Antisecretory effect of peptide YY through neural receptors in the rat jejunum in vitro.

Basal short circuit current (Isc) was measured in stripped rat jejunum after addition of neural antagonists and of peptide YY (PYY). Basal Isc was slightly (by 10-21%) but significantly inhibited by tetrodotoxin, hexamethonium, idazoxan, and the sigma antagonist BMY 14,802. PYY (10(-7) M) reduced basal Isc by approximately 54%. This inhibition was unchanged by hexamethonium but reduced by 44-68% in the presence of tetrodotoxin, idazoxan, haloperidol, BMY 14,802, and atropine. The Y2 agonist pYY(3-36) was more potent than the Y1 agonist (Leu31,Pro34)PYY. In conclusion, PYY reduces basal Isc in rat jejunum in part through a neural mechanism involving muscarinic receptors, alpha2 adrenoceptors, and sigma receptors and, in part, through a direct effect on enterocytes. The PYY effect seems mainly carried out through Y2-receptor activation.

Comparison of the postprandial release of peptide YY and proglucagon-derived peptides in the rat.

Endocrine L-cells of the distal intestine synthesize both peptide YY (PYY) and proglucagon-derived peptides (PGDPs), whose release has been reported to be either parallel or selective. Here we compare the release mechanisms of PYY, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and oxyntomodulin-like immunoreactivity (OLI) in vivo. Anaesthetized rats were intraduodenally (ID) given either a mixed semi-liquid meal or oleic acid, or they received oleic acid or short chain fatty acids (SCFA) intracolonically (IC). The ID meal released the three peptides with a similar time-course (peak at 30 min); ID oleic acid produced a progressive release of PYY and OLI, while GLP-1 release was less. IC oleic acid or SCFA released smaller (but significant) amounts of PYY but no OLI or GLP-1. Hexamethonium inhibited most of the response to the ID meal and ID oleic acid, but did not change the PYY response to IC oleic acid. NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME, a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor) inhibited meal-induced PYY release and left OLI and GLP-1 unaffected. BW10 (a gastrin-releasing peptide antagonist) had no effect on the meal-induced release of either peptide. These results suggest a parallel initial release of PYY, OLI and GLP-1 after the ID meal, or oleic acid, by an indirect mechanism triggered in the proximal bowel, using nicotinic synapses, and involving nitric oxide release for PYY and an unknown mediator for PGDPs. For PYY there is a later phase of peptide release, probably induced by direct contact between nutrients and colonic L-cells.

Inhibitory effects of peptide YY on basal and VIP-stimulated short-circuit current in the rat jejunum: influence of technical conditions on observed results.

The interaction of PYY and VIP was studied in stripped and intact rat jejunum preparations mounted in Ussing chambers. PYY decreased basal Isc in intact as well as in stripped jejunum. Stripping was necessary to evidence a stimulation of basal Isc by VIP. When PYY and VIP were administered at the same time in the serosal bath, their effects seemed additive; VIP stimulation took over when VIP was present in ten times larger amounts than PYY, while PYY inhibition predominated at isomolar concentrations (10(-7) M) of both peptides. However, when PYY was administered three to six minutes before isomolar amounts of VIP, the VIP stimulation developed without being notably hampered. At this time, however, the amount of radioimmunoassayable PYY in the serosal compartment represented still 60% of the added amount. In conclusion, the experimental conditions can significantly change the results: stripping the longitudinal muscle/myenteric plexus impairs the effect of PYY and VIP in a different fashion, while the timing and order of administration of the peptides may change the apparent interaction between VIP stimulation and PYY inhibition.

Mechanisms of peptide YY release induced by an intraduodenal meal in rats: neural regulation by proximal gut.

Peptide YY (PYY) release in anaesthetized rats was studied during the 2 h following the intraduodenal administration of a semi-liquid meal of 21 kJ. Surgical and pharmacological manipulations were performed in order to analyse the mechanisms of PYY release. Postprandial PYY release was suppressed or strongly decreased by caecocolonectomy, truncal vagotomy, tetrodotoxin, hexamethonium, sensory denervation by perivagal capsaicin, and by the NO-synthase inhibitor L-N-arginine methyl ester, while atropine, adrenergic blockers, antagonists of type-A or type-B cholecystokinin (CCK) receptors or bombesin receptors had no effect. Comparing the digestive transit of the semi-liquid meal with the amount of PYY contained in the small bowel wall showed that nutrients had not reached the area rich in cells containing PYY by 30 min, the time at which there was a large PYY release in plasma. By 120 min, the meal front had travelled 72% of the small intestine length, just beginning to reach the PYY-rich part of the ileum. We conclude that the main postprandial PYY release studied in this model comes from ileal and colonic L-cells indirectly stimulated through a neural mechanism originating in the proximal gut and involving sensory vagal fibres, nicotinic synapses and NO release, while CCK and bombesin do not seem to be physiologically involved.

Colonic fermentation and proximal gastric tone in humans.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Some carbohydrates escape small intestinal absorption, and their presence in the ileum can affect proximal gut motility. Carbohydrates reaching the colon can inhibit gastric and pancreatic secretions. The hypothesis of this study was that colonic fermentation products of carbohydrates (short-chain fatty acids [SCFAs]) affect proximal gut motility and especially gastric tone. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were studied after oral administration of 20 g lactulose (n = 6) and intracolonic infusions of 20 g lactose (n = 7) and SCFAs (54 mmol/180 mL and 90 mmol/180 mL, respectively). Gastric tone (electronic barostat) and H2 concentrations in exhaled air were simultaneously monitored, and peripheral intestinal peptide levels were measured by specific radioimmunoassays. RESULTS: After oral lactulose administration (but not after saline), a significant decrease in gastric tone was observed, which rapidly followed the increase in H2 concentrations. Gastric tone also decreased after intracolonic infusions of both lactose and SCFAs; the most marked effect occurred after the highest SCFA dose. No significant changes in the level of plasma oxyntomodulin-like immunoreactivity and glucagon-like peptide 1 were found, whereas the level of peptide YY increased significantly over time, but not differently after saline and test solutions. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic fermentation of undigestible carbohydrates can inhibit gastric tone, and SCFAs may be responsible for this colonic brake. The role of intestinal peptides, if any, was not identified.

[Antisecretory effects of YY peptide and neuropeptide Y at three levels of the small intestine in rats]. / Effets antisécrétoires du peptide YY et du neuropeptide Y à trois niveaux de l'intestin grêle chez le rat.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of peptide YY (PYY) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) on VIP- and PGE2-stimulated intestinal net water flux at three different levels of the small intestine (duodenum, jejunum, ileum), by a technique of in situ closed loops in anaesthetised rats. RESULTS: VIP-stimulated net water flux was efficiently inhibited by both peptides at all three intestinal levels studied; PYY (ID50 about 30 pmol/kg.h) was 3 to 18 fold more potent than NPY. PGE2-stimulated net water flux was also efficiently inhibited in the jejunum and ileum; PYY (ID50 about 10 pmol/kg.h) was 30 to 90 fold more potent than NPY. A 30% inhibition of PGE2-stimulated net water flux could only be achieved in the duodenum with the largest dose of either peptide used in this study. CONCLUSIONS: PYY and NPY display potent inhibitory effects of stimulated net water flux at the three studied levels of the small intestine, except in the PGE2-stimulated duodenum. The PYY ID50s measured suggest that PYY may have a physiological action in regulating small intestinal water flux in the rat.

Peptide YY release after intraduodenal, intraileal, and intracolonic administration of nutrients in rats.

