Predictive genetic markers in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a long way to go. Review of the literature.

The role of genetic molecular markers in neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer has been reviewed, focusing strictly on concurrent chemoradiation protocols followed by surgery. Eleven studies evaluated the role of mRNA expression profile; the end point was overall survival (OS) in two studies and different definitions of histological response in nine. Genes reported as significant were involved in cell cycle control (30), apoptosis (7), structural molecules (9), cell metabolism (6) and DNA repair (1). Seven studies reported about 15 microRNA (miRNA) molecules associated with OS (2) or histological response (13), however, defined with different classifications. Their target genes were prevalently involved in cell cycle control (4), apoptosis (1), cell adhesion (1), migration (1) and angiogenesis (1). Gene polymorphisms (single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) have been evaluated in 8 studies reporting 10 variants associated with survival or pathological response. OS was the end point in six of these studies. SNPs reported as significant were involved in DNA repair system (4), detoxification (2), folate metabolism (6), drug efflux (2) and others (2). In a study, a panel including histology, pathological response and five SNPs discriminated two subsets of patients with 5-year survival rates of 79.3% and 26.3% (hazard ratio 6.25, P<0.0001). In another study, combination of stage, grade and 4 miRNAs improved prediction of pathological response (P=10-30). At present, given the great inconsistency of the data and the variability of the end points, definite conclusions are extremely difficult, if not impossible. More consistent data can derive only from analyses obtained from patients included in prospective randomized trials while panels combining genetic and clinical factors may improve prediction.

Use of the ratio of time to progression following first- and second-line therapy to document the activity of the combination of oxaliplatin with 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that the activity of a second-line treatment regimen can be documented by showing that the time to progression (TTP) following second-line therapy is longer than the TTP following first-line therapy in the same patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ratio of TTP during first and second-line therapy, identified as the growth modulation index (GMI), was determined in 34 patients with advanced colorectal cancer. First-line chemotherapy consisted of one of several schedules of leucovorin (LV)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or raltitrexed. Second-line therapy consisted of the combination of LV-modulated 5-FU and oxaliplatin (1-OHP). Patients were switched to second-line therapy upon evidence of progressive disease following first-line therapy. RESULTS: Median TTP following first-line therapy was 13 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.6-18.7), while median TTP following second-line therapy was 31 weeks (95% CI: 21.3-41.0). Sixteen patients (47%; 95% CI: 35%-59%), showed a GMI > or = 1.33, while the remaining 18 patients (53%; 95% CI: 40%-66%) had a GMI < 1.33. Log-rank analysis of the Kaplan-Meier curves of TTP following first- versus second-line therapy demonstrated a statistically significant difference in favour of second-line therapy (P = 0.0081). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of the GMI as a tool for assessing the activity of novel second-line therapeutic programs.