Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Neurol ; 79(7): 672-681, 2022 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35639399

RESUMEN

Importance: Women with epilepsy frequently need antiseizure medication (ASM) to prevent seizures in pregnancy. Risk of neurodevelopmental disorders after prenatal exposure to AMSs is uncertain. Objective: To determine whether children exposed prenatally to ASMs in monotherapy and duotherapy have increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Nordic register-based study of antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy (SCAN-AED) is a population-based cohort study using health register and social register data from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden (1996-2017; analysis performed February 2022). From 4 702 774 alive-born children with available mother-child identities and maternal prescription data, this study included 4 494 926 participants. Children from a multiple pregnancy or with chromosomal disorders or uncertain pregnancy length were excluded (n = 207 848). Exposures: Prenatal exposure to ASM determined from maternal prescription fills between last menstrual period and birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: We estimated cumulative incidence at age 8 years in exposed and unexposed children. Cox regression adjusted for potential confounders yielded adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% CIs for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disability (ID), or any neurodevelopmental disorder (ASD and/or ID). Results: A total of 4 494 926 children were included; 2 306 993 (51.3%) were male, and the median (IQR) age at end of follow-up was 8 (4.0-12.1) years. Among 21 634 unexposed children of mothers with epilepsy, 1.5% had a diagnosis of ASD and 0.8% (numerators were not available because of personal data regulations in Denmark) of ID by age 8 years. In same-aged children of mothers with epilepsy exposed to topiramate and valproate monotherapy, 4.3% and 2.7%, respectively, had ASD, and 3.1% and 2.4% had ID. The aHRs for ASD and ID after topiramate exposure were 2.8 (95% CI, 1.4-5.7) and 3.5 (95% CI, 1.4-8.6), respectively, and after valproate exposure were 2.4 (95% CI, 1.7-3.3) and 2.5 (95% CI, 1.7-3.7). The aHRs were elevated with higher ASM doses compared with children from the general population. The duotherapies levetiracetam with carbamazepine and lamotrigine with topiramate were associated with increased risks of neurodevelopmental disorders in children of women with epilepsy: levetiracetam with carbamazepine: 8-year cumulative incidence, 5.7%; aHR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5-8.2; lamotrigine with topiramate: 8-year cumulative incidence, 7.5%; aHR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-4.9. No increased risk was associated with levetiracetam with lamotrigine (8-year cumulative incidence, 1.6%; aHR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.3-2.5). No consistently increased risks were observed for neurodevelopmental disorders after prenatal exposure to monotherapy with lamotrigine, levetiracetam, carbamazepin, oxcarbazepine, gapapentin, pregabalin, clonazepam, or phenobarbital. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, prenatal exposure to topiramate, valproate, and several duotherapies were associated with increased risks of neurodevelopmental disorders.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Trastorno Autístico , Epilepsia , Discapacidad Intelectual , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/epidemiología , Trastorno Autístico/epidemiología , Carbamazepina/efectos adversos , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Discapacidad Intelectual/tratamiento farmacológico , Discapacidad Intelectual/epidemiología , Lamotrigina/efectos adversos , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/inducido químicamente , Topiramato/uso terapéutico , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico
2.
Evid Based Ment Health ; 25(2): 54-62, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34810174

