Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 44
Filtrar
2.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 68(5): 433-40, 2001 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11352323

RESUMEN

When elderly patients might benefit from home care, a key question is whether Medicare will pay for it. We describe what physicians can do to avoid the pitfalls in qualifying appropriate patients for Medicare's Home Health Services and hospice programs, and the basic features of these two programs. We also describe the experience and methods used in prototype programs that provide home-based hospital-level care, and that revive a supposedly lost art: physician house calls.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/normas , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/organización & administración , Visita Domiciliaria , Medicare/normas , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/economía , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/tendencias , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/psicología , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/tendencias , Hospitales para Enfermos Terminales/economía , Hospitales para Enfermos Terminales/organización & administración , Visita Domiciliaria/economía , Visita Domiciliaria/tendencias , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Medicare/economía , Rol del Médico , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía
3.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 49(11): 1549-54, 2001 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11890598

RESUMEN

Withdrawal of medical interventions has become common in the hospital for patients with terminal disease. Despite the widespread feeling that medical interventions may be futile in certain patients, many patients, families, and medical staff find withdrawal of care difficult and withdrawal of mechanical ventilation to be the most disturbing secondary to the close proximity of withdrawal and death. Presented is a 6-year retrospective review of elective withdrawal of life-sustaining mechanical ventilation on a chronic ventilator unit (CVU) in an academic nursing home. Of the 98 patients admitted to the 19-bed CVU during this period, only 13 underwent terminal weaning (TW). Statistically, these 13 patients did not differ significantly in age, gender, race, route of nutrition, decisional capacity, or length of stay on the unit compared with the 85 patients who were not terminally weaned (t-test P > .05). Stepwise logistic regression found that patients who were more alert at admission were more likely to have participated in TW (chi2 = 5.22, coefficient for alertness P < .036). The decision to terminate mechanical ventilation was made by patients in eight cases and by family in five cases. The first step in the process leading to TW was a discussion with the patient and family about plan of care, including the patient's desires for attempted resuscitation, rehospitalization, advance directives, and family contacts. Plan of care was reviewed informally in a weekly multidisciplinary round and formally, to address each patient's care plan, in a multidisciplinary family meeting on a regular basis. The second step was to address TW when brought up by the patient, family, or medical staff. A request for TW by a patient or surrogate was referred to the medical staff, who screened the patient for depression or other remediable symptoms. The third step was to refer the patient and family to another formal meeting to discuss the request for TW and, if needed, in the case of multiple family members, to allow questions to be answered and consensus to be formed. Additional meetings were scheduled as needed. The next step occurred once a consensus was reached to proceed with TW; a date and time was set to reconvene the patient, family, and anyone else who wanted to be present at the TW. The TW process began when a peripheral intravenous catheter was placed and the patient was premedicated with low doses of morphine sulfate and a benzodiazepine. After premedication, the patient was removed from the ventilator. The physician, nurse, family, and physician assistant remained at the bedside and additional morphine or benzodiazepine was given, as needed, for symptom management. Death from TW occurred in all patients, at times ranging from 2 minutes to 10.5 hours (average 6.2 hours). A mean total dose of 115 mg morphine and 14 mg diazepam was given for symptom control. There was no correlation between dose of these medications and duration of survival off the ventilator.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Directivas Anticipadas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Baltimore , Femenino , Hogares para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Desconexión del Ventilador
6.
JAMA ; 282(14): 1365-70, 1999 Oct 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10527184

RESUMEN

Patients with advanced dementia frequently develop eating difficulties and weight loss. Enteral feeding tubes are often used in this situation, yet benefits and risks of this therapy are unclear. We searched MEDLINE, 1966 through March 1999, to identify data about whether tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia can prevent aspiration pneumonia, prolong survival, reduce the risk of pressure sores or infections, improve function, or provide palliation. We found no published randomized trials that compare tube feeding with oral feeding. We found no data to suggest that tube feeding improves any of these clinically important outcomes and some data to suggest that it does not. Further, risks are substantial. The widespread practice of tube feeding should be carefully reconsidered, and we believe that for severely demented patients the practice should be discouraged on clinical grounds.