Peptide YY (PYY) release was studied by measuring radioimmunoassayable PYY in the arterial plasma of anaesthetized rats receiving into the duodenum, ileum or colon either a complete semi-liquid meal (3ml, 21kJ) or elemental nutrients as isocaloric or isoosmolar solutions. PYY release induced by the intraduodenal meal peaked at 60min and lasted more than 120min. The integrated response of PYY over 120min was larger when the meal was administered into the duodenum than into the ileum. The undigested meal induced no release of PYY over a 120-min period when administered into the colon. When injected into the duodenum in isocaloric amounts to the meal, glucose and amino acids led to the release of as much PYY as did the meal, whereas oleic acid led to the release of less PYY. Part of these responses were due to osmolarity, since administration of intraduodenal hyperosmolar saline led to the release of about half as much PYY as did hyperosmolar glucose. In moderate amounts, and injected as a solution isoosmolar to plasma, oleic acid was a major PYY releaser; the amounts released were at least two times larger when oleic acid was administered into the duodenum than into the ileum and colon. Isoosmolar glucose and amino acids led to the release of no PYY when injected into the duodenum, but were nearly as active as oleic acid in the colon. Short-chain fatty acids induced the release of PYY when injected into the colon, but not into the ileum. Hexamethonium suppressed PYY release induced by the intraduodenal meal, but did not change PYY release induced by glucose or oleic acid in the colon. Urethane anaesthesia did not reduce PYY release induced by the intraduodenal meal. These results suggest that two mechanisms at least contribute to PYY release in the rat. An indirect, neural mechanism, involving nicotinic synapses, is prominent in the proximal small intestine; the stimulation is transmitted to ileal and colonic L-cells by undetermined pathways, but contact of nutrients with L-cells is not needed. Another mechanism, probably direct and quantitatively smaller, occurs in the distal intestine when nutrients come into contact with the mucosa containing L-cells. Glucose, fatty acids and amino acids stimulate differentially the proximal and distal mechanisms.

[Cephalic phase of gastric secretion in dogs. Effect of palatability and caloric intake]. / Phase céphalique de la sécrétion gastrique chez le chien. Influence de la palatabilité et de l'ingestion calorique.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the relative part of the cephalic phase in the gastric secretory and circulating gastrin responses to meals of variable composition and palatability in dogs. Meal palatability was quantified by measuring the ingestion rate of a fixed amount of food. By progressively increasing the amount of carbohydrates or lipids added to a normal meat meal, it was possible to obtain eleven meals of progressively decreasing ingestion rate. When were offered as sham-feeding these eleven meals in dogs fitted with a cervical esophagostomy and a gastric fistula, gastric acid response decreased only after meals of very small ingestion rates. Moreover, neither gastrin, nor gastric pepsin responses changed significantly with ingestion rate of the sham-fed meals. By subtracting the response to sham-fed meals from the response to real meals of identical composition, it was possible to calculate the non-cephalic part of gastric responses. The non-cephalic part of gastric acid secretion and of circulating gastrin was significantly correlated to calorie intake; the slope of the best fitting regression line was greater after lipid meals than after carbohydrate meals. The non-cephalic part of pepsin secretion was very small, if any, and its level was not correlated to the amount of ingested calories. This work suggests that palatability has very little influence on gastric secretion control in dogs.

Evidence for the interaction between antacid and gastric mucosa using an "artificial stomach" model including gastric mucosa.

In light of evidence that certain aluminum-based antacids adhere to the gastric mucosa, we modified our previously described "artificial stomach" (AS) model by including a piece of hog stomach and compared the antacid activity of six aluminum-containing antacid products in the model with and without gastric mucosa. The activity of three of these, Maalox, Riopan and Supralox, was not significantly different in the two systems. In contrast, the activity of the other three, Aludrox, Phosphalugel and Simeco, was significantly greater with mucosa. Antacid activity of one product from each set (Supralox, Phosphalugel) was evaluated in two in vivo methods in human volunteers. For both antacids, results in vivo were similar to those obtained with the AS-containing mucosa. Without mucosa, in vivo and in vitro results were dissimilar for Phosphalugel, thus validating the modified AS. The difference between the two sets of antacids can be explained by 1) the fact that the Al:Mg ratio in the set affected by mucosa is greater than that of unaffected antacids, and 2) a weaker antacid load than in unaffected Supralox. We suggest that in an acid milieu, aluminum ions in antacids like Aludrox, Phosphalugel and Simeco are bound to sialic acid residues in mucus glycoproteins, thus retarding the transit of these antacids through both the AS and the real stomach and prolonging their activity in both situations. When the Al:Mg ratio is low or when the amount of antacid salts is large, aluminum ions tend to be buried in complexes, giving them less chance to interact with gastric mucus, so they transit the stomach more quickly.