RESUMEN
It is highly desirable to test agricultural emission mitigation strategies in a whole-farm environment to ensure that all aspects of management and production operations are included. However, the large spatial scale of commercial operations makes the dual measurements of control and treatment(s) difficult. We evaluated the application of two micrometeorological methods, a novel concentration ratio method and an inverse dispersion method, where both were used to measure methane (CH) emission reductions in cattle fed the compound 3-nitrooxypropanol compared with cattle fed just the basal diet. In total, there were 1344 cattle used that were located in six pens (â¼222 animals per pen). Three adjacent pens to the east and three to the west were designated as the treatment and control blocks, respectively. Underlying the emission reduction method was the assumption of site symmetry between the treatment and control pen blocks in the feedlot. There was, on average, a large CH emission reduction of â¼70% (±18%) due to the additive as found by both micrometeorological methods. Both methods also show a change in the diel distribution (peak emissions after initial morning feeding) and seasonal pattern (a decrease in emission reduction of 7.5 and 26.1% over 90 d). The simplicity of the developed concentration ratio method is expected to have applications for evaluating other mitigation strategies at large commercial scales (e.g., the application of manure additives to pens to reduce odors and ammonia emissions).
Asunto(s)
Metano , Carne Roja , Alimentación Animal , Animales , Bovinos , Dieta , Estiércol , PropanolesRESUMEN
Ammonia (NH) volatized from livestock manure is affiliated with ecosystem and human health concerns and decreased fertilizer value of manure and can also be an indirect source of greenhouse gas. Beef cattle feedlots, where thousands of cattle are grouped together to enable greater control of feed management and production, are hot spots in the agricultural landscape for NH emissions. Quantifying the feedlot NH emissions is a difficult task, partly due to the reactive nature of NH within and surrounding the feedlot. Our study used a dispersion model coupled to field measurements to derive NH emissions from a feedlot in southern Alberta, Canada. The average feedlot NH emission was 50 µg m s (85 g animal d), which coincides with a low dietary crude protein content. At a location 165 m east of the feedlot, a flux gradient (FG) technique measured an average NH deposition of 12.0 µg m s (west wind) and 5.3 µg m s (east wind). Ammonia FG emission averaged 1 µg m s with east winds, whereas no NH emission was found for west wind. Using soil-captured NH, there was a decrease in deposition with distance from the feedlot (50% over 200 m). Collectively, the results of this study provide insight into the dynamics of NH in the agricultural landscape and illustrate the need for NH mitigation to improve the environmental and economic sustainability of cattle feedlots.
Asunto(s)
Amoníaco/análisis , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Canadá , Bovinos , Estiércol , Carne RojaRESUMEN
Ammonia is the primary basic gas in the atmosphere and has the most important role in the neutralization of atmospheric acids generated by fossil fuel combustion. The reaction product forms a NH(4)(+) aerosol, which is a major component of atmospheric particulates. These NH(4)(+) particulates are part of atmospheric haze and may be transported long distances from the production site before returning to the surface by dry deposition or scavenged by precipitation. Animal production produces a significant component of anthropogenic NH(3) emissions and the National Academy of Sciences concluded that NH(3) emissions estimates from animal feeding operations have not been characterized sufficiently, leading the US Environmental Protection Agency to institute studies in the United States to obtain NH(3) emissions from animal feeding operations under the US Environmental Protection Agency Air Consent Agreement. The objective of this study is to obtain additional broiler NH(3) emissions estimates using a backward Lagrangian stochastic technique. This technique uses NH(3) concentrations measured upwind and downwind of the farm, wind observations, and atmospheric dispersion model calculations to obtain whole-farm emissions. Ammonia emissions were low at bird placement and increased steadily after about the third week of growth. At the end of the flock (47 d, ~297,000 birds), cumulative emissions for the flock cycle period were 0.016 kg of NH(3).bird(-1).flock(-1). Between-flock emissions, including bird harvest, cleanout, temporary storage of litter outside of the buildings, and downtime (buildings closed), added another 0.003 kg of NH(3).bird(-1).flock(-1). Emissions from this broiler farm were less than from some eastern US broiler farms but were comparable to broiler farms in Europe. Based on the results of this study and a similar winter study at this same farm, total flock wintertime and summertime (flock cycle plus between-flock) NH(3) emissions from this farm represented 7.8 and 8.3% of feed N as NH(3)-N, respectively, or an annual average of 8.1%.
Asunto(s)
Agricultura , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/química , Contaminación del Aire , Amoníaco/química , Pollos/fisiología , Animales , California , Estiércol , Modelos Teóricos , Estaciones del Año , Factores de Tiempo , VientoRESUMEN
Open cattle feedlots are a source of air pollutants that include particular matter (PM). Over 24 h, exposure to ambient concentrations of 50 microg m(-3) of the coarse-sized fraction PM (aerodynamic diameter <10 microm [PM(10)]) is recognized as a health concern for humans. The objective of our study was to document PM(10) concentration and emissions at two cattle feedlots in Australia over several days in summer. Two automated samplers were used to monitor the background and in-feedlot PM(10) concentrations. At the in-feedlot location, the PM(10) emission was calculated using a dispersion model. Our measurements revealed that the 24-h PM(10) concentrations on some of the days approached or exceeded the health criteria threshold of 50 microg m(-3) used in Australia. A key factor responsible for the generation of PM(10) was the increased activity of cattle in the evening that coincided with peak concentrations of PM(10) (maximum, 792 microg m(-3)) between 1930 and 2000 h. Rain coincided with a severe decline in PM(10) concentration and emission. A dispersion model used in our study estimated the emission of PM(10) between 31 and 60 g animal(-1) d(-1). These data contribute to needed information on PM(10) associated with livestock to develop results-based environmental policy.
Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos , Bovinos/fisiología , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Vivienda para Animales , Material Particulado , Animales , Australia , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo (Meteorología)RESUMEN
Accurate measurements of enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions from cattle (Bos taurus) are necessary to improve emission coefficients used in national emissions inventories, and to evaluate mitigation strategies. Our study was conducted to evaluate a novel approach that allowed near continuous CH(4) measurement from beef cattle confined in pens. The backward Lagrangian Stochastic (bLS) dispersion technique was used in conjunction with global position system (GPS) information from individual animals, to evaluate CH(4) emissions from pens of cattle. The dispersion technique was compared to estimates of CH(4) production using the SF(6) tracer technique. Sixty growing beef cattle were fed a diet containing 60% barley silage (dry matter basis) supplemented with either barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grain or corn (Zea mays L.) distillers dried grains. The results show that daily CH(4) emissions were about 7% lower for the dispersion technique than for the tracer technique (185 vs. 199 g CH(4) animal(-1) d(-1)). The precision of the dispersion technique, relative to the SF(6) tracer technique, expressed by the Pearson coefficient was 0.76; the relative accuracy given by the concordance coefficient was 0.69. The bLS dispersion technique was able to detect differences (P < 0.05) due to diet and has the added advantage of measuring the pattern of CH(4) production during the 24-h period, with emissions ranging from 161 to 279 g CH(4) animal(-1) d(-1). Configuring the cattle as point sources resulted in more accurate CH(4) emissions than assuming a uniform area release from the pen surface. The results indicate that the bLS dispersion technique using cattle as point sources can be used to accurately measure enteric CH(4) from cattle and to evaluate the impact of dietary mitigation strategies.
Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Bovinos/metabolismo , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Metano/análisis , Modelos Teóricos , Animales , Metano/metabolismoRESUMEN
Ammonia gas is the only significant basic gas that neutralizes atmospheric acid gases produced from combustion of fossil fuels. This reaction produces an aerosol that is a component of atmospheric haze, is implicated in nitrogen (N) deposition, and may be a potential human health hazard. Because of the potential impact of NH3 emissions, environmentally and economically, the objective of this study was to obtain representative and accurate NH3 emissions data from large dairy farms (>800 cows) in Wisconsin. Ammonia concentrations and climatic measurements were made on 3 dairy farms during winter, summer, and autumn to calculate emissions using an inverse-dispersion analysis technique. These study farms were confinement systems utilizing freestall housing with nearby sand separators and lagoons for waste management. Emissions were calculated from the whole farm including the barns and any waste management components (lagoons and sand separators), and from these components alone when possible. During winter, the lagoons' NH3 emissions were very low and not measurable. During autumn and summer, whole-farm emissions were significantly larger than during winter, with about two-thirds of the total emissions originating from the waste management systems. The mean whole-farm NH3 emissions in winter, autumn, and summer were 1.5, 7.5, and 13.7% of feed N inputs emitted as NH3-N, respectively. Average annual emission comparisons on a unit basis between the 3 farms were similar at 7.0, 7.5, and 8.4% of input feed N emitted as NH3-N, with an annual average for all 3 farms of 7.6 +/- 1.5%. These winter, summer, autumn, and average annual NH3 emissions are considerably smaller than currently used estimates for dairy farms, and smaller than emissions from other types of animal-feeding operations.
Asunto(s)
Amoníaco/análisis , Industria Lechera , Contaminantes Ambientales/análisis , Animales , Bovinos , Femenino , Vivienda para Animales , Estaciones del Año , Factores de Tiempo , Administración de Residuos , WisconsinRESUMEN
Livestock manure is a significant source of ammonia (NH3) emissions. In the atmosphere, NH3 is a precursor to the formation of fine aerosols that contribute to poor air quality associated with human health. Other environmental issues result when NH3 is deposited to land and water. Our study documented the quantity of NH3 emitted from a feedlot housing growing beef cattle. The study was conducted between June and October 2006 at a feedlot with a one-time capacity of 22,500 cattle located in southern Alberta, Canada. A backward Lagrangian stochastic (bLS) inverse-dispersion technique was used to calculate NH3 emissions, based on measurements of NH3 concentration (open-path laser) and wind (sonic anemometer) taken above the interior of the feedlot. There was an average of 3146 kg NH3 d(-1) lost from the entire feedlot, equivalent to 84 microg NH3 m(-2) s(-1) or 140 g NH3 head(-1) d(-1). The NH3 emissions correlated with sensible heat flux (r2 = 0.84) and to a lesser extent the wind speed (r2 = 0.56). There was also evidence that rain suppressed the NH3 emission. Quantifying NH3 emission and dispersion from farms is essential to show the impact of farm management on reducing NH3-related environmental issues.
Asunto(s)
Amoníaco/análisis , Amoníaco/metabolismo , Animales Domésticos/metabolismo , Modelos Biológicos , Amoníaco/química , Alimentación Animal , Animales , Bovinos , Nitrógeno/químicaRESUMEN
Estimates of enteric methane (CH4) emissions from ruminants are typically measured by confining animals in large chambers, using head hoods or masks, or by a ratiometric technique involving sampling respired air of the animal. These techniques are not appropriate to evaluate large-scale farm emissions and the variability between farms that may be partly attributed to different farm management. This study describes the application of an inverse-dispersion technique to calculate farm emissions in a controlled tracer-release experiment. Our study was conducted at a commercial dairy farm in southern Alberta, Canada (total of 321 cattle, including 152 lactating dairy cows). Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) and CH4 were released from 10 outlet locations (barn and open pens) using mass-flow controllers. A Lagrangian stochastic (LS) dispersion model was then used to infer farm emissions from downwind gas concentrations. Concentrations of SF6 and CH4 were measured by gas chromatography analysis and open path lasers, respectively. Wind statistics were measured with a three-dimensional sonic anemometer. Comparing the inferred emissions with the known release rate showed we recovered 86% of the released CH4 and 100% of the released SF6. The location of the concentration observations downwind of the farm was critically important to the success of this technique.