Involuntary arm movements post-pacemaker insertion - real or Reel syndrome?

BACKGROUND: Twiddler syndrome, and the variant Reel syndrome, are rare but important complications of pacemaker implantation. CASE SUMMARY: We describe a rare complication of conventional permanent pacemaker implantation of rhythmic arm twitching secondary to brachial plexus stimulation from a displaced pacing lead caused by Reel syndrome. DISCUSSION: Twiddler syndrome and its variants are rare but important complications of pacemaker insertion. Holistic planning of cardiac procedures in elderly patients should identify those at risk to allow for targeted education and post-procedural care.

Non-invasive electrocardiographic mapping on the ward to guide ablation of premature ventricular contractions.

Premature ventricular contracts (PVCs) are commonly encountered in clinical practice, but their ablation can prove difficult. In 15 patients with idiopathic PVCs, non-invasive mapping system View Into Ventricular Onset ™ (VIVO) in combination with 12­lead Holter monitoring on the ward accurately guided catheter ablation via the creation of 'electrical roadmaps' of ventricular activation. This allowed for better discussions of risks and benefits with the patient prior to the procedure, and is likely to have particular advantages for patients with a low PVC burden, multiple morphologies, or difficult to reach origins. CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE: PERSONALISED APPROACH: A novel non-invasive mapping tool in combination with technology, such as 12 lead Holter monitoring, allows for individualised, accurate prediction of PVC origin outside the electrophysiology (EP) lab. NON-INVASIVE MAPPING: An "electrical road map" can be implemented into 3D electroanatomical mapping systems, shortening procedure times and resulting in excellent clinical outcomes. POTENTIAL BENEFITS: VIVO could be used to improve catheter ablation outcomes for patients with infrequent PVCs, multiple morphologies and/or difficult to reach origins.

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: An International Multicenter Registry Study.

BACKGROUND: Data on atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and outcomes are limited in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). We aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients with CHD presenting for AF ablation and their outcomes. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective analysis was performed of patients with CHD undergoing AF ablation between 2004 and 2020 at 13 participating centers. The severity of CHD was classified using 2014 Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society/Heart Rhythm Society guidelines. Clinical data were collected. One-year complete procedural success was defined as freedom from atrial tachycardia or AF in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs or including previously failed antiarrhythmic drugs (partial success). RESULTS: Of 240 patients, 127 (53.4%) had persistent AF, 62.5% were male, and mean age was 55.2±13.3 years. CHD complexity categories included 147 (61.3%) simple, 68 (28.3%) intermediate, and 25 (10.4%) severe. The most common CHD type was atrial septal defect (n=78). More complex CHD conditions included transposition of the great arteries (n=14), anomalous pulmonary veins (n=13), tetralogy of Fallot (n=8), cor triatriatum (n=7), single ventricle physiology (n=2), among others. The majority (71.3%) of patients had trialed at least one antiarrhythmic drug. Forty-six patients (22.1%) had reduced systemic ventricular ejection fraction <50%, and mean left atrial diameter was 44.1±8.2 mm. Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 227 patients (94.6%); additional ablation included left atrial linear ablations (40%), complex fractionated atrial electrogram (19.2%), and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (40.8%). One-year complete and partial success rates were 45.0% and 20.5%, respectively, with no significant difference in the rate of complete success between complexity groups. Overall, 38 patients (15.8%) required more than one ablation procedure. There were 3 (1.3%) major and 13 (5.4%) minor procedural complications. CONCLUSIONS: AF ablation in CHD was safe and resulted in AF control in a majority of patients, regardless of complexity. Future work should address the most appropriate ablation targets in this challenging population.