RESUMEN
We report the case of a 56-year-old male heart transplant recipient, who underwent postoperative pacemaker implantation through a left sided superior vena cava (LSVC) via anonymous vein. We describe our successful management of this case. We suggest that the specific anatomic conditions should be considered in all heart transplant recipients with LSVC if pacemaker implantation is necessary postoperatively.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Marcapaso Artificial , Vena Cava Superior/anomalías , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
The experience of 579 patients with left ventricular pacing specific characteristics of various leads and lead types for left ventricular stimulation are reported. After describing the advantages of coronary vein (CV) leads versus epicardial lead usage for left ventricular stimulation, commercially available CV leads are introduced and discussed. Since there is no universally applicable CV lead, the individual optimal lead choice and the sequelae of erroneous lead choice are described in typical clinical examples.