling for hospital procedure volume and patient characteristics. METHODS: Admissions of 16,422 northern Illinois residents to Illinois hospitals for aortoiliac (AI) or distal bypass operations during 1993 to 1999 were analyzed. Hospitals were considered to have a high capability for vascular operations if they had cardiac surgical facilities and either an accredited blood flow laboratory, general surgical residency, or fellowship training in vascular surgery. Logistic regression was used to model the effect of hospital capability on mortality after controlling for hospital LEAB procedure volume, operation level, severity of illness, age, sex, and emergent admission. RESULTS: Sixteen of 98 Illinois hospitals with 34.4% of the sample patients, including 8 of 18 hospitals with more than 40 admissions for LEAB procedures annually, were classified as having high surgical capability. Hospitals classified as having high versus low capability had lower mortality (2.8% vs 3.7%; P =.003) and amputation rates (4.6% vs 4.9% [not significant]) but higher major complication rates (9.8% vs 8.5%; P =.006). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality outcomes for LEAB procedures were superior at high capability hospitals, even after controlling for patient characteristics, disease severity, and LEAB volume. Hospital complication rates were not correlated with mortality rates and may not be a meaningful measure of quality of care.


Asunto(s)
Arterias/trasplante , Pierna/irrigación sanguínea , Pierna/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos
8.
J Vasc Surg ; 34(2): 283-90, 2001 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11496281

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A noncardiac surgery risk model was used as a means of analyzing variations in postoperative mortality and amputation-free survival for older veterans undergoing femorodistal bypass grafting surgery. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was undertaken in 105 Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals at the time of index operation from 1991 to 1995. Each patient was linked to subsequent hospitalizations, major amputation surgery, and survival through 1999. Logistic regression and proportional hazards models were used as a means of developing risk indices on the basis of risk factors from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. A total of 4288 male veterans 40 years or older underwent artificial, vein, or in situ bypass grafting surgery at the femoral to tibial level. The main outcome measures were 30-day postoperative mortality and amputation-free survival. RESULTS: Approximately half of all patients had undergone an earlier revascularization or amputation at any level for vascular disease. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 2.1% and varied greatly between mortality risk index quartiles (0.6%-5.2%). In a median 44.3 months of follow-up, surviving patients had 17,694 subsequent VA hospitalizations, 1147 patients (26.7%) underwent subsequent major amputation, and 1913 patients (44.6%) died. The overall survival probability was 88% at 1 year and 63% at 5 years; 1- and 5-year (any sided) limb salvage rates were 87% and 74%, respectively, for patients who underwent a femoropopliteal bypass grafting procedure, compared with 77% and 63%, respectively, for patients who underwent a tibial bypass grafting procedure. When amputation and death were combined as end points, amputation-free survival probability rates at 1, 3, and 7.5 years were 74%, 56%, and 29%, respectively. Patients with the best 20% survival risk scores had observed mean survival probability rates 30% higher than patients in the poorest 20% of survival risk. CONCLUSION: Risk indices derived from the preoperative workup may be of use to clinicians in assessing and communicating risk and prognosis. Risk-adjustment of outcomes is critical for evaluating future disease management initiatives for patients with advanced peripheral arterial disease.


Asunto(s)
Vena Femoral/cirugía , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares
9.
Surgery ; 130(1): 21-9, 2001 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11436008

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A surgical risk model is used to analyze postoperative mortality and late survival for older veterans who underwent above- or below-knee amputations in 119 Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals from 1991 to 1995. METHODS: Preoperative medical conditions and laboratory values abstracted by the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were linked to subsequent hospitalization and survival through 1999. Logistic regression and proportional hazards models were used to develop risk indexes for postoperative mortality and long-term survival. RESULTS: Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 6.3% for 1909 below-knee and 13.3% for 2152 above-knee amputees. Mortality varied greatly between the lowest-highest risk index quartiles (0.8%-18.4% for below-knee amputation and 2.3%-31.1% for above-knee amputation). Surviving patients had 10,827 subsequent VA hospitalizations during a median 32-month follow-up. Survival probabilities for below- and above-knee amputees were 77% and 59% at 1 year, 57% and 39% at 3 years, and 28% and 20% at 7.5 years. The lowest quartile of survival risk had a 61% five-year survival compared with 14% for the highest-risk quartile. CONCLUSION: A generic surgical risk model can be of use in stratifying prognosis after major amputation. The heavy burden of hospital use by these patients suggests the need for better disease management for this high-risk, high-cost patient population.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Pierna/cirugía , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Adulto , Anciano , Amputación Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Hospitales de Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
10.
J Gen Intern Med ; 16(3): 157-62, 2001 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11318910

