RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify factors that may be important in determining whether a degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-L5 is mobile. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Degenerative scoliosis is a common condition among middle-aged and elderly adults. Sacropelvic morphology and orientation modulate the geometry of the lumbar spine and, consequently, the mechanical stresses at the lumbo-sacral junction. To date, no in vivo data exist to describe the relationship between these pelvic parameters and their association with a mobile spondylolisthesis. METHOD: Sixty consecutive patients with a degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) at L4-L5 with adequate imaging were identified. Patient groups were defined on the basis of whether the DS was mobile (Group A) or nonmobile (Group B) when comparing the upright plain lumbar radiograph to the supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We assessed the grade of slip, lumbar lordosis, pelvic parameters, and facet characteristics (angles, tropism, presents of effusion, degenerative score-cartilage and sclerosis values) as well as disc degenerative score (Pfirrmann) at L4-L5. RESULTS: There were 40 patients in Group A and 20 in Group B. No significant differences were found between groups for pelvic incidence (p = .409), pelvic tilt (p = .476), sacral slope (p = .785), lumbar lordosis (p = .695), degree of facet tropism (p = .38), and magnitude of the facet effusions (p = .01). Facet angle differences between groups approached significance (p = .058). Significant differences between groups were found in cartilage degenerative score (p = .01), facet sclerosis grade (p = .01), and disc degenerative score (p < .0001). In Group A, 10 of 40 (25%) reduced fully and were not apparent on the supine MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal pelvic parameters do not play a significant role in differentiating between mobile and nonmobile DS at L4-L5. However, DS does appear to be associated with more sagittally orientated facets, higher Pfirrmann grade, and higher facet cartilage and sclerosis degenerative scores.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Traumatic neck pain is a common presentation to the emergency department. Lateral plain radiographs remain the primary investigation in the assessment of these injuries. Soft tissue assessment forms an integral component of these radiographs. They can provide information on subtle injuries that may not be obvious. Many methods are used to assess the prevertebral soft tissue shadows. The two more commonly used techniques include the 'seven at two and two at seven' rule (method 1) and the ratio of the soft tissues with respect to the vertebral width (method 2). AIM: To assess which of the above two methods in assessing cervical spine soft tissue shadows on lateral radiographs is more sensitive in the presence of cervical spine injuries. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive traumatic cervical spine films performed within a busy trauma tertiary centre over a period of 7 months. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1-fractures; group 2-no fractures. The prevertebral soft tissue shadows were measured at referenced points on the lateral cervical spine films with respect to the above two methods and comparisons between the groups were made. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients in group 1 were compared to a control group of 60 patients in group 2. Both methods failed to identify any significant differences between the two groups. The sensitivity and specificity for method 1 was 7.6 and 93 %, and for method 2, they were 7.6 and 98 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between the soft tissue shadows when comparing patients with and without cervical spine fractures on lateral radiographs. Both commonly used measures of soft tissue shadows in clinical practice are insensitive in identifying patients with significant osseous injuries. They, therefore, do not offer any further value in interpreting traumatic cervical spine radiographs. The management of patients with cervical spine trauma in the absence of obvious osseous injury on standard radiographs should warrant a computed tomography (CT) scan if clinically indicated.