Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a single hamstring tendon graft and tape locking screw (TLS) fixation leads to good clinical outcome in two years of follow-up.

Background: There are many fixation methods for hamstring tendon autograft available for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The intention of this study was to report clinical follow-up data of the Tape Locking Screw (TLS) reconstruction technique. Hypothesis: Does TLS method give good long term results in patient satisfaction and in clinical knee tests. Patients and methods: We selected 119 prospectively collected patients with a two-year follow-up who had an ACL reconstruction using TLS technique. A total of 114 cases were available for follow-up two years postoperatively. The evaluation methods were instrumented laxity measurements, clinical examination and knee scores. Results: The Lysholm and IKDC scores improved from preoperative 76 and 50 to 95 and 90, respectively. Tegner activity level before surgery was 3 and improved to 6 at 2 years postoperatively. Discussion: ACL reconstruction with TLS technique showed good objective outcome at the 2-year follow-up. We confirmed improvement in all evaluation method variables. Level of evidence: Case series; level of evidence, 4. Trial registration: ISRCTN registry, study ID ISRCTN34011837. Registered retrospectively April 29, 2020.

Patient injury claims for posterior cruciate ligament injury: a nationwide registry study in Finland.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries usually occur in combination with other ligamentous knee injuries. The outcome varies and may be poor due to suboptimal treatment. We investigated claims following PCL injury treatment on a nationwide scale. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patient PCL injury claims filed in Finland from 1997 to 2015 were collected from the Patient Insurance Centre (PIC) register. We reviewed and analyzed all records to determine the causes of claims. General background data were obtained from the National Care Register for Social Welfare and Health Care (HILMO). RESULTS: We found out from HILMO background data that, during the 19-year study period, 1,891 PCL and 1,380 multiligament reconstructions were performed in 99 different hospitals. The number of PCL injuries treated conservatively is unknown. During this same period, 49 claims arrived at the PIC, and 39/49 of these patients were operated on. 12/49 claims were compensated. Of these 12 claims, 6 were compensated for technical errors and 4 were compensated for diagnostic delays. CONCLUSION: The number of patient injury claims was few, and compensated claims were even fewer. Technical errors and diagnostic delays were the most common reasons for reimbursement.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction learning curve study - Comparison of the first 50 consecutive patients of five orthopaedic surgeons during a 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The goal of all surgical and orthopaedic training is to ensure necessary education and surgical skills without compromising the quality of operations or patient safety. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common multi-staged orthopaedic surgical procedure with a learning curve. Previous studies focus mainly on learning or the learning curve of one surgeon and tunnel placements. The aims of this study were to define the learning curve in arthroscopic ACLRs, define the number of procedures needed before the surgical "knifetime" plateaus, examine the effect of experience on complications, and identify possible individual differences in the surgical learning curve. METHODS: The study included the first 50 consecutive ACLR operations of five orthopaedic surgeons, thus, a total of 250 patients. For comparison and statistical analysis, patients were arranged into five groups, each comprising 50 patients (=order group). Order group 1 comprised the first 10 patients operated on by each of the five surgeons, group 2 patients 11-20, group 3 patients 21-30, group 4 patients 31-40, and group 5 the last 10 patients. The learning curve was defined with a LOESS curve. Surgical time and complications, including graft failure and postoperative knee instability, were analysed between order groups and between surgeons. RESULTS: Median surgical time was 105 (interquartile range 82-124) min. The learning curve showed the first steep decline in surgical time and started to settle slowly after 20 reconstructions. Surgical time was significantly longer when order group 1 was compared with order group 2 (p = 0.031), and when order group 1 was compared separately with order groups 3, 4, and 5 (p < 0.001). Operation order alone explained only 17.1% of the alteration in surgical time. No significant difference emerged in graft failure rate between the order groups or the surgeons. Objective instability of the knee showed a significant difference when order group 1 was compared separately with order group 3 and with order group 4 (p = 0.004). Surgical time differed between surgeons (p < 0.001), and the shape of the learning curve showed great individual variability. CONCLUSION: In the first 10 to 20 ACLR operations, the surgical time was longer and the complication rate higher, but thereafter both started to settle down. We recommend that first 10-20 ACLR operations should be supervised.