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess factors associated with patient satisfaction with communication of mammography results and their understanding and ability to recall these results. DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey. SETTING: Academic breast imaging center. PATIENTS: Two hundred ninety-eight patients who had either a screening or diagnostic mammogram. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Survey items assessed waiting time for results, anxiety about results, satisfaction with several components of results reporting, and patients' understanding of results and recommendations. Women undergoing screening exams were more likely to be dissatisfied with the way the results were communicated than those who underwent diagnostic exams and received immediate results (20% vs 11%, P =.05). For these screening patients, waiting for more than two weeks for notification of results, difficulty getting in touch with someone to answer questions, low ratings of how clearly results were explained, and considerable or extreme anxiety about the results were all independently associated with dissatisfaction with the way the results were reported, while age and actual exam result were not. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing screening mammograms were more likely to be dissatisfied with the way the results were communicated than were those who underwent diagnostic mammograms. Interventions to reduce the wait time for results, reduce patients' anxiety, and improve the clarity with which the results and recommendations are given may help improve overall satisfaction with mammography result reporting.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Mamografía/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Ansiedad/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Mamografía/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Tiempo
11.
J Vasc Surg ; 31(5): 901-9, 2000 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10805880

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Recent increases in the rate of carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) have been attributed to results of clinical trials demonstrating efficacy when CEA is performed in centers of excellence. Subsequent population-based data suggest that trial results may not be matched in the community. This study was undertaken to characterize trends in CEA procedure rates after the dissemination of trial data and to describe any change in patient outcomes with population-based data from a single state. METHODS: Hospital administrative data on CEAs from 1992 to 1996 (n = 45,744) were obtained for the state of Florida. Annualized CEA rates per 100, 000 Florida residents were analyzed to determine trends in patient age, sex, admission type, size of hospital beds, ownership type and teaching status, and annual hospital and surgeon CEA volume. Outcomes were examined to track trends in complication rates. RESULTS: The annual number of CEA procedures increased 74% from 63.7 per 100,000 residents per year to 110.8 per 100,000 residents per year between 1992 and 1996. A single large increase occurred during the second half of 1994 when CEAs increased 73.5% from 16.6 per 100, 000 residents per quarter to 28.8 per 100,000 residents per quarter after a clinical alert on benefits to CEAs in asymptomatic patients. Over 5 years, there were significant trends toward more nonemergent admissions, and more procedures were performed in high-volume hospitals and by high-volume surgeons. Procedure rates in both women and very elderly patients increased more than 70%, which was in step with younger patients and men. The incidence of inpatient stroke and death declined over the 5-year period, whereas the rate of perioperative myocardial infarction remained constant. CONCLUSIONS: Experience from Florida indicates that CEA rates increased as results of the Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Study disseminated. Trial results have been broadly interpreted to include women and very elderly patients. More patients are being referred to busier hospitals and to high-volume surgeons, which should continue to result in better patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Endarterectomía Carotidea/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Endarterectomía Carotidea/tendencias , Femenino , Florida/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control
12.
Annu Rev Med ; 51: 101-13, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10774455

RESUMEN

Lower-extremity vascular surgery is most often indicated for patients with critical leg ischemia but has increasingly been used for patients with disabling intermittent claudication. This article reviews indications, follow-up protocols, and procedure-related outcomes including perioperative and late mortality, complications, and long-term patency rates, which vary with patient risk factors, vascular disease severity, and hospital volume. Population-based studies have yet to establish whether rates of limb-preserving bypass surgery are related to overall amputation rates, partly because of the continued high rate of primary amputation. The functional benefits of vascular surgery have been traditionally assessed by treadmill protocols and batteries of physical tests. Claudication treatment is increasingly being measured by both generic and disease-specific functional and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires. Patient self-reported measures of physical functioning and walking ability are reviewed. Finally, conclusions are presented about trends in lower-extremity bypass surgery rates.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Pierna/irrigación sanguínea , Pierna/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Recuperación de la Función , Inducción de Remisión , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Caminata
13.
Arch Surg ; 135(1): 75-80, 2000 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10636352

RESUMEN

HYPOTHESIS: This study tests whether age, sex, income, and racial differences predict rates of aortoiliac and femorodistal bypass surgery and above- and below-knee amputation for residents of northern Illinois from 1993 to 1997. DESIGN: A hospital discharge survey study describing standardized procedure rates and the odds of undergoing amputation vs bypass procedures for specified sociodemographic populations. Multiple logistic regression was used to compare the odds of undergoing major amputation vs bypass surgery controlling for the prevalence of diabetes, gangrene, high-risk comorbid conditions, and treatment at major area teaching hospitals. RESULTS: Between 1993 and 1997, 19,250 study procedures were performed during 18,603 admissions at 105 Illinois hospitals. The mean annual major amputation rate per 100,000 was 20.77; femorodistal and aortoiliac bypass rates were 24.26 and 4.70, respectively. Significantly higher odds (between 1.14 and 1.36) of undergoing amputation were found for low-income areas and ZIP codes with large and medium African American populations. Severe comorbidity, diabetes, and especially gangrene (odds ratio, 12.9) predicted amputation, while treatment at a major teaching hospital and male sex predicted a higher odds of undergoing bypass procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Results are consistent with unmeasured racial and income differences in the severity of atherosclerosis (or related risk factors such as smoking, diet, and exercise), barriers to timely primary care, or selective referral of lower-income and African American patients to hospitals with less vascular surgery capacity. These findings imply a particular need to identify and review the quality of care for patients undergoing primary lower-extremity amputations.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/estadística & datos numéricos , Isquemia/cirugía , Pierna/irrigación sanguínea , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Población Negra , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Illinois , Isquemia/epidemiología , Isquemia/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos
14.
J Vasc Surg ; 31(1 Pt 1): 93-103, 2000 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10642712

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was the prospective comparison of functional outcomes after lower extremity bypass grafting surgery, angioplasty, or medical management of intermittent claudication. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective cohort study to compare functional outcomes for patients with interventional management to medical management, including a matched (younger, with more disability) subgroup, followed for a mean of 19 months. Sixteen Chicago-area vascular surgery clinics participated in the study. The subjects were consecutively enrolled patients with an abnormal ankle-brachial blood pressure index (ABI), without signs of rest pain, ulcer, or gangrene, and without prior lower extremity revascularization procedures. The main outcome measures were changes in physical functioning, community walking distance, bodily pain, leg symptoms, and ABI. RESULTS: Of the 526 study patients, 20% underwent revascularization procedures (60 surgical bypass grafting and 44 angioplasty only). The mean ABI improved significantly for the patients who underwent bypass grafting surgery (0.20; P <.001) and modestly for the patients who underwent angioplasty (0.09; P <. 05). Patients undergoing bypass grafting and angioplasty maintained highly significant (P <.001) improvements in mean physical functioning, (17%, 14%), bodily pain (18%, 13%), and walking distance (28%, 27%) scores and reported greater leg symptom improvement. The results were far superior for the patients with greater improvement in ABI. The conditions of the 277 unmatched patients who underwent medical management declined on all outcome measures, and the conditions of the 145 matched patients who underwent medical management improved 5% (P <.001) on walking distance score. Eighteen percent of the study patients failed to complete the full study follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Most of the functional improvement achieved by patients who underwent interventional management appears to be related to improved patency rather than to selection bias or placebo effects. The functional gains were approximately half those often reported for patients for hip arthroplasty and similar to patients who undergo elective coronary angioplasty.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Angioplastia/normas , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/normas , Claudicación Intermitente/cirugía , Caminata , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea , Femenino , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/complicaciones , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico por imagen , Claudicación Intermitente/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
15.
Eval Health Prof ; 22(2): 254-77, 1999 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10557859

RESUMEN

Longitudinal monitoring of individual patient data is becoming routine in physician office practice. This study compares three different methods for evaluating clinical outcomes for individual patients: raw change score analysis versus normative and ipsative statistical analyses. Two discrete samples of intermittent claudication patients making vascular surgery office visits--drawn from interventional management versus stable, routinely followed control groups--were tested four times using both generic and disease-specific functional status measures. Results indicated that the ipsative method was most consistent with several different types of a priori hypotheses that are often evaluated in analysis of repeated measures data.


