Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 69(6): 1591-9, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22535333

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We are trying to identify predictive factors of high risk of toxicity by analyzing candidate genes in the irinotecan pathways in order to identify useful tools to improve mCRC patient management under real practice conditions. METHODS: Genomic DNA was genotyped for UGT1A1 (*28, *60 and *93) from all 101 patients, and irinotecan dose was 180 mg/m(2) every second week. Clinical data were obtained by retrospective chart review. The primary endpoint is to find out whether the pharmacogenetic test in the clinical practice may predict toxicity. RESULTS: Grade 3/4 diarrhea occurred in twelve patients and required dose reduction in six patients, and neutropenia reached grade 3/4 in 19 patients (only one patient with *28/*28 genotype). The UGT1A1*93 seemed to relate with grade 3/4 neutropenia but only in the heterozygote state (G/A), p = 0.071, and UGT1A*60 showed no association with neutropenia. Twenty-eight percentage of patients required the use of G-CSF; 64.3% of them harbored *1/*28 or *28/*28 genotypes, p = 0.003. Thirty-seven (36.6%) patients required dose reduction of irinotecan and/or 5-FU owing to toxicity, mainly neutropenia and diarrhea. No significant association was detected between *28, *60 and *93 UGT1A variants and severe irinotecan-associated hematologic or GI toxicity. CONCLUSION: The impact of increased risk of toxicity attributed to the UGT1A variants may be offset by irinotecan in clinical practice by dose reduction or the use of colony-stimulating factor.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucuronosiltransferasa/genética , Polimorfismo Genético , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Genotipo , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Irinotecán , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia
2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 28(5): 527-33, 2009 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18985396

RESUMEN

The aim of this article was to report the emergence of patient infections with linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (LRSE) in a tertiary university hospital. Our objectives were to determine the molecular mechanism of the resistance, set up the genetic relationship among isolates, and analyze the relations between linezolid usage, period of treatment, and emergence of resistance in the hospital. The emergence of infection with linezolid-resistant S. epidermidis affecting 20 patients in a tertiary university hospital was investigated using repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR, DiversiLab System; BioMérieux, Inc., France). The presence of the G2576T mutation of 23S rRNA was screened by pyrosequencing. We determined the pattern of linezolid usage in the hospital as a whole and in the critical care unit that was most affected. G2576T mutation of 23S rRNA was detected in all linezolid-resistant S. epidermidis studied. Of these, 90% were genetically related and had been recovered from patients admitted to the same critical care unit. There had been an increase in linezolid usage in the hospital and in the critical care unit in the 2 years prior to the emergence of resistant strains. More strict control measures in hand washing and linezolid prescription were subsequently established, but no reduction in LRSE rates have yet been observed. Linezolid-resistant S. epidermidis emerged at our hospital, probably from a single strain originating in the critical care unit. The most likely explanation is that person-to-person spread of linezolid-resistant S. epidermidis led to skin colonization and, after linezolid treatment, this resistant staphylococci became the dominant cutaneous flora causing infection in some critical patients. In order to preserve the usefulness of this antibiotic as a therapeutic agent and to avoid a situation similar to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, judicious use of antibiotics is essential.


Asunto(s)
Acetamidas/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Oxazolidinonas/farmacología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus epidermidis/efectos de los fármacos , Análisis por Conglomerados , Enfermedad Crítica , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Dermatoglifia del ADN , ADN Bacteriano/química , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Linezolid , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Epidemiología Molecular , Mutación Puntual , ARN Ribosómico 23S/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Staphylococcus epidermidis/clasificación , Staphylococcus epidermidis/genética , Staphylococcus epidermidis/aislamiento & purificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA