Tubular biomarkers and histology in lupus nephritis.

INTRODUCTION: The relevance of tubulo-interstitial involvement for kidney prognosis has recently been emphasized, but validated biomarkers for predicting histology are still lacking. The aim of our study was to evaluate different serum and urinary markers of tubular damage in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) and to correlate them with kidney histopathology. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted from January 2016 to December 2021. Serum and urine samples were collected on the same day of kidney biopsy and correlated with histologic data from a cohort of 15 LN patients. We analyzed the following urinary markers, adjusted for urine creatinine: beta 2-microglobulin, alpha 1-microglobulin, NGAL, uKIM-1, MCP-1, uDKK-3, and uUMOD. The serum markers sKIM-1 and sUMOD were also analyzed. RESULTS: A positive and strong correlation was observed between the degree of interstitial fibrosis (rho = 0.785, p = .001) and tubular atrophy (rho = 0.781, p = .001) and the levels of uDKK3. uUMOD also showed an inverse and moderate correlation with interstitial fibrosis (rho = -0.562, p = .037) and tubular atrophy (rho = -0.694, p = .006). Patients with >10% cortical interstitial inflammation had higher levels of uKIM-1 [4.9 (3.9, 5.5) vs. 0.8 (0.6, 1.5) mcg/mg, p = .001], MCP-1 [3.8 (2. 3, 4.2) vs. 0.7 (0.3, 1.2) mcg/mg, p = .001], sKIM-1 [9.2 (5.9, 32.7) vs. 1.4 (0, 3.5) pg/mL, p = .001], and lower sUMOD [8.7 (0, 39.7) vs. 46.1 (35.7, 53) ng/mL, p = .028]. CONCLUSION: The use of specific urinary and serum biomarkers of tubular dysfunction or injury may help to predict certain histologic parameters in LN patients.

Tubular biomarkers in proteinuric kidney disease: histology correlation and kidney prognosis of tubular biomarkers.

Background: Proteinuria is not only a biomarker of chronic kidney disease (CKD) but also a driver of CKD progression. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum and urinary tubular biomarkers in patients with biopsied proteinuric kidney disease and to correlate them with histology and kidney outcomes. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of 156 patients from January 2016 to December 2021. The following urinary and serum biomarkers were analyzed on the day of kidney biopsy: beta 2 microglobulin (ß2-mcg), alpha 1 microglobulin (α1-mcg), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (uKIM-1), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), urinary Dickkopf-3 (uDKK3), uromodulin (urinary uUMOD), serum kidney injury molecule-1 (sKIM-1) and serum uromodulin (sUMOD). A composite outcome of kidney progression or death was recorded during a median follow-up period of 26 months. Results: Multivariate regression analysis identified sUMOD (ß-0.357, P < .001) and uDKK3 (ß 0.483, P < .001) as independent predictors of interstitial fibrosis, adjusted for age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and log proteinuria. Elevated levels of MCP-1 [odds ratio 15.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.52-69.20] were associated with a higher risk of cortical interstitial inflammation >10% adjusted for eGFR, log proteinuria and microhematuria. Upper tertiles of uDKK3 were associated with greater eGFR decline during follow-up. Although not a predictor of the composite outcome, doubling of uDKK3 was a predictor of kidney events (hazard ratio 2.26, 95% CI 1.04-4.94) after adjustment for interstitial fibrosis, eGFR and proteinuria. Conclusions: Tubular markers may have prognostic value in proteinuric kidney disease, correlating with specific histologic parameters and identifying cases at higher risk of CKD progression.