Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Liver Int ; 33(6): 926-35, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23560780

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Evaluate in liver biopsies: (i) interobserver agreement of estimates of fat proportionate area (eFPA) and steatosis grading, (ii) the relationship between steatosis grades and measured fat proportionate area (mFPA, digital image analysis), (iii) the accuracy of eFPA, (iv) to present images to aid standardization and accuracy of eFPA. METHODS: Twenty-one liver biopsies were selected from the Royal Free Hospital (RFH) histopathology archive to represent the full range of histopathological steatosis severity. As many non-overlapping fields of parenchyma as possible were photographed at ×20 objective magnification from the biopsies (n = 651). A total of 15 sample images were selected to represent the range of steatosis seen. Twelve hepatopathologists from 11 sites worldwide independently evaluated the sample images for steatosis grade [normal (none)/mild/moderate/severe], and eFPA (% area of liver parenchyma occupied by fat). RESULTS: The hepatopathologists had good linear correlation between eFPA and mFPA for sample images (r = 0.924, P < .001) and excellent concordance (kappa = 0.91, P < 0.001). Interobserver concordance of steatosis grade showed 'substantial agreement' (kappa = 0.64). There was significant difference between eFPA and mFPA in the sample images for mild, moderate and severe steatosis (P = 0.024, P < 0.001, P < 0.001 respectively): the observers consistently over-estimated the eFPA. CONCLUSION: Hepatopathologists showed 'excellent' interobserver agreement in eFPA and 'substantial' agreement in assigning steatosis grade (precision was high). However, compared with mFPA, eFPA was inaccurate. eFPA systematically exceeds mFPA; generally the overestimation increases with severity of steatosis. Considering that non-invasive technologies for estimating liver fat utilize histopathology as reference, such assessments would benefit from quantitative validation of visually estimated microscopic liver fat percentages.


Asunto(s)
Adiposidad , Hígado Graso/patología , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador , Hígado/patología , Microscopía , Asia , Biopsia , Brasil , Consenso , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos
2.
Liver Int ; 28(6): 807-13, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18422936

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The mechanisms by which severe cholestatic hepatitis develops after liver transplantation are not fully understood. Reports on immunohistochemical distribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigens are still scarce, but recently, HCV immunostaining was suggested for early diagnosis of cholestatic forms of recurrent hepatitis C in liver grafts. After purification, Rb246 pab anticore (aa1-68) yielded specific, granular cytoplasmic staining in hepatocytes. Signal amplification through the Envision-Alkaline Phosphatase System avoided endogenous biotin and peroxidase. AIMS/METHODS: Rb246 was applied to liver samples of explants of 12 transplant recipients, six with the most severe form of post-transplantation recurrence, severe cholestatic hepatitis (group 1) and six with mild recurrence (group 2). We also assessed immuno-reactivity at two time-points post-transplantation (median 4 and 22 months) in both groups. HCV-core Ag was semiquantified from 0 to 3+ in each time point. Serum HCV-RNA was also measured on the different time points by branched DNA. RESULTS: In the early post-transplant time point, one patient had a mild staining (1+), two patients had a moderate staining (2+) and the other three had no staining in group 1, compared with five patients with no staining (0) and one patient with mild staining (1+) in group 2. Late post-transplant liver samples were available in nine patients, and two out of four samples in group 1 showed a mild staining, compared with no staining patients in five patients in group 2. Strikingly, on the explant samples, HCV immunostaining was strongly positive in group 1, and mildly positive in group 2. Two out of five samples showed 3+ staining, and three samples showed 2+ staining in group 1; two out of five samples showed no staining, two samples showed 1+ staining and one sample showed 2+ staining in group 2. Serum HCV-RNA was significantly higher in group 1, on both time-points post-transplantation. HCV-core Ag was not directly associated with serum HCV-RNA on the different time points. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that strong HCV immunostaining in the explant is predictive of more severe disease recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Colestasis Intrahepática/virología , Hepacivirus/patogenicidad , Hepatitis C/virología , Trasplante de Hígado , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Colestasis Intrahepática/patología , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/inmunología , Hepatitis C/patología , Antígenos de la Hepatitis C/análisis , Humanos , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas , Hígado/química , Hígado/patología , Hígado/virología , Fallo Hepático/cirugía , Fallo Hepático/virología , ARN Viral/sangre , Recurrencia , Proteínas del Núcleo Viral/análisis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA