RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) is not only a increasing medical but also economical problem. METHODS: Data from the DRG project group of the German society for digestive and metabolic diseases (DGVS) were analyzed for CDAD. Out of 430,875 cases from 37 German hospitals 2,767 cases were grouped by having CDAD either as primary (PD) or secondary diagnosis (SD; likely to be from a hospital source) in an initial or recurring hospital stay (RD). For comparison non-CDAD cases from the same hospitals from that year where matched using propensity score matching. As endpoints we defined LOS (length of stay), difference of LOS to national average LOS, total costs per case and difference between costs and revenue for all three groups. RESULTS: Patients from the PD group (nâ=â817) showed a mean LOS of 11.2 days compared to 8.5 days for the control group, 4,132â mean cost per case (536â more than control) and a mean loss of -1,064â per case compared to -636â. In the SD group (nâ=â1,840) patients stayed in the hospital for 28.8 days (control: 18.1 days), had costs of 19,381â (control: 13,082â) and a loss of -3,442â compared to -849â in the control group.âRecurring cases (RD; nâ=â110) showed a LOS of 37.3 days (control: 21.3 days), had even higher costs (20.755â vs. 13,101â) and higher losses (-4,196â vs. -1,109â). CONCLUSION: By extrapolating these findings CDAD not only harms patients but generates a yearly cost burden of 464 million for the German healthcare system including a loss of 197 million for German hospitals. To the authors' opinion sufficient measures against CDAD should include pre hospital risk reduction programs, introduction of effective therapeutic and hygienic strategies in hospitals as well as improvements in documentation for these cases to support further developments of the German DRG system.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/economía , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/epidemiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Distribución por Edad , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estadística & datos numéricos , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/microbiología , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por SexoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The management of bloodstream infections especially sepsis is a difficult task. An optimal antibiotic therapy (ABX) is paramount for success. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a well investigated biomarker that allows close monitoring of the infection and management of ABX. It has proven to be a cost-efficient diagnostic tool. In Diagnoses Related Groups (DRG) based reimbursement systems, hospitals get only a fixed amount of money for certain treatments. Thus it's very important to obtain an optimal balance of clinical treatment and resource consumption namely the length of stay in hospital and especially in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). We investigated which economic effects an optimized PCT-based algorithm for antibiotic management could have. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected inpatient episode data from 16 hospitals. These data contain administrative and clinical information such as length of stay, days in the ICU or diagnoses and procedures. From various RCTs and reviews there are different algorithms for the use of PCT to manage ABX published. Moreover RCTs and meta-analyses have proven possible savings in days of ABX (ABD) and length of stay in ICU (ICUD). As the meta-analyses use studies on different patient populations (pneumonia, sepsis, other bacterial infections), we undertook a short meta-analyses of 6 relevant studies investigating in sepsis or ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). From this analyses we obtained savings in ABD and ICUD by calculating the weighted mean differences. Then we designed a new PCT-based algorithm using results from two very recent reviews. The algorithm contains evidence from several studies. From the patient data we calculated cost estimates using German National standard costing information for the German G-DRG system. We developed a simulation model where the possible savings and the extra costs for (in average) 8 PCT tests due to our algorithm were brought into equation. RESULTS: We calculated ABD savings of 4 days and ICUD reductions of -1.8 days. Our algorithm contains recommendations for ABX onset (PCT ≥ 0.5 ng/ml), validation whether ABX is appropriate or not (Delta from day 2 to day 3 ≥ 30% indicates inappropriate ABX) and recommendations for discontinuing ABX (PCT ≤ 0.25 ng/ml). We received 278,264 episode datasets where we identified by computer-based selection 3,263 cases with sepsis. After excluding cases with length of stay (LOS) too short to achieve the intended savings, we ended with 1,312 cases with ICUD and 268 cases without ICUD. Average length of stay of ICU-patients was 27.7 ± 25.7 days and for Non-ICU patients 17.5 ± 14.6 days respectively. ICU patients had an average of 8.8 ± 8.7 ICUD. - After applying the simulation model on this population we calculated possible savings of Euro -1,163,000 for ICU-patients and Euro -36,512 for Non-ICU patients. DISCUSSION: Our findings concerning the savings from the reduction of ABD are consistent with other publications. Savings ICUD had never been economically evaluated so far. Our algorithm is able to possibly set a new standard in PCT-based ABX. However the findings are based on data modelling. The algorithm will be implemented in 5-10 hospitals in 2012 and effects in clinical reality measured 6 months after implementation. CONCLUSION: Managing sepsis with daily monitoring of PCT using our refined algorithm is suitable to save substantial costs in hospitals. Implementation in clinical routine settings will show how much of the calculated effect will be achieved in reality.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Antibacterianos/economía , Calcitonina/sangre , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Precursores de Proteínas/sangre , Sepsis/economía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores/sangre , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Simulación por Computador , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Alemania , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/economía , Sepsis/sangre , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) often occurring as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most frequent hospital infection in intensive care units (ICU). Early adequate antimicrobial therapy is an essential determinant of clinical outcome. Organisations like the German PEG or ATS/ IDSA provide guidelines for the initial calculated treatment in the absence of pathogen identification. We conducted a retrospective chart review for patients with HAP/VAP and assessed whether the initial intravenous antibiotic therapy (IIAT) was adequate according to the PEG guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected data from 5 tertiary care hospitals. Electronic data filtering identified 895 patients with potential HAP/VAP. After chart review we finally identified 221 patients meeting the definition of HAP/VAP. Primary study endpoints were clinical improvement, survival and length of stay. Secondary endpoints included duration of mechanical ventilation, total costs, costs incurred on the intensive care unit (ICU), costs incurred on general wards and drug costs. RESULTS: We found that 107 patients received adequate initial intravenous antibiotic therapy (IIAT) vs. 114 with inadequate IIAT according to the PEG guidelines. Baseline characteristics of both groups revealed no significant differences and good comparability. Clinical improvement was 64% over all patients and 82% (85/104) in the subpopulation with adequate IIAT while only 47% (48/103) inadequately treated patients improved (p< 0.001). The odds ratio of therapeutic success with GA versus NGA treatment was 5.821 (p<0.001, [95% CI: 2.712-12.497]). Survival was 80% for the total population (n = 221), 86% in the adequately treated (92/107) and 74% in the inadequately treated subpopulation (84/114) (p = 0.021). The odds ratio of mortality for GA vs. NGA treatment was 0.565 (p=0.117, [95% CI: 0.276-1.155]). Adequately treated patients had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) (23.9 vs. 28.3 days; p = 0.022), require significantly less hours of mechanical ventilation (175 vs. 274; p = 0.001), incurred lower total costs (EUR 28,033 vs. EUR 36,139, p = 0.006) and lower ICU-related costs (EUR 13,308 vs. EUR 18,666, p = 0.003). Drug costs for the hospital stay were also lower (EUR 4,069 vs. EUR 4,833) yet not significant. The most frequent types of inadequate therapy were monotherapy instead of combination therapy, wrong type of penicillin and wrong type of cephalosporin. DISCUSSION: These findings are consistent with those from other studies analyzing the impact of guideline adherence on survival rates, clinical success, LOS and costs. However, inadequately treated patients had a higher complicated pathogen risk score (CPRS) compared to those who received adequate therapy. This shows that therapy based on local experiences may be sufficient for patients with low CPRS but inadequate for those with high CPRS. Linear regression models showed that single items of the CPRS like extrapulmonary organ failure or late onset had no significant influence on the results. CONCLUSION: Guideline-adherent initial intravenous antibiotic therapy is clinically superior, saves lives and is less expensive than non guideline adherent therapy. Using a CPRS score can be a useful tool to determine the right choice of initial intravenous antibiotic therapy. The net effect on the German healthcare system per year is estimated at up to 2,042 lives and EUR 125,819,000 saved if guideline-adherent initial therapy for HAP/VAP were established in all German ICUs.