Managing Major Peripheral Nerves in Forearm-Level Amputations With TMR and RPNI: What's the Best Recipe?

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) prevent symptomatic neuroma formation in amputees. Forearm-level amputations present multiple muscular targets, making it challenging to determine the ideal treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best TMR targets, role of RPNI, and appropriate patient-selection criteria in forearm-level amputations. We hypothesized that deep and distal TMR targets would best prevent symptomatic neuromas, RPNI would prove a success adjunct, and patients with poorly controlled diabetes would not develop symptomatic neuromas regardless of nerve management. METHODS: We retrospectively identified forearm-level amputations performed between 2017 and 2022. Patients with TMR by outside providers, follow-up <6 months, or insufficient documentation were excluded. Demographics, surgical nerve management, and postoperative complications were collected. The primary outcome was development of a painful neuroma determined by the Eberlin criteria. Patients undergoing TMR were divided a priori into two groups, superficial and proximal versus deep and distal TMR targets, and were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria, and 16 developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patients with a deep or distal TMR target developed a symptomatic neuroma. One nerve out of 12 treated with RPNI developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patient with poorly controlled diabetes developed a symptomatic neuroma, despite no advanced nerve management. CONCLUSIONS: In a case series of forearm amputations, deep and distal TMR targets prevented symptomatic neuroma formation more than superficial and proximal targets. Regenerative peripheral nerve interface is a useful adjunct for neuroma control, especially for the radial sensory nerve. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes may not require advanced nerve management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV retrospective case series.

Reliability of Wrist Arthroscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears.

PURPOSE: Wrist arthroscopy is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of intra-articular wrist conditions including triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears; however, the ability to reliably diagnose TFCC pathology during wrist arthroscopy is unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of the diagnosis of TFCC tears on wrist arthroscopy videos. METHODS: Five hand surgeons reviewed 43 cases on a secure web-based platform at two time points separated by 4-6 weeks. Each case included a deidentified clinical vignette and wrist radiographs with ulnar variance measurements and an arthroscopy video of ulnar wrist pathology, averaging 42 seconds. Surgeons were queried on the presence of TFCC tear and Palmer and Atzei classifications. Interobserver/intraobserver reliabilities were determined using kappa coefficients. RESULTS: The interobserver reliability regarding the presence/absence of TFCC tear was fair-good, with kappa coefficients of 0.596 in the first round of case review and 0.708 in the second round. The overall intraobserver reliability for the presence/absence of TFCC tear was also fair-good, with a kappa coefficient of 0.567. For cases with central TFCC tears, the interobserver reliability regarding the presence of TFCC tear was perfect, with a kappa coefficient of 1.0. When central tears were excluded, the kappa coefficients decreased to 0.322 and 0.368 in each round. The interobserver reliability for the Palmer and Atzei classifications was low, with kappa coefficients of 0.220 and 0.121 in the first round and 0.222 and 0.123 in the second round. CONCLUSIONS: Experienced wrist arthroscopy surgeons demonstrated fair-good interobserver reliability for the diagnosis of TFCC tear on wrist arthroscopy. However, when central TFCC tears were excluded, interobserver reliability was poor. These findings demonstrate a need for a focus on education for wrist arthroscopy anatomy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This investigation demonstrated poor agreement in surgeon identification and classification of TFCC tears, aside from central TFCC tears. The low reliability has a direct bearing on treatment considerations for TFCC tears.

Periodontal status and mandibular biomechanics in rats subjected to hyposalivation and periodontitis.

Xerostomia emerges as a consequence of salivary gland hypofunction, and seriously compromises the integrity of hard and soft oral tissues, whileperiodontitis is an infectious disease characterized by biofilm accumulation, inflammation and alveolar bone resorption. AIM: The aim this study was to compare the deleterious effects caused by experimental hyposalivation, periodontitis, and the combination of both on periodontal tissues and mandibular biomechanics in rats. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Hyposalivation (group H) was induced through bilateral submandibulectomy. Periodontitis (group EP) was induced by injecting LPS (1 mg/ml) into the gingiva of the first lower molars. A third group was subjected to both conditions (group H+EP). Alveolar bone loss was evaluated by micro-computed tomography and histomorphometric analysis, and gingival inflammatory mediators were assessed by specific techniques. Biomechanical properties were evaluated in mandible. RESULTS: Alveolar bone loss increased similarly in groups H, EP and H+EP compared to control. Metalloproteinase (MMP2 and MMP9) activity was similar in H and control, but higher in groups EP and H+EP (MMP2: C 9644+2214, EP 34441+3336, H 5818+1532, H+EP 42673+3184; MMP9: C 5792+961, EP 14807+861, H 9295+520, H+EP 4838+1531). The rest of the inflammatory mediators evaluated increased in groups H, EP and H+EP to a greater or lesser extent with respect to the control, although in most cases, they were higher in groups EP and H+EP than in group H. The biomechanical properties of the mandible increased in group H compared to the other three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both hyposalivation and periodontitis cause periodontal damage, but hyposalivation also produces biomechanical alterations, causing more extensive deleterious effects than periodontitis.

