Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Epilepsia Open ; 9(4): 1458-1466, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38813985

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: GABAA receptor subunit mutations pose a significant risk for genetic generalized epilepsy; however, there are over 150 identified variants, many with unknown or unvalidated pathogenicity. We aimed to develop in vivo models for testing GABAA receptor variants using the model organism, Caenorhabditis elegans. METHODS: CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing was used to create a complete deletion of unc-49, a C. elegans GABAA receptor, and to create homozygous epilepsy-associated mutations in the endogenous unc-49 gene. The unc-49 deletion strain was rescued with transgenes for either the C. elegans unc-49B subunit or the α1, ß3, and γ2 subunits for the human GABAA receptor. All newly created strains were analyzed for phenotype and compared against existing unc-49 mutations. RESULTS: Nematodes with a full genetic deletion of the entire unc-49 locus were compared with existing unc-49 mutations in three separate phenotypic assays-coordinated locomotion, shrinker frequency and seizure-like convulsions. The full unc-49 deletion exhibited reduced locomotion and increased shrinker frequency and PTZ-induced convulsions, but were not found to be phenotypically stronger than existing unc-49 mutations. Rescue with the unc-49B subunit or creation of humanized worms for the GABAA receptor both showed partial phenotypic rescue for all three phenotypes investigated. Finally, two epilepsy-associated variants were analyzed and deemed to be loss of function, thus validating their pathogenicity. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings establish C. elegans as a genetic model to investigate GABAA receptor mutations and delineate a platform for validating associated variants in any epilepsy-associated gene. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Epilepsy is a complex human disease that can be caused by mutations in specific genes. Many possible mutations have been identified, but it is unknown for most of them whether they cause the disease. We tested the role of mutations in one specific gene using a small microscopic worm as an animal model. Our results establish this worm as a model for epilepsy and confirm that the two unknown mutations are likely to cause the disease.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Caenorhabditis elegans , Caenorhabditis elegans , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Epilepsia , Mutación , Receptores de GABA-A , Animales , Caenorhabditis elegans/genética , Receptores de GABA-A/genética , Epilepsia/genética , Proteínas de Caenorhabditis elegans/genética , Fenotipo , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas , Edición Génica , Locomoción
2.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1031: 233-247, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29214576

RESUMEN

Eighty percent of drugs that enter human clinical testing are never approved for use. This means that for every five drugs that make it into the clinic, there are four that failed to show effectiveness for treating the disease or condition the drug was designed to treat.This high failure rate means there are many existing, partially developed therapeutic candidates with known pharmacology, formulation, and potential toxicity. Finding new uses for existing experimental drugs or biologics "repositioning" builds upon previous research and development efforts, so new candidate therapies can be advanced to clinical trials for a new use more quickly than starting from scratch.Federal funding initiatives in the U.S. and UK started to support pre-clinical /or early stage trials for repositioning existing experimental drugs or biologics (therapies). This chapter covers some of the process issues that have been solved and the remaining challenges that are still in need of solutions. The chapter is primarily written from a U.S. federal funding perspective. The general concepts could be applied more globally to benefit rare and neglected disease populations. The drug development and process bottlenecks are the same for both rare and common disease.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Reposicionamiento de Medicamentos/métodos , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado , Producción de Medicamentos sin Interés Comercial , Enfermedades Raras/tratamiento farmacológico , Proyectos de Investigación , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/economía , Reposicionamiento de Medicamentos/economía , Humanos , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado/economía , Producción de Medicamentos sin Interés Comercial/economía , Seguridad del Paciente , Asociación entre el Sector Público-Privado , Enfermedades Raras/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Raras/economía , Enfermedades Raras/epidemiología , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA