Potential role of FDG PET/CT in evaluating patients with hepatic incidentalomas.

This review article is focused on the role of FDG PET/CT in diagnosing and characterizing hepatic incidentalomas. A large variety of unsuspected lesions can be detected in the liver both with ultrasound and CT performed for other reasons; the prevalence of liver incidentalomas increases in patients with chronic liver disease or preexisting oncologic history. The major challenge is to discriminate benign from malignant lesions. There is a large body of literature indicating that FDG PET/CT is a useful tool to this purpose even if it is unspecific (ie, it cannot differentiate a primary tumor from a secondary lesion). Occasionally, FDG PET/CT can be useful for biopsy guidance.

Additional value of FDG-PET/CT in management of "solitary" liver metastases: preliminary results of a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The most common malignancy affecting the liver is metastasis from a wide variety of tumors, particularly those of gastrointestinal origin. Successful surgical removal of a solitary liver metastasis may significantly extend survival and optimal preoperative assessment in this regard is a mandatory prerequisite for proper patient selection. The addition of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to other more conventional imaging procedures (e.g., ultrasound (US), CT, and magnetic resonance) has the potential to greatly improve the selection process by the combination of high-resolution anatomy afforded by CT directly combined with the functional scintigraphic map of intra- and extrahepatic lesions depicted by 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG)-PET. In this study, we assess the additional value of PET/CT in the management strategy of patients with solitary liver metastasis from colorectal and other cancers identified by conventional imaging methods. METHODS: We evaluated 43 consecutive patients (17 males, 26 females, mean age 53 +/- 6 years) with known solitary liver metastasis. This sample consisted of 18 patients with colorectal cancer, 15 with nonsmall cell lung cancer, six with breast carcinoma, and four ovarian cancers. In addition to contrast-enhanced CT and US, all patients were studied with FDG-PET/CT before surgery. PET/CT was performed within 3 weeks of the initial diagnosis and the scans were read by two experienced radiologists/nuclear medicine specialists blinded to the clinical data. A final diagnosis was obtained at surgery in 31 patients, by fine needle biopsy in five, and long-term clinical, biochemical, and follow-up imaging in seven patients. RESULTS: In 12 out of 43 patients (28%), PET/CT resulted in restaging disease and a change in therapy. Twenty-two of 31 patients with confirmed solitary liver lesions (71%) were disease-free, eight of 31 (26%) developed a new recurrence, and one of 31 (3%) died from disease progression over a 17 +/- 6-month follow-up interval. Nine of 12 patients (75%) with multiple metastases demonstrated by FDG-PET/CT were alive with disease and three of 12 (25%) deceased due to disease progression (p < 0.01) over a 17 +/- 6-month follow-up interval. CONCLUSION: The addition of FDG-PET/CT to the routine assessment of patients with liver metastasis has a significant impact on disease staging and selection of suitable candidates for solitary liver metastasis resection and outcome.

The role of dual-time combined 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the staging and restaging workup of locally advanced rectal cancer, treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy and radical surgery.

PURPOSE: In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) staging and, after preoperative chemo-radiation therapy (CRT), restaging workup could be useful to tailor therapeutic approaches. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([(18)F]FDG-PET) is a promising tool for monitoring the effect of antitumor therapy. This study was aimed to evaluate the possible role of dual time sequential FDG-PET scans in the staging and restaging workup of LARC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty-seven consecutive patients with LARC were enrolled. CRT consisted of external-beam intensified radiotherapy (concurrent boost), with concomitant chemotherapy PVI 5-FU (300 mg/m(2)/day) followed 8-10 weeks later by surgery. All patients underwent [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT before and 5-6 weeks later after the completion of CRT. Measurements of FDG uptake (SUV(max)), and percentage of SUV(max) difference (Response Index = RI) between pre- and post-CRT [(18)F]FDG-PET scans were evaluated. RESULTS: Six of 87 patients were excluded due to protocol deviation. Following CRT, 40/81 patients (49%) were classified as responders according to Mandard's criteria (TRG1-2). The mean pre-CRT SUV(max) was significantly higher than post-CRT (15.8, vs 5.9; p < 0.001). The mean RI was significantly higher in responders than in nonresponder patients (71.3% vs 38%; p = 0.0038). Using a RI cut-off of 65% for defining response to therapy, the following parameters have been obtained: 84.5% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 81.4% positive predictive value, 84.2% negative predictive value, and 81% overall accuracy. CONCLUSION: These results suggest the potential role of [(18)F]FDG-PET in the restaging workup after preoperative CRT in LARC. RI seems the best predictor to identify CRT response.

Sequential FDG-PET/CT reliably predicts response of locally advanced rectal cancer to neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Prediction of rectal cancer response to preoperative, neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy (CRT) provides the opportunity to identify patients in whom a major response is expected and who may therefore benefit from alternative surgical approaches. Traditional morphological imaging techniques are effective in defining tumour extension in the initial diagnostic and staging work-up, but perform poorly in distinguishing residual neoplastic tissue from scarring post CRT, when restaging the patient before surgery. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a promising tool for monitoring the effect of anti-tumour therapy. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the value of sequential FDG-PET scans in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer to neo-adjuvant CRT. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with locally advanced (cT3-4) primary rectal cancer and four patients with pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer were enrolled in this prospective study. Treatment consisted of external beam intensified radiotherapy (50 Gy to the posterior pelvis, 56 Gy to the tumour), chemotherapy (in most cases PVI 5-FU at 300 mg/m(2) per day) and, 8-10 weeks later, surgery with curative intent. All patients underwent FDG-PET/CT both before CRT and 5-6 weeks after completing CRT. One patient died before surgery because of acute myocardial infarction, and was therefore excluded from further analysis. Semi-quantitative measurements of FDG uptake (SUV(max)), absolute difference (DeltaSUV(max)) and percent SUV(max) difference (Response Index, RI) between pre- and post-CRT PET scans were considered. Results were correlated with pathological response, assessed both by histopathological staging of the surgical specimens (pTNM) and by the tumour regression grade (TRG) according to Mandard's criteria (patients with TRG1-2 being defined as responders and patients with TRG3-5 as non-responders). RESULTS: Following neo-adjuvant CRT, of the 45 patients submitted to surgery, 23 (51.1%) were classified as responders according to Mandard's criteria (8 TRG1 and 15 TRG2), while the remaining 22 (48.9%) were non-responders (9 TRG3 and 13 TRG4-5). Considering all patients, the mean pre-CRT SUV(max) was 15.6, significantly higher than the mean value of 5.4 post CRT (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, when stratifying patients according to response to CRT (using Mandard's criteria), the mean RI was significantly higher in responders than in non-responders (75.9% versus 46.9%,p = 0.0015). Using a 66.2% SUV(max) decrease as the cut-off value (identified by ROC analysis) for defining response to therapy, the following parameters were obtained: 79.2% specificity, 81.2% sensitivity, 77% positive predictive value, 89% negative predictive value and 80% overall accuracy. CONCLUSION: The results suggest the potential utility of FDG-PET as a complementary diagnostic and prognostic procedure in the assessment of neo-adjuvant CRT response of locally advanced rectal cancer. DeltaSUV(max) and RI seem the best predictors of CRT response.