Time use in clinical encounters: are African-American patients treated differently?

Racial disparities in the process and outcome of health care may be partially explained by differences in time use during outpatient visits by African-American and white patients. This study was undertaken to determine whether physicians use their time in clinical encounters with African-American patients differently than with white patients. This study was a multimethod, cross-sectional study conducted between October 1994 and August 1995 in 84 family practices in northeast Ohio. Participants were 4,352 white and African-American outpatients visiting 138 physicians. Time use during the patient visit was measured by the Davis Observation Code, which categorizes every 20-second interval into 20 different behavioral categories. Among 3,743 white and 509 African-American patients, after adjustment for potential confounders, visits by African-American patients were slightly longer than visits with white patients (10.7 vs. 10.1 minutes, p = 0.027). After further adjustment for multiple comparisons, physicians spent a lower proportion of time intervals with African-American patients as compared to white patients planning treatment (29.0% vs. 32.1%, p < 0.001), providing health education (16.4% vs. 19.7%, p < 0.001), chatting (5.2% vs. 7.6%, p < 0.001), assessing patients' health knowledge (0.8% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001), and answering questions (5.8% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.002). Physicians spent relatively more time intervals with African-American patients discussing what is to be accomplished (9.3% vs. 7.6%, p < 0.001) and providing substance use assessment and advice (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.001). In conclusion, physicians spend time differently with African-American as compared with white patients. These differences may represent appropriate tailoring of services to meet unique needs, but could also represent racial bias.

Is diabetes treated as an acute or chronic illness in community family practice?

OBJECTIVE: Poor quality of diabetes care has been ascribed to the acute care focus of primary care practice. A better understanding of how time is spent during outpatient visits for diabetes compared with visits for acute conditions and other chronic diseases may facilitate the design of programs to enhance diabetes care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Research nurses directly observed consecutive outpatient visits during two separate days in 138 community family physician offices. Time use was categorized into 20 different behaviors using the Davis Observation Code (DOC). Time use was compared for visits for diabetes, other chronic conditions, and acute illnesses during 1,867 visits by patients > or =40 years of age. RESULTS: Of 20 DOC behavioral categories, 10 exhibited differences among the three groups. Discriminant analysis identified two distinct factors that distinguished visits for chronic disease from visits for acute illness and visits for diabetes from those for other chronic diseases. Compared with visits for other chronic diseases, visits for diabetes devoted a greater proportion of time to nutrition counseling, health education, and feedback on results and less time to chatting. Compared with visits for acute illness, visits for diabetes were longer and involved a higher proportion of dietary advice, negotiation, and assessment of compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Visits for diabetes are distinct from visits for other chronic diseases and acute illnesses in ways that may facilitate patient self-management. Novel quality-improvement interventions could support and expand existing differences between family physicians' current approaches to care of diabetes and other chronic and acute illnesses.

Facilitating participatory decision-making: what happens in real-world community practice?

BACKGROUND: Participatory decision-making (PDM), a widely held ideal, depends on physician facilitation of patient participation. However, little is known about how PDM facilitation is actualized in outpatient primary care. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of physician facilitation of PDM in community family practices and associated physician, patient, and visit characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional observational study. SUBJECTS: The study included 3,453 patients seen by 138 family physicians in 84 community practices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Research nurses directly observed PDM facilitation in consecutive adult outpatient visits. The association between PDM facilitation and patient, physician, and visit characteristics was assessed with multilevel multivariable regression. RESULTS: PDM facilitation occurred during 25% of observed patient visits. Rates varied considerably among physicians, from 0% to 79% of visits. Patient satisfaction was not associated with PDM facilitation. In multivariable analyses, employed physicians, chronic illness visits, longer visit duration, and visits involving referral were independently associated with PDM facilitation. Visits in which greater time was spent planning treatment and conducting health education were also more likely to involve facilitation of PDM. CONCLUSIONS: Community family physicians facilitate PDM at highly variable rates but focus it on patients with the greatest medical needs and most complex levels of decision making. This selective approach appears to meet patient expectations, because PDM facilitation and patient satisfaction are not associated. If patient participation is to be more widely incorporated into outpatient primary care, it must be addressed within the complexity and multiple demands of community practice.