The mother-child interaction and clinical judgment during acute pediatric illnesses.

OBJECTIVES: For acutely ill children living in less than optimal environments, mothers and pediatricians may have a heightened perception of illness severity, a lower specificity of clinical judgments, and a tendency to over-utilize resources. We examined the mother-child interaction in order to understand the relation of less optimal environments to clinical judgment and resource use. STUDY DESIGN: At the 2-week and 6-, 15-, and 24-month well child visits of 316 children, the mother-well child interaction was assessed by using the Biringen's Emotional Availability Scales (EAS). Data were gathered regarding maternal depression and sense of competence, infant temperament, maternal social support, life events, the home environment, and demographics. At ill visits, the mother-ill child interaction was assessed by using the EAS, and mothers and pediatricians independently assessed illness severity using the Acute Illness Observation Scales. Resource use during the illness was evaluated. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred eight-three acute illnesses were assessed. A less optimal mother-child interaction was significantly (P <.05 for all comparisons) associated with poorer reliability of mothers' judgments, lower specificity of mothers' judgments (71% vs 85%) and pediatricians' judgments (92% vs 97%), and greater use of resources (eg, for hospitalizations, 2.6% of visits vs 0.7%). Adverse maternal, infant, and demographic characteristics were associated with a less optimal mother-well child (r = 0.68) and mother-ill child (r = 0.80) interaction, a heightened perception of illness severity, and greater resource use. CONCLUSION: Less optimal environments adversely affect the mother-child interaction; a poor mother-child interaction is correlated with low specificity of clinical judgment and over-utilization of resources.

Mothers' clinical judgment: a randomized trial of the Acute Illness Observation Scales.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of mothers' judgments about acute illnesses in their children could be improved by using the Acute Illness Observation Scales (AIOS). At the 2-week well child care visit in a primary care center and a private practice, 369 mothers were divided at random into an intervention group (n = 183) and a control group (n = 186). A teaching film and booklet were used to educate mothers in the intervention group about the AIOS; control group mothers were taught a 3-point global scoring system for evaluating the chance of serious illness. In the 32 months of follow-up, 704 acute illnesses were evaluated in tandem and independently by mothers and pediatricians before the history and physical examination; 20 of these illnesses were serious. The judgments of the intervention group were more reliable than those of the control group (weighted kappa = 0.50 vs 0.26, respectively), as was the specificity of their judgments (85% vs 52%, respectively; p less than 0.0001). No difference was noted in the sensitivity of intervention group and control group mothers' judgments (80% vs 90%, respectively). Teaching parents to assess specific clinical information, as represented in the AIOS, has its greatest effect on the reliability and specificity, not the sensitivity, of their judgments. Such teaching could lead to fewer unnecessary office visits during acute illnesses.

Observation, history, and physical examination in diagnosis of serious illnesses in febrile children less than or equal to 24 months.

To determine if observational assessment performed in a systematic manner adds to the efficacy of the traditional history and physical examination in detecting serious illnesses in febrile children, and to determine the sensitivity of the combined evaluation, we studied consecutive patients less than or equal to 24 months of age seen for evaluation of fever at the Primary Care Center-Emergency Room (PCC-ER) of the Yale-New Haven Hospital (n = 143) and a suburban private practice (n = 207). An attending pediatrician performed the observation using the previously reported Acute Illness Observation Scales (AIOS). Subsequently, the history and physical examination were done by an attending pediatrician, and findings were scored as to whether they suggested the presence of a serious illness. Thirty-six patients, 28 in the PCC-ER and eight in the private practice, had a serious illness. The combined AIOS, history, and physical examination had a higher sensitivity and r correlation for serious illness than did the traditional history and physical examination. Three children with serious illnesses, all of whom had no abnormalities on history and physical examination, were identified only by use of AIOS. We conclude that assessment of appearance in a child with fever, when performed in a careful, integrated, stepwise fashion, improves the sensitivity of the history and physical examination in detecting serious illnesses in febrile children.