Postmarketing Analysis of Eosinophilic Adverse Reactions in the use of Biologic Therapies for Type 2 Inflammatory Conditions.

BACKGROUND: Temporary eosinophilia is a potential adverse reaction of monoclonal antibody therapies in the treatment of a variety of type 2 inflammatory conditions, including asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). The pathophysiology, epidemiology, and clinical significance of eosinophilia and eosinophilic adverse reactions following the initiation of biologic therapy are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To describe the postmarketing, eosinophilic adverse reactions with clinical significance in patients treated with the 3 biologic therapies approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for CRSwNP: dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab. METHODS: The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard was searched for eosinophilic adverse reactions related to dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab treatments from November 2004 to December 2022. Data regarding each of the eosinophilic adverse reactions were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 218, 270, and 134 reports of eosinophilic adverse reactions were reported among patients who were treated with dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab, respectively. The most common eosinophilic adverse reaction was eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (338 patients), followed by eosinophilic respiratory tract reactions (158 patients). The most common indication for biological treatment among the reaction groups was asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Eosinophilic adverse reactions are rare but consequential complications of biological treatment. They are more common among patients treated for asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Measuring and monitoring blood eosinophil levels may be appropriate in specific clinical instances when patients are started on different biologic therapies for type 2 inflammatory conditions.

Corticosteroid-eluting implants for the management of chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps.

INTRODUCTION: Topical corticosteroid therapies are the most popular prescribed medications for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). While topical corticosteroids effectively reduce the inflammatory burden associated with CRS, their distribution inside the nasal cavity is limited and primarily dependent on their delivery device. Corticosteroid-eluting implants serve as relatively novel technology, allowing targeted, sustained release of a high concentration of corticosteroids directly onto the sinus mucosa. Three types of corticosteroid-eluting implants can be characterized: 1. intraoperatively inserted corticosteroid-eluting sinus implants, 2. postoperatively inserted, office-based corticosteroid-eluting sinus implants, and 3. office-based corticosteroid-eluting implants for naïve paranasal sinuses. AREAS COVERED: The review summarizes the different steroid-eluting sinus implants, their indications for use in CRS patients, and the existing evidence regarding their clinical efficacy. We also highlight potential areas for improvement and development. EXPERT OPINION: Corticosteroid-eluting sinus implants highlight an evolving field that is constantly investigating and adding new treatment options to the market. Presently, corticosteroid-eluting implants for CRS are most commonly applied intraoperatively and postoperatively with endoscopic sinus surgery, providing significant improvements in mucosal healing and reducing the amount of surgical failures. Future development around corticosteroid-eluting implants should focus on strategies to reduce the amount of crusting around the implants.

Laryngeal Side Effects of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are common targeted drugs, used in the treatment of hematological and solid malignancies. These drugs present a multitude of potential adverse effects. Laryngeal manifestations, including laryngeal edema, secondary to TKIs treatment have not been well studied, despite their potential lethality. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included adult patients (>18 years) treated with TKIs who were followed in a secondary medical center and underwent a voluntary otolaryngological examination, which included laryngeal fiber-optic laryngoscopy (FOL). FOL was independently performed by two senior otolaryngologists, and results were recorded and evaluated by two grading systems, to assess the degree of laryngeal edema. In addition, medical files were reviewed, and data collected included past medical history, signs and symptoms, physical examination, laboratory results, treatment type, and duration. RESULTS: Sixteen patients, aged 68.2 ± 13.6 years, were examined during October 2014 to December 2014. Of them, three (19%) were males. Eleven (68%) patients presented with varying degrees of laryngeal edema. A significant correlation was found between gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and laryngeal edema (P = 0.02). TKI treatment was stopped in one patient, because of symptomatic laryngeal edema, which completely resolved within 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Laryngeal edema was common in our study group. This edema was most often not life threatening. Yet, because of the potential severity of this side effect, we propose a routine FOL examination of patients before commencing TKI treatment and a reevaluation performed during treatment.