Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Presse Med ; 26(14): 656-62, 1997 Apr 26.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9180880

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: All the central venous catheters (CVC) inserted at the Saint-Antoine Hospital between December 5, 1994 and June 6, 1995 were prospectively studied in order to better define practices in the management of CVC and to determine the rate of catheter-related infections. METHODS: The following data were recorded for each CVC: insertion procedure, clinical data, catheter dressings, removal, catheter-related infections, bacteriological findings. Catheter-related infections were distinguished from probably catheter-related infections and localized skin infections. RESULTS: Among 325 patients, a total of 414 catheters were inserted. At the end of the surveillance period, 350 (85%) had been removed, 43 (10%) were still in place and 21 (5%) were lost to follow-up. Analysis of procedures such as cutaneous disinfection, routine replacement of the i.v. sets or changes of dressings showed wide variations between care units and within the same unit. The overall incidence of catheter-related infections was 0.24 per 100 days of catheterization. Infections occurred 29 +/- 34 days after insertion. Microorganisms responsible for catheter-related bacteremia were mostly Gram positive (84%) and Gram negative (16%). Sixty-two infections (15%) were clinically suspected by physicians, leading to the catheter removal in 84% of cases. Out of the 43 CVC sent to the laboratory, 29 (67%) were negative (i.e., "sterile") in quantitative culture of the tips as described by Brun-Buisson, suggesting that the CVC was unnecessarily removed. Bacteriological analysis ordered by physicians were not always relevant. For example, 76% of CVC received by the laboratory were systematically sent although they were not suspected of infections. Conversely, only 61% of exsudate formation at the insertion site were collected and analyzed. CONCLUSION: This study was designed to recall good guidelines to the hospital staff. Results will lead to the development of a better use of antiseptics and to the implementation of appropriate and standardized procedures to reduce risk infection.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Bacteriemia/etiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paris , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...