Traditional bone setting and trauma care in South-Eastern Chad.

Background: Traditional bonesetters are the main providers of fracture treatment and trauma care in much of Africa. However, there is a paucity of literature on bonesetters in Chad. Objectives: Our study sought to investigate Chadian bonesetter practices, their relationship to the community, and the complex local perspectives on trauma care in Am Timan, Chad. Methods: Thirty-three semi-structured interviews were conducted with community members, traditional bonesetters, and physicians in Am Timan using a constructivist grounded theory approach. Responses were coded, categorized, and compared within and across study populations to identify themes. Results: Most community members (n=25) interviewed preferred bonesetters for trauma care due to their affordability, continuity and convenience of care, and the community's fear of Western medical practices. Although the Chadian bonesetters' fracture management mirrored bonesetters in neighboring African countries, the Chadian bonesetters have a much wider scope of practice, including treatment for both medical and spiritual ailments. Both Jabari (n=6) and physicians (n=2) emphasized the need for more training and collaboration. Conclusion: As in much of Africa, bonesetters perform a major role in providing trauma care in Chad. Our research identifies an opportunity to maximize trauma care in Chad through dialogue, training, and collaboration between bonesetters and physicians.

Cost-Effectiveness of Lay First Responders Addressing Road Traffic Injury in Sub-Saharan Africa.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of training lay first responders (LFRs) to address road traffic injury (RTI) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) as the first step toward formal emergency medical services (EMS) development. MATERIALS/METHODS: Cost data from five LFR programs launched between 2008 and 2019 in SSA was collected for LFR cost estimation, including three prospective collections from our group. We systematically reviewed literature and projected aggregate disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from RTI in SSA that are addressable by LFRs to inform cost-effectiveness ratios ($USD cost per DALY averted). Cost-effectiveness ratios were then compared against African per capita gross domestic product (GDP) to determine the cost-effectiveness of LFRs addressing RTIs in SSA, following WHO-CHOICE guidelines, which state cost-effectiveness ratios less than GDP per capita are considered "very cost-effective." RESULTS: Average annual cost per LFR trained across five programs was calculated to be 16.32USD (training=4.04USD, supplies=12.28USD). Following WHO and Disease Control Priorities recommendations for adequate emergency catchment, initial training of 750 LFRs per 100,000 people would cost 12,239.47USD with projected total annual DALYs averted equal to 227.7 per 100,000. Cost per DALY averted would therefore be 53.75USD with appropriate LFR availability, less than sub-Saharan African GDP per capita (1,585.40USD) and the lowest sub-Saharan African GDP per capita (Burundi, 261.20USD). CONCLUSION: Following WHO-CHOICE guidelines, training LFRs can be a highly cost-effective means to address RTI morbidity and mortality across sub-Saharan Africa. With EMS unavailable for 91.3% of the African population, training LFRs can be an affordable first step toward formal EMS development.

Developing a Lay First Responder Program in Chad: A 12-Month Follow-Up Evaluation of a Rural Prehospital Emergency Care Program.

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization (WHO; Geneva, Switzerland) recommends lay first responder (LFR) programs as a first step toward establishing formal Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to address injury. There is a scarcity of research investigating LFR program development in predominantly rural settings of LMICs. STUDY OBJECTIVE: A pilot LFR program was launched and assessed over 12 months to investigate the feasibility of leveraging pre-existing transportation providers to scale up prehospital emergency care in rural, low-resource settings of LMICs. METHODS: An LFR program was established in rural Chad to evaluate curriculum efficacy, using a validated 15-question pre-/post-test to measure participant knowledge improvement. Pre-/post-test score distributions were compared using a Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. For test evaluation, each pre-test question was mapped to its corresponding post-test analog and compared using McNemar's Chi-Squared Test to examine knowledge acquisition on a by-question basis. Longitudinal prehospital care was evaluated with incident reports, while program cost was tracked using a one-way sensitivity analysis. Qualitative follow-up surveys and semi-interviews were conducted at 12 months, with initial participants and randomly sampled motorcycle taxi drivers, and used a constructivist grounded theory approach to understand the factors motivating continued voluntary participation to inform future program continuity. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist was used to guide design, analysis, and reporting the qualitative results. RESULTS: A total of 108 motorcycle taxi participants demonstrated significant knowledge improvement (P <.001) across three of four curricular categories: scene safety, airway and breathing, and bleeding control. Lay first responders treated 71 patients over six months, encountering five deaths, and provided patient transport in 82% of encounters. Lay first responders reported an average confidence score of 8.53/10 (n = 38). In qualitative follow-up surveys and semi-structured interviews, the ability to care for the injured, new knowledge/skills, and the resultant gain in social status and customer acquisition motivated continued involvement as LFRs. Ninety-six percent of untrained, randomly sampled motorcycle taxi drivers reported they would be willing to pay to participate in future training courses. CONCLUSION: Lay first responder programs appear feasible and cost-effective in rural LMIC settings. Participants demonstrate significant knowledge acquisition, and after 12 months of providing emergency care, report sustained voluntary participation due to social and financial benefits, suggesting sustainability and scalability of LFR programs in low-resource settings.