RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) has developed a grading system for emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions. We sought to validate the AAST EGS grades for patients undergoing urgent/emergent colorectal resection. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the "Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multicenter Colorectal Resection in EGS-to anastomose or not to anastomose" study undergoing urgent/emergent surgery for obstruction, ischemia, or diverticulitis were included. Baseline demographics, comorbidity severity as defined by Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), procedure type, and AAST grade were prospectively collected. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS) in-hospital mortality, and surgical complications (superficial/deep/organ-space surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, stoma complication, fascial dehiscence, and need for further intervention). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to describe outcomes and risk factors for surgical complication or mortality. RESULTS: There were 367 patients, with a mean (± SD) age of 62 ± 15 years. 39% were women. The median interquartile range (IQR) CCI was 4 (2-6). Overall, the pathologies encompassed the following AAST EGS grades: I (17, 5%), II (54, 15%), III (115, 31%), IV (95, 26%), and V (86, 23%). Management included laparoscopic (24, 7%), open (319, 87%), and laparoscopy converted to laparotomy (24, 6%). Higher AAST grade was associated with laparotomy (P = .01). The median LOS was 13 days (8-22). At least 1 surgical complication occurred in 33% of patients and the mortality rate was 14%. Development of at least 1 surgical complication, need for unplanned intervention, mortality, and increased LOS were associated with increasing AAST severity grade. On multivariable analysis, factors predictive of in-hospital mortality included AAST organ grade, CCI, and preoperative vasopressor use (odds ratio (OR) 1.9, 1.6, 3.1, respectively). The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma emergency general surgery grade was also associated with the development of at least 1 surgical complication (OR 2.5), while CCI, preoperative vasopressor use, respiratory failure, and pneumoperitoneum were not. CONCLUSION: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma emergency general surgery grading systems display construct validity for mortality and surgical complications after urgent/emergent colorectal resection. These results support incorporation of AAST EGS grades for quality benchmarking and surgical outcomes research.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Cirugía General , Laparoscopía , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Female patients with pelvic/adnexal masses often undergo gynecologic operations due to presumed ovarian origin. The diagnosis of an appendiceal tumor is often only made postoperatively after suboptimal cytoreduction has been performed. We hypothesized that an index gynecological procedure increases the morbidity of definitive cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) in patients with appendiceal mucinous tumors. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed to identify female patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal tumors from 2012 to 2020. RESULTS: During the 8-year period, CRS/HIPEC was performed in 36 female patients with appendiceal mucinous tumors. Eighteen patients (50.0%) had received a prior pelvic operation by gynecologists (PPO Group) for presumed ovarian origin before referral for definitive CRS/HIPEC. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was higher in the PPO group (21 vs. 9, p = 0.04). The median number of days from gynecologic procedure to definitive CRS/HIPEC was 169 days. Compared to patients who did not undergo a prior gynecologic operation, those in the PPO group had higher intraoperative blood loss (650 vs 100 mL, p < 0.01) during CRS/HIPEC as well as longer length of stay (12 vs 8 days, p = 0.02) and higher overall morbidity (72.3% vs 33.3%, p = 0.02). After controlling for PCI, prior gynecologic operation increased risk of 30-day morbidity after definitive CRS/HIPEC (OR 11.6, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A multi-disciplinary approach is needed for the primary evaluation of patients with pelvic masses of undetermined origin. A gynecological resection is associated with increased morbidity during definitive cytoreduction and HIPEC for appendiceal mucinous tumors.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/terapia , Apendicectomía/métodos , Neoplasias del Apéndice/terapia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias del Apéndice/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Ciego/cirugía , Errores Diagnósticos , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/métodos , Íleon/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Salpingooforectomía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Elucidating how robotic skills are best obtained will enable surgeons to best develop future robotic training programs. We perform a randomized controlled trial to assess the performance of robotic compared to laparoscopic surgery, transference of pre-existing skills between the two modalities, and to assess the learning curve between the two using novice medical students. METHODS: Forty students were randomized into either Group A or B. Students practiced and were tested on a peg transfer task in either a laparoscopic simulator (LS) and robotic simulator (RS) in a pre-defined order. Performance, transference of skills and learning curve were assessed for each modality. Additionally, a fatigue questionnaire was issued. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between overall laparoscopic scores (219 ± 19) and robotic scores (227 ± 23) (p = 0.065). Prior laparoscopic skills performed significantly better on robotic testing (236 ± 12) than without laparoscopic skills (216 ± 28) (p = 0.008). There was no significant difference in scores between students with prior robotic skills (223 ± 16) than without robotic skills (215 ± 22) (p = 0.162). Students reported no difference in fatigue between RS and LS. The learning curve plateaus at similar times between both modalities. CONCLUSION: Novice medical students with laparoscopic skills performed better on a RS test than students without laparoscopic training, suggesting a transference of skills from laparoscopic to robotic surgery. These results suggest laparoscopic training may be sufficient in general surgery residencies as the skills transfer to robotic if used post-residency.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Entrenamiento Simulado , Competencia Clínica , Simulación por Computador , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The US News & World Report (USNWR) annual ranking of the best hospitals for gastroenterology and gastrointestinal surgery offers direction to patients and healthcare providers, especially for recommendations on complex medical and surgical gastrointestinal (GI) conditions. The objective of this study was to examine the outcomes of complex GI cancer resections performed at USNWR top-ranked, compared to non-ranked, hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: Using the Vizient database, data for patients who underwent esophagectomy, gastrectomy, and pancreatectomy for malignancy between January and December 2018 were reviewed. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed according to USNWR rank status. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes include length of stay, mortality index (observed-to-expected mortality ratio), rate of serious complication, and cost. Secondary analysis was performed for outcomes of patients who developed serious complications. RESULTS: There were 3,054 complex GI cancer resections performed at 42 top-ranked hospitals vs 3,608 resections performed at 198 non-ranked hospitals. The mean annual case volume was 73 cases at top-ranked hospitals compared to 18 cases at non-ranked hospitals. Compared with non-ranked hospitals, top-ranked hospitals had lower in-hospital mortality (0.96% vs 2.26%, respectively, p < 0.001) and lower mortality index (0.71 vs 1.53, respectively). There were no significant differences in length of stay, rate of serious complications, or direct cost between groups. In patients who developed serious morbidity, top-ranked hospitals had a lower mortality compared with non-ranked hospitals (8.2% vs 16.8%, respectively, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of complex GI cancer resection, USNWR top-ranked hospitals performed a 4-fold higher case volume and were associated with improved outcomes. Patients with complex GI-related malignancies may benefit from seeking surgical care at high-volume regional USNWR top-ranked hospitals.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía , Gastrectomía , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos Directos de Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Esofagectomía/economía , Esofagectomía/mortalidad , Esofagectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/economía , Gastrectomía/mortalidad , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales/normas , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/normas , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatectomía/economía , Pancreatectomía/mortalidad , Pancreatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient-related risk factors for the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) include age ≥ 60-years, congestive heart failure, hypoalbuminemia and smoking. The effect of obesity is unclear and has not been shown to independently increase the likelihood of PPCs in trauma patients undergoing trauma laparotomy. We hypothesized the likelihood of mortality and PPCs would increase as body mass index (BMI) increases in trauma patients undergoing trauma laparotomy. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) was queried to identify trauma patients ≥ 18-years-old undergoing trauma laparotomy within 6-h of presentation. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the likelihood of PPCs and mortality when stratified by BMI. RESULTS: From 8,330 patients, 2,810 (33.7%) were overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2), 1444 (17.3%) obese (30-34.9 kg/m2), 580 (7.0%) severely obese (35-39.9 kg/m2), and 401 (4.8%) morbidly obese (≥ 40 kg/m2). After adjusting for covariates including age, injury severity score, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking, and rib/lung injury, the likelihood of PPCs increased with increasing BMI: overweight (OR = 1.37, CI 1.07-1.74, p = 0.012), obese (OR = 1.44, CI 1.08-1.92, p = 0.014), severely obese (OR = 2.20, CI 1.55-3.14, p < 0.001), morbidly obese (OR = 2.42, CI 1.67-3.51, p < 0.001), compared to those with normal BMI. In addition, the adjusted likelihood of mortality increased for the morbidly obese (OR = 2.60, CI 1.78-3.80, p < 0.001) compared to those with normal BMI. CONCLUSION: Obese trauma patients undergoing emergent trauma laparotomy have a high likelihood for both PPCs and mortality, with morbidly obese trauma patients having the highest likelihood for both. This suggests obesity should be accounted for in risk prediction models of trauma patients undergoing laparotomy.
