Distal Radial Artery Access in comparison to Forearm Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial (DARFORA Trial).

Background: In our clinical practice, conventional radial access has been employed routinely for coronary procedures. The distal radial artery (DRA) access site has recently emerged as a novel technique in cardiac procedures. Objectives: This study compares distal radial access to standard forearm radial access (FRA) in terms of feasibility, outcomes, and complications. Method: This prospective, randomized trial was conducted at a single center. The patients were chosen from An-Najah National University Hospital's catheterization laboratory between December 2019 and November 2020. A total of 209 patients were randomized into two groups: DRA group (n = 104) and FRA group (n = 105). Results: Access was successful in 98% of patients in both the groups. The DRA group had a longer puncture duration and a higher number of attempts (duration: 56.6 ± 61.1 s DRA vs. 20.0 ± 18.4 s FRA, p < 0.001, attempts: 1.9 ± 1.3 DRA vs. 1.2 ± 0.60 FRA, p < 0.001). Puncture-associated pain was greater in the DRA group (4 ± 2.2 DRA vs. 3 ± 2.1 FRA, p=0.001). There were two radial artery occlusions in the FRA group and none in the DRA group (p=0.139). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 26% of the DRA group and 37.1% of the FRA group. The DRA group had significantly shorter procedure times (p=0.006), fluoroscopy times (p=0.002), and hemostasis times (p=0.002). Over time, the learning curve demonstrated improved puncture duration and a decrease in the number of puncture attempts. Conclusions: DRA is a safe and practical alternative to FRA for coronary angiography and intervention. The overtime learning curve is expected to improve puncture-related outcomes.

Magnetic resonance imaging of severe idiopathic club foot treated with one-week accelerated Ponseti (OWAP) technique.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate changes in tarsal bones relationship after the use of one week accelerated Ponseti method in the treatment of severe idiopathic clubfoot using MRI. We hypothesize that one-week accelerated Ponseti is at least as effective as standard techniques in achieving the desirable MRI parameters. METHODS: This is a prospective study of 8 children with severe idiopathic clubfeet (Pirani 6) (4 unilateral and 4 bilateral) treated before the age of three months with one-week accelerated Ponseti technique, as described in a former study with minimum 2-year follow-up. The 8 corrected feet were compared with the 4 unilateral normal feet at clinical and radiological levels using a Pirani scoring system and an MRI, respectively. RESULTS: Clinical results showed that Pirani score was 1.1 in the last follow up in comparison to Pirani 6 pretreatment (p < 0.05). MRI results indicated that the malleocalcaneal angle, axial malleocalcaneal index, coronal tibiocalcaneal angle, sagittal talocalcaneal angle, and talar head neck calcaneal rotation showed statistical difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). Sagittal malleocalcaneal index, sagittal tibiocalcaneal angle, talar head neck rotation related to talar body, and posterior calcaneal rotation showed no statistical difference between normal feet and clubfeet after correction (p value >0.05). CONCLUSION: One-week accelerated Ponseti technique showed to be as effective and safe as other treatment methods through clinical and MRI follow up data. MRI role was to confirm the efficiency of this innovative accelerated technique, but not used as a routine follow up.