Poor runoff and distal coverage below the knee are associated with poor long-term outcomes following endovascular popliteal aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Reports of good short-term outcomes for endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysms have led to an increased use of the technique. However, data are lacking on long-term limb-related outcomes and factors associated with the failure of endovascular repair. METHODS: All patients who underwent endovascular popliteal aneurysm repair (EPAR) at a single institution from January 2006 to December 2018 were included in the study. Demographics, indications, anatomic and operative details, and outcomes were reviewed. Long-term patency, major adverse limb event-free survival (MALE-FS) and graft loss/occlusion were analyzed with multivariable cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: We included 117 limbs from 101 patients with a mean follow-up of 55.6 months (range, 0.43-158 months). The average age was 73 ± 9.3 years. Thirty-two patients (29.1%) were symptomatic (claudication, rest pain, tissue loss, or rupture). The stent grafts crossed the knee joint in 91.4% of cases. In all, 36.8% of procedures used one stent graft, 41.0% used two stent grafts, and 22.2% of procedures used more than two stent grafts. The median arterial length covered was 100 mm, with an average length of stent overlap of 25 mm. Tapered configurations were used in 43.8% of cases. The majority of limbs (62.8%) had a three-vessel runoff, 20.2% had a two-vessel runoff, and 17% has a one-vessel runoff. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of graft occlusion at 1 and 3 years were 6.3% and 16.2%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year primary patency rates were 88.2% and 72.6%, and the 1- and 3-year major adverse limb event-free survival (MALE-FS) rates were 82% and 57.4%. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 92.9% and 76.2%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, aneurysm size, one-vessel runoff, and coverage below the knee were associated with a lower 3-year MALE-FS. Coverage below the knee was also associated with a lower 3-year MALE-FS. Other anatomic or technical details were not associated with limb-related events or patency. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest single center analysis to describe the predictors of poor outcomes after EPAR. EPAR is a safe and effective way to treat popliteal artery aneurysms. Factors associated with poor MALE-FS after EPAR include single-vessel tibial runoff and coverage below the knee.

Single- versus multiple-stage catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis does not have an impact on iliac vein stent length or patency rates.

BACKGROUND: Incomplete venous thrombolysis and residual nonstented iliac vein disease are known predictors of recurrent deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Controversy exists as to whether the number of thrombolysis sessions affects total stent treatment length or stent patency. The goal of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent single vs multiple catheter-directed lysis sessions with regard to stent extent and patency. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent thrombolysis and stenting for acute iliofemoral DVT between 2007 and 2018 were identified and divided into two groups on the basis of the number of treatments performed (one vs multiple sessions). Operative notes and venograms were reviewed to determine the number of lytic sessions performed and stent information, including size, location, total number, and length treated. End points included total stent length, 30-day and long-term patency, and post-thrombotic syndrome (Villalta score ≥5). The χ2 comparisons, logistic regression, and survival analysis were used to determine outcomes. RESULTS: There were 79 patients who underwent lysis and stenting (6 bilateral interventions; mean age, 45.9 ± 17 years; 48 female). Ten patients (12 limbs) underwent single-stage treatment with pharmacomechanical thrombolysis, and the remaining 69 (73 limbs) had two to four operating room sessions combining pharmacomechanical and catheter-directed thrombolysis. Patients who underwent a single-stage procedure were older and more likely to have a malignant disease. These patients received less tissue plasminogen activator compared with the multiple-stage group (17.2 ± 2.2 mg vs 27.6 ± 11.6 mg; P = .008). Average stent length was 8.8 ± 5.2 cm for the single-stage group vs 9.2 ± 4.6 cm for the multiple-stage group (P = .764). Patients who underwent a single-stage procedure had no difference in average length of stay from that of patients who underwent multiple sessions (8.5 days vs 5.9 days; P = .269). The overall 30-day rethrombosis rate was 7.3%. Two-year patency was 72.2% and 74.7% for the single and multiple stages, respectively (P = .909). The major predictors for loss of primary patency were previous DVT (hazard ratio [HR], 5.99; P = .020) and incomplete lysis (HR, 5.39; P = .014) but not number of procedures (HR, 0.957; P = .966). The overall post-thrombotic syndrome rate was 28.4% at 5 years and was also not associated with the number of treatment sessions. CONCLUSIONS: Single- vs multiple-stage thrombolysis for DVT is not associated with a difference in extent of stent coverage. Patency rates remain high for iliac stenting irrespective of the number of lytic sessions, provided lysis is complete and the diseased segments are appropriately stented.

Standardized care protocol and modifications to electronic medical records to facilitate venous ulcer healing.

BACKGROUND: Venous ulcers are painful, recurrent, and difficult to heal. Electronic medical records (EMRs) are often not optimized to track wounds. Specialized wound care programs may not interface with office-based records, creating a need to standardize the process of venous ulcer measurement and dressing documentation within existing systems. This work describes the creation of an EMR protocol to track venous ulcer size, to standardize dressings, to address related health issues, and to improve education of the patient. We hypothesized that the institution of an EMR protocol to track clinical features of venous ulcer patients, including wound size and health status, would facilitate wound healing. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospective database from September 2014 to May 2017. Modifications to the EMR included the formation of a venous ulcer patient list, a dressing tracker, calculation of total ulcer area, graphing of ulcer size over time, and images of the wound area. Patient education materials were created through the EMR and loaded into an automatic end-visit printout that emphasized smoking cessation, weight loss, and consultation with specialty services as necessary. Quarterly meetings with the supervising physician were established to review each patient's wound progress and to target areas of improvement. RESULTS: During the study period, 204 patients with chronic C5 and C6 disease were observed. Before the start of the project, the healing rate was 53.3%. Wound healing rates improved from 59.5% (quarter 1) to 77.94% (quarter 8). In the quarter before the project started, there were no patients who had quit or cut down on smoking or smokeless tobacco, no patients who were referred for weight loss consultation, and nine who were already patients of bariatric surgery. During the study period, 29% of patients quit smoking, 19% decreased smoking, and 20% cut down smokeless tobacco use. There were 54 patients who underwent advanced arterial evaluation; 175 patients underwent sclerotherapy and 137 patients had endovenous thermal ablation to treat axial reflux in the affected limb. The EMR modification project took 13 months to craft and to implement, with approximately 8 hours of meeting time from the surgical team. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive care model for venous ulcer patients through EMR modification improved overall patient care, increased communication between providers, and facilitated ulcer healing. EMR modification can be introduced with an acceptable time investment on the part of both the provider and the institutional information technology team.

Outcomes and predictors of failure of thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with adjunctive mechanical techniques, when successful, is reported to alleviate symptoms of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (IFDVT) and to lower the occurrence of the post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). This study aimed to determine longer term outcomes of catheter-based interventions for IFDVT and to identify predictors of immediate and mid-long-term failures that would guide optimal patient selection. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent CDT or pharmacomechanical thrombolysis for IFDVT between May 2007 and March 2013 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Assessment of predictors of immediate periprocedural failure was based on the degree of clot lysis (≤ 50% vs >50%) and 30-day recurrence of DVT. Long-term anatomic and clinical failures and outcomes were assessed by ultrasound imaging of the lysed segments and Villalta score (≥ 5 vs <5). Survival analysis was used to assess primary patency and PTS morbidity. Multivariate binary logistic and Cox regression models were used to determine predictors of anatomic and clinical failures. RESULTS: During the study period, 93 patients (118 limbs; mean age, 49.4 ± 16.2 years; 47 women) with symptoms averaging 11.1 ± 9.6 days in duration were treated with various combinations of CDT or pharmacomechanical thrombolysis; in 52 (56%), at least one iliocaval stent was deployed. Immediate treatment failure was seen in 11 patients (12%) predicted by the preoperative indication "phlegmasia" (odds ratio, 3.12; P = .042) and recent surgery (odds ratio, 19.6; P = .018). At a mean ultrasonographic follow-up of 16 ± 14 months (range, 1-65 months), six more patients sustained a rethrombosis, accounting for an overall 3-year primary patency of 72.1%. In the long-term model, loss of primary patency was associated with recent surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 4.04; P = .023), malignant disease (HR, 6.75; P = .016), and incomplete thrombolysis (≤ 50%) (HR, 5.83; P < .001). By stratification of PTS on the basis of postprocedure failures, at 2 years PTS occurred in 50.6% of patients and in 16.3% of patients without failure (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolysis for symptomatic IFDVT can achieve high rates of thrombus resolution and reduce long-term PTS morbidity on careful patient selection. Improved anatomic and clinical outcomes are associated with the completeness of thrombolysis.