Asunto(s)
Estudios Longitudinales , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Estadística como Asunto , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Humanos , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/terapia
16.
J Clin Oncol ; 17(11): 3676-81, 1999 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10550166

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Research Committee sought to assess whether more appropriate patterns of colony-stimulating factor (CSF) use occurred after the publication of ASCO evidence-based practice guidelines in 1994 and 1996 for patients with solid tumors or lymphoma. METHODS: In 1994 and 1997, questionnaires describing clinical scenarios were mailed to ASCO members who practiced medical oncology. Physicians were asked the extent to which they preferred to use a CSF for primary prophylaxis, secondary prophylaxis, or treatment of neutropenic complications. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine predictors of overall propensity to use CSFs and, when using a CSF, propensity to support longer schedules of CSF use. RESULTS: Decreased use of CSFs was shown in the following situations: (1) treatment for febrile neutropenia without localizing signs (39% in 1994 v 29% in 1997) or with a right lower lobe infiltrate (54% v 46%); (2) primary prophylaxis with paclitaxel for ovarian cancer (20% v 11%) or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (8.4% v 4.6%); and (3) secondary prophylaxis after afebrile neutropenia following chemotherapy for germ cell tumors (44.5% v 36.0%). One third fewer physicians supported the extended use of CSFs until an absolute neutrophil count >/= 10,000/mm(3) or a WBC count >/= 10,000/mm(3) was reached, both counts serving as criteria for stopping CSF therapy. However, we observed high rates of CSF use despite ASCO guideline recommendations against use in the following clinical situations: (1) primary prophylaxis in patients at low risk of febrile neutropenia (6% v 16%); (2) secondary prophylaxis late in the course of curative and palliative therapy (80% v 53%); and (3) treatment of afebrile and uncomplicated febrile neutropenia (30% v 60%). In 1994 and 1997, fee-for-service physicians were more likely than other physicians to prefer use of CSF support while maintaining treatment dose and schedule instead of using dose-reduction strategies, and, when using a CSF, they were more likely to support longer CSF treatment schedules (P <.05 for both scenarios). CONCLUSION: Decreased use and more appropriate use of CSFs in accordance with ASCO guideline recommendations occurred from 1994 to 1997, but there remain many opportunities to reduce CSF use with no clinical harm. Many oncologists continue to support the use of CSFs in scenarios and with scheduling criteria that the guidelines and evidence do not support. ASCO's evidence-based guidelines should be linked with formal continuous quality improvement initiatives to substantially improve the quality of supportive oncology care.


Asunto(s)
Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Neoplasias/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Humanos , Oncología Médica , Análisis de Regresión , Sociedades Médicas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
17.
Home Health Care Serv Q ; 17(4): 25-37, 1999.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10539579

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine home health nurses' attitudes towards physician capabilities in home health care, and whether nurses' attitudes are associated with their experience, practice setting, degree of physician interaction, or use of home health guidelines. DESIGN: A multiple regression analysis of a 90 item survey on agency characteristics, degree of interaction with physicians, and ratings of physicians capabilities across multiple dimensions of home health practice. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: 86 registered visiting nurses from seven Chicago-area home health agencies, who averaged 25 home visits and over one hour of direct contact with physicians weekly. MEASUREMENTS: Nurses' ratings of physician capability in home health practice were scaled from 18 survey items with high internal consistency reliability and correlated with nurses' practice characteristics. RESULTS: While most nurses (72%) felt that physicians responded adequately in emergencies and respected them as colleagues (70%), over 70% of respondents did not agree that physicians were adequately trained in home health. A majority of respondents rated physicians negatively on patient education, cross-coverage and availability, discharge planning, support and medical supply services, and insurance issues. Respondents' years of home health experience correlated negatively (p = .004) and degree of contact with physicians correlated positively (p = .05) with ratings of physician capabilities. CONCLUSION: Nurses' attitudes about physicians' performance can provide important insights for improving the effectiveness of specialized disease and outcomes management programs which rely on care in the home setting.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/normas , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Competencia Profesional , Chicago , Competencia Clínica , Enfermería en Salud Comunitaria , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Percepción , Relaciones Médico-Enfermero , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Recursos Humanos
18.
Am J Public Health ; 89(8): 1222-7, 1999 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10432910

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This report describes trends in the rates of lower-extremity amputation and revascularization procedures and vascular disease risk factors. METHODS: We analyzed trends in National Hospital Discharge Survey data for 1979 through 1996 and in National Health Interview Study data for 1983 through 1994. RESULTS: Despite a decline between 1983/84 and 1991/92, by 1995/96 the rate of major amputation had increased 10.6% since 1979/80. The earlier 12-year decline was positively correlated with reductions in the prevalence of smoking (r = 0.88, P < .0001), hypertension (r = 0.65, P = .02), and heart disease (r = 0.73, P = .007), but not diabetes (r = -0.33, P = .29). During the 1980s, amputation and angioplasty rates were inversely correlated (r = -0.75, P = .001), but the decline in amputation rates occurred before the increase in angioplasty. The major amputation rate, which has increased since 1993, was 24.95 per 100,000 people in 1996. CONCLUSIONS: Major amputation rates fell in the years following the diffusion of distal bypass surgery but before the widespread use of peripheral angioplasty. Because disease prevalence and primary amputation rates are unknown, it is difficult to estimate the contribution of recent improvements in vascular surgery to limb preservation.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pierna/cirugía , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/epidemiología , Fumar/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendencias
19.
J Vasc Surg ; 29(5): 768-76; discussion 777-8, 1999 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10231626

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Mortality and morbidity rates after vascular surgical procedures have been related to hospital volume. Hospitals in which greater volumes of vascular surgical procedures are performed tend to have statistically lower mortality rates than those hospitals in which fewer procedures are performed. Only a few studies have directly assessed the impact of the surgeon's volume on outcome. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to review a large state data set to determine the impact of surgeon volume on outcome after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), lower extremity bypass grafting (LEAB), and abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA). METHODS: The Florida Agency for Health Care Administration state admission data from 1992 to 1996 were obtained. The data included all nonfederal hospital admissions. Frequencies were calculated from first-listed International Classification of Diseases-9 codes. Multiple logistic regression was used to test the significance on outcome of surgeon volume, American Board of Surgery certification for added qualifications in general vascular surgery, hospital size, hospital volume, patient age, and gender. RESULTS: During this interval, there were 31,172 LEABs, 45,744 CEAs, and 13,415 AAAs performed. The in-hospital mortality rate increased with age. A doubling of surgeon volume was associated with a 4% reduction in risk for adverse outcome for CEA (P =.006), an 8% reduction for LEAB, and an 11% reduction for AAA ( P =.0002). However, although hospital volume was significant in predicting better outcomes for CEA and AAA procedures, it was not associated with better outcomes for LEAB. Certification for added qualifications in general vascular surgery was a significant predictor of better outcomes for CEA and AAA. Certified vascular surgeons had a 15% lower risk rate of death or complications after CEA (P =.002) and a 24% lower risk rate of a similar outcome after AAA (P =.009). However, for LEAB, certification was not significant. CONCLUSION: Surgeon volume and certification are significantly related to better patient outcomes for patients who undergo CEA and AAA. In addition, surgeons with high volumes demonstrated consistently lower mortality and morbidity rates than did surgeons with low volumes. Hospital volume for a given procedure also is correlated with better outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Certificación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Vasos Sanguíneos/trasplante , Endarterectomía Carotidea/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
Ann Oncol ; 10(11): 1355-9, 1999 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10631465

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Financial considerations play an important role in the delivery of medical care in the US. In 1996, revised guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) indicated that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were unlikely to be harmful for older acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and suggested that physicians could consider their use in this setting. In 1997, the ASCO health services research committee evaluated whether physician reimbursement was a primary determinant in the decision to use G-CSF and GM-CSF in this clinical situation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire describing clinical scenarios for a 67-year-old man with newly diagnosed de novo AML was mailed to 1500 ASCO members who practiced medical oncology and hematology. Physicians were queried about their preferences for adjunctive CSF use following induction and consolidation chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of 1020 potentially eligible respondents, returned surveys were received from 672. Following induction chemotherapy, support for CSF use was 40%, similar in magnitude for that for non-use of these agents. The most important determinant of support for CSF use was being in a fee-for-service practice (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians in the US are mixed in their support for CSFs for older AML patients. Support was high in settings where CSF use was accompanied by financial profit to the physician practice, and support was low otherwise.


Asunto(s)
Costos de los Medicamentos , Utilización de Medicamentos/economía , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/administración & dosificación , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/economía , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/economía , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Aguda/economía , Masculino , Oncología Médica/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Muestreo , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA