Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest ; 84(3): 183-192, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701073

RESUMEN

Tube manufacturers use different composition of gels and blood clot activator formulations in serum tube production. Our aim was to investigate the within-tube (repeatability) and between-tube variation, concordance between comparison results of BD and VacuSEL tubes. Blood samples were collected from control subjects (n = 20) and patients (n = 30) in accordance with the CLSI GP41-A6 and CLSI GP34-A guidelines. Twenty-three clinical chemistry parameters were analysed via Roche Cobas C702 Chemistry Analyzer on T0 (0 hour) and T24 (24 hour). Mean differences % were compared with Wilcoxon matched pair test. Clinical significance was evaluated based on desirable bias according to total allowable error (TEa). VacuSEL tubes demonstrated acceptable performance for the results of 20 parameters with regards to desirable bias % limits. Lactate dehydrogenase (LD) [mean difference % (%95 confidence intervals (CI) values of BD and VacuSEL tubes at T0 [6.41% (4.80-8.01%)]; sodium (Na) and total protein (TP) at T24 [-0.27% (-0.46 to -0.07%) and -1.39% (-1.87 to -0.91), respectively] were over the desirable bias limits (LD: 4.3%, Na: 0.23% and TP: 1.36%, respectively) but not exceeding total biological variation CV % [Na: 0.5 (0.0-1.0) % and TP: 2.6 (2.3-2.7) %). %95 confidence intervals (CI) of T0 LD values overlap with within-subject biological variation % (CI) limits (LD: 5.2 (4.9-5.4) %). The differences between two tubes were not medically significant and necessarily conclusive. VacuSEL serum tubes presented comparable performance with BD serum tubes.


Asunto(s)
Recolección de Muestras de Sangre , Humanos , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/instrumentación , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/métodos , L-Lactato Deshidrogenasa/sangre , Femenino , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Químico de la Sangre/instrumentación , Análisis Químico de la Sangre/normas , Análisis Químico de la Sangre/métodos , Adulto , Sodio/sangre , Anciano
2.
Pract Lab Med ; 39: e00386, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715658

RESUMEN

Objectives: Urinalysis is a first-line test for screening for urinary tract infection. Several devices performing strip and sediment analysis have been introduced. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of Labsan Tricell-1000 and Dirui FUS-2000 automated urine analyzers with manual microscopy. Methods: 463 urine samples were analyzed. Digital image processing and particle recognition automatically display the cells in a flowing sheath fluid mixed monolayer urine sample, take the pictures of particles via digital camera, analyse these pics with a particle recognition software, transfer images of the formed elements to the screen and allow well-trained personnel to select, reclassify or remove them. Manual microscopy was used for comparison. Results: Agreement between Tricell-100 and manual microscopy was very good for RBC (Ï° = 0.80), and WBC (Ï° = 0.83); good for CaOx (Ï° = 0.69), SEC (Ï° = 0.80), YLC (Ï° = 0.72), HC (0.69) and LC (Ï° = 0.64); moderate for BAC (Ï° = 0.51), APC (Ï° = 0.43) and MT (Ï° = 0.55); fair for GC (Ï° = 0.39) and RTEC (Ï° = 0.32). Conclusions: Labsan Trion TriCell-1000 demonstrated satisfactory performance and can be used in routine urinalysis. In the case of low counts of RBC, presence of yeast, crystal, casts or cell clumping in urine sediment, characterization of urine particles should be performed by manual microscopy.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA