Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 11(3): 278-85, 1988 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2899112

RESUMEN

Solutions of 2.0% and 3.4% glutaraldehyde, and of 0.5% phenate with 0.18% glutaraldehyde were stressed with a microbial and organic soil load for the periods advocated by the respective manufacturers. The disinfecting efficacy of the stressed solutions was challenged with Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, Mycobacterium bovis (BCG), a water Mycobacterium sp. and Candida albicans. The three disinfectants were active against the fast-growing bacteria in appropriate dilutions; lesser dilutions of the glutaraldehyde solutions killed the mycobacteria and the yeast, while stressed phenate with glutaraldehyde did not. One hour exposure of the stressed disinfectants failed to kill the spore preparations while reducing the number of survivors.


Asunto(s)
Aldehídos/farmacología , Desinfectantes/normas , Contaminación de Medicamentos , Glutaral/farmacología , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Candida albicans/efectos de los fármacos , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Glutaral/administración & dosificación
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 25(12): 2413-4, 1987 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3429634

RESUMEN

Susceptibility results obtained with individualized MIC strips (MICRO-MIC) agreed with the standard microdilution broth method at a level of 96% or greater for each of the 10 antimicrobial agents tested.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Tiras Reactivas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...