Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 134(17): 897-902, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19337961

RESUMEN

Overwhelming Post-Splenectomy Infection (OPSI or PSS), most frequently caused by encapsulated Gram-positive pathogens, is a complication after splenectomy. Reasons for splenectomy include trauma, or malignant and non-malignant hematologic diseases. OPSI-inducing bacteria are mainly Streptococcus pneumoniae and less frequently Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitides and Gram-negative bacilli. There exist very efficient--albeit often neglected--strategies, how to prevent infections in patients after splenectomy. These include vaccination, prophylactic antibiotics (always for 3 years during childhood and adolescence) and prompt antibiotic treatment, if an infection is suspected. Patients need to know the nature and likelihood of PSS and they should seek immediate medical attention if they become ill or febrile. Each patient should carry at all times a letter or card documenting the splenectomy. With these measures and precautions, the PSS-risk can be significantly reduced or at best be completely avoided.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Bazo/fisiopatología , Esplenectomía/efectos adversos , Trombosis/prevención & control , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Vacunas Bacterianas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana/etiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Malaria/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Bazo/inmunología , Bazo/lesiones , Enfermedades del Bazo/cirugía
2.
Eur J Haematol ; 80(4): 303-9, 2008 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18182082

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In this single-center analysis, we assessed whether lower thalidomide doses are feasible and result in favourable treatment response in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. RESULTS: Between May 2001 and October 2006, 38 consecutive MM patients received thalidomide. Their median age was 62.4 yr, all had stage II/III MM and 31.6% had deletion 13q14 (del13q14). Prior to thalidomide, patients had received a median of two treatment lines. The median thalidomide dose was 100 mg/d (range 50-800) and the median treatment duration was 34 wk. The median cumulative thalidomide dose was 24 g. Sixteen patients received thalidomide as a single agent and 22 in combination (+dexamethasone n = 18; others n = 4). The median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) after thalidomide initiation was 30.4 wk. Analysis of prognostic factors showed a significantly prolonged TTF without del13q14 (38.1 vs. 8.9 wk with del13q14; P = 0.006). Our analysis of TTF between thalidomide given alone vs. in combinations showed a better TTF for the combination (23.6 vs. 30.6 wk), albeit not reaching significance (P = 0.20). Other parameters, such as age, stage, and prior SCT showed no difference in TTF. Peripheral polyneuropathy (PNP) frequencies were increased with longer (>28 wk) and increased cumulative thalidomide doses (>40 g), which emphasizes (a) the need to carefully escalate thalidomide from 50 to 200 mg/d, thereby reducing side effects and increasing patient compliance, and (b) that PNP occurs more frequently with longer and higher thalidomide doses. CONCLUSION: The strategy to lower thalidomide doses seems a feasible and attractive approach in MM patients, this being currently tested in prospective randomized trials.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Talidomida/efectos adversos , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/clasificación , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Ann Hematol ; 85(8): 502-13, 2006 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16715299

RESUMEN

We retrospectively studied 89 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) over a period of 10 years to (1) identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS); (2) to assess and compare the Bournemouth-, Spanish-, Düsseldorf-, Lille-, and the International prognostic scoring systems (IPSS); and to (3) compare the French-American-British (FAB) and World Health Organization (WHO) classifications. The median age of patients was 63 years (range, 26-85). Karyotype analyses were done in 85 patients (96%). Median OS was 3 years; 67 patients (75%) have died, and 28 (31%) had progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Major independent prognostic variables for both OS and LFS (multivariate analysis) were percentage of bone marrow (BM) blasts (P < 0.0001), and in patients with cytogenetic data available, cytogenetic risk groups by Lille-score (OS, P = 0.031/LFS, P = 0.002) and IPSS (OS, P = 0.024). All five prognostic scoring systems successfully discriminated risk groups as regards OS and LFS, but in patients with cytogenetic data available, the major independent prognostic score for OS (P < 0.0001) and LFS (P = 0.006) was the IPSS. The FAB and WHO classifications also successfully discriminated between risk groups. The new WHO subgroups [refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD), with (RCMD-RS) or without ringed sideroblasts] showed a significantly (P = 0.0454) different prognosis for OS, but not for LFS (P = 0.0839), in comparison to the subgroups having erythroid dysplasia only (RA/RARS). Risk stratification into refractory anemia with excess blast-I (RAEB-I) and RAEB-II tended to yield different prognoses for OS and LFS. The 5q-minus syndrome strongly predicted for a good prognosis. In patients treated with the demethylating agent decitabine (n = 24), IPSS "poor risk" cytogenetics were unable to predict for the expected worse prognosis when compared to "intermediate-risk" cytogenetics. In conclusion, we confirm in a single-center patient cohort that the use of the WHO classification improves the predictive value of the FAB classification and that, in patients with cytogenetic data available, the IPSS can be used for clinical decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Refractaria con Exceso de Blastos , Anemia Sideroblástica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia Refractaria con Exceso de Blastos/diagnóstico , Anemia Refractaria con Exceso de Blastos/mortalidad , Anemia Sideroblástica/diagnóstico , Anemia Sideroblástica/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Organización Mundial de la Salud
5.
Ann Hematol ; 84 Suppl 1: 25-31, 2005 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16292666

RESUMEN

Intravenous low-dose 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) yields an approximately 50% overall response rate, including 20-25% complete remission. Decitabine-treated MDS patients can be managed as outpatients after completion of a 3-day infusion schedule. In-hospital nights (IHNs), overall survival (OS), and remaining life spent in hospital were evaluated and compared to a matched control group receiving different standard treatments. Between July 1992 and September 2001, 99 high-risk MDS patients, median age 70 years (range 49-86), were treated with low-dose decitabine. Durations of all hospitalizations were recorded. For matched-pair analysis, 44 decitabine-treated patients were matched to 44 MDS patients according to International Prognostic Scoring System classification, period of diagnosis, age, French-American-British classification, and gender. Median number of IHN across all patients was 56 and survival was 481 days, resulting in 84% of remaining life spent at home. In the matched-pair analysis, the median number of IHN was 57 in the decitabine group vs. 50 in the control group. Median survival was 400 vs. 371 days for the decitabine and control groups, respectively. Median number of remaining life spent at home was identical (83% for both groups). Matched patients who received only best supportive care (n=12) had a shorter median survival than the decitabine patients (234 vs. 400 days), and the proportion of remaining life spent at home was slightly greater (82 vs. 77%). Interestingly, matched patients with induction therapy showed comparable IHN, OS, and remaining life spent at home. In conclusion, high-risk MDS patients treated with low-dose decitabine have better survival, and spend comparable time in hospital than patients treated with supportive treatment.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Azacitidina/análogos & derivados , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Azacitidina/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Metilasas de Modificación del ADN/antagonistas & inhibidores , Decitabina , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA