RESUMEN
Introduction Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) rely on endometrial receptivity (ER) for successful embryo implantation. This study aimed to compare the impact of different progesterone administration routes on ER assessed using optimal time for endometrial receptivity analysis (OpERA) and clinical outcomes in ART cycles. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 281 infertile women who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). Patients were stratified based on progesterone administration routes: oral and vaginal progesterone (Group 1) vs. intramuscular progesterone (Group 2). OpERA was performed on 257 patients to assess ER. Clinical outcomes, including biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR), and abortion rate (AR), were compared between the groups. Results OpERA results showed no significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 in receptive (51.2% vs. 52.0%, p = 0.857), pre-receptive (44.1% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.933), or post-receptive (4.7% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.496) states. Clinical outcomes, including BPR (59.9% vs. 60.9%, p = 0.903), CPR (50.0% vs. 56.5%, p = 0.463), IR (52.5% vs. 55.3%, p = 0.748), and AR (44.3% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.882), did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion Progesterone administration routes did not significantly affect ER or clinical outcomes, highlighting the need to prioritize understanding and enhancing ER instead of solely focusing on progesterone delivery methods. Identifying molecular pathways or biomarkers could improve receptivity and optimize ART, ultimately improving pregnancy outcomes.
RESUMEN
Background Infertility remains a significant global challenge, and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) poses a considerable concern in assisted reproductive technology. Understanding the factors contributing to implantation failure is essential for developing accurate diagnostic tools and treatment strategies. Endometrial receptivity (ER) during the window of implantation is crucial for successful embryo implantation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures. Molecular-based endometrial receptivity analysis and next-generation sequencing provide insights into ER, but there is a lack of research on these in the Indian population, particularly in patients with RIF. This retrospective cohort study evaluates the effectiveness of Optimal Timing for Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (OpERA)-guided personalized embryo transfer (pET) in Indian patients with a history of RIF. Methodology The study includes 158 female patients with a history of failed embryo transfers who underwent OpERA testing before frozen embryo transfer. Patients were categorized based on the number of previous failed transfers. OpERA outcomes were assessed, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with and without OpERA. Endometrial preparation involved hormone replacement therapy, and OpERA testing was performed at the Neuberg Centre for Genomic Medicine using RNA extraction, cDNA conversion, and sequencing. Results OpERA outcomes showed no significant differences in receptive rates among patient groups. Group 3, with three or more failed transfers, exhibited significantly higher biochemical pregnancy rates (BPRs), clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs), and abortion rates (ARs) compared to Groups 1 and 2. OpERA with PGT-A showed significantly higher BPR, implantation rate, CPR, and lower AR compared to OpERA without PGT-A. Conclusions OpERA-guided pET, especially with PGT-A, demonstrated improved pregnancy outcomes, particularly in patients with a history of RIF. The study emphasizes the importance of OpERA in determining optimal transfer timing, moving beyond the traditional reliance on embryo quality alone. OpERA presents promise in predicting pregnancy outcomes for Indian patients with previous IVF failures. The integration of OpERA and PGT-A represents a significant advancement in personalized reproductive medicine, offering new hope for individuals grappling with infertility complexities.
RESUMEN
The full-length sequence of HLA-DRB1*15:68 and HLA-DRB1*16:10:01 identified in solid organ donors.
