RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the optimal threshold iodine density to distinguish enhancing and nonenhancing renal masses with dual-layer dual-energy CT (dlDECT). METHODS: In this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study, 383 consecutive renal mass dlDECT studies from September 5, 2018, through December 15, 2022, were reviewed for enhancing solid renal masses with ≥∆20 HU. Studies with simple cysts in the same interval served as controls. Lesion ROI HU measurements on unenhanced and nephrographic phases and ROI iodine density measurements of each lesion and the abdominal aorta for normalization were recorded. The mean lesion HU values and absolute and normalized iodine densities were compared with enhancing and nonenhancing renal lesions using a two-sample t test. The diagnostic accuracy of iodine thresholds was assessed by calculating sensitivity and specificity, with receiver operating characteristic curve and AUC analysis. RESULTS: There were 38 enhancing and 39 nonenhancing renal lesions. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) ∆HU was 73.5 (38.7) and 3.9 (5.1) HU for enhancing and nonenhancing lesions, respectively. The mean absolute iodine density was significantly different for enhancing and nonenhancing lesions (3.2 [1.7] mg/mL and 0.20 [0.22] mg/mL, respectively; P < 0.0001). Normalized mean iodine density was significantly different for enhancing and nonenhancing lesions (0.62 [0.33] mg/mL and 0.04 [0.04] mg/mL, respectively; P < 0.0001). The optimal absolute iodine density threshold of 0.70 mg/mL (AUC, 0.999) and normalized iodine density threshold of 0.11 mg/mL (AUC, 0.999) were 100% sensitive and 97.4% specific for discriminating enhancing and nonenhancing renal lesions. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides absolute and normalized iodine density thresholds to distinguish enhancing and nonenhancing renal lesions with high sensitivity and specificity using dlDECT.
RESUMEN
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high healthcare utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including computed tomography angiography, catheter angiography, computed tomography enterography, magnetic resonance enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Consenso , Estados Unidos , Gastroenterología/normas , Sociedades Médicas , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Diagnóstico por Imagen/normas , Endoscopía GastrointestinalRESUMEN
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is the most common GI diagnosis leading to hospitalization within the United States. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of GI bleeding is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing high health care utilization and costs. Radiologic techniques including CT angiography, catheter angiography, CT enterography, MR enterography, nuclear medicine red blood cell scan, and technetium-99m pertechnetate scintigraphy (Meckel scan) are frequently used to evaluate patients with GI bleeding and are complementary to GI endoscopy. However, multiple management guidelines exist, which differ in the recommended utilization of these radiologic examinations. This variability can lead to confusion as to how these tests should be used in the evaluation of GI bleeding. In this document, a panel of experts from the American College of Gastroenterology and Society of Abdominal Radiology provide a review of the radiologic examinations used to evaluate for GI bleeding including nomenclature, technique, performance, advantages, and limitations. A comparison of advantages and limitations relative to endoscopic examinations is also included. Finally, consensus statements and recommendations on technical parameters and utilization of radiologic techniques for GI bleeding are provided. © Radiological Society of North America and the American College of Gastroenterology, 2024. Supplemental material is available for this article. This article is being published concurrently in American Journal of Gastroenterology and Radiology. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. Citations from either journal can be used when citing this article. See also the editorial by Lockhart in this issue.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Radiología , Humanos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Angiografía , CatéteresRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Appropriate follow-up of incidental adrenal masses (IAMs) is infrequent. We implemented a quality improvement (QI) program to improve management of IAMs. STUDY DESIGN: This system-wide initiative targeted primary care providers (PCPs) after IAM detection. It incorporated (1) chart-based messages and emails to PCPs, (2) an evidence-based IAM evaluation algorithm, (3) standardized recommendations in radiology reports, and (4) access to a multispecialty adrenal clinic. Patients diagnosed with an IAM from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019, were prospectively included (the "QI cohort") and compared with a historical, preintervention cohort diagnosed with IAMs in 2016. The primary outcomes were the initiation of an IAM investigation by the PCP, defined as relevant clinical history-taking, laboratory screening, follow-up imaging, or specialist referral. RESULTS: The QI cohort included 437 patients and 210 in the historical cohort. All patients had 12 months or more of follow-up. In the QI cohort, 35.5% (155 of 437) met the primary endpoint for PCP-initiated evaluation, compared with 27.6% (58 of 210) in the historical cohort (p = 0.0496). Among the subgroup with a documented PCP working within our health system, 46.3% (74 of 160) met the primary endpoint in the QI cohort vs 33.3% (38 of 114) in the historical cohort (p = 0.035). After adjusting for insurance status, presence of current malignancy, initial imaging setting (outpatient, inpatient, or emergency department), and having an established PCP within our health system, patients in the QI cohort had 1.70 times higher odds (95% CI 1.16 to 2.50) of undergoing a PCP-initiated IAM evaluation. Adrenal surgery was ultimately performed in 2.1% (9 of 437) of QI cohort patients and 0.95% (2 of 210) of historical cohort patients (p = 0.517). CONCLUSIONS: This simple, moderately labor-intensive QI intervention was associated with increased IAM evaluation initiated by PCPs.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vulnerable populations have worse hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) outcomes. We sought to understand if this could be mitigated at a safety-net hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of HCC patients was conducted (2007-2018). Stage at presentation, intervention and systemic therapy were analyzed (Chi-square for categorical variables and Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables) and median survival calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: 388 HCC patients were identified. Sociodemographic factors were similar for stage at presentation, except insurance status (diagnosis at earlier stages for commercial insurance and later stages for safety-net/no insurance). Higher education level and origin of mainland US increased intervention rates for all stages. Early-stage disease patients had no differences in receipt of intervention or therapy. Late-stage disease patients with higher education level had increased intervention rates. Median survival was not impacted by any sociodemographic factor. CONCLUSION: Urban safety-net hospitals with a focus on vulnerable patient populations provide equitable outcomes and can serve as a model to address inequities in HCC management.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a potentially life-threatening condition accounting for more than 300 000 annual hospitalizations. Multidetector abdominopelvic CT angiography is commonly used in the evaluation of patients with GI bleeding. Given that many patients with severe overt GI bleeding are unlikely to tolerate bowel preparation, and inpatient colonoscopy is frequently limited by suboptimal preparation obscuring mucosal visibility, CT angiography is recommended as a first-line diagnostic test in patients with severe hematochezia to localize a source of bleeding. Assessment of these patients with conventional single-energy CT systems typically requires the performance of a noncontrast series followed by imaging during multiple postcontrast phases. Dual-energy CT (DECT) offers several potential advantages for performing these examinations. DECT may eliminate the need for a noncontrast acquisition by allowing the creation of virtual noncontrast (VNC) images from contrast-enhanced data, affording significant radiation dose reduction while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. VNC images can help radiologists to differentiate active bleeding, hyperattenuating enteric contents, hematomas, and enhancing masses. Additional postprocessing techniques such as low-kiloelectron voltage virtual monoenergetic images, iodine maps, and iodine overlay images can increase the conspicuity of contrast material extravasation and improve the visibility of subtle causes of GI bleeding, thereby increasing diagnostic confidence and assisting with problem solving. GI bleeding can also be diagnosed with routine single-phase DECT scans by constructing VNC images and iodine maps. Radiologists should also be aware of the potential pitfalls and limitations of DECT. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Imagen Radiográfica por Emisión de Doble Fotón , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Intestino Delgado , Yodo , Imagen Radiográfica por Emisión de Doble Fotón/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Incidental adrenal masses (IAMs) are common but rarely evaluated. To improve this, we developed a standardized radiology report recommendation template and investigated its implementation and effectiveness. METHODS: We prospectively studied implementation of a standardized IAM reporting template as part of an ongoing quality improvement initiative, which also included primary care provider (PCP) notifications and a straightforward clinical algorithm. Data were obtained via medical record review and a survey of radiologists. Outcomes included template adoption rates and acceptability (implementation measures), as well as the proportion of patients evaluated and time to follow-up (effectiveness outcomes). RESULTS: Of 4,995 imaging studies, 200 (4.0%) detected a new IAM. The standardized template was used in 54 reports (27.0%). All radiologists surveyed were aware of the template, and 91% affirmed that standardized recommendations are useful. Patients whose reports included the template were more likely to have PCP follow-up after IAM discovery compared with those with no template (53.7% versus 36.3%, P = .03). After adjusting for sex, current or prior malignancy, and provider ordering the initial imaging (PCP, other outpatient provider, or emergency department or inpatient provider), odds of PCP follow-up remained 2.0 times higher (95% confidence interval 1.02-3.9). Patients whose reports included the template had a shorter time to PCP follow-up (log-rank P = .018). PCPs ultimately placed orders for biochemical testing (35.2% versus 18.5%, P = .01), follow-up imaging (40.7% versus 23.3%, P = .02), and specialist referral (22.2% versus 4.8%, P < .01) for a higher proportion of patients who received the template compared with those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a standardized template to communicate IAM recommendations was associated with improved IAM evaluation. Our template demonstrated high acceptability, but additional strategies are necessary to optimize adoption.
Asunto(s)
Hallazgos Incidentales , Radiología , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Diagnóstico por ImagenRESUMEN
This article presents the MR protocols, imaging features, diagnostic criteria, and complications of commonly encountered emergencies in pancreaticobiliary imaging, which include pancreatic trauma, bile leak, acute cholecystitis, biliary obstruction, and pancreatitis. Various classifications and complications that can arise with these conditions, as well as artifacts that may mimic pathology, are also included. Finally, the emerging utility of abbreviated MR protocols is discussed.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Vías Biliares , Enfermedades Pancreáticas , Pancreatitis , Enfermedades de las Vías Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Urgencias Médicas , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Two years into the COVID-19 pandemic, there are few published accounts of postmortem SARS-CoV-2 pathology in children. We report 8 such cases (4 infants aged 7-36 weeks, 4 children aged 5-15 years). Four underwent ex vivo magnetic resonance neuroimaging, to assist in identification of subtle lesions related to vascular compromise. All infants were found unresponsive (3 in unsafe sleeping conditions); all but 1 had recent rhinitis and/or influenza-like illness (ILI) in the family; 1 had history of sickle cell disease. Ex vivo neuroimaging in 1 case revealed white matter (WM) signal hyperintensity and diffuse exaggeration of perivascular spaces, corresponding microscopically to WM mineralization. Neurohistology in the remaining 3 infants variably encompassed WM gliosis and mineralization; brainstem gliosis; perivascular vacuolization; perivascular lymphocytes and brainstem microglia. One had ectopic hippocampal neurons (with pathogenic variant in DEPDC5). Among the children, 3 had underlying conditions (e.g., obesity, metabolic disease, autism) and all presented with ILI. Three had laboratory testing suggesting multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C). Two were hospitalized for critical care including mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); one (co-infected with adenovirus) developed right carotid stroke ipsilateral to the ECMO cannula and the other required surgery for an ingested foreign body. Autopsy findings included: acute lung injury in 3 (1 with microthrombi); and one each with diabetic ketoacidosis and cardiac hypertrophy; coronary and cerebral arteritis and aortitis, resembling Kawasaki disease; and neuronal storage and enlarged fatty liver. All 4 children had subtle meningoencephalitis, focally involving the brainstem. On ex vivo neuroimaging, 1 had focal pontine susceptibility with corresponding perivascular inflammation/expanded perivascular spaces on histopathology. Results suggest SARS-CoV-2 in infants may present as sudden unexpected infant death, while in older children, signs and symptoms point to severe disease. Underlying conditions may predispose to fatal outcomes. As in adults, the neuropathologic changes may be subtle, with vascular changes such as perivascular vacuolization and gliosis alongside sparse perivascular lymphocytes. Detection of subtle vascular pathology is enhanced by ex vivo neuroimaging. Additional analysis of the peripheral/autonomic nervous system and investigation of co-infection in children with COVID-19 is necessary to understand risk for cardiovascular collapse/sudden death.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine if rapid switching dual-energy CT (rsDECT) provides improvements in vascular attenuation, subjective diagnostic quality, and detection of vascular injuries compared to conventional CT in trauma patients undergoing lower extremity CT angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The IRB approved this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Informed consent was waived. Thirty-nine patients with acute lower extremity trauma including gunshot wounds (19 patients), falls (6 patients), motor vehicle accidents (5 patients), stab wounds (4 patients), pedestrian struck (2 patients), and unspecified trauma (3 patients) who underwent IV contrast-enhanced rsDECT angiography of the lower extremities on a rapid-kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT scanner (Revolution CT, GE Healthcare) from 6/4/2019 to 1/14/2021 were studied. 7 patients were initially positive for vascular injury on conventional CT, while 32 patients were negative. Blended CT reconstructions simulating conventional 120 kVp single-energy CT, and rsDECT reconstructions (50 keV monoenergetic and iodine density maps) were reviewed. Region of interest contrast density measurements were recorded on conventional and 50 keV reconstructions at multiple levels from the distal aorta to the ankles and compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Vascular contrast density of 150 HU was used as a minimum cutoff for diagnostically adequate opacification. Images were interpreted by consensus for subjective image quality and presence of injury on both conventional and DECT reconstructions by two fellowship-trained abdominal radiologists blinded to clinical data, and compared using the paired McNemar test. RESULTS: Density measurement differences between conventional and rsDECT at every level of the bilateral lower extremities were statistically significant, with the average difference ranging from 304 Hounsfield units (HU) in the distal aorta to 121 HU at the ankles (p < 0.0001). Using a cutoff of 150 HU, 9.5% (93/976) and 3.1% of vascular segments (30/976) were considered non-diagnostic in the conventional and rsDECT groups, respectively, a reduction of 67.7% (p < 0.0001). Subjective image quality between conventional and rsDECT was not statistically significant, but there were 7 vascular segments out of a total of 976 segments across 3 different patients out of a total of 39 patients in which diagnostic quality was upgraded from non-diagnostic on conventional CT to diagnostic on rsDECT, all of which showed suboptimal bolus quality on conventional CT (unmeasurable in 4/7 and ranging from 56-146 HU in the remaining 3). Similarly, rate of injury detection was identical between conventional CT (15/39 patients) and DECT (15/39 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular contrast density is statistically significantly higher with rsDECT compared to conventional CT, and subjective image quality was upgraded from non-diagnostic on conventional CT to diagnostic on rsDECT in 7 vascular segments across 3 patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: rsDECT provides greater vascular contrast density than conventional CT, with potential to salvage suboptimal examinations caused by poor contrast opacification.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Pierna , Imagen Radiográfica por Emisión de Doble Fotón , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Medios de Contraste , Humanos , Traumatismos de la Pierna/diagnóstico por imagen , Extremidad Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Imagen Radiográfica por Emisión de Doble Fotón/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Despite guidelines developed to standardize the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, significant variability remains in recommendations and practice. The purpose of this survey was to obtain information on practice patterns for the evaluation of overt lower GI bleeding (LGIB) and suspected small bowel bleeding. A 34-question electronic survey was sent to all Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) members. Responses were received from 52 unique institutions (40 from the United States). Only 26 (50%) utilize LGIB management guidelines. 32 (62%) use CT angiography (CTA) for initial evaluation in unstable patients. In stable patients with suspected LGIB, CTA is the preferred initial exam at 21 (40%) versus colonoscopy at 24 (46%) institutions. CTA use increases after hours for both unstable (n = 32 vs. 35, 62% vs. 67%) and stable patients (n = 21 vs. 27, 40% vs 52%). CTA is required before conventional angiography for stable (n = 36, 69%) and unstable (n = 15, 29%) patients. 38 (73%) institutions obtain two post-contrast phases for CTA. 49 (94%) institutions perform CT enterography (CTE) for occult small bowel bleeding with capsule endoscopy (n = 26, 50%) and CTE (n = 21, 40%) being the initial test performed. 35 (67%) institutions perform multiphase CTE for occult small bowel bleeding. In summary, stable and unstable patients with overt lower GI are frequently imaged with CTA, while CTE is frequently performed for suspected occult small bowel bleeding.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular , Radiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Humanos , Radiografía Abdominal , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Incidental adrenal masses (IAMs) are common. Primary care providers (PCPs) are frequently responsible for incidentaloma evaluations. We evaluated whether PCPs view this paradigm effective, barriers faced, and strategies to optimize care delivery. METHODS: This is a sequential explanatory study, comprised of surveys followed by focus groups of PCPs. Because lung nodules are another type of common incidental finding, we compared PCP views on management of lung nodules to their views on IAMs. RESULTS: For IAMs, 22.3% of PCPs "always refer" to specialists, but for lung nodules this was 11.5% (p = 0.026). For lung nodules, the most significant barrier was insufficient time/support to longitudinally follow results (69%), but for IAMs it was uncertainty about which tests to order (68%). Fear of litigation was equal (lung = 22.5%, IAMs = 21.3%). Consistent themes regarding the "ideal" system included specific recommendations in radiology reports; automation of orders for follow-up tests; longitudinal tracking tools; streamlined consultations; and decision guides embedded within the electronic health record. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents are more comfortable with lung nodules than IAMs. Management of "incidentalomas" is within their scope of practice, but the current system can be optimized.
Asunto(s)
Hallazgos Incidentales , Derivación y Consulta , Humanos , Pulmón , Atención Primaria de Salud , EspecializaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Incidental adrenal masses (IAMs) are detected in approximately 1%-2% of abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. Recent estimates suggest that more than 70-million relevant CT scans are performed annually in the United States; thus, IAMs represent a significant clinical entity. Most clinical guidelines recommend an initial follow-up evaluation that includes imaging and biochemical testing after index IAM detection. METHODS: Systematic review of literature in the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases to determine whether guidelines regarding IAM evaluation are followed and to identify effective management strategies. Our initial search was in January 2018 and updated in November, 2019. RESULTS: 31 studies met inclusion criteria. In most institutions, only a minority of patients with IAMs undergo initial follow-up imaging (median 34%, IQR 20%-50%) or biochemical testing (median 18%, IQR 15%-28%). 2 interventions shown to improve IAM evaluation are IAM-specific recommendations in radiology reports and dedicated multi-disciplinary teams. Interventions focused solely on alerting the ordering clinician or primary care provider to the presence of an IAM have not demonstrated effectiveness. Patients who are referred to an endocrinologist are more likely to have a complete IAM evaluation, but few are referred. DISCUSSION: Most patients with an IAM do not have an initial evaluation. The radiology report has been identified as a key component in determining whether IAMs are evaluated appropriately. Care teams dedicated to management of incidental radiographic findings also improve IAM follow-up. Although the evidence base is sparse, these interventions may be a starting point for further inquiry into optimizing care in this common clinical scenario.
Asunto(s)
Derivación y Consulta , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Hallazgos IncidentalesRESUMEN
Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common potentially life-threatening medical condition frequently requiring multidisciplinary collaboration to reach the proper diagnosis and guide management. GI bleeding can be overt (eg, visible hemorrhage such as hematemesis, hematochezia, or melena) or occult (eg, positive fecal occult blood test or iron deficiency anemia). Upper GI bleeding, which originates proximal to the ligament of Treitz, is more common than lower GI bleeding, which arises distal to the ligament of Treitz. Small bowel bleeding accounts for 5-10% of GI bleeding cases commonly manifesting as obscure GI bleeding, where the source remains unknown after complete GI tract endoscopic and imaging evaluation. CT can aid in identifying the location and cause of bleeding and is an important complementary tool to endoscopy, nuclear medicine, and angiography in evaluating patients with GI bleeding. For radiologists, interpreting CT scans in patients with GI bleeding can be challenging owing to the large number of images and the diverse potential causes of bleeding. The purpose of this pictorial review by the Society of Abdominal Radiology GI Bleeding Disease-Focused Panel is to provide a practical resource for radiologists interpreting GI bleeding CT studies that reviews the proper GI bleeding terminology, the most common causes of GI bleeding, key patient history and risk factors, the optimal CT imaging technique, and guidelines for case interpretation and illustrates many common causes of GI bleeding. A CT reporting template is included to help generate radiology reports that can add value to patient care. An invited commentary by Al Hawary is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Angiografía , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare conventional and dual-energy CT (DECT) for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and gangrene. METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive adult patients with abdominal pain who underwent IV contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT on a dual-layer (dlDECT) or rapid-switching (rsDECT) scanner from September, 2018 to April, 2021 with cholecystectomy and pathology-confirmed cholecystitis were retrospectively reviewed, and compared with 57 consecutive adult patients without cholecystitis from the same interval scanned with DECT. Images were reviewed independently by two abdominal radiologists with 12 and 16 years of experience in two sessions 4 weeks apart, blinded to clinical data. Initially, only blended reconstructions (simulating conventional single-energy CT images) were reviewed (CT). Subsequently, CT and DECT reconstructions including low-keV virtual monoenergetic images and iodine maps were reviewed. Gallbladder fossa hyperemia, pericholecystic fluid, subjective presence of gangrene, heterogeneous wall enhancement, sloughed membranes, intramural air, abscess, overall impression of the presence of acute cholecystitis, and intramural iodine density were assessed. RESULTS: Gallbladder fossa hyperemia was detected with increased sensitivity on DECT (R1, 61.4%; R2, 75.4%) vs. CT (R1, 22.8%; R2, 15.8%). DECT showed increased sensitivity for gangrene (R1, 24.6%; R2, 38.6%) vs. CT (R1, 5.3%; R2, 14%), heterogeneous wall enhancement (DECT: R1, 33.3%; R2, 63.2% vs. CT: R1, 7%; R2, 31.6%), and cholecystitis (DECT: R1, 86%; R2, 89.5% vs. CT: R1, 77.2%; R2, 70.2%). In addition, DECT was more sensitive for the detection of acute cholecystitis (R1, 86%; R2, 89.5%) vs. CT (R1, 77.2%; R2, 70.2%). Iodine density threshold of 1.2 mg/ml, 0.8 mg/mL, and 0.5 mg/mL showed specificity for gangrenous cholecystitis of 78.26%, 86.96%, and 95.65%, respectively, using the rsDECT platform. CONCLUSION: DECT showed improved sensitivity compared to conventional CT for detection of acute cholecystitis. Iodine density measurements may be helpful to diagnose gangrene.
Asunto(s)
Colecistitis Aguda , Colecistitis , Yodo , Adulto , Colecistitis Aguda/diagnóstico por imagen , Medios de Contraste , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to quantify improved rates of follow-up and additional important diagnoses made after notification for overdue workups recommended by radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Standard reports from imaging studies performed at our institution from October through November 2016 were searched for the words "recommend" or "advised," yielding 9784 studies. Of these, 5245 were excluded, yielding 4539 studies; reports for 1599 of these 4539 consecutive studies were reviewed to identify firm or soft recommendations or findings requiring immediate management. If recommended follow-ups were incomplete within 1 month of the advised time, providers were notified. Compliance was calculated before and after notification and was compared using a one-sample test of proportion. RESULTS. Of 1599 patients, 92 were excluded because they had findings requiring immediate management, and 684 were excluded because of soft recommendations, yielding 823 patients. Of these patients, 125 were not yet overdue for follow-up and were excluded, and 18 were excluded because of death or transfer to another institution. Of the remaining 680 patients, follow-up was completed for 503 (74.0%). A total of 177 (26.0%) of the 680 patients were overdue for follow-up, and providers were notified. Of these 177 patients, 36 (20.3%) completed their follow-ups after notification, 34 (19.2%) had follow-up designated by the provider as nonindicated, and 107 (60.5%) were lost to follow-up, yielding four clinically important diagnoses: one biopsy-proven malignancy, one growing mass, and two thyroid nodules requiring biopsy. The rate of incomplete follow-ups after communication decreased from 26.0% (177/680) to 20.7% (141/680) (95% CI, 17.7-23.9%; p = .002), with a 20.4% reduction in relative risk of noncompliance, and 39.5% (70/177) of overdue cases were resolved when nonindicated studies were included. CONCLUSION. Notification of overdue imaging recommendations reduces incomplete follow-ups and yields clinically important diagnoses.
Asunto(s)
Notificación de Enfermedades/métodos , Comunicación en Salud/métodos , Perdida de Seguimiento , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiología/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate hepatic vascular injury (HVI) on CT in blunt and penetrating trauma and assess its relationship to patient management and outcome. METHOD AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study was IRB approved and HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was waived. Included were patients ≥ 16 years old who sustained blunt or penetrating trauma with liver laceration seen on a CT performed at our institution within 24 h of presentation over the course of 10 years and 6 months (August 2007-February 2018). During this interval, 171 patients met inclusion criteria (123 males, 48 females; mean age 34; age range 17-80 years old). Presence of HVI was evaluated and liver injury was graded in a blinded fashion by two radiologists using the 1994 and 2018 American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) liver injury scales. Hospital length of stay and treatment (angioembolization or operative) were recorded from the electronic medical record. Multivariate linear regressions were used to determine our variables' impact on the length of stay, and logistic regressions were used for categorical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the included liver trauma patients, 25% had HVI. Patients with HVI had a 3.2-day longer length of hospital stay on average and had a 40.3-fold greater odds of getting angioembolization compared to those without. Patients with high-grade liver injury (AAST grades IV-V, 2018 criteria) had a 3.2-fold greater odds of failing non-operative management and a 14.3-fold greater odds of angioembolization compared to those without. CONCLUSION: HVI in liver trauma is common and is predictive of patient outcome and management. KEY POINTS: ⢠Hepatic vascular injury occurs commonly (25%) with liver trauma. ⢠Hepatic vascular injury is associated with increased length of hospital stay and angioembolization. ⢠High-grade liver injury is associated with failure of non-operative management and with angioembolization.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas no Penetrantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Incidental radiographic findings, such as adrenal nodules, are commonly identified in imaging studies and documented in radiology reports. However, patients with such findings frequently do not receive appropriate follow-up, partially due to the lack of tools for the management of such findings and the time required to maintain up-to-date lists. Natural language processing (NLP) is capable of extracting information from free-text clinical documents and could provide the basis for software solutions that do not require changes to clinical workflows. OBJECTIVES: In this manuscript we present (1) a machine learning algorithm we trained to identify radiology reports documenting the presence of a newly discovered adrenal incidentaloma, and (2) the web application and results database we developed to manage these clinical findings. METHODS: We manually annotated a training corpus of 4,090 radiology reports from across our institution with a binary label indicating whether or not a report contains a newly discovered adrenal incidentaloma. We trained a convolutional neural network to perform this text classification task. Over the NLP backbone we built a web application that allows users to coordinate clinical management of adrenal incidentalomas in real time. RESULTS: The annotated dataset included 404 positive (9.9%) and 3,686 (90.1%) negative reports. Our model achieved a sensitivity of 92.9% (95% confidence interval: 80.9-97.5%), a positive predictive value of 83.0% (69.9-91.1)%, a specificity of 97.8% (95.8-98.9)%, and an F1 score of 87.6%. We developed a front-end web application based on the model's output. CONCLUSION: Developing an NLP-enabled custom web application for tracking and management of high-risk adrenal incidentalomas is feasible in a resource constrained, safety net hospital. Such applications can be used by an institution's quality department or its primary care providers and can easily be generalized to other types of clinical findings.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/diagnóstico por imagen , Hallazgos Incidentales , Internet , Aprendizaje Automático , Informática Médica/métodos , Radiografía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural , Riesgo , Programas InformáticosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the quantification accuracy of virtual unenhanced images and establish the lower limit of iodine quantification as a function of dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A large elliptical and cylindric phantom mimicking the patient abdomen was scanned on two commercial dual-energy CT scanners, an IQon Spectral CT (Philips Healthcare) and a Revolution CT with Gemstone Spectral Imaging Xtream suite (GE Healthcare). The phantom contained simulated soft tissue, blood, and bone with known elemental composition. It also contained simulated iodine concentrations (0.2-15.0 mg/mL) and iodine-enhanced blood (0.5-5.0 mg/mL). The mean absolute error in CT value for virtual unenhanced images and mean absolute percent error in iodine, calcium, and fat-specific images were measured. RESULTS. For virtual unenhanced images, when excluding the simulated bone, the mean absolute error in CT value was 8.0 ± 5.0 (SD) HU and 9.0 ± 6.2 HU for the IQon and the Revolution CT, respectively (p = 0.61). The mean error in CT value of the simulated bone was -90.5 ± 111.6 HU and -98.5 ± 117.8 HU on the IQon and the Revolution CT, respectively (p = 0.08). For iodine-specific images, the mean absolute percent error was 13.7% and 8.3% for the IQon and the Revolution CT, respectively, above 0.5 mg/mL iodine concentration, and 150% and 100% at less than 0.5 mg/mL iodine concentration. The mean absolute percent error increased from 16.2% at 100% radiation dose to 18.9% and 24% at 75% and 50% dose, respectively, on the IQon; and from 8.8% at 100% dose to 11.1% and 17.8% at 75% and 50%, respectively, on the Revolution CT. CONCLUSION. Virtual unenhanced images are reasonably accurate for simulated soft tissues and contrast materials, except for simulated bone. The lower limit of iodine quantification is radiation-dose dependent. For typical dose levels, 0.5 mg/mL iodine concentration is the lower threshold for iodine detection accuracy.
Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Yodo/administración & dosificación , Fantasmas de Imagen , Imagen Radiográfica por Emisión de Doble Fotón , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Incidental adrenal masses are those that are found on imaging performed for any nonadrenal evaluation. Published guidelines define accepted follow-up criteria for incidental adrenal masses; however, adherence to these guidelines and barriers to appropriate follow-up are not well understood. We aimed to describe practice patterns for the discovery, evaluation, and follow-up of incidental adrenal masses. METHODS: Medical records of patients with an incidental adrenal mass underwent retrospective review at a tertiary referral and level-1 trauma center, as well as regional ambulatory care locations. Individuals ≥18 years of age with an incidental adrenal mass identified during 2016 were included. Patterns of evaluation, follow-up, and associated adrenal diagnoses were determined. RESULTS: From a total of 19,171 cross-sectional imaging procedures (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging), 244 patients with new incidental adrenal masses were identified. A majority (52%) were discovered as part of an evaluation in the emergency department. Of 153 patients with an identifiable primary care provider, approximately 75% had an in-network primary care provider, and 12 (7.8%) had both follow-up imaging and biochemical evaluation. Twenty-three percent of patients with an in-network primary care provider underwent an appropriate cross-sectional imaging procedure in follow-up compared to 29% for a non-network primary care provider (P = .54). Patients with a mass described with benign terminology were less likely to undergo follow-up imaging compared to those with indeterminate terminology (5% vs 37%, P < .001). Patients with imaging ordered as an outpatient were more likely to receive follow-up with imaging (22.8% outpatient vs 11.5% inpatient, P = .042). There was no difference between any groups regarding biochemical evaluation, which inappropriately was performed in only 15% of patients with an incidental adrenal mass. CONCLUSION: To optimize follow-up of incidental adrenal masses, efforts should be made to assure and prioritize inpatient/emergency department incidental findings and to communicate to the appropriate primary care provider the necessary next steps for evaluation. Further, efforts to increase biochemical testing should be pursued.