RESUMEN
The increasing prevalence of mobility impairments underscores the urgent need for accessible and affordable mobility aids. To overcome the mobility limitations of people with disabilities, there is an increasing need for the development of lightweight and portable powered wheelchairs that can be easily loaded. This study aimed to perform an early health technology assessment and a formative usability evaluation on a modular (detachable) powered wheelchair. It aimed to gauge device satisfaction among users, pinpoint areas for improvement, and detect any unforeseen errors to inform future development. Engaging 16 participants, including powered wheelchair users, healthcare professionals, and caregivers, the research evaluated the wheelchair's functionality in various scenarios, emphasizing safety, effectiveness, and convenience. Statistical analyses of task performance and satisfaction surveys highlighted that, while powered wheelchair users successfully completed tasks focusing on driving and power control, healthcare professionals and caregivers encountered difficulties with the wheelchair's assembly and disassembly. Despite general positivity, the surveys indicated mixed satisfaction levels regarding safety, validity, and convenience, with specific issues related to frame durability, seat comfort, and control mechanisms. These findings suggest that refining the wheelchair's design and addressing user concerns could significantly enhance satisfaction and mobility services. Future efforts will include a thorough review of an advanced prototype and further satisfaction assessments.
We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature by addressing a critical gap in the understanding of user-centric design and usability testing for powered wheelchairs.By emphasizing the importance of early assessments and incorporating user feedback into the development process, our research offers practical insights for creating more accessible and user-friendly mobility solutions.This contribution is particularly relevant in the context of advancing assistive technology and improving the quality of life for individuals with disabilities.
RESUMEN
Purpose: To define an MRI scoring system for differentiating xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) from wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (GBC) and compare the diagnostic performance of the scoring system with the visual assessment of radiologists. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 23 and 35 patients who underwent abdominal MRI and were pathologically diagnosed with XGC and wall-thickening-type GBC after surgery, respectively. Three radiologists reviewed all MRI findings. We defined a scoring system using these MRI findings for differentiating XGC from wall-thickening type GBC and compared the area under the curve (AUC) of the scoring system with the visual assessment of radiologists. Results: Nine MRI findings showed significant differences in differentiating the two diseases: diffuse gallbladder wall thickening (p < 0.001), mucosal uniformity (p = 0.002), intramural T2-high signal intensity (p < 0.001), mucosal retraction (p = 0.016), gallbladder stones (p < 0.001), T1-intermediate to high-signal intensity (p = 0.033), diffusion restriction (p = 0.005), enhancement pattern (p < 0.001), and phase of peak enhancement (p = 0.008). The MRI scoring system showed excellent diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.972, which was significantly higher than the visual assessment of the reviewers. Conclusion: The MRI scoring system showed better diagnostic performance than the visual assessment of radiologists to differentiate XGC from wall-thickening-type GBC.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical applicability of a customised power wheelchair joystick using rapid prototyping with 3D modeling and printing technology within a rehabilitation centre for patients with cervical spinal cord injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two male participants with tetraplegia following cervical-level spinal cord injury who had difficulty operating a powered wheelchair were recruited. The procedure of the joystick-making and training service consists of four steps: (1) driving evaluation; (2) digital fabrication; (3) functional test; and (4) driving training. K-QUEST 2.0 (Korean-Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction version 2.0) was used to measure the usability of the off-the-shelf and customised joystick. RESULTS: During the application process, several redesign stages were required to obtain the final customised joystick. After participants attended a 30-min driving training five times per week for 8 weeks, the usability of the customised joystick was higher than that of the off-the-shelf one. CONCLUSION: Providing the customised joystick-making and training service can be used in hospitalised rehabilitation centre before the hospital discharge of patients and returns to their everyday lives.
3D printing technology in rehabilitation clinics can provide new benefits, including cost-effectiveness, customisation of assistive devices, higher productivity, and enhanced collaboration with clients. More specifically, the entire intervention process, from medical evaluation, designing and manufacturing the devices, and training the client, can be performed efficiently and quickly by rehabilitation practitioners who best understand the client's characteristics.This study aimed to confirm the clinical applicability of a quick and efficient service for a customised power wheelchair joystick using 3D modelling and printing technology in rehabilitation centres for patients with cervical spinal cord injury. This study is expected to provide clinical support for connecting potential users and practitioners with technological advancements.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The distal femur comprises a wide intramedullary cavity and thin cortical bone. Firm internal fixation of comminuted fractures with displacement is challenging. Although many comparative studies have reported retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIN) and distal femoral plating (DFP) as the usual fixation methods for distal femoral fractures, no clear conclusion has been reached. Therefore, a meta-analysis and systematic review of the clinical and radiological results were conducted to determine the appropriate treatment method for distal femoral fractures. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to December 19, 2022, was performed using predefined criteria. Studies comparing the effects of RIN and DFP were considered. The analyzed outcome measures included duration of surgery, blood loss, time to union, delayed union, nonunion, malalignment, implant failure, infection, reoperation, limb length discrepancy, range of motion, persistent anterior knee pain, knee stiffness, and functional scores. Meta-analysis of pooled data was conducted using a random-effects model to determine the standard mean difference (SMD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Thirty-three studies with 2,432 patients were included. Compared to DFP, RIN was associated with a shorter time to fracture union (SMD, 1.83 months; 95% CI - 2.76 to - 0.90; P < 0.001) and a lower incidence of postoperative infection (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.94; P = 0.03). Pooled analysis revealed no significant differences in other outcome measures between the two treatment modalities. CONCLUSION: In distal femoral fractures, RIN had a shorter bone union time and was more resistant to infection than DFP. However, there were no significant differences in the other clinical parameters. Therefore, the characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses of RIN and DFP should be carefully identified, and appropriate treatment should be provided based on the patient's medical condition and fracture pattern.
RESUMEN
Preoperative templating needs to be precise to optimize hip arthroplasty outcomes. Unexpected implant mismatches can occur despite meticulous planning. We investigated the risk factors for oversized and undersized stem mismatch during uncemented hemiarthroplasty using a double-tapered wedge rectangular stem for femoral neck fracture. Out of 154 consecutive patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture, 104 patients were divided into three groups: (1) oversized (n = 17; 16.3%), (2) matched (n = 80; 76.9%), and (3) undersized stem group (n = 7; 6.7%). A smaller femoral head offset (odds ratio [OR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.81-0.98, P = 0.017), smaller isthmus diameter (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.35-0.92, P = 0.021), and smaller canal flare index (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.04-0.98, P = 0.047) were significantly associated with oversized stem insertion, while older age (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.01-1.39, P = 0.037) was associated with undersized stem insertion in logistic regression. In conclusion, when performing hemiarthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture with a double-tapered wedge rectangular stem, surgeons must pay close attention to proximal femoral geometry and patient age during preoperative planning to avoid stem mismatch.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral , Hemiartroplastia , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Hemiartroplastia/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Although numerous radiologic parameters of abnormal hip joint morphology are utilized in practice, studies on the relation of these parameters to acetabular fractures are limited. This study hypothesized that certain morphological features of hip joints are associated with acetabular posterior wall (PW) fracture patterns and aimed to identify morphological characteristics predictive of acetabular PW fracture. The records of 107 consecutive patients, who were diagnosed with acetabular fractures in a level I trauma center from August 2017 to April 2021, were initially reviewed. After excluding patients who lacked proper radiographic evaluation and had previous surgery or concomitant injury on the ipsilateral lower limb, a total of 99 patients were analyzed to investigate the morphological characteristics of the hip joint, measured in computed tomography, associated with acetabular posterior wall fracture. We included patient demographics, acetabular index (AI), sharp angle, acetabular depth-to-width ratio (AD/WR), center-edge angle (CEA), head-neck offset ratio (HNOR), acetabular head index (AHI), anterior acetabular sector angle (AASA), posterior acetabular sector angle (PASA), and acetabular version angle (AVA) in the univariate and multivariate analyses. The injury mechanism (p = 0.001) and AD/WR (p = 0.021) were predictors of PW fracture in the univariate analysis. In the multivariable analysis, injury mechanism (p = 0.011), AI (coefficient B = 0.320; Exp (B) = 1.377; p = 0.017), and AD/WR (coefficient B = 33.047; Exp (B) = 2.250 × 1014; p = 0.028) were significant predictors of PW fracture. This study highlights the importance of morphological factors, such as a larger AI and AD/WR, that may influence joint stress distribution, resulting in acetabular PW fracture. Understanding these pathomechanisms may protect the hip joint and prevent future injuries through the early identification and treatment of pathological conditions.
RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: An acetabular reinforcement ring (ARR) with a structural allograft is conventionally used to treat large acetabular bone defects or discontinuity during revision hip arthroplasty. However, ARR is prone to failure due to bone resorption and lack of incorporation. Here, we investigated the surgical outcomes of the patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using ARR combined with a metal augment (MA). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 10 consecutive patients who had a minimum 8-year follow-up after revision hip arthroplasty using ARR with MA in Paprosky type III acetabular defect. We collected patient demographics, surgical details, clinical scores (including Harris Hip Score (HHS)), postoperative complications, and 8-year survival rates. Results: Six male and four female patients were included. The mean age was 64.3 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 104.3 months (96.0-112.0 months). Trauma-related diagnosis was the most common reason for index surgery. Three patients underwent all component revision, and seven underwent cup revision. Six were confirmed as Paprosky type IIIA and four as type IIIB. The mean HHS at the final follow-up was 81.5 (72-91). One patient was diagnosed with prosthetic joint infection at the 3-month follow-up; therefore, the minimum 8-year survival rate with our technique was 90.0% (95% confidence interval, 90.3-118.5%). Conclusions: The satisfactory mid- to long-term results of revision THA suggest that ARR combined with tantalum MA is a viable revision option for treating severe acetabular defects with pelvic discontinuity.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Falla de Prótesis , Acetábulo/cirugía , Reoperación/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Combined hip and upper-extremity fractures raise clinical concerns because upper-extremity fractures may hinder early mobilization, thereby affecting rehabilitation and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of combined upper-extremity and hip fractures on rehabilitation and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published before March 20, 2022, that evaluated the impact of concomitant upper-extremity injuries in geriatric patients with hip fractures. The pooled analysis identified differences in the (1) length of hospital stay, (2) discharge destination, and (3) mortality rates between the isolated and combined hip fracture groups. RESULTS: A total of 217,233 patients with isolated hip fractures (n = 203,816) and combined hip and upper-extremity fractures (n = 13,417) from 12 studies were analyzed. The average length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the combined upper-extremity fracture group than in the isolated hip fracture group (mean difference = 1.67 days; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-2.70; P = 0.002). Patients in the combined upper limb fracture group were less likely to be discharged directly home (odds ratio [OR] = 0.64; 95% CI 0.52-0.80; P < 0.001) and showed significantly higher 30-day mortality (OR = 1.44; 95% CI 1.32-1.58; P < 0.001). The mortality rate after 30 days was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant upper-extremity fractures have debilitating effects on rehabilitation and early mortality in geriatric patients with hip fractures. Therefore, more focus should be placed on the early ambulation of patients with hip fractures and simultaneous upper limb fractures to promote rehabilitation and alleviate the public health burden. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III meta-analysis.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Brazo , Fracturas de Cadera , Humanos , Anciano , Extremidad Superior , Tiempo de Internación , Alta del PacienteRESUMEN
Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the kidney is an extremely rare cystic malignant tumor with a poor prognosis that occurs in the pelvicalyceal system. Pre-opeartive diagnosis is very difficult because the tumor's clinical and imaging features are nonspecific. Here we report a case of primary mucinous adenocarcinoma arising from the horseshoe kidney in a 69-year-old male, focusing on CT findings. The tumor was a complex cystic mass with irregular wall thickening, multifocal calcifications, and septa and progressed to pseudomyxoma peritonei postoperatively.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although a concomitant ipsilateral femoral neck and intertrochanteric fracture has been considered to be a rare type of injury, its incidence has been increasing, especially among elderly hip fracture patients. However, there is limited evidence on the optimal treatment option. This study surveys surgical outcomes of different implants in order to assist in selecting the best possible implant for a combined femoral neck and intertrochanteric fracture. METHODS: The postoperative complications after the treatment of a concomitant ipsilateral femoral neck and intertrochanteric fracture via cephalomedullary nail (CMN), dynamic hip screw (DHS), and hip arthroplasty groups were analyzed by retrospectively reviewing the electronic medical records of 115 consecutive patients. RESULTS: The patient demographics and perioperative details showed no significant discrepancies amongst different surgical groups, except for the operative time; a CMN had the shortest mean operative time (standard deviation) of 85.6 min (31.1), followed by 94.7 min (22.3) during a DHS, and 107.3 min (37.2) during an HR (p = 0.021). Of the 84 osteosynthesis patients, 77 (91.7%) achieved a fracture union. Only one (3.2%) of the 31 HR cases had a dislocation. The sub-analysis of the different osteosynthesis methods showed a higher incidence of excessive sliding and the nonunion of the fracture fragment in the DHS group than that in the CMN group (p = 0.004 and p = 0.022, respectively). The different surgical methods did not significantly vary in other outcome variables, such as the re-operation rate, mortality, and hip function. CONCLUSIONS: For the surgical treatment of combined femoral neck and trochanteric fractures, osteosynthesis did not differ significantly from an HR in terms of the overall postoperative complications, reoperation and mortality rate, and hip function, however, the risk of nonunion and more mechanical complications should be considered when choosing a DHS. Our suggestion for the treatment of a femoral neck and ipsilateral trochanteric fracture is that a surgeon should choose wisely between an HR and a CMN depending on the patient's age, the displacement of the femoral neck, and one's expertise.
