18F-NaF PET/CT imaging of bone formation induced by bioactive glass S53P4 after mastoid obliteration.

PURPOSE: Bioactive glass has been successfully used for surgical treatment of chronic infections in bone and bone cavities. Besides infection control, new bone formation is induced by the bioactive glass which is considered to have osteoconductive properties. Evaluation of postsurgical changes after bone graft surgery is generally performed with conventional radiographs or CT/MR imaging, but 18F-NaF PET/CT might be more suitable since it has a high and rapid bone uptake, accompanied by a fast blood clearance leading to a high bone to background ratio. CASE: Obliteration with S53P4 bioactive glass of the mastoid and middle ear was performed in a patient suffering from chronic otitis media. Control of the chronic otitis media was achieved, and follow-up imaging after 3 years with 18F-NaF PET/CT showed increased uptake in the obliterated cavity indicating new bone formation. CONCLUSION: 18F-NaF PET/CT is able to detect new bone formation after obliteration of the mastoid with S53P4 bioactive glass.

¹²³I-MIBG heart-to-mediastinum ratio is influenced by high-energy photon penetration of collimator septa from liver and lung activity.

AIM: The 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) late heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M) is a well-established prognostic parameter in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, 123I presents imaging problems owing to high-energy photon emission leading to penetration of collimator septa and subsequent reduction in image quality. Most likely this affects the H/M ratio and may subsequently lead to incorrect patient risk classification. In this prospective study we assessed the intrapatient variation in late H/M ratio between low-energy high-resolution (LEHR) and medium-energy (ME) collimators in patients with CHF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients with CHF (87% male, age 63±8.3 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 29±7.8) referred for 123I-MIBG scintigraphy were enrolled in the study. In each patient, after the administration of 185 MBq I-MIBG, early (15 min after injection) and late (4 h after injection) planar anterior thoracic images were acquired with both LEHR and ME collimators. Early and late H/M ratios were calculated on the basis of the mean count densities from the manually drawn regions of interest (ROIs) over the left ventricle and a predefined fixed ROI placed in the upper mediastinum. Additional ROIs were drawn over the liver and lungs. Liver/lung to myocardium and liver/lung to mediastinal ratios were calculated to estimate the effect of collimator septa penetration from liver and lung activity on the myocardial and mediastinal ROIs. RESULTS: The mean LEHR collimator-derived parameters were lower compared with those from the ME collimator (late H/M 1.41±0.18 vs. 1.80±0.41, P<0.001). Moreover, Bland-Altman analysis showed that with increasing late H/M ratios the difference between the ratios from the two collimator types increased (R2=0.73, P=0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that almost 90% of the variation in the difference between ME and LEHR late H/M ratios could be explained by scatter from the liver in both the mediastinal and myocardial ROIs (R2=0.90, P=0.001). Independent predictors for the difference in the late H/M between ME and LEHR were the liver-to-heart ratio and the liver-to-mediastinum ratio assessed by ME (standardized coefficient of -1.69 and 1.16, respectively) and LEHR (standardized coefficient of 1.24 and -0.90, respectively) (P<0.001 for all). CONCLUSION: Intrapatient comparison in H/M between the ME and LEHR collimators in patients with CHF showed that with increasing H/M the difference between the ratios increased in favour of the ME collimator. These differences could be explained by septal penetration of high-energy photons from both the liver and the lung in the mediastinum and myocardium, being lowest when using the ME collimator. These results strengthen the importance of the recommendation to use ME collimators in semiquantitative 123I-MIBG studies.

Impact of a predefined mediastinal ROI on inter-observer variability of planar ¹²³I-MIBG heart-to-mediastinum ratio.

AIM: Purpose of this study was to assess the impact of mediastinal region of interest (ROI) definition on intra- and inter-observer variability in relation to collimator type. METHODS: Thirty-five subjects with CHF (80% men, mean age 66 ± 9 years, NYHA 2.4 ± 0.5, LVEF 29 ± 8.4%) were enrolled. 15 minutes and 4 hours post-injection (p.i.) of (123)I-MIBG, planar images were sequentially acquired with low energy high energy (LEHR) and medium energy (ME) collimators. In the first analysis, observer-defined mediastinal ROI was used. In the second analysis, a predefined mediastinal ROI was used. Intra- and inter-observer variability of late H/M was assessed using Lin's concordance coefficient (LCC). RESULTS: There was substantial agreement between all three observers using predefined mediastinum ROI. LCCs for LEHR were 0.98, 0.96, and 0.95, for ME 0.98, 0.97, and 0.97. However, observer-defined mediastinal ROI resulted in poor-moderate agreement. LCCs for LEHR were 0.82, 0.94, and 0.70, for ME 0.77, 0.91, and 0.80. Intra-observer analysis using predefined mediastinal ROI showed substantial agreement. LCC was 0.97 for LEHR and 0.96 for ME. CONCLUSION: Predefined mediastinal ROI results in low intra- and inter-observer variability of late H/M and is, therefore, to be preferred over observer-defined mediastinal ROI. Intra- and inter-observer variability of late H/M is not influenced by collimator choice.

Comparison of observer variability and accuracy of different criteria for lung scan interpretation.

UNLABELLED: Different criteria have been advocated for the interpretation of ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scans in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). Besides these predefined criteria, many physicians use an integration of the different sets of criteria and their own experience-the so-called Gestalt interpretation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver variability and accuracy of 3 sets of criteria: the Hull and PIOPED (Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis) criteria and the Gestalt interpretation. METHODS: Two experienced observers interpreted V/Q scans of all 328 patients according to the 3 different schemes. The diagnostic classification obtained for the different sets of criteria was analyzed against the presence or absence of PE. RESULTS: The interobserver variabilities as assessed by the kappa statistics of the PIOPED and Hull criteria and for the Gestalt interpretation were 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.76), 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.85), and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.58-0.72), respectively. The differences in kappa values between the Hull and PIOPED criteria and between the Hull criteria and Gestalt interpretation were statistically significant (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). For 16 patients (14 without PE) with a normal lung scan result according to the Hull criteria, the result according to the PIOPED criteria was low probability. For 21 patients (12 with PE), the scans were intermediate probability according to the PIOPED criteria, whereas the result with the Hull criteria was high probability. Analysis of receiver-operating-characteristic curves yielded a comparable area under the curve for all sets of criteria (0.87-0.90). CONCLUSION: The Hull, PIOPED, and Gestalt interpretation of V/Q lung scans all have a good accuracy and interobserver variability. However, the reproducibility of the Hull criteria is superior in comparison with that of the other sets of criteria.

Travel and the risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.

Whether long-distance travel and symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) are associated is debated. On the basis of the available literature a fair risk estimate cannot be obtained. We estimated an accurate odds ratio for the relationship between recent travelling and symptomatic VTE. From three case-control studies consisting of 788 and 170 patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and 989 patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) referred for diagnostic work-up, a pooled odds ratio for the relation between travel and symptomatic VTE was calculated. Cases were patients in whom the diagnosis was confirmed according to a diagnostic management strategy, whereas controls were patients in whom the diagnosis was excluded and who had an uneventful clinical follow-up. Patients were seen in the period April 1997 to September 2000. Travel history was recorded prior to diagnostic work-up. The pooled odds ratio for the association between any travel and symptomatic venous thromboembolism was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.6-1.4). The median travel time was 7 h (quartile range 4 to 10 h). Separate analyses performed for different types of transport (plane, car, bus or train) yielded comparable odds ratios. The analysis for duration of travelling showed an increased odds ratio of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.0-6.2) in the category of 10-15 h of travelling. This study shows that the average traveller does not have an increased risk for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. Only very long travelling (more than 10 h) may be associated with venous thromboembolic disease.

How to use a gestalt interpretation for ventilation-perfusion lung scintigraphy.

UNLABELLED: The use of a so-called gestalt interpretation, an integration of different sets of criteria and the physician's own experience, has been advocated in the interpretation of lung scintigraphs of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. However, data on the reliability of this approach are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the observer variability and accuracy of the gestalt interpretation of perfusion scintigraphy (combined with chest radiography) as well as the impact of adding ventilation scintigraphy and clinical pretest information. METHODS: Three experienced observers independently reviewed the chest radiograph and ventilation-perfusion scans of 101 consecutive patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. All datasets were reviewed twice by each observer, using a visual analog scale to indicate the estimated probability of pulmonary embolism. The results of the gestalt interpretations were analyzed against the presence or absence of pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: All 3 gestalt interpretations had a good-to-excellent interobserver variability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.73-0.89), with similar intraobserver agreement (ICC, 0.76-0.95). The performance of all 3 readers was comparable. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of all 3 observers were high and similar (for observer 1, the AUCs were 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI)], 0.93-1.00), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00), and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-1.00), respectively, for the 3 gestalt interpretations). CONCLUSION: A gestalt interpretation is a useful classification scheme with good-to-excellent intra- and interobserver variability. However, the interpretation and the consequences of this result are dependent on the observer. Unexpectedly, the addition of information on ventilation scintigraphy and clinical information did not affect the overall assessment.