Asunto(s)
Laparotomía , Obesidad Mórbida , Adolescente , Índice de Masa Corporal , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Female representation in surgery and surgical subspecialties has increased over the last decade. Studies have shown a discrepancy in compensation in the field of surgery, and several groups have advocated for increasing transparency as a primary solution to decrease this gender salary gap in surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in compensation between genders in surgical specialties within a large academic healthcare system. METHODS: Using a public compensation database from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, this retrospective observational study analyzed salaries of full-time faculty surgeons within a large multi-institutional academic healthcare system. Surgeons included those who were employed for the entirety of 2016 and were full-time faculty who were then stratified according to surgical specialty and rank. The median base and median total salaries were compared between male and female surgeons with adjustment for rank and surgical specialty. RESULTS: There were 170 surgeons from eight surgical subspecialties included in the study with 29% being female (n = 50). Overall, unadjusted and adjusted median total salaries were significantly lower for female compared to male surgeons by $121,578 and $45,904, respectively. The three subspecialties with the highest compensation had a median total salary of $558,998 and had a high male to female ratio (3.7 male to 1 female), whereas the three subspecialties with the lowest compensation had a median total salary of $376,174 and had a male to female ratio of 1.5 male to 1 female. CONCLUSIONS: In a large academic healthcare system with transparent and publicly accessible salaries, the gender compensation gap in surgery persists. In conjunction with transparency, future academic institutions should consider a value-based, objective compensation plan with personal and systemic introspection of traditional gender biases, in efforts to circumvent the impact of gender on salary.
Asunto(s)
Especialidades Quirúrgicas , Cirujanos , Atención a la Salud , Docentes Médicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Salarios y Beneficios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer remains controversial. Our objective was to compare outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) vs. open total gastrectomy (OTG) for gastric adenocarcinoma using a national cancer database. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2010-2014) was analyzed for total gastrectomy cases performed for gastric adenocarcinoma. Patient demographics and surgical outcomes were stratified by stage and compared based on laparoscopic vs. open surgical approach. Primary outcome measures included 30-day and 90-day mortality and Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate long-term survival. RESULTS: There were 2584 cases analyzed, including 592 (22.9%) stage I, 710 (27.5%) stage II, and 1282 (49.6%) stage III cases. The distribution of LTG vs. OTG cases was 156 (26.4%) vs. 436 (73.6%) for stage I, 163 (23.0%) vs. 547 (77.0%) for stage II, and 241 (18.8%) vs. 1041 (81.2%) for stage III. For all stages analyzed, there was no difference between laparoscopic vs. open approach for adjusted 30-day mortality (stage I: adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.52, p = 0.75; stage II: AOR 1.36, p > 0.99; stage III: AOR 0.46, p = 0.29) or 90-day mortality (stage I: AOR 0.46, p = 0.99; stage II: AOR 1.17, p = 0.99; stage III: 0.57, p = 0.29). There was no difference between LTG vs. OTG 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated survival curves for any stage (stage I: p = 0.20; stage II: p = 0.83; stage III: p = 0.46). When compared to OTG, LTG had a similar hazard ratio (HR) for mortality (HR 0.89 p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy and OTG have comparable 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and long-term survival.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Gastrectomía , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Anciano , Femenino , Gastrectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Laparoscopía/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Small case series have suggested that selective nonoperative management (NOM) of penetrating internal jugular vein (IJV) injuries is safe and feasible in select patients lacking "hard signs" mandating exploration. Therefore, we sought to compare NOM to operative management (OM) of penetrating IJV injury, hypothesizing that both strategies have similar patient outcomes and mortality when patients are appropriately selected. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2013-2016) was queried for patients with penetrating IJV injury with an abbreviated injury scale score of the neck ≥3. Demographics and patient outcomes were compared between patients undergoing NOM and patients undergoing OM, followed by a multivariable logistic regression model to analyze the risk of mortality. RESULTS: A penetrating IJV injury was identified in 188 (0.01%) patients meeting inclusion criteria, and OM was performed in 124 (66.0%) patients, whereas 64 (34.0%) patients underwent NOM. Although the OM group had a higher rate of pneumothorax (8.9% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.01), there was no difference in any other concomitant injuries or demographic data (all P > 0.05). The OM group had a higher rate of ventilator days (3 vs. 2 days, P = 0.01) but no other significant differences in morbidity or mortality (P > 0.05). After controlling for covariates, OM was associated with similar risk of mortality compared with NOM of patients with penetrating IJV injury (odds ratio 1.05, confidence interval 0.23-4.83, P = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The NOM of penetrating IJV injuries is associated with similar risk of morbidity and mortality compared with OM, suggesting that NOM may be used in appropriately selected patients. Future research is needed to determine the ideal patients suited for NOM and to identify risk factors and outcomes associated with failure of NOM.
