Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Occup Environ Med ; 63(4): e184-e186, 2021 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33769403

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an empirical olfactory test to identify COVID-19 cases during a workplace entrance screening. METHOD: An active screening for olfactory dysfunction using water and vinegar was conducted in April to June 2020 among 4120 meat packing workers in Latin America. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the active olfactory screening examination were 41.2% and 85.3%, respectively, using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests as a gold standard. 10.6% of employees who tested positive for COVID-19 had an olfactory dysfunction as their only symptom. These individuals would not have been identified with standard workplace screening measures including temperature screening. CONCLUSION: Active screening for olfactory dysfunction may serve as a valuable tool to both identify potential COVID-19 infections and exclude those who do not have infection and should be a part of parallel algorithm combined with standard workplace entrance screening procedures.


Asunto(s)
Anosmia/diagnóstico , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Lugar de Trabajo , Ácido Acético , Anosmia/fisiopatología , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Industria para Empaquetado de Carne , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Agua
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...