La xerostomía surge como consecuencia de la hipofunción de las glándulas salivales y compromete seriamente la integridad de los tejidos orales duros y blandos, mientras que la periodontitis es una enfermedad infecciosa caracterizada por la acumulación de biofilm, inflamación y reabsorción ósea alveolar. OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente estudio fue comparar los efectos deletéreos causados por la hiposalivación y la periodontitis experimental, y la combinación de ambas sobre los tejidos periodontales y la biomecánica mandibular en ratas. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: La hiposalivación (H) se indujo mediante una submandibulectomía bilateral. Por otra parte, la periodontitis (PE) se indujo mediante la inyección de LPS (1 mg/ml) en la encía de los primeros molares inferiores. Otro grupo se sometió a ambas condiciones (H+PE). La pérdida ósea alveolar se evaluó mediante tomografia microcomputarizada y análisis histomorfométrico, mientras que los mediadores inflamatorios gingivales fueron determinados mediante técnicas específicas. Se evaluaron las propiedades biomecánicas en la mandíbula. RESULTADOS: La hiposalivación aumentó la pérdida ósea alveolar en comparación con el control de forma similar a la PE y H+PE. La actividad de las metaloproteinasas (MMP2 y MMP9) fue similar en los grupos H y control, pero resultó mayor en los grupos PE y H+PE (MMP2: C 9644+2214, PE 34441+3336, H 5818+1532, H+PE 42673+3184; MMP9: C 5792+961, PE 14807+861, H 9295+520, H+PE 24838+1531). El resto de los mediadores inflamatorios evaluados aumentaron en mayor o menor medida en los grupos H, PE y H+PE respecto al control, aunque en la mayoría de los casos fueron superiores en los grupos PE y H+PE respecto al grupo H. Sin embargo, las propiedades biomecánicas de la mandíbula aumentaron en el grupo H con respecto a los otros grupos. CONCLUSIONES: Tanto la hiposalivación como la periodontitis causan daño periodontal, pero la hiposalivación también produce alteraciones biomecánicas, provocando efectos deletéreos más extensos que la periodontitis.

Surgical Hand Antisepsis: Environmental and Cost Impact in Hand Surgery.

Health care systems, including operating rooms, are a considerable contributor to environmental waste. Given ongoing concerns regarding water scarcity in the United States and worldwide, action to reduce water utilization should be taken. Traditional water-based hand scrubbing wastes an estimated 11 L of water per scrub. Waterless hand rubbing with an alcohol-based solution has been shown to be as effective as traditional water-based hand scrubbing in surgical hand antisepsis and in preventing surgical site infections. Furthermore, alcohol-based rubbing results in less waste and reduced costs when compared with water-based hand scrubbing. The hand surgery operating room, including minor procedure rooms, serves as an opportunity to decrease water use and reduce the environmental impact of our field. Waterless alcohol-based hand rubbing for antisepsis may also be an opportunity to save money and provide value-based care to our patients.

Periodontal status and mandibular biomechanics in rats subjected to hyposalivation and periodontitis / Estudio del estado periodontal y la biomecánica mandibular en ratas sometidas a hiposalivación y periodontitis

ABSTRACT Xerostomia emerges as a consequence of salivary gland hypofunction, and seriously compromises the integrity of hard and soft oral tissues, whileperiodontitis is an infectious disease characterized by biofilm accumulation, inflammation and alveolar bone resorption. Aim The aim this study was to compare the deleterious effects caused by experimental hyposalivation, periodontitis, and the combination of both on periodontal tissues and mandibular biomechanics in rats. Materials and Method Hyposalivation (group H) was induced through bilateral submandibulectomy. Periodontitis (group EP) was induced by injecting LPS (1 mg/ml) into the gingiva of the first lower molars. A third group was subjected to both conditions (group H+EP). Alveolar bone loss was evaluated by micro-computed tomography and histomorphometric analysis, and gingival inflammatory mediators were assessed by specific techniques. Biomechanical properties were evaluated in mandible. Results Alveolar bone loss increased similarly in groups H, EP and H+EP compared to control. Metalloproteinase (MMP2 and MMP9) activity was similar in H and control, but higher in groups EP and H+EP (MMP2: C 9644+2214, EP 34441+3336, H 5818+1532, H+EP 42673+3184; MMP9: C 5792+961, EP 14807+861, H 9295+520, H+EP 4838+1531). The rest of the inflammatory mediators evaluated increased in groups H, EP and H+EP to a greater or lesser extent with respect to the control, although in most cases, they were higher in groups EP and H+EP than in group H. The biomechanical properties of the mandible increased in group H compared to the other three groups. Conclusions Both hyposalivation and periodontitis cause periodontal damage, but hyposalivation also produces biomechanical alterations, causing more extensive deleterious effects than periodontitis.