Asunto(s)
Venas Yugulares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapia , Heridas Penetrantes/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Venas Yugulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Yugulares/lesiones , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidad , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas Penetrantes/mortalidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Evidence comparing stoma creation (STM) versus anastomosis after urgent or emergent colorectal resection is limited. This study examined outcomes after colorectal resection in emergency general surgery patients. METHODS: This was an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma-sponsored prospective observational multicenter study of patients undergoing urgent/emergent colorectal resection. Twenty-one centers enrolled patients for 11 months. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were recorded. χ, Mann-Whitney U test, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to describe outcomes and risk factors for surgical complication/mortality. RESULTS: A total of 439 patients were enrolled (ANST, 184; STM, 255). The median (interquartile range) age was 62 (53-71) years, and the median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 4 (1-6). The most common indication for surgery was diverticulitis (28%). Stoma group was older (64 vs. 58 years, p < 0.001), had a higher CCI, and were more likely to be immunosuppressed. Preoperatively, STM patients were more likely to be intubated (57 vs. 15, p < 0.001), on vasopressors (61 vs. 13, p < 0.001), have pneumoperitoneum (131 vs. 41, p < 0.001) or fecal contamination (114 vs. 33, p < 0.001), and had a higher incidence of elevated lactate (149 vs. 67, p < 0.001). Overall mortality was 13%, which was higher in STM patients (18% vs. 8%, p = 0.02). Surgical complications were more common in STM patients (35% vs. 25%, p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis, management with an open abdomen, intraoperative blood transfusion, and larger hospital size were associated with development of a surgical complication, while CCI, preoperative vasopressor use, steroid use, open abdomen, and intraoperative blood transfusion were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: This study highlights a tendency to perform fecal diversion in patients who are acutely ill at presentation. There is a higher morbidity and mortality rate in STM patients. Independent predictors of mortality include CCI, preoperative vasopressor use, steroid use, open abdomen, and intraoperative blood transfusion. Following adjustment by clinical factors, method of colon management was not associated with surgical complications or mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/métodos , Cirugía Colorrectal/educación , Diverticulitis del Colon/cirugía , Cirugía General/educación , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Colectomía/educación , Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Studies demonstrate a significant variation in decision-making regarding withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) practices for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We investigated risk factors associated with WLST in severe TBI. We hypothesized age ≥65 years would be an independent risk factor. In addition, we compared survivors with patients who died in hospital after WLST to identify potential factors associated with in-hospital mortality. The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) was queried for patients with severe TBI of the head. Patients were compared by age (age < 65 and age ≥ 65 years) and survival after WLST (survivors versus non-survivors) at hospitalization discharge. A multivariable logistic regression model was used for analysis. From 1,403,466 trauma admissions, 328,588 (23.4%) patients had severe TBI. Age ≥ 65 years was associated with increased WLST (odds ratio: 1.76, confidence interval: 1.59-1.94, P < 0.001), whereas nonwhite race was associated with decreased WLST (odds ratio: 0.60, confidence interval: 0.55-0.65, P < 0.001). Compared with non-survivors of WLST, survivors were older (74 vs 61 years, P < 0.001) and more likely to have comorbidities such as hypertension (57% vs 38.5%, P < 0.001). Age ≥ 65 years was an independent risk factor for WLST, and nonwhite race was associated with decreased WLST. Patients surviving until discharge after WLST decision were older (≥74 years) and had multiple comorbidities.