Comparative life cycle assessment of three 2030 scenarios of the Brazilian cement industry.

The cement industry is intensive in energy and feedstock use. It includes three main phases: raw materials and energy supply, transport, and manufacturing. The sector is known for its considerable environmental impacts. The increase in energy efficiency and the use of non-fossil fuels and raw materials are considered mature technologies in cement industries. We evaluate different environmental impacts of the production of 1 t of cement in four Brazilian scenarios. We compare one business-as-usual reference scenario (case 1) to three alternative 2030 carbon mitigation sectoral plan scenarios (cases 2, 3a, and 3b) that assume mature technologies. We analyze all 18 impact categories within the ReCiPe 2016 Life Cycle Assessment methodology. Results show reductions in 17 impact categories, ranging from no change in ozone depletion (case 2) to 39% reduction in fossil resource scarcity (case 3b). The effects on climate change decreased 14% in case 2 and 33% in cases 3a and 3b. The clinkerization process is the greatest contributor to atmospheric impacts, while raw material consumption to toxicity impacts. In contrast, there is no single main process contributing to resource depletion impacts. The changes in cement production lead to carbon emission reductions above expected levels and to reductions in other environmental impact categories modeled in ReCiPe 2016 method.

A social and ecological assessment of tropical land uses at multiple scales: the Sustainable Amazon Network.

Science has a critical role to play in guiding more sustainable development trajectories. Here, we present the Sustainable Amazon Network (Rede Amazônia Sustentável, RAS): a multidisciplinary research initiative involving more than 30 partner organizations working to assess both social and ecological dimensions of land-use sustainability in eastern Brazilian Amazonia. The research approach adopted by RAS offers three advantages for addressing land-use sustainability problems: (i) the collection of synchronized and co-located ecological and socioeconomic data across broad gradients of past and present human use; (ii) a nested sampling design to aid comparison of ecological and socioeconomic conditions associated with different land uses across local, landscape and regional scales; and (iii) a strong engagement with a wide variety of actors and non-research institutions. Here, we elaborate on these key features, and identify the ways in which RAS can help in highlighting those problems in most urgent need of attention, and in guiding improvements in land-use sustainability in Amazonia and elsewhere in the tropics. We also discuss some of the practical lessons, limitations and realities faced during the development of the RAS initiative so far.