Giant cell tumor at tibial screw site after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

We report a case of giant cell tumor that occurred in the proximal tibia of a 52-year-old man 13 years after bone-patella-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The tumor was at the site of the metal interference screw. We discuss the differential diagnosis of proximal tibia lesions that occur after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the importance of recognizing potentially life-threatening sports tumors.

How to treat the stiff total knee arthroplasty?: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Multiple modalities have been used to treat the stiff TKA, including manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), arthroscopy, and open arthrolysis. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We reviewed the literature to address three questions: (1) How many degrees of ROM will a stiff TKA gain after MUA, arthroscopy, and open arthrolysis? (2) Does the timing of each procedure influence this gain in ROM? (3) What is the number of clinically important complications for each procedure? METHODS: We performed a PubMed search of English language articles from 1966 to 2008 and identified 20 articles, mostly Level IV studies. RESULTS: For patients who have arthrofibrosis after TKA, the gains in ROM after MUA and arthroscopy (with or without MUA) are similar. Open arthrolysis seems to have inferior gains in ROM. MUA is more successful in increasing ROM when performed early but still may be effective when performed late. Arthroscopy combined with MUA still is useful 1 year after the index TKA. The numbers of clinically important complications after MUA and arthroscopy (with or without MUA) are similar. CONCLUSIONS: Stiffness after TKA is a common problem that can be improved with MUA and/or arthroscopic lysis of adhesions with few complications. The low quality of available literature makes it difficult to develop treatment protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft.

PURPOSE: No graft tissue has consistently shown superiority over others for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and doubled hamstring tendon (semitendinosus and gracilis) (HT) are the most commonly used autologous grafts. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of ACL reconstruction using either BPTB or HT grafts. TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE database (1966 to April 2003) for English-language randomized or prospective studies comparing BPTB and 3- or 4-strand HT grafts used for ACL reconstruction. For inclusion, studies were required to follow identical rehabilitation protocols within each study, and provide subjective or objective outcome data after a minimum average 2-year follow-up. Comparison data between BPTB and HT for each identified outcome measure were combined using a random-effects model meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eleven reports fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. Outcomes favoring BPTB were found in the following outcome measures: normal Lachman examination (relative risk [RR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.99; P = .025), normal pivot-shift (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88-1.0; P = .067), KT-1000 manual-maximum side-to-side difference of < or = 3 mm (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.55-1.01; P = .057), and fewer reconstructions resulting in flexion loss > 5 degrees (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.01-1.96; P = .04). Intermediate level laxity was more common with the HT graft, as shown by higher rates of abnormal Lachman > 0 (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.99-1.5; P = .06), pivot-shift > 0 (RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.96-1.75; P = .09), and KT-1000 manual-maximum side-to-side differences > 3 mm (RR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.13-2.39; P = .01). Outcome measures that favored HT were absence of patellofemoral crepitance (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15; P = .03), fewer results with extension loss > 5 degrees (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.3-1.03; P = .06), and kneeling pain. The incidence of instability, as defined by Lachman grade 2, pivot-shift grade 2, or KT-1000 manual-maximum side-to-side difference > 5 mm, was not significantly different between the 2 grafts. All other outcome measures were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The data presented in this meta-analysis show that the incidence of instability is not significantly different between the BPTB and HT grafts. However, BPTB was more likely to result in reconstructions with normal Lachman, normal pivot-shift, KT-1000 manual-maximum side-to-side difference < 3 mm, and fewer results with significant flexion loss. In contrast, HT grafts had a reduced incidence of patellofemoral crepitance, kneeling pain, and extension loss. The choice of graft by the patient and surgeon must be individualized, and the results of this meta-analysis can aid in the decision by clarifying the risks and benefits of each surgical approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.