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Privación de Tratamiento , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/etnología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Toma de Decisiones , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de SupervivenciaAsunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/lesiones , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Vísceras/irrigación sanguínea , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Abdominales/mortalidad , Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidad , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Popliteal artery injury (PAI) is a rare occurrence in pediatric patients with significant consequences. Delays in diagnosis lead to severe complications such as lifelong disability and limb loss. We sought to identify outcomes and clinical predictors of PAI in the pediatric trauma population. METHODS: The Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2014-2016) was queried for patients ≤17 years old with PAI. Patient demographics and outcomes were characterized. A comparison of patients sustaining blunt versus penetrating PAI was performed. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of PAI. RESULTS: From 119,132 patients, 58 (<0.1%) sustained a PAI with 74.1% from blunt trauma. Most of the patients were male (75.9%) with a median age of 15 and median Injury Severity Score of 9. A majority of the patients were treated with open repair (62.1%) in comparison to endovascular repair (10.3%) and nonoperative management (36.2%). The rates of open and endovascular repair and nonoperative management were similar between blunt and penetrating PAI patients (P = not significant). Concomitant injuries included popliteal vein injury (PVI) (12.1%), posterior tibial nerve injury (3.4%), peroneal nerve injury (3.4%), and closed fracture/dislocation of the femur (22.4%), patella (25.9%), and tibia/fibula (29.3%). Overall complications included compartment syndrome (8.6%), below-knee amputation (6.9%), and above-knee amputation (3.4%). The overall mortality was 3.4%. Patients with PAI secondary to penetrating trauma had a higher rate of concomitant PVI (26.7% vs. 7%, P = 0.04) and posterior tibial nerve injury (13.3% vs. 0%, P = 0.02) but a lower rate of closed fracture/dislocation of the patella (0% vs. 34.9%, P = 0.008) and tibia/fibula (0% vs. 39.5%, P = 0.004) compared to patients with PAI from blunt trauma. Predictors for PAI included PVI (odds ratio [OR] 296.57, confidence interval [CI] = 59.21-1,485.47, P < 0.001), closed patella fracture/dislocation (OR 50.0, CI = 24.22-103.23, P < 0.001), open femur fracture/dislocation (OR 9.05, CI = 3.56-22.99, P < 0.001), closed tibia/fibula fracture/dislocation (OR 7.44, CI = 3.81-14.55, P < 0.001), and open tibia/fibula fracture/dislocation (OR 4.57, CI = 1.80-11.59, P < 0.001). PVI had the highest association with PAI in penetrating trauma (OR 84.62, CI = 13.22-541.70, P < 0.001) while closed patella fracture/dislocation had the highest association in blunt trauma (OR 52.01, CI = 24.50-110.31, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A higher index of suspicion should be present for PAI in pediatric trauma patients presenting with a closed patella fracture/dislocation after blunt trauma. PVI is most strongly associated with PAI in penetrating trauma. Prompt recognition of PAI is crucial as there is a greater than 10% amputation rate in the pediatric population.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Fractura-Luxación/terapia , Traumatismos de la Pierna/terapia , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Vena Poplítea/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapia , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Heridas Penetrantes/terapia , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Amputación Quirúrgica , Niño , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Fractura-Luxación/diagnóstico por imagen , Fractura-Luxación/mortalidad , Humanos , Traumatismos de la Pierna/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de la Pierna/mortalidad , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/lesiones , Vena Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Poplítea/lesiones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidad , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas Penetrantes/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hiatal Hernia Repairs (HHR) are performed by both general surgeons (GS) and thoracic surgeons (TS). However, there are limited literature with respect to outcomes of HHR based on specialty training. The objective of this study was to compare the utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for HHR performed by GS versus TS. METHODS: The Vizient database was used to identify patients who underwent elective laparoscopic HHR between October 2014 and June 2018. Patients were grouped according to surgeon's specialty (GS vs. TS). Patient demographics and outcomes including in-hospital mortality were compared between groups. RESULTS: During the study period 13,764 patients underwent HHR by either GS or TS. GS performed 9930 (72%) cases while TS performed 3834 (28%) cases. There was no significant difference between GS versus TS with regard to serious morbidity (1.28% vs. 1.30%, p = 0.97) or mortality (0.10% vs. 0.21%, p = 0.19). The mortality index was 0.24 for GS versus 0.45 for TS. Compared to TS, laparoscopic HHR performed by GS was associated with a shorter LOS (2.57 days vs. 2.72 days, p < 0.001) and lower mean hospital costs ($7139 vs. $8032, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of academic centers, laparoscopic HHRs are mostly performed by GS with comparable outcome between general versus thoracic surgeons.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Cirujanos , Centros Médicos Académicos/economía , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hernia Hiatal/epidemiología , Hernia Hiatal/mortalidad , Herniorrafia/economía , Herniorrafia/mortalidad , Costos de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Laparoscopía/economía , Laparoscopía/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether, similar to adults, early tracheostomy in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) improves inhospital outcomes including ventilator days, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and total hospital LOS when compared to late tracheostomy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: The Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-seven pediatric patients <16 years old with severe (>3) abbreviated injury scale TBI who underwent early (days 1-6) or late (day ≥7) tracheostomy between 2014 and 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Pediatric TQIP database was queried for patients <16 years old with severe TBI, who underwent tracheostomy. Patient demographics and outcomes of early versus late tracheostomy were compared using Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and χ2 analysis. Sixteen patients underwent early tracheostomy while 111 underwent late tracheostomy. The groups had similar distributions of age, gender, mechanism of injury, and mean injury severity scores (P > .05). Early tracheostomy was associated with decreased ICU LOS (early: 17 vs late: 32 days, P < .05) and ventilator days (early: 9.7 vs late: 27.1 days, P < .05). There was no difference in total LOS (early: 26.7 vs late: 41.3 days, P = .06), the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (early: 6.3% vs late: 2.7%, P = .45), pneumonia (early: 12.5% vs late: 29.7%, P = .15), or mortality (early: 0% vs late: 2%, P = .588) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Similar to adults, early tracheostomy in pediatric patients with severe TBI is associated with decreased ICU LOS and ventilator days. Future prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings. ARTICLE TWEET: Early tracheostomy in pediatric patients with severe TBI is associated with decreased ICU LOS and ventilator days.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Traqueostomía , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Ventiladores MecánicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Although traumatic injuries to the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), portal vein (PV), and hepatic vein (HV) are rare, their impact is significant. Small single center reports estimate mortality rates ranging from 29% to 100%. Our aim is to elucidate the incidence and outcomes associated with each injury due to unique anatomic positioning and varied tolerance of ligation. We hypothesize that SMV injury is associated with a lower risk of mortality compared to HV and PV injury in adult trauma patients. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2010-2016) was queried for patients with injury to either the SMV, PV, or HV. A multivariable logistic regression model was used for analysis. RESULTS: From 1,403,466 patients, 966 (0.07%) had a single major hepatoportal venous injury with 460 (47.6%) involving the SMV, 281 (29.1%) involving the PV, and 225 (23.3%) involving the HV. There was no difference in the percentage of patients undergoing repair or ligation between SMV, PV, and HV injuries (P > .05). Compared to those with PV and HV injuries, patients with SMV injury had a higher rate of concurrent bowel resection (38.5% vs 12.1% vs 7.6%, P < .001) and lower mortality (33.3% vs 45.9% vs 49.3%, P < .01). After controlling for covariates, traumatic SMV injury increased the risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-2.54, P = .05) in adult trauma patients; however, this was less than PV injury (OR = 2.77, CI = 1.56-4.93, P = .001) and HV injury (OR = 2.70, CI = 1.46-4.99, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Traumatic SMV injury had a lower rate of mortality compared to injuries of the HV and PV. SMV injury increased the risk of mortality by 60% in adult trauma patients, whereas PV and HV injuries nearly tripled the risk of mortality.
Asunto(s)
Venas Hepáticas/lesiones , Vena Porta/lesiones , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Venas Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Hepáticas/cirugía , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vena Porta/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Porta/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidad , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery. Although several studies have examined VTE, few have examined risk factors separately for DVT and PE after contemporary bariatric surgery, including laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Our objective was to define risk factors for DVT and PE independently for both LSG and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) patients using the largest validated bariatric surgery database. METHODS: The metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program (MBSAQIP) database was queried to identify patients who underwent LSG or LRYGB between January 2015 and December 2017. Perioperative data were compared using bivariate analysis. Risk of DVT and PE after LSG or LRYGB was determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 369,032 bariatric cases (72% LSG, 28% LRYGB) were performed. The incidence of DVT was similar between LSG and LRYGB (0.2% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.96), while the incidence of PE was decreased for LSG compared to LRYGB (0.1% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001). Operative length was associated with increased risk of postoperative DVT (OR 1.1, CI 1.01-1.30, p = 0.04) and postoperative PE (OR 1.4, CI 1.16-1.64, p < 0.001) after surgery. The largest independent risk factors for DVT were history of DVT (OR 6.2, CI 4.44-8.45, p < 0.001) and transfusion (OR 4.2, CI 2.48-6.63, p < 0.001). The largest independent risk factors for PE were transfusion (OR 5.0, CI 2.69-8.36, p < 0.001) and history of DVT (OR 2.8, CI 1.67-4.58, p < 0.001). LSG was associated with a decreased risk of PE compared to LRYGB (OR 0.7 CI 0.55-0.91, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged operative length is associated with a higher risk of DVT and PE after either LSG or LRYGB. Transfusion and history of DVT are the largest risk factors for developing DVT and PE. There is a decreased risk of PE after LSG compared to LRYGB.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Adulto , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Gastrectomía/métodos , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Humanos , Incidencia , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Initial adoption of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) began in the late 1990s but its surgical technique, perioperative management, and outcome continues to evolve. METHODS: The aim of this study was to examine the evolving changes in the technique, outcome, and new strategies in management of postoperative leaks after MIE was performed at a single institution over a two-decade period. A retrospective chart review of 75 MIE operations was performed between November 2011 and September 2018 and this was compared to the initial series of 104 MIE operations performed by the same group between 1998 and 2007. Operative technique, outcomes, and management strategies of leaks were compared. RESULTS: There were 65 males (86.7%) with an average age of 61 years. The laparoscopic/thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy became the preferred MIE approach (49% of cases in the initial vs. 95% in the current series). Compared to the initial case series, there was no significant difference in median length of stay (8 vs. 8 days), major complications (12.5% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.68), incidence of leak (9.6% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.82), anastomotic stricture (26% vs. 32.0%, p = 0.38), or in-hospital mortality (2.9% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.47). Management of esophageal leaks has changed from primarily thoracotomy ± diversion initially (50% of leak cases) to endoscopic stenting ± laparoscopy/thoracoscopy currently (87.5% of leak cases). CONCLUSION: In a single-institutional series of MIE over two decades, there was a shift toward a preference for the laparoscopic/thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis approach with similar outcomes. The management of postoperative leaks drastically changed with predilection toward minimally invasive option with endoscopic drainage and stenting.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Esófago/cirugía , Esofagectomía/tendencias , Laparoscopía/tendencias , Toracoscopía/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Esofagectomía/métodos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Toracoscopía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In patients undergoing bariatric surgery, the presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) contributes to perioperative morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the utilization and outcome of severely obese patients with MetS who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Using the 2015 and 2016 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database, data were obtained for patients with MetS undergoing LSG or LRYGB. There were 29,588 MetS patients (LSG: 58.7% vs LRYGB: 41.3%). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (0.1% for LSG vs 0.2% for LRYGB, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.58, confidence interval (CI) 0.32-1.05, P = 0.07) or length of stay between groups (2 ± 2 for LSG vs 2.2 ± 2 days for LRYGB, P = 0.40). Compared with LRYGB, LSG was associated with significantly shorter operative time (78 ± 39 vs 122 ± 54 minutes, P < 0.01), lower overall morbidity (2.3% vs 4.4%, AOR 0.53, CI 0.46-0.60, P < 0.01), lower serious morbidity (1.5% vs 2.3%, AOR 0.64, CI 0.53-0.76, P < 0.01), lower 30-day reoperation (1.2% vs 2.3%, AOR 0.52, CI 0.43-0.63, P < 0.01), and lower 30-day readmission (4.2% vs 6.6%, AOR 0.62, CI 0.55-0.69, P < 0.01). In conclusion, LSG is the predominant operation being performed for severely obese patients with MetS, and its popularity may in part be related to its improved perioperative safety profile.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía/métodos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Síndrome Metabólico/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Intervalos de Confianza , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/mortalidad , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/mortalidad , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Oportunidad Relativa , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Análisis de Regresión , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Traumatic esophageal injury is a highly lethal but rare injury with minimal data in the trauma population. We sought to provide a descriptive analysis of esophageal trauma (ET) to identify the incidence, associated injuries, interventions, and outcomes. We hypothesized that blunt trauma is associated with higher risk of death than penetrating trauma. The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) was queried for patients with ET. Patients with blunt and penetrating trauma were compared using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine risk of mortality. Of 1,403,466 adult patients, 651 (<0.01%) presented with ET. The most common associated thoracic injuries were rib fractures (38.7%) and pneumothorax (26.7%). More patients with a penetrating mechanism underwent open repair of the esophagus than those with blunt mechanism (46.2% vs 11.7%, P < 0.001). After controlling for covariates, there was no difference in risk of mortality between blunt and penetrating trauma (P = 0.65). The mortality rate for patients with esophageal injury surviving greater than 24 hours was 7.5 per cent. In this large national database analysis, ET was rare and most commonly associated with rib fractures and pneumothorax. Contrary to our hypothesis, the risk of mortality was equivalent between blunt and penetrating ET.
Asunto(s)
Esófago/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Heridas Penetrantes/mortalidad , Adulto , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Esófago/cirugía , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Morbilidad , Neumonía/epidemiología , Neumonía/etiología , Neumotórax/complicaciones , Neumotórax/epidemiología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de las Costillas/complicaciones , Fracturas de las Costillas/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Stents/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas Penetrantes/epidemiología , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugíaRESUMEN
Vaginal and vulvar trauma may occur accidentally or because of an act of violence. Due to its rarity, little is known about risk factors effecting need for operative intervention. We sought to perform a large descriptive analysis of adult non-obstetric vulvovaginal trauma (VVT) and elucidate risk factors for requiring operative intervention. A retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank was performed between 2007 and 2015. Patients ≥ 16 years old with vaginal or vulvar trauma were identified. Risk factors for surgical intervention were identified using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. From 2,040,235 female patients, 2445 (< 0.2%) were identified to have VVT with the majority being injury to the vagina (68.6%). In patients with injury to the vagina, age > 65 (OR = 0.41, CI 0.26-0.62, p < 0.001), Injury Severity Score > 25 (OR = 0.66, CI 0.50-0.86, p = 0.01) and victims of rape (OR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.26-0.57, p < 0.001) were less likely to require operative intervention. In patients with injury to the vulva, age > 65 (OR = 0.45, CI 0.21-0.94, p = 0.02), victims of rape (OR = 0.26, CI 0.08-0.87, p = 0.01) and gunshot violence (OR = 0.10, CI 0.02-0.59, p = 0.02) were less likely to require operative intervention, but those with a concomitant injury to the vagina were more likely to require operative intervention (OR = 2.56, CI 1.63-4.03, p < 0.001). Injuries to the vagina or vulva occur in < 0.2% of traumas. Interestingly, in both vulvar and vaginal trauma, older age, and involvement in rape were associated with lower risk for operative intervention. A combined injury to the vagina and vulva increases the need for operative intervention.