RESUMEN La xerostomía surge como consecuencia de la hipofunción de las glándulas salivales y compromete seriamente la integridad de los tejidos orales duros y blandos, mientras que la periodontitis es una enfermedad infecciosa caracterizada por la acumulación de biofilm, inflamación y reabsorción ósea alveolar. Objetivo El objetivo del presente estudio fue comparar los efectos deletéreos causados por la hiposalivación y la periodontitis experimental, y la combinación de ambas sobre los tejidos periodontales y la biomecánica mandibular en ratas. Materiales y Método La hiposalivación (H) se indujo mediante una submandibulectomía bilateral. Por otra parte, la periodontitis (PE) se indujo mediante la inyección de LPS (1 mg/ml) en la encía de los primeros molares inferiores. Otro grupo se sometió a ambas condiciones (H+PE). La pérdida ósea alveolar se evaluó mediante tomografia microcomputarizada y análisis histomorfométrico, mientras que los mediadores inflamatorios gingivales fueron determinados mediante técnicas específicas. Se evaluaron las propiedades biomecánicas en la mandíbula. Resultados La hiposalivación aumentó la pérdida ósea alveolar en comparación con el control de forma similar a la PE y H+PE. La actividad de las metaloproteinasas (MMP2 y MMP9) fue similar en los grupos H y control, pero resultó mayor en los grupos PE y H+PE (MMP2: C 9644+2214, PE 34441+3336, H 5818+1532, H+PE 42673+3184; MMP9: C 5792+961, PE 14807+861, H 9295+520, H+PE 24838+1531). El resto de los mediadores inflamatorios evaluados aumentaron en mayor o menor medida en los grupos H, PE y H+PE respecto al control, aunque en la mayoría de los casos fueron superiores en los grupos PE y H+PE respecto al grupo H. Sin embargo, las propiedades biomecánicas de la mandíbula aumentaron en el grupo H con respecto a los otros grupos. Conclusiones Tanto la hiposalivación como la periodontitis causan daño periodontal, pero la hiposalivación también produce alteraciones biomecánicas, provocando efectos deletéreos más extensos que la periodontitis.

Hand Fractures-Management and the Complications That Inevitably Occur: Metacarpal Fractures.

Metacarpal fractures are among the most common hand fractures. To properly manage these injuries, surgeons must understand the anatomy, biomechanics, clinical assessment, surgical and nonsurgical treatment options, and potential complications. Metacarpal head fractures often require surgical treatment to restore the joint surface by using a variety of techniques. Metacarpal neck fractures are usually stable injuries that do not require surgical intervention, but surgeons must know when surgical intervention is indicated. Fractures of the metacarpal shaft can be treated surgically and nonsurgically and may be associated with large bone defects or soft-tissue injuries that require careful consideration. Finally, fractures involving the carpometacarpal joints must be promptly managed to avoid long-term complications, potentially requiring salvage procedures.

Phalangeal Fractures and Fingertip Injuries.

A comprehensive analysis of the assessment, diagnosis, and management of phalangeal fractures and fingertip injuries should emphasize the importance of achieving the right balance between undertreatment and overtreatment. Phalangeal injuries are complex, requiring an in-depth understanding of hand anatomy, fracture patterns, and treatment options to optimize patient outcomes. A thorough examination of proximal and middle phalangeal fractures and fingertip injuries, including those to the nail bed and distal phalanx, is important. A systematic approach to addressing the most prevalent injuries in this category should be implemented while highlighting the need for patient-specific approaches to treatment and a multidisciplinary perspective to ensure the best possible outcomes for patients.

Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fractures.

Multiple fracture patterns can occur around the proximal interphalangeal joint and require surgeons to have a thorough understanding of the anatomy, clinical and radiographic examination, common fracture patterns, surgical and nonsurgical treatment options, and potential complications. Proximal phalangeal condylar fractures are typically managed surgically, because even nondisplaced fractures have a propensity for displacement. Middle phalangeal base fractures most commonly present as a volar lip fracture with or without dorsal subluxation or dislocation. Treatment options include extension block splinting or pinning, transarticular pinning, open reduction and internal fixation, external fixation, volar plate arthroplasty, and hemihamate arthroplasty. Less common fractures include dorsal lip fractures with or without volar subluxation or dislocation (the central slip fracture), lateral plateau impaction or avulsion injuries, and pilon fractures. The main goals in the management of middle phalangeal base fractures are to restore articular congruency and initial early range of motion, which are more important than obtaining an anatomic reduction.

Pediatric Phalanx Fractures.

Phalangeal fractures are extremely common in the pediatric and adolescent populations. The incidence of phalangeal fractures peaks in children ages 10 to 14 years, corresponding to the age in which children begin contact sports. Younger children are more likely to experience crush injuries, whereas older children often sustain phalangeal fractures during sports. The physis is particularly susceptible to fracture because of the biomechanically weak nature of the physis compared with the surrounding ligaments and bone. Phalangeal fractures are identified through a thorough physical examination and are subsequently confirmed with radiographic evaluation. Management of pediatric phalangeal fractures is dependent on the age of the child, the severity of the injury, and the degree of fracture displacement. Nondisplaced fractures are often managed nonsurgically with immobilization, whereas unstable, displaced fractures may require surgery, which is often a closed rather than open reduction and percutaneous pinning.