RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: laparoscopic pyeloplasty is an important tool in urology armamentarium. The most important & also the difficult part of this surgery is intracorporial suturing and knotting. There are only a few reports of knotless Barbed sutures for upper tract reconstruction. We report the comparative outcomes of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty with barbed suture vs non barbed sutures used for uretero-pelvic anastomosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients' records that underwent Laparoscopic pyeloplasty at our Institution from January 2013 to May 2014. Total 37 patients were underwent LP in this period. Whole of the procedure was same as conventional LP except suture material. 3-0 barbed suture was used in 21 patients and 3-0 vicryl used in 16 patients for uretero-pelvic anastomosis and continuous suturing technique was employed. Patients' demographics, total operative time, intracorporial suturing time, post operative complications, symptoms & renal isotope scan were recorded. RESULTS: Average total operative time was significantly less in barbed suture group vs vicryl group (162 vs 208 minutes) (p=0.0811). Average time taken for intracorporial suturing was 31.2 minutes vs 70 minutes (p=0.0576). 1 patient developed post operative urine leak which persisted for 5 days in barbed group (4.76 %) vs no leak in vicryl group. Most common complication was UTI presented in 2 patients (9.5 %) vs 2 in vicryl (12.5%). JJ stent was removed at 4 weeks. Median follow up was 3 months with 7 patients lost to follow up. None of the patients found to have obstructive drainage or deterioration of split function on follow up isotope renogram at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with barbed suture has acceptable outcome when compared to conventional non barbed suture on short term basis. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty with barbed suture can potentially become the standard approach in near future.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We studied the learning curve for percutaneous nephrolithotomy of urology residents according to stone complexity. METHODS: The learning curve of 8 residents with no previous experience of solo percutaneous nephrolithotomy was studied. Stones were classified according to complexity using the Guy stone score. Competence was reviewed using 4 markers, namely operative time, fluoroscopic time, complication rate using the modified Clavien grading system and success rate. Analysis was done in 3-month cohorts to determine how and when competence and excellence were achieved during 1 year of training for various grades of stone. The results of resident surgeons were compared with those of experienced endourologist. RESULTS: Resident surgeons achieved a plateau in mean operative time and fluoroscopic time for grade I stones after 30 to 35 cases but not for more complex stones. Similarly complications were decreased significantly only in grade I stone cases. Resident surgeons also achieved an almost excellent success rate of 87% for grade I stones only. CONCLUSIONS: This study of the learning curve of residents suggests that competence and near excellence is reached after 30 to 35 cases for grade I stones. However the learning curve for complex stones (grades II to IV) is steeper and requires more experience.