Factors that influence perforator thrombosis and predict healing with perforator sclerotherapy for venous ulceration without axial reflux.

OBJECTIVE: Refluxing perforators contribute to venous ulceration. We sought to describe patient characteristics and procedural factors that (1) impact rates of incompetent perforator vein (IPV) thrombosis with ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy (UGS) and (2) impact the healing of venous ulcers (CEAP 6) without axial reflux. METHODS: A retrospective review of UGS of IPV injections from January 2010 to November 2012 identified 73 treated venous ulcers in 62 patients. Patients had no other superficial or axial reflux and were treated with standard wound care and compression. Ultrasound imaging was used to screen for refluxing perforators near ulcer(s). These were injected with sodium tetradecyl sulfate or polidocanol foam and assessed for thrombosis at 2 weeks. Demographic data, comorbidities, treatment details, and outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariable modeling was performed to determine covariates predicting IPV thrombosis and ulcer healing. RESULTS: There were 62 patients (55% male; average age, 57.1 years) with active ulcers for an average of 28 months with compression therapy before perforator treatment, and 36% had a history of deep venous thrombosis and 30% had deep venous reflux. At a mean follow-up of 30.2 months, ulcers healed in 32 patients (52%) and did not heal in 30 patients (48%). Ulcers were treated with 189 injections, with an average thrombosis rate of 54%. Of 73 ulcers, 43 ulcers (59%) healed, and 30 (41%) did not heal. The IPV thrombosis rate was 69% in patients whose ulcers healed vs 38% in patients whose ulcers did not heal (P < .001). Multivariate models demonstrated male gender (P = .03) and warfarin use (P = .01) negatively predicted thrombosis of IPVs. A multivariate model for ulcer healing found complete IPV thrombosis was a positive predictor (P = .02), whereas a large initial ulcer area was a negative predictor (P = .08). Increased age was associated with fewer ulcer recurrences (P = .05). Predictors of increased ulcer recurrences were hypertension (P = .04) and increased follow-up time (P = .02). Calf vein thrombosis occurred after 3% (six of 189) of injections. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombosis of IPVs with UGS increases venous ulcer healing in a difficult patient population. Complete closure of all IPVs in an ulcerated limb was the only predictor of ulcer healing. Men and patients taking warfarin have decreased rates of IPV thrombosis with UGS.

Inferior vena cava filter placement during thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the need for inferior vena cava (IVC) filters and to identify anatomic and patient-specific risk factors associated with embolization in patients undergoing thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis or pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) for iliofemoral DVT from May 2007 to March 2012 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were categorized in two groups, depending on the status of IVC filtration during the lysis procedures: patients with an IVC filter protection (group A) and patients without an IVC filter protection (group B). The primary outcome was perioperative clinically significant pulmonary embolism (PE) or intraprocedural IVC filter clot capture. RESULTS: Eighty patients (mean age, 50 ± 16 years; 39 women) with symptoms averaging 12 ± 10 days were treated. A perioperative IVC filter was placed in 32 patients, and nine patients had an indwelling patent filter (group A, n = 41). Twenty patients received no filter, and 19 patients had an indwelling thrombosed filter (group B, n = 39). There were no clinically significant PE in either group. In group A, nine patients (22%) had documented embolic clot within the filter nest. The clot volume was deemed clinically significant in only two patients (5%). Factors related to embolization included female gender (odds ratio [OR], 5.833; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.038-32.797; P = .032) and preoperative clinical PE (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.043-30.081; P = .054). A trend for increased embolization was seen with a higher average number of DVT risk factors (1.44 vs 1; P = .065) and when PMT was used as a single treatment (OR, 4.32; 95% CI, 0.851-21.929; P = .087). CONCLUSIONS: IVC filters during thrombolysis should be used selectively in patients with preoperative clinical PE, in women and potentially in patients with multiple risk factors for DVT, or when stand-alone PMT is planned.