Asunto(s)
Demencia , Investigación Empírica , Nutrición Enteral , Medición de Riesgo , Actividades Cotidianas , Demencia/complicaciones , Nutrición Enteral/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infecciones/etiología , Trastornos Nutricionales/etiología , Trastornos Nutricionales/prevención & control , Satisfacción del Paciente , Neumonía por Aspiración/etiología , Neumonía por Aspiración/prevención & control , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Ann Intern Med ; 130(9): 782-6, 1999 May 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10357706
15.
Clin Geriatr Med ; 12(2): 369-77, 1996 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8799354

RESUMEN

For ethical decision-making near the end of life, autonomy is the moral North Star. At the same time, for some treatments, the burdens so clearly outweigh benefits that physicians may make a judgment not to offer the treatment. This is often clearer in surgery. A person with colon cancer and metastases may not insist on resection of the metastases. For some reason, some treatments have escaped these logical constraints. Attempted resuscitation of a dying patient is a good example. The circumstances in which a physician may make choices on behalf of a competent, terminally-ill patient without consent, and even without notification, are hotly debated, but data suggest that physicians do so frequently. Patients who lack capacity present even more difficult challenges. Advance directives, when available, can be extremely helpful, but even with them difficult problems can remain. If advance directives have not been established, family and close friends are an obvious source of guidance. Their legal role varies in different jurisdictions; in practice, they are crucial in bedside decision-making. Guardianship and alternatives to it remain a poor last resort. Euthanasia is a very difficult problem. We believe it is semantically misleading to lump under the term "passive euthanasia" those circumstances where potentially life-sustaining treatment is withheld or withdrawn. The tension between patient autonomy and medical common sense remains unresolved within the "futility" controversy. The authors believe it serves no purpose to discuss carefully with dying patients propositions that are nonsense. At the same time, physicians must not confuse decisions about quality of life with judgements about treatment effectiveness. We believe that what many, although not all, dying patients want are physicians with intelligent compassion who can take care of them through the dying process.


Asunto(s)
Ética Médica , Defensa del Paciente , Cuidado Terminal , Directivas Anticipadas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Eutanasia , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Inutilidad Médica , Medicare , Estados Unidos
17.
N Engl J Med ; 334(4): 274, 1996 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8532021
18.
Clin Geriatr Med ; 11(3): 391-402, 1995 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7585386

RESUMEN

Non-institutional long-term care is a broad, poorly defined, rapidly developing field. The need for it, the technologic ability to provide it, and the amount of money spent on it are all growing. Reconciling the public's reluctance to support social programs with the inevitable overlap of social and medical needs in the care of the frail elderly presents a serious challenge in formulating policy. Medical directors of programs in non-institutional long-term care will have to face governmental constraints and will be responsible for developing and implementing new policy in the future.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/organización & administración , Ejecutivos Médicos/organización & administración , Rol del Médico , Anciano , Anciano Frágil , Política de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/organización & administración , Humanos , Perfil Laboral , Medicare Part A , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Estados Unidos
20.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 43(7): 761-6, 1995 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7602027

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors for nursing home placement among a group of frail older patients receiving formal home care services. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: A geographically defined catchment area of southeast Baltimore, Maryland. PATIENTS: A total of 334 homebound patients who started using the Elder Housecall Program (EHP), a multidisciplinary team providing in-home care and housed at the Johns Hopkins Geriatrics Center, between 1986 and 1989. MEASUREMENTS: Independent variables, based on the chart review, were age, sex, diagnosis, functional status, and caregiver conditions at entry into EHP. Dependent variable was nursing home placement until December 31, 1991. MAIN RESULTS: Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that significant predictors were diabetes mellitus, bowel incontinence, and three caregiver characteristics: living separate from the patient, having time conflicts because of a job, and being stressed by caregiving. CONCLUSION: Among this group of frail older people, caregiver problems were significant predictors of nursing home placement, but functional disabilities generally were not. These results suggest the need for geriatricians to be alert to the psychosocial aspects of patients and their caregivers.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Hogares para Ancianos , Institucionalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Baltimore , Cuidadores , Femenino , Anciano Frágil/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...