Of the article: evaluation of the masticatory efficiency of children with stainless steel crowns: a pilot cross-sectional split-mouth study.

BACKGROUND: Stainless steel crowns (SSCs) are commonly employed to restore the posterior teeth of children and over the years, they are available with improved anatomical shapes. This study was conducted to evaluate and assess the effect of the placement of SSCs on the masticatory efficiency of children. METHODS: This pilot cross-sectional split-mouth study assessed masticatory efficiency in children aged 6-11 years. Fifteen participants, each with stainless-steel crowns placed unilaterally at least one month prior, were included. This study utilized two flavours of trident chewing gum (red and green) to measure masticatory efficiency. The child was asked to chew half a strip of red and green chewing gum placed one on top of the other using either the noncrown or crown side 15 times. Another set of chewing gum was given to the child to chew 20 times on the same side. The chewing exercise was repeated using teeth on the other side. Chewed gum samples were collected, photographed, and analysed via ImageJ software to determine the red and green areas. Masticatory efficiency was subsequently calculated with the help of a formula in which the red areas and green areas were calculated via ImageJ software. The data were analysed with paired t tests via SPSS (version 20.0). RESULTS: When the mean values of the crown side were compared with those of the noncrown side following 15 chewing cycles, the chewing efficiency on the noncrown side was greater, with a difference of 0.303, whereas the chewing efficiency following 20 chewing cycles was greater on the crown side, with a difference of 0.814. However, both differences were statistically nonsignificant, with t values of -0.07 and 0.26, respectively, and p values of 0.94 and 0.8, respectively. CONCLUSION: The presence of SSCs on the molars of children did not affect masticatory efficiency.

Comparison of clinical effectiveness of conventional and self-etch sealant: a split mouth randomized controlled trial.

Background: Self-etching has been shown to be beneficial compared to the other resin sealants especially in pediatric practice. The present in-vivo study was designed to clinically evaluate the sealing ability and retention of the self-etching sealant compared to the conventional resin sealant. The aim was to evaluate and compare the retention and marginal integrity of the self-etch and acid etch sealant materials at three, six and twelve-month follow up. Methods: The study was designed as a double blinded, split mouth randomized controlled trial, . In total, 35 children (70 teeth) between 7 and 10 years of age formed part of the study. Group 1 received acid-etch sealant and Group 2 received self-etch sealants. The study participants and the investigator who performed the statistical analysis were blinded to the treatment allocation. All the samples were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months. The inter-group and intragroup comparison were carried out using the Chi-Square test and Friedman test with level of significance set at 5% and the P value less than 0.05. Results: Complete retention of sealants was observed in 34.5% of conventional acid etch (group 1) and 22.9% of self-etch samples (group 2) whereas complete loss of sealants were seen in 11.4% of group 1 and 20% of the group 2 samples and intergroup comparison of retention failure was non-significant (p=0.135). In total, 85.7% of the group 1 and 82.9% of the group 2 samples exhibited good marginal integrity with no clinical changes in the enamel around the margins but this was not statistically significant (p=0.5). Conclusions: Sealants with fewer procedural steps and those which provide adequate retention would be ideal for use in children. Thus, self-etch sealants have been found to be effective and efficient as a sealant in the present in-vivo study. Clinical Trials Registry, India registration: CTRI/2019/03/018343 (29/03/2019).