Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
3.
Rev. chil. infectol ; Rev. chil. infectol;33(supl.1): 36-53, oct. 2016. ilus, tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-844434

RESUMEN

Objective: To update information about drug interactions in patients with HIV/AIDS. Methods: Comprehensive literature review in MEDLINE/PubMed database from May of 2009 to December of 2014, using the Mesh terms: Anti-retroviral agents and drug interactions or herb-drug interactions or food-drug interactions. Publications with drug interactions in humans, in English or Spanish, and with full text were retrieved. Additionally, citation lists from identified articles were reviewed. The study inclusion was assessed by three independent researchers and by consensus among them when was necessary. Clinical relevance of drug interaction was grouped into four levels according to seriously and probability of occurrence. Results: Global, 546 different references were retrieved and 243 were selected. In addition 11 further manuscripts were identified in the references of the included articles. Overall, 935 pairs of drug interactions were identified, 95.7% pharmacokinetic (823 by enzyme induction or inhibition and 67 by changes in bioavailability). Of the 935 pairs of drug interactions, 402(43%) were classified as levels 1 or 2. Conclusions: The most clinically relevant antiretroviral drug interactions are due to pharmacokinetic mechanism, mainly induction or enzyme inhibition, according to previous reviews, the protease inhibitors remain as the antiretrovirals with the highest number of clinical relevant interactions.


Objetivo: Actualizar información sobre interacciones medicamentosas en pacientes con VIH/SIDA. Métodos: Revisión estructurada en MEDLINE/PubMed utilizando los términos Mesh: Anti-retroviral agents and drug interactions or herb-drug interactions or food-drug interactions, entre mayo de 2009 y diciembre de 2014. Publicaciones sobre interacciones medicamentosas, en humanos, en inglés o español y con acceso a texto completo fueron seleccionadas. Además, se incluyeron referencias de artículos considerados relevantes. La inclusión de los artículos fue evaluada por tres investigadores independientes y, en caso de requerirlo, por consenso entre ellos. La relevancia clínica se estableció en cuatro niveles, acorde con la gravedad y probabilidad de ocurrencia de la interacción. Resultados: Se identificaron 546 artículos, de los cuales se seleccionaron 273; además, se incluyeron 11 referencias relevantes. Se identificaron 935 parejas de interacciones medicamentosas, 95,7% farmacocinéticas. De este grupo, 823 mediadas por inducción o inhibición enzimática y 67 por cambios en la biodisponibilidad. De las 935 parejas de interacciones, 402 (43%) fueron relevantes clínicamente (niveles 1 o 2). Conclusiones: Las interacciones medicamentosas con anti-retrovirales de mayor relevancia clínica se deben a mecanismos farmacocinéticos, principalmente inducción o inhibición enzimática. Acorde con revisiones previas, los inhibidores de proteasa continúan siendo los anti-retrovirales con mayor número de interacciones relevantes.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/tratamiento farmacológico , Antirretrovirales/farmacocinética , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Inhibidores de Proteasas/farmacocinética , Factores de Riesgo , Interacciones Farmacológicas
4.
Rev Chilena Infectol ; 33(Suppl 1): 36-53, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28453026

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To update information about drug interactions in patients with HIV/AIDS. METHODS: Comprehensive literature review in MEDLINE/PubMed database from May of 2009 to December of 2014, using the Mesh terms: Anti-retroviral agents and drug interactions or herb-drug interactions or food-drug interactions. Publications with drug interactions in humans, in English or Spanish, and with full text were retrieved. Additionally, citation lists from identified articles were reviewed. The study inclusion was assessed by three independent researchers and by consensus among them when was necessary. Clinical relevance of drug interaction was grouped into four levels according to seriously and probability of occurrence. RESULTS: Global, 546 different references were retrieved and 243 were selected. In addition 11 further manuscripts were identified in the references of the included articles. Overall, 935 pairs of drug interactions were identified, 95.7% pharmacokinetic (823 by enzyme induction or inhibition and 67 by changes in bioavailability). Of the 935 pairs of drug interactions, 402(43%) were classified as levels 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: The most clinically relevant antiretroviral drug interactions are due to pharmacokinetic mechanism, mainly induction or enzyme inhibition, according to previous reviews, the protease inhibitors remain as the antiretrovirals with the highest number of clinical relevant interactions.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/tratamiento farmacológico , Antirretrovirales/farmacocinética , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Humanos , Inhibidores de Proteasas/farmacocinética , Factores de Riesgo
5.
J Infect ; 65(6): 549-58, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23085245

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that statins may modify the immune response against HIV. The aim was to evaluate the antiretroviral and immunomodulatory effects of lovastatin in HIV-infected patients, naïve for antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase-II clinical trial. Primary outcomes were plasma viral load and circulating CD4+ T cell count, after 6 and 12 months of treatment; secondary outcomes were CD8+ T cell count, expression of activation markers (CD38 and HLA-DR) on T cells, and clinical outcomes. With a power of 90% to detect both a decrease of 0.3 log10 in plasma HIV-1 RNA copies and an increase of 20% in the CD4+ T cell count, we estimated a required sample size of 110 HIV-infected patients (55 per group). The results were analyzed by a model of repeated measurements using Generalized Estimating Equations. RESULTS: Patients were randomized to receive either lovastatin (n = 55) or placebo (n = 57). During the 12-month follow-up, there was no effect of lovastatin either on viral load (estimated average change = 0.157 copies/mL; CI 95% = -0.099 to 0.414), or on the CD4+ T cell count (estimated average change = -26.1 cells/µL; CI 95% = -89.8 to 37.6). Moreover, there were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Daily administration of lovastatin (40 mg) for one year in HIV-infected patients, naïve for antiretroviral therapy, had no significant effect on HIV replication, the CD4+ T cell count, or the activation level of T cells. (www.clinicaltrials.gov; ID NCT00721305).


Asunto(s)
Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Lovastatina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antirretrovirales/efectos adversos , Anticolesterolemiantes/efectos adversos , Relación CD4-CD8 , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Colesterol/sangre , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , Infecciones por VIH/sangre , Infecciones por VIH/inmunología , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Humanos , Lovastatina/efectos adversos , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Viral/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA