Heparin management test versus activated coagulation time during cardiovascular surgery: correlation with anti-Xa activity.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the abilities of the heparin management test (HMT) and the activated coagulation time (ACT) to provide a measurement of heparin effect in patients undergoing cardiac or peripheral vascular surgery. These measurements of heparin effect were also compared with measurements of heparin concentrations tested by anti-Xa activity. A secondary objective was to compare the performance of the noncitrated HMT with that of the citrated HMT. DESIGN: A prospective study. SETTING: A single-center study conducted in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: After human investigation committee approval and informed consent were obtained, adult patients undergoing cardiac or peripheral vascular surgery were included in this study. INTERVENTIONS: In both surgical groups, blood was sampled for ACT, HMT, and anti-Xa activity. Each HMT was performed on both noncitrated and citrated samples. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: As an indicator of heparin effect, the HMT had a strong correlation with the ACT (r = 0.899; p < 0.01). In addition, the HMT had a significantly stronger correlation with anti-Xa activity than the ACT (p < 0.01). The correlation obtained from the noncitrated samples was identical with that obtained from the citrated samples (r = 0.819; p < 0.001 for both groups). CONCLUSION: The ability of the HMT and the ACT to measure heparin effect was similar. The HMT performed better than the ACT when using anti-Xa activity as a measure of heparin concentration. Noncitrated HMT results were similar to citrated HMT results, thus supporting the use of fresh whole blood for testing purposes.

Point-of-care and standard laboratory coagulation testing during cardiovascular surgery: balancing reliability and timeliness.

OBJECTIVE: The use of point-of-care technology has increased faster than efforts to validate its effectiveness compared to standard laboratory testing modalities. To address this issue with a current point-of-care coagulation system (HEMOCHRON Jr, International Technidyne Corporation (ITC), Edison, NJ), we designed a study to test the hypothesis that data obtained from point-of-care coagulation equipment correlates with data obtained from standard laboratory coagulation equipment. One of the potential advantages gained using point-of-care testing is the ability to obtain more rapid results. To address this issue, turnaround time, defined as the elapsed time (in minutes) from when the sample was acquired from the patient until the investigators knew the results, was also determined. METHODS: Following Human Investigation Committee approval and informed consent, a prospective study was conducted to compare results obtained from point-of-care coagulation equipment with those results obtained from standard laboratory coagulation equipment. The study was performed in three groups of patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery, each requiring different levels of anticoagulation. RESULTS: Of the 83 patients who met the inclusion criteria, the correlation (combining data from groups 1-3) between results obtained from point-of-care and standard laboratory prothrombin time was r = 0.867, p < 0.001. The correlation (group 3) between point-of-care and standard laboratory international normalized ratio was r = 0.943, p < 0.001. The correlation (combining data from groups 1 & 2) between point-of-care and standard laboratory activated partial thromboplastin time was r = 0.825, p < 0.001. Median turnaround time for the standard laboratory was 90 minutes, with a mean turnaround time of 74 to 78 minutes, depending upon the group. In contrast, the median turnaround time for point-of-care testing was two minutes and 14 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study population reveal that data obtained from point-of-care prothrombin time, international normalized ratio and activated partial thromboplastin time results correlate with results obtained from standard laboratory coagulation testing. The value of obtaining reliable results in a timely fashion offers a potential advantage for point-of-care testing in dinical situations, such as in the operating room, where saving time may translate into financial savings.