Clinical utility of the platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) for the assessment of the platelet status in patients with congestive heart failure (EPCOT trial).

BACKGROUND: Data from small studies have shown the presence of platelet abnormalities in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). We sought to characterize the diagnostic utility of platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) in the CHF population. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained for measurement of adenosine diphosphate (ADP)/collagen and epinephrine/collagen shear-induced closure time (CT), whole blood aggregation, platelet contractile force, activity of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa, and P-selectin receptors in 100 consecutive outpatients with CHF. RESULTS: Substantial interindividual variability of platelet characteristics exists in patients with CHF. There were no statistically significant differences when patients were divided by the incidence of vascular events, emergency revascularization needs, survival, or etiology of heart failure. Aspirin use did not affect instrument readings as well. CT correlates well with whole blood aggregometry (r(2)=.587) and less with GP IIb/IIIa activity (r(2)=.326). No correlation has been observed for the CT with the platelet-bound P-selectin (r(2)=.041) and platelet contractile force measures (r(2)=.028). CONCLUSIONS: PFA-100 is indeed capable to serve as a platelet analyzer and may be successfully used as a screening device. However, patients with heart failure enrolled in the EPCOT trial exhibited a marginal, sometimes oppositely directed changes in the platelet function, challenging the diagnostic utility of PFA-100 to serve as a useful tool for the identification of platelet abnormalities, predicting clinical outcomes, or for the monitoring of antiplatelet strategies in this population.

Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with congestive heart failure: diagnostic significance and clinical challenge.

Knowledge of the pathogenesis of congestive heart failure (CHF) has improved greatly in recent years. However, this disease continues to cause one of the highest morbidities and mortalities in the Western world. The pathophysiology of heart failure is complex and much of our understanding revolves strictly around the neurohormonal mechanisms involved. Various pharmacologic interventions have significantly improved morbidity and include ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, diuretics, and inotropic agents. Yet, no consensus has been reached regarding the use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents. It has been suggested that CHF is associated with altered hemostasis, but whether this prothrombotic state contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of the disease is unknown. The purpose of this review article is to discuss our current knowledge of platelet activation, thrombin generation, fibrinolysis, and endothelial dysfunction in CHF patients, and the potential role of anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet agents in preventing these hemostatic abnormalities.

Combining necrosis and platelet markers for perfecting myocardial infarction rule out: how close are we?

Each year, at least 5 million patients in the United States present to hospital emergency departments with the complaint of chest pain, and more than 10% of them will be diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction. One of the foremost tasks of the emergency department physician is to avoid unnecessary admissions and concomitantly to minimize the number of patients discharged home inappropriately. Currently available diagnostic tools, including the electrocardiogram and myocardial markers, have several shortcomings, including low specificity, and delayed sensitivity for the timely detection of myocardial necrosis. Therefore, the search for better methods of rapidly identifying patients with unstable coronary syndromes is one of the utmost priorities of modern emergency medicine. Available biochemical diagnostic tools are discussed in this review, focusing on the potential benefits of combining myocardial necrosis markers with indicators of platelet activation. It is hypothesized that such a combined approach may be more powerful in myocardial infarction risk stratification than separate marker determination.

Failure of thrombin generation markers to triage patients presenting with chest pain.

Thrombin generation (TG) is an important pathogenic factor in acute coronary syndromes including acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Since the diagnostic utility of TG remains uncertain we sought to determine whether markers of TG may triage patients presenting to the Emergency Department with chest pain. Soluble plasma levels of prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F(1+2)), and thrombin/antithrombin III complexes (TAT) were determined by ELISA in 80 patients presenting with chest pain to the Emergency Department and compared with 20 controls. There were no differences in TG markers between patients with non-cardiac chest pain and healthy controls. Patients with unstable angina (UA), and congestive heart failure (CHF) did not differ from controls with respect to F(1+2), and TAT was elevated in UA patients (6.05 +/- 1.15 ng/ml, p = 0.033) when compared with controls (3.34 +/- 0.20 ng/ml). Contrary to expectations, TAT levels at presentation with AMI were well below the concentrations observed in patiens with UA and CHF. Moreover, plasma F(1+2) levels were significantly lower than in healthy controls (0.84 +/- 0.10 ng/ml versus 1.22 +/- 0.11, p = 0.026). At the time of presentation to the Emergency Department, F(1+2) and TAT failed to suitably triage patients with chest pain. The surprisingly low levels of TG markers in AMI patients before applying intensive therapy and reperfusion strategies deserves further investigation.