RESUMEN
Extramedullary (EM) reduction, defined as the medial cortex of the head-neck fragment located outside the medullary canal of the distal shaft fragment, has been introduced to prevent excessive postoperative sliding or failure of the lag screw in pertrochanteric fracture surgeries. Favorable EM reduction results have recently been reported in several clinical and biomechanical studies. Despite these efforts, maintaining the head-neck fragment in an EM position is periodically a difficult and challenging problem. Herein, the technique for reduction and maintenance of the head-neck fragment was introduced in an EM position using a Kirschner wire and partially threaded cannulated screw fixation via screw fixation from EM to the head-neck fragment, which was positioned inferior to the lag screw on the femoral calcar, also called the reduction screw. The authors utilized this reduction screw in 34 pertrochanteric fracture surgeries using a cephalomedullary nail and fracture union was acheive in all cases by a minimum one-year follow-up period without surgical complications.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Recently, several studies have suggested that blade-type cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) have a higher risk of fixation failure than that of lag screws, but no clinical consensus exists. This study compared fixation failure between helical blade-type and lag screw-type CMNs with cut-out and cut-through rates as primary outcomes and degree of sliding length, time to union, and nonunion rate as secondary outcomes. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published before March 4, 2020, using the PRISMA guidelines. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they directly compared helical blade and lag screw for treating hip fractures. Data could be extracted for CMN alone to avoid mixing CMN and extramedullary plate devices, such as the dynamic hip screw. DATA EXTRACTION: Two board-certified orthopaedic surgeons specializing in hip surgery independently extracted data from the selected studies, and the data collected were compared to verify agreement. DATA SYNTHESIS: All data were pooled using a random-effects model. For all comparisons, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as dichotomous data, whereas continuous data were analyzed using mean differences with 95% CIs. CONCLUSIONS: Fixation failure (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.09-3.23, P = 0.02), especially cut-through (OR = 5.33; 95% CI, 2.09-13.56; P < 0.01), was more common with helical blades than with lag screws, although the cut-out rate was not significantly different between both the 2 groups (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.38-1.96, P = 0.73). Surgeons should carefully select a blade-type CMN when treating hip fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de Cadera , Clavos Ortopédicos , Tornillos Óseos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , HumanosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Amputation for a mangled extremity is an effective and reliable life-saving treatment method, which requires a relatively shorter duration for treatment than limb salvage. However, only a few studies have focused on treatment with amputation. Herein, we report good clinical outcomes achieved through staged surgery performed after amputation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 47 patients (38 men, 9 women; average age, 52.4 years) diagnosed with mangled extremity, who underwent primary amputation between March 2014 and January 2019. The patients were divided into the initial closure (IC) groups (including 26 patients who underwent IC after amputation) and staged surgery (SS) (including 21 patients who underwent SS after amputation) groups. The presence of complications including necrosis and infection, consequent additional surgery, duration of hospitalization and expense for treatment, and functional scores of upper and lower extremities were assessed. RESULTS: No specific postoperative complication was found in the SS group. However, additional surgeries were performed in the IC group because of complications including three cases of infection and two cases of necrosis. The differences between the hospitalization period, treatment cost, and functional examination conducted 1 year after surgery of the two groups were not statistically significant. The patients in the IC group who underwent additional surgery were hospitalized for a longer period and presented with lower functional scores due to delayed rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Staged surgery is a definitive and safe treatment option that can effectively reduce complications including infection and necrosis in patients with mangled extremity.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Extremidad Inferior , Extremidad Superior , Femenino , Humanos , Extremidad Inferior/lesiones , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Extremidad Superior/lesiones , Extremidad Superior/cirugíaRESUMEN
Extramedullary (EM) reduction, defined as the medial cortex of the head–neck fragment located outside the medullary canal of the distal shaft fragment, has been introduced to prevent excessive postoperative sliding or failure of the lag screw in pertrochanteric fracture surgeries. Favorable EM reduction results have recently been reported in several clinical and biomechanical studies. Despite these efforts, maintaining the head–neck fragment in an EM position is periodically a difficult and challenging problem. Herein, the technique for reduction and maintenance of the head–neck fragment was introduced in an EM position using a Kirschner wire and partially threaded cannulated screw fixation via screw fixation from EM to the head–neck fragment, which was positioned inferior to the lag screw on the femoral calcar, also called the reduction screw. The authors utilized this reduction screw in 34 pertrochanteric fracture surgeries using a cephalomedullary nail and fracture union was acheive in all cases by a minimum one-year follow-up period without surgical complications.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Presently, hip arthroscopy is a widely adopted surgical intervention for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). However, there is insufficient evidence regarding which between arthroscopy and nonoperative treatment is more optimal for symptomatic FAI. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies that compared arthroscopy and nonoperative interventions for FAI treatment from inception to August 4, 2020. We included studies that directly compared surgical and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic FAI and excluded those that did not use arthroscopic treatment as a surgical technique and studies performed on patients with concomitant diagnoses instead of pure FAI. We compared the following clinical outcome scores at 6 and 12 months of follow-up: International Hip Outcome Tool 33 (iHOT-33), hip outcome score (HOS), EuroQol-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), modified Harris hip score (mHHS), and nonarthritic hip score (NAHS). RESULTS: Five studies totaling 838 patients were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis; 382 patients underwent hip arthroscopy, and 456 patients were treated by nonoperative interventions. At 6 months of follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in iHOT-33 ratings (mean difference [MD] = 7.92, Pâ=â.15), HOS (MD of HOS-ADLâ=â5.15, Pâ=â.26 and MD of HOS-Sports = 2.65, Pâ=â.79, respectively), and EQ-VAS (MD = 1.22, Pâ=â.76) between the 2 treatment strategies. At 12 months of follow-up, the arthroscopy group had a greater mean improvement in iHOT-33 score than the conservative treatment group (MD = 8.42, Pâ=â.002), but there was no difference between the groups in terms of mHHS rating (MDâ=â-0.24, Pâ=â.83) and NAHS (MD = -2.08, Pâ=â.09). CONCLUSION: Despite arthroscopy being associated with significantly superior iHOT-33 scores after 12 months of follow-up, we were unable to discern the difference between the treatment strategies using other scoring methods, such as HOS, EQ-VAS, mHHS, and NAHS. Further studies will be needed to conclusively determine if 1 strategy is superior to the other for treating FAI.
Asunto(s)
Artroscopía , Tratamiento Conservador , Pinzamiento Femoroacetabular , Articulación de la Cadera , Humanos , Pinzamiento Femoroacetabular/cirugía , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The study examined the fusion site and characteristics of the subtalar arthrodesis after intraarticular calcaneal fractures using computed tomography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical results and computed tomographic analysis of the fusion site were reviewed in 18 patients who were followed-up for a minimum of six months after undergoing subtalar arthrodesis due to traumatic arthritis caused by an intra-articular calcaneal fracture from December 2012 to April 2017. RESULTS: An evaluation of clinical results after subtalar arthrodesis revealed statistically significant improvements. In all cases, arthritis was found in the injured articular surface, which was displaced superolaterally from the initial primary fracture line of the calcaneus. Six months after arthrodesis, the subtalar fusion rate was 80.0% (16/20). Of these, 14 cases had a cannulated screw inserted in the uninjured site that is medial to the primary fracture line. Joint fusion was observed on the uninjured articular surface in 17 cases (85.0%). CONCLUSION: Joint fusion was initially achieved at the uninjured posterior facet after subtalar arthrodesis due to traumatic arthritis caused by a displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture. This suggests that meticulous surgical techniques and cannulated screw positioning at the uninjured site will promote joint fusion.