Multicenter Performance Evaluation of Elecsys Anti-HBc II, Anti-HCV II, HIV combi PT, HBsAg II, and Syphilis Immunoassays.

BACKGROUND: The WHO recommends mandatory serological testing of blood donors for hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and syphilis. We evaluated the performance of Elecsys® infectious disease immunoassays against commercially available comparator assays. METHODS: Prospective, routine, anonymized patient or donor samples (n = 8,821) were analyzed at three German sites using Elecsys antihepatitis B core antigen (Anti-HBc II), Anti-HCV II, HIV combi PT, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg II), and Syphilis immunoassays (cobas e 411 analyzer) versus ARCHITECT comparator assays. RESULTS: The Elecsys immunoassays demonstrated comparable sensitivity (≤ 1.54% difference) and equivalent specificity (≤ 0.63% difference) to the respective ARCHITECT comparator assays. Overall sensitivity for the Elecsys and ARCHITECT infectious disease panels was 99.78% vs. 99.40%, respectively, and overall specificity was 99.74% vs. 99.80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Elecsys infectious disease immunoassays demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, which were similar to comparator assays, supporting their suitability for routine laboratory practice.

[Rapid diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections : Joint statement of DSTIG, RKI, and PEI, as well as the reference centers for HIV, HBV, and HCV and consulting laboratories for Chlamydia, gonococci, and Treponema pallidum]. / Schnelltestdiagnostik sexuell übertragbarer Infektionen : Gemeinsame Stellungnahme von DSTIG, RKI, PEI sowie den Referenzzentren für HIV, HBV und HCV und Konsiliarlaboren für Chlamydien, Gonokokken und Treponema pallidum.

In February 2019, the fourth expert meeting on rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for sexually transmitted infections (STI) was held at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) in Berlin. Novel technical developments and new aspects of RDT applications were discussed by representatives from the German STI Society (DSTIG); RKI; the Paul Ehrlich Institute; national reference centers for HIV, HBV, and HCV; and reference laboratories for Chlamydia, gonococci, and Treponema pallidum.As a result of this meeting, we present a revision of the joint statement on STI diagnostics with RDTs from 2017. The Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council on in vitro diagnostic medical devices became effective in May 2017 and includes more stringent regulatory requirements for RDTs, mainly concerning conformity of manufacturing processes and performance characteristics of class D in vitro diagnostics (detection of HIV, HBV, HCV, and T. pallidum). Some RDTs for HIV, HCV, and T. pallidum have been evaluated in clinical studies and/or were WHO prequalified and may be used in low-threshold services. Among them are some HIV RDTs available and approved for self-testing. In addition, some HBV RDTs based on detection of HBs antigen (HBsAg) received WHO prequalification. However, false negative results may occur in samples with low HBsAg levels, as for instance in HIV-coinfected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy. For Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), antigen-based RDTs still do not allow reliable detection of infection. Only PCR-based CT/NG RDTs possess sufficient diagnostic accuracy to be used as point-of-care tests. Rapid PCR tests for NG, however, do not provide any information about antimicrobial resistance.

Schnelltest-Diagnostik sexuell übertragbarer Infektionen in niedrigschwelligen Einrichtungen : Gemeinsame Stellungnahme des RKI, PEI und der DSTIG.

On February 5th, 2016 an expert meeting on rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) for sexually transmitted infections (STI) was held in Berlin at the Robert-Koch-Institute. The aim of the conference was to update a former evaluation of RDTs for diagnosis of HIV, HBV, HCV, T. pallidum, C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae in low-threshold counseling services for STI that had been published after the previous meeting in 2012. According to the strategy to control HIV, hepatitis B and C and other STI, recently adopted by the German Government, there is a lack of test capabilities and a demand for more testing services as well as improved access to testing. Using RDTs as low-threshold test services in counseling centers or even for testing at home may provide an important option to lower the barrier of testing. Based on performance data evaluated in clinical trials some RDTs for HIV, HCV and syphilis are quite well suited as a point-of-care Test (POCT). In contrast, sufficient diagnostic accuracy for detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae can only be achieved by PCR-based POCTs. In Germany the use of POCTs is subjected to legal stipulations of IfSG and MPG. Of importance, it is not allowed to deliver HIV tests to private persons for home testing (§ 11, MPG). Furthermore, both assessment and communication of infectious diseases are reserved to the physician and must not happen as remote diagnostics (§ 24, IfSG). In addition, like all laboratory tests, RDTs are subject to quality assessment according to guidelines of the German Medical Association.

High Prevalence and High Incidence of Coinfection with Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and Syphilis and Low Rate of Effective Vaccination against Hepatitis B in HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex with Men with Known Date of HIV Seroconversion in Germany.

OBJECTIVES: Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at higher risk for coinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and syphilis than the general population. HIV infection and these coinfections accelerate disease progression reciprocally. This study evaluated the prevalence and incidence of these coinfections in HIV1-positive MSM in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of a nationwide, multicenter, prospective cohort study of HIV-infected MSM, plasma samples collected yearly were screened for HBsAg and antibodies to HBc, HBs, HCV, and syphilis. Samples with indications of active HBV or HCV infection were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction. Prevalence and incidence of each infection and incidence rates per study participant were calculated, and incidences over 4-year time intervals compared. RESULTS: This study screened 5,445 samples from 1,843 MSM. Median age at HIV seroconversion was 33 years. Prevalences of active, cleared, and occult HBV, and of active/cleared HCV were 1.7%, 27.1%, 0.2%, and 8.2%, respectively, and 47.5% had been effectively vaccinated against HBV. Prevalence of antibodies to Treponema pallidum and of triple or quadruple sexually transmitted infections (STIs) were 39.6% and 18.9%, respectively. Prevalence of STI, cleared HBV, HBV vaccination, and history of syphilis differed significantly among age groups. Incidences of HBV, HCV, and syphilis were 2.51, 1.54, and 4.06 per 100 person-years, respectively. Incidences of HCV and syphilis increased over time. HCV incidence was significantly higher in MSM coinfected with syphilis and living in Berlin, and syphilis incidence was significantly higher for MSM living in Berlin. DISCUSSION: Despite extensive HBV vaccination campaigns, fewer than 50% of screened MSM were effectively vaccinated, with a high proportion of HIV-positive MSM coinfected with HBV. High rates of STI coinfections in HIV-positive MSM and increasing incidences emphasize the need for better tailored campaigns for HBV vaccination and STI prevention.

Time trends of syphilis and HSV-2 co-infection among men who have sex with men in the German HIV-1 seroconverter cohort from 1996-2007.

OBJECTIVES: Numbers of newly diagnosed HIV infections among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Germany increased after the year 2000. We sought to explore trends in STI co-infections around the time of HIV seroconversion in patients from the German HIV-1 seroconverter cohort from 1996-2007. METHODS: MSM from the cohort were included for secondary analysis, if seroconversion occurred between 1996 and 2007 and if a blood sample taken within 2 y after HIV infection was available for further testing. Samples were tested for antibodies against Treponema pallidum and HSV-2. A classification system was developed to assign the chronology of syphilis and HIV-1 infection. RESULTS: Data of 1052 MSM were eligible for analysis. Overall seroprevalence of syphilis markers was 26%, increasing from 10% (1996-1999) to 35% (2005). Among HIV seroconverters with positive syphilis antibodies, 32% (n=88) were rated as having had coincident infections with HIV and syphilis. Coincident syphilis infection at HIV diagnosis increased substantially (p<0.001) from 2.3% in 2000 to 16.9% in 2003; and thereafter declined to 4.3% in 2007. Mean HSV-2 antibody prevalence was 40.5%, mean anti-HSV-2 IgM prevalence was 11.2%, with no significant change over time. DISCUSSION: We found a stable prevalence of HSV-2 infection and increasing prevalence of syphilis infection around the time of HIV acquisition among MSM in Germany. Time course and rate of co-infections suggest that a re-emerging syphilis co-epidemic among MSM after 2000 could have contributed to an increase of HIV incidence by enhancing HIV transmission probability.

Evaluation of two human plasma pools as candidate international standard preparations for syphilitic antibodies.

A collaborative study was designed to asses two freeze-dried human plasma preparations containing anti-Treponema pallidum antibodies, 05/132 and 05/122, for their suitability as international reference reagents for syphilis serology. Both preparations are intended as replacements of the first international standard (IS) for syphilitic serum antibodies (HS). Samples were tested by eight laboratories using the T. pallidum passive particle agglutination assay (TPPA), the venereal disease research laboratory test (VDRL) and the rapid plasma reagin test (RPR). In addition a range of immunoassays was also used. The outcome of the collaborative study revealed that candidate standard 05/132 contains T. pallidum-specific IgG and IgM and is reactive in VDRL or RPR, and that 05/122 contains T. pallidum-specific IgG but is not reactive in either the VDRL or RPR test. Both 05/132 and 05/122 are reactive in the TPPA. On the basis of these results the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization of the World Health Organization designated 05/132 as the 1st IS for human syphilitic plasma IgG and IgM with a unitage of 3 IU per ampoule relative to HS and 05/122 as the 1st IS for human syphilitic plasma IgG with a unitage of 300 mIU per ampoule relative to 05/132.

RETRACTED: Evaluation of two Human plasma pools as candidate International Standard Preparations for syphilitic antibodies.

This article has been retracted.

Is serological testing a reliable tool in laboratory diagnosis of syphilis? Meta-analysis of eight external quality control surveys performed by the german infection serology proficiency testing program.

The accuracy of diagnostic tests is critical for successful control of epidemic outbreaks of syphilis. The reliability of syphilis serology in the nonspecialist laboratory has always been questioned, but actual data dealing with this issue are sparse. Here, the results of eight proficiency testing sentinel surveys for diagnostic laboratories in Germany between 2000 and 2003 were analyzed. Screening tests such as Treponema pallidum hemagglutination assay (mean accuracy, 91.4% [qualitative], 75.4% [quantitative]), Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (mean accuracy, 98.1% [qualitative], 82.9% [quantitative]), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (mean qualitative accuracy, 95%) were more reliable than Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) testing (mean accuracy, 89.6% [qualitative], 71.1% [quantitative]), the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test (FTA-ABS) (mean accuracy, 88% [qualitative], 65.8% [quantitative]), and immunoblot assays (mean qualitative accuracy, 87.3%). Clearly, immunoglobulin M (IgM) tests were more difficult to manage than IgG tests. False-negative results for samples that have been unambiguously determined to be IgM and anti-lipoid antibody positive accounted for 4.7% of results in the IgM ELISA, 6.9% in the VDRL test, 18.5% in the IgM FTA-ABS, and 23.0% in the IgM immunoblot assay. For negative samples, the mean percentage of false-positive results was 4.1% in the VDRL test, 5.4% in the IgM ELISA, 0.7% in the IgM FTA-ABS, and 1.4% in the IgM immunoblot assay. On average, 18.3% of participants misclassified samples from patients with active syphilis as past infection without indicating the need for further treatment. Moreover, 10.2% of laboratories wrongly reported serological evidence for active infection in samples from patients with past syphilis or in sera from seronegative blood donors. Consequently, the continuous participation of laboratories in proficiency testing and further standardization of tests is strongly recommended to achieve better quality of syphilis serology.

Quality of Lyme disease serology. Lessons from the German Proficiency Testing Program 1999-2001. A preliminary report.

OBJECTIVE: External quality control surveys are an important tool in regulating the quality of infection serology in general and of borreliosis serology in particular. We report on the results of a Lyme disease proficiency testing program which is regularly organised twice a year by our institutions in close cooperation with the Institute of Standardisation in the Medical Laboratory (INSTAND). METHODS: From 1999 to 2001, between 226 and 337 microbiological laboratories participated in each of the four surveys that have been held so far. In addition, between 23 and 30 laboratories from 13 other European countries also participated in each trial. In each survey two serum samples which had been unambiguously characterised by six reference laboratories to contain or not to contain antibodies against the Lyme disease spirochete were distributed in order to determine the accuracy of the diagnostic methods used in participating laboratories. The laboratories also reported interpretative statements of whether or not the test constellation suggested a possible borrelial infection and if an early or late phase of the specific antibody response was suspected. RESULTS: Test results were found to be in part highly variable and clearly correlated with the manufacturers and the applied test methodology. It was also clear that IgM tests were more difficult to handle than were IgG tests. ELISA-testing was more reproducible and proved to be more sensitive and specific than IFA and IHA testing. Quantification of test results and reporting of specific immunoblot bands also showed high variability. Moreover, for some assays a high number of false positive and false negative test results were reported by the participants. CONCLUSION: In view of our results further standardisation of Lyme disease serology is not just desirable but is urgently needed. Moreover, stronger criteria for the validation of available test kits must be applied.

Evaluation of INNO-LIA syphilis assay as a confirmatory test for syphilis.

We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of a new confirmatory test for treponemal antibodies, INNO-LIA Syphilis (Innogenetics NV, Ghent, Belgium), on a large number of sera from a clinical laboratory. This multiparameter line immunoassay (LIA) uses recombinant and synthetic polypeptide antigens derived from Treponema pallidum proteins. In a single-blinded cross-sectional retrospective study, 289 seronegative sera, 219 seropositive sera, and 23 sera with an indeterminate serological status for syphilis were analyzed. All sera were tested by the T. pallidum hemagglutination assay (TPHA), the immunoglobulin (IgG)-fluorescent T. pallidum absorption assay (IgG-FTA-ABS), and the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test. In addition, some seropositive samples were analyzed by the 19S-IgM-FTA-ABS test, an enzyme immunoassay (IgM-EIA), and the MarDx immunoblotting assay. Based on a consensus diagnosis derived from conventional serology, all of the sera were classified as positive, negative, or indeterminate, and the results were compared with the findings of the INNO-LIA Syphilis assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the LIA were 100% (219 of 219) and 99.3% (286 of 288), respectively. Compared to TPHA and IgG-FTA-ABS, the new test gave a significantly higher number (P = 0.021 and P < 0.0001, respectively) of correct results than either of the other two tests. The multiparameter INNO-LIA Syphilis assay is a useful confirmatory test for syphilis because it increases the reliability of syphilis diagnosis with respect to current conventional techniques.