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotics are increasingly used among women of childbearing age and during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether children exposed to antipsychotics in utero are at increased risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or autism spectrum disorder (ASD), accounting for maternal diagnoses of bipolar, psychotic and other psychiatric disorders. Design Population-based cohort study, including a sibling analysis. Setting Nationwide data on all pregnant women and their live-born singletons in Denmark (1997-2017), Finland (1996-2016), Iceland (2004-2017), Norway (2004-2017), and Sweden (2006-2016). Participants 4 324 086 children were eligible for inclusion to the study cohort. Intervention Antipsychotic exposure in utero, assessed by pregnancy trimester, type of antipsychotic, and varying patterns of use. Main outcome measures Non-mutually exclusive diagnoses of ADHD and ASD. We used Cox proportional hazard models to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) controlling for maternal psychiatric disorders and other potential confounding factors. FINDINGS: Among 4 324 086 singleton births, 15 466 (0.4%) were exposed to antipsychotics in utero. During a median follow-up of 10 years, we identified 72 257 children with ADHD and 38 674 children with ASD. Unadjusted HRs were raised for both outcomes but shifted substantially towards the null after adjustment; 1.10 (95%CI 1.00 to 1.27) for ADHD and 1.12 (0.97 to 1.29) for ASD. Adjusted HRs remained consistent by trimester of exposure and type of antipsychotic. Comparing in utero exposure with pre-pregnancy use yielded HRs of 0.74 (0.62 to 0.87) for ADHD and 0.88 (0.70 to 1.10) for ASD. Sibling analyses yielded HRs of 1.14 (0.79 to 1.64) for ADHD and 1.34 (0.75 to 2.39) for ASD. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest little or no increased risk of child ADHD or ASD after in utero exposure to antipsychotics. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Results regarding child neurodevelopment are reassuring for women who need antipsychotics during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Atención , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/etiología , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/inducido químicamente , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/epidemiología , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/inducido químicamente , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/epidemiología
3.
Br J Cancer ; 125(6): 893-900, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34253872

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are associated with microbiome changes of the gut, which in turn may affect the progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aims to assess the associations between PPI use and all-cause and CRC-specific mortality. METHODS: We selected all patients registered in the Swedish Prescribed Drug Registry who were diagnosed with CRC between 2006 and 2012 (N = 32,411, 54.9% PPI users) and subsequently followed them through register linkage to the Swedish Causes of Death Registry until December 2013. PPI users were patients with ≥1 post-diagnosis PPI dispensation. Time-dependent Cox-regression models were performed with PPI use as time-varying exposure. RESULTS: Overall 4746 (14.0%) patients died, with an aHR of 1.38 (95% CI 1.32-1.44) for all-cause mortality comparing PPI users with PPI nonusers. Higher-magnitude associations were observed among male, cancer stage 0-I, rectal cancer and patients receiving CRC surgery. The PPI-all-cause mortality association was also more pronounced comparing new users to non-users (aHR = 1.47, 95%CI 1.40-1.55) than comparing continuous users to non-users (aHR = 1.32, 95%CI 1.24-1.39). The risk estimates for CRC-specific mortality comparing PPI users to PPI nonusers were similar to those for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: PPI use after the CRC diagnosis was associated with increased all-cause and CRC-specific mortality.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Causas de Muerte , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Análisis de Supervivencia , Suecia/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
4.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol ; 126(6): 484-491, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31872571

RESUMEN

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used drugs among cancer patients. Due to conflicting reports on their safety, we aimed to determine whether PPI use is associated with mortality among prostate cancer patients. In this population-based cohort study, we identified incident diagnoses of prostate cancer between 2007 and 2012 (n = 1058). Follow-up was from 12 months after diagnosis until death, emigration or end the of study. Post-diagnosis use was defined as ≥2 filled prescriptions following diagnosis. We used time-dependent Cox proportional hazard regression models to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for prostate cancer-specific and all-cause mortality associated with post-diagnosis use of PPIs. We identified 347 (32.8%) post-diagnosis PPI users and 711 (67.2%) non-users after diagnosis. Of the 347 patients using PPIs after diagnosis, 59 (17.0%) died due to any cause and 22 (6.3%) due to prostate cancer, compared with 144 (20.3%) and 76 (10.7%) among non-users after diagnosis, respectively. Post-diagnosis PPI use was not associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.52-1.48) or all-cause mortality (HR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.73-1.43). Contrary to a previous report, this study did not find evidence of an association between post-diagnosis PPI use and mortality among prostate cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Islandia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo
5.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 28(4): 471-478, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30565786

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Increased expression of Vacuolar-type H+ ATPases (V-ATPases), in the plasma membrane of cancer cells has been suggested to contribute to the development of aggressive cancer phenotypes by promoting acidic tumor microenvironments. Accumulating data suggest that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may elicit a chemopreventive effect via V-ATPase inhibition in some cancers, but evidence is still limited. Therefore, we aimed to explore a potential preventive role of PPIs in this study. METHODS: In this population-based case-control study, we identified incident cases of breast cancer (n = 1739), prostate cancer (n = 1897), and malignant melanoma (n = 385) in Iceland between 2005 and 2014 from the Icelandic Cancer Registry. We assessed varying levels of PPI use through record linkages to the Icelandic Medicines Registry. For each case, we selected up to 10 age-matched, sex-matched, and calendar-matched population controls using risk-set sampling. Using conditional logistic regression, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) controlling for NSAID use. RESULTS: Adjusted ORs associated with ever use of PPIs were 1.03 (95% CI: 0.92-1.16) for breast cancer, 1.12 (95% CI: 1.00-1.25) for prostate cancer, and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.69-1.12) for malignant melanoma. Analyses of high use of PPIs (≥1000 DDDs) yielded ORs of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.78-1.19), 1.20 (0.99-1.47), and 0.59 (0.40-1.13) for breast cancer, prostate cancer, and malignant melanoma, respectively. Analyses of cumulative exposure to PPIs did not support a dose-response relationship for any of the three cancer types. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support a chemopreventive effect of PPI use on breast cancer, prostate cancer, or malignant melanoma.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Melanoma/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Islandia/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Melanoma/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Neoplasias de la Próstata/prevención & control , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Microambiente Tumoral/efectos de los fármacos , ATPasas de Translocación de Protón Vacuolares/antagonistas & inhibidores , ATPasas de Translocación de Protón Vacuolares/metabolismo , Adulto Joven
6.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol ; 11: 1756284818777943, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29872455

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) has grown worldwide, and there are concerns about increased unsubstantiated long-term use. The aim of the study was to describe the real-world use of PPIs over the past decade in an entire national population. METHODS: This was a nationwide population-based drug-utilization study. Patterns of outpatient PPI use among adults in Iceland between 2003 and 2015 were investigated, including annual incidence and prevalence, duration of use, and dose of tablet used (lower versus higher), as well as the proportion of PPI use attributable to gastroprotection. RESULTS: We observed 1,372,790 prescription fills over the entire study period, of which 95% were for higher-dose PPIs. Annual incidence remained stable across time (3.3-4.1 per 100 persons per year), while the annual prevalence increased from 8.5 per 100 persons to 15.5 per 100 persons. Prevalence increased with patient age and was higher among women than men. Duration of treatment increased with patients' age (36% of users over 80 years remained on treatment after 1 year compared with 13% of users aged 19-39 years), and was longer among those initiating on a higher dose compared with a lower dose. The proportion of PPI users concurrently using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs decreased over the study period, while the proportion concurrently using acetylsalicylic acid, oral anticoagulants, or platelet inhibitors increased. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide study, a considerable increase in overall outpatient use of PPIs over a 13-year period was observed, particularly among older adults. Patients were increasingly treated for longer durations than recommended by clinical guidelines and mainly with higher doses.

7.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 27(10): 1064-1076, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28755801

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to assess international trends in antipsychotic use, using a standardised methodology. A repeated cross-sectional design was applied to data extracts from the years 2005 to 2014 from 16 countries worldwide. During the study period, the overall prevalence of antipsychotic use increased in 10 of the 16 studied countries. In 2014, the overall prevalence of antipsychotic use was highest in Taiwan (78.2/1000 persons), and lowest in Colombia (3.2/1000). In children and adolescents (0-19 years), antipsychotic use ranged from 0.5/1000 (Lithuania) to 30.8/1000 (Taiwan). In adults (20-64 years), the range was 2.8/1000 (Colombia) to 78.9/1000 (publicly insured US population), and in older adults (65+ years), antipsychotic use ranged from 19.0/1000 (Colombia) to 149.0/1000 (Taiwan). Atypical antipsychotic use increased in all populations (range of atypical/typical ratio: 0.7 (Taiwan) to 6.1 (New Zealand, Australia)). Quetiapine, risperidone, and olanzapine were most frequently prescribed. Prevalence and patterns of antipsychotic use varied markedly between countries. In the majority of populations, antipsychotic utilisation and especially the use of atypical antipsychotics increased over time. The high rates of antipsychotic prescriptions in older adults and in youths in some countries merit further investigation and systematic pharmacoepidemiologic monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Quimioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Internacionalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores Sexuales , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...