A prospective comparison of 3 hamstring ACL fixation devices-rigidfix, bioscrew, and intrafix-randomized into 4 groups with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

BACKGROUND: ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction remains the gold standard surgical option for patients with ACL tears. There are many fixation devices available for ACL reconstruction. Recent ACL reconstruction strategies are aiming to reproduce the native anatomy and normal kinematics of the knee. This is a five years follow-up report of some of the new devices for graft fixation. A two years follow-up data was published previously. METHODS: 120 patients were randomized into four different groups (30 each) for ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons: group I femoral Rigidfix cross-pin and Intrafix tibial extension sheath with a tapered expansion screw; group II Rigidfix femoral and BioScrew interference screw tibial fixation; group III BioScrew femoral and Intrafix tibial fixation; group IV BioScrew fixation into both tunnels. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, knee scores, and instrumented laxity measurements. RESULTS: In this 5 years follow-up there were 102/120 (85%) patients available, but only 77 (64,2%) attended the clinical examinations. No significant difference between the groups in the clinical results was detected. Between the 2 and 5 years follow-up there were 6 additional procedures in group I and one in group II. There was a significant difference in additional procedures between group I and the other groups (P = .041). CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in the additional procedures, most in group I (six). The ACL grafts were intact. Other statistically or clinically significant differences in the 5 years follow-up results were not found. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. Trial registration ISRCTN registry with study ID ISRCTN34011837. Retrospectively registered 17.4.2020.

Comparison of clinical results of anteromedial and transtibial femoral tunnel drilling in ACL reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: A femoral bone tunnel in ACL reconstruction can be constructed from the outside in or from the inside out. When doing it inside out, the approach can be via the anteromedial (AM) portal or through the tibial bone tunnel. It has been suggested that better results might be expected by doing it anteromedially. Clinical results after femoral tunnel drilling via the AM or transtibial (TT) techniques in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are presented. METHODS: Three hundred patients with ACL injuries were chosen for this study from previously collected data on ACL reconstructions. They were divided into two groups: 150 patients treated with AM drilling and 150 treated with TT drilling. In the AM group, the reconstructions were performed using a semitendinosus graft with the Tape Locking Screw (TLS™) technique (n = 87) or Retrobutton™ femoral and BioScrew™ tibial fixation with a semitendinosus-gracilis graft (n = 63). In the TT group, the fixation method used was Rigidfix™ femoral and Intrafix tibial fixation with a semitendinosus-gracilis graft. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, knee scores (Lysholm, Tegner and IKDC) and instrumented laxity measurements (KT-2000™). Our aim was to evaluate if there was better rotational stability and therefore better clinical results when using AM drilling compared to TT drilling. RESULTS: After excluding revision ACL reconstructions, there were 132 patients in the AM group and 133 in the TT group for evaluation. At the 2-year follow-up, there were 60 patients in the AM group (45.5%) and 58 in the TT group (43.6%). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in any of the evaluation methods used. CONCLUSION: Both drilling techniques resulted in improved patient performance and satisfaction. We found no data supporting the hypothesis that the AM drilling technique provides better rotational stability to the knee. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry with study ID ISRCTN16407730. Retrospectively registered Jan 9th 2020.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-related patient injuries: a nationwide registry study in Finland.

Background and purpose - Treatment outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are generally good, but complications after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) can result in long-lasting problems. Patient injury claims usually fall on the more severe end of the complication spectrum. They are important to investigate because they may reveal the root causes of adverse events, which are often similar regardless of the complication's severity. Therefore, we analyzed ACL-related patient injuries in Finland, the reasons for these claims, causes of complications, and grounds for compensation.Patients and methods - We analyzed all claims filed at the Patient Insurance Centre (PIC) between 2005 and 2013 in which the suspected patient injury occurred between 2005 and 2010. This study also reviewed all original patient records and available imaging studies. General background data were obtained from the National Care Register for Social Welfare and Health Care (HILMO).Results - There were 248 patient injury claims, and 100 of these were compensated. Compensated claims were divided into 4 main categories: skill-based errors (n = 46), infections (n = 34), knowledge-based errors (n = 6), and others (n = 14). Of the compensated skill-based errors, 34 involved graft malposition, 26 of them involved the femoral-side tunnel. All compensated infections were deep surgical site infections (DSSI).Interpretation - This is the first nationwide study of patient injuries concerning ACLRs in Finland. The most common reasons for compensation were DSSI and malposition of the drill tunnel. Therefore, it would be possible to decrease the number of serious complications by concentrating on infection prevention and optimal surgical technique.

Association study of MMP8 gene in osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint disease common in the elderly. There is a prior functional evidence for different matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), such as MMP8 and MMP9, having a role in the breakdown of cartilage extracellular matrix in OA. Thus, we analyzed whether the common genetic variants of MMP8 and MMP9 contribute to the risk of OA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 13 common tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were studied in a discovery knee OA cohort of 185 cases and 895 controls. For validation, two knee OA replication cohorts and two hand OA replication cohorts were studied (altogether 1369 OA cases, 4445 controls in the five cohorts). The χ(2) test for individual study cohorts and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for combined meta-analysis were calculated using Plink. RESULTS: The rs1940475 SNP in MMP8 showed suggestive association in the discovery cohort (OR = 0.721, 95% CI 0.575-0.906; p = 0.005). Other knee and hand OA replication study cohorts showed similar trend for the predisposing allele without reaching statistical significance in independent replication cohorts nor in their meta-analysis (p > 0.05). Meta-analysis of all five hand and knee OA study cohorts yielded a p-value of 0.027 (OR = 0.904, 95% CI 0.826-0.989). CONCLUSIONS: Initial analysis of the MMP8 gene showed suggestive association between rs1940475 and knee OA, but the finding did not replicate in other study cohorts, even though the trend for predisposing allele was similar in all five cohorts. MMP-8 is a good biological candidate for OA, but our study did not find common variants with significant association in the gene.

A randomized prospective controlled study with 5-year follow-up of cross-pin femoral fixation versus metal interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine and compare mid- to long-term results of cross-pin versus metal interference screw fixation of ACL graft. METHODS: In a prospective trial, 62 patients were randomized into two groups based on method of fixation. Transtibial drilling technique was used in the cross-pin and outside-in femoral drilling in the interference screw fixation group. Clinical and radiographical outcomes were assessed 2 and 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS: The study showed no clinically significant difference with respect to method of graft fixation. Mean anteroposterior side-to-side instrumented laxity difference was 2.4 mm in the cross-pin group and 2.5 mm in the screw group (n.s.). Median Tegner and mean Lysholm scores at 5 years were 6 (range 3-9) and 92.2 (range 69-100) in the screw group and 7 (3-10) and 93.3 (82-100), respectively, in the cross-pin group. Radiographical osteoarthritis increased in both groups from 2 to 5 years after reconstruction (p < 0.05), especially in the medial and patellofemoral joint spaces. Widening of the drill tunnels continued from 2 to 5 years without clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The method of graft fixation did not yield a difference in clinical or radiographical outcome at 5 years. Results were excellent in both groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Knee arthroscopy and exercise versus exercise only for chronic patellofemoral pain syndrome: 5-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To study the long-term outcome of arthroscopy in patients with chronic patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), the authors conducted a randomised controlled trial. The authors also investigated factors predicting the outcome in patients with PFPS. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with PFPS were randomised into two groups: an arthroscopy group (N=28), treated with knee arthroscopy and an 8-week home exercise programme, and a control group (N=28), treated with a similar 8-week home exercise programme only. The primary outcome was the Kujala score on pain and function at 5-year. Secondary outcomes were visual analogue scales (VASs) to assess activity-related symptoms. RESULTS: According to the Kujala score, both groups showed a marked improvement during the 5-year follow-up: a mean improvement of 14.7 (95% CI 9.9 to 19.4) in the arthroscopy group and 13.5 (95% CI 8.1 to 18.8) in the controls. No differences between the groups in mean improvement in the Kujala score (group difference 1.2 (95% CI -8.4 to 6.1)) or in the VAS scores were found. None of the investigated factors predicted the long-term outcome, but in most of the cases the treatment result immediately after the exercise programme remained similar also after the 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our RCT, being the first of its kind, indicates that the 5-year outcome in most of the patients with chronic PFPS treated with knee arthroscopy and home exercise programme or with the home exercise programme only is equally good in both groups. Some of the patients in both groups do have long-term symptoms.

Results of total knee replacement with a cruciate-retaining model for severe valgus deformity--a study of 48 patients followed for an average of 9 years.

The objectives of the present study were to find out the results and the factors affecting survival after primary knee arthroplasty with a cruciate-retaining prosthesis in severe valgus deformity. Forty-eight patients (52 knees) participated in the current follow-up study. All patients were followed at least 5 years or to first revision. Mean follow-up time was 9 years (range, 1 to 17 years).The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed 79% (95% CI 68% to 91%) survival rate with revision for any reason and 81% (95% CI 70% to 93%) survival rate with revision for instability as an endpoint at 10 years. Preoperatively TFA was 23° (range, 15°-51°) in valgus and 7° (range, 21° valgus-4° varus) in valgus postoperatively. Of the 14 re-operated patients, eight were revised because of progressive postoperative medial collateral ligament instability. All re-operations were performed during the first 4 years of the follow-up. The mean TFA was 15.5° valgus postoperatively for those eight and the odds ratio for a revision was 2 (95% CI 1-3, p = 0.025) when compared to the rest of the study population. The residual valgus deformity increases the risk of re-operation and it should be avoided. If proper soft-tissue balance cannot be achieved or there is no functional medial collateral ligament present more constrained implants should be used. In selected cases where both bony correction and ligament balancing have properly been achieved the use of a cruciate-retaining type of prosthesis is justified.

Allelic variants of IL1R1 gene associate with severe hand osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: In search for genes predisposing to osteoarthritis (OA), several genome wide scans have provided evidence for linkage on 2q. In this study we targeted a 470 kb region on 2q11.2 presenting the locus with most evidence for linkage to severe OA of distal interphalangeal joints (DIP) in our genome wide scan families. METHODS: We genotyped 32 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in this 470 kb region comprising six genes belonging to the interleukin 1 superfamily and monitored for association with individual SNPs and SNP haplotypes among severe familial hand OA cases (material extended from our previous linkage study; n = 134), unrelated end-stage bilateral primary knee OA cases (n = 113), and population based controls (n = 436). RESULTS: Four SNPs in the IL1R1 gene, mapping to a 125 kb LD block, provided evidence for association with hand OA in family-based and case-control analysis, the strongest association being with SNP rs2287047 (p-value = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an association between severe hand OA and IL1R1 gene. This gene represents a highly relevant biological candidate since it encodes protein that is a known modulator of inflammatory processes associated with joint destruction and resides within a locus providing consistent evidence for linkage to hand OA. As the observed association did not fully explain the linkage obtained in the previous study, it is plausible that also other variants in this genome region predispose to hand OA.

Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data.

BACKGROUND: The best means of ensuring knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains a core debate in sports medicine. HYPOTHESIS: There is no difference between ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring tendon autografts with regard to postoperative knee laxity and instability. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis of individual patient data. METHODS: Pooled analysis of individual patient data from 6 published randomized clinical trials included 423 patients with symptomatic unilateral anterior cruciate ligament injury randomly assigned to reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring tendon autograft. Knee instability, defined as a positive pivot-shift test result, was the primary outcome, and knee laxity, defined as a positive Lachman test result, was the secondary outcome. Odds ratios were computed before and after adjustment for potential confounders and trial effect. Regression analyses were performed to look for effects of covariates on outcomes, and mixed-effects models were used to account for a trial effect. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the effects of missing data and excluding each trial. RESULTS: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft was significantly associated with a decreased risk of a positive pivot-shift test result (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.86; P = .016). The risk of having a positive Lachman test result was not significantly different between the 2 groups. The estimated treatment effect was not substantially changed by differences in handling missing data or exclusion of any of the trials. A positive pivot-shift test result was more common in female (P = .003) and younger patients (P = .017). CONCLUSION: Postoperative knee instability was less common after ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft than with hamstring tendon autograft.

A prospective comparison of 3 hamstring ACL fixation devices--Rigidfix, BioScrew, and Intrafix--randomized into 4 groups with 2 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: New devices for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are released to clinical use without clinical follow-up data. HYPOTHESIS: There is similar clinical outcome after either cross-pin or absorbable interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A total of 120 patients were randomized into 4 different groups (30 each) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons: femoral Rigidfix cross-pin and Intrafix tibial expansion sheath with a tapered expansion screw; Rigidfix femoral and BioScrew interference screw tibial fixation, BioScrew femoral and Intrafix tibial fixation; or BioScrew fixation into both tunnels. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, knee scores, and instrumented laxity measurements. RESULTS: Ten patients were completely lost to follow-up and 3 revisions were done before the 2-year follow-up, leaving 107 of 120 (89%) patients for analysis. No statistically significant differences between the groups were seen 2 years postoperatively, and all but 2 patients in the Rigidfix/Intrafix and Rigidfix/BioScrew groups, respectively, were classified into International Knee Documentation Committee A or B categories. A revision reconstruction was performed before the 2-year follow-up in 2 cases after a high-energy injury caused a rerupture (1 in Rigidfix/Intrafix and 1 in BioScrew/BioScrew groups). In addition, there were 4 nontraumatic failures revised before the 2-year follow-up (2 in Rigidfix/Intrafix and 1 each in Rigidfix/BioScrew and BioScrew/BioScrew). CONCLUSION: There were no statistically or clinically relevant differences in the results 2 years postoperatively, and all 4 techniques improved patient performance.

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with Miller-Galante II prosthesis: mid-term clinical and radiographic results.

AIM: The purpose of our study was to evaluate retrospectively the mid-term results of the Miller-Galante II (Zimmer, Warsaw, USA) unicondylar knee arthoplasty (UKA). METHOD: The study included 46 patients with medial UKAs. Mean follow-up time was 7.0 years (range 2.7-13.1 years). RESULTS: Survival rate of the prosthesis was 86.6% (95% CI 73.7-99.6) at 7 years. The mean clinical and functional Knee Society Scores had increased from 51 and 62 points preoperatively to 76 and 93 points (P < 0.001) postoperatively. Five of the 46 knees were revised because of excessive wear of the polyethylene liner, and three due to progression of the osteoarthritis in the lateral compartment of the knee. CONCLUSION: Survival of this fixed-bearing UKA was not as good as previously reported and polyethylene wear seems to be a more common problem than previously assumed.

Isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength and knee function 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts.

Existing clinical studies have not proven which graft is to be preferred in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. In recent years, bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendons have been the most frequently used graft types. Muscle strength deficit is one of the consequences after ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible differences in hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength and knee function 5 years after ACL reconstruction between the BPTB and the STG groups. The study group consisted of 288 patients (132 women, 156 men) with a unilateral ACL rupture who had received a BPTB (175 patients) or STG (113 patients) ACL reconstruction. Lower extremity concentric isokinetic peak extension and flexion torques were assessed at the angular velocities of 60 degrees /s and 180 degrees /s. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Tegner activity level, the Lysholm knee and the Kujala patellofemoral scores were also collected. Isokinetic quadriceps peak torque (percentage of the contralateral side) was 3.9% higher in the STG group than in the BPTB group at the velocity of 60 degrees /s and 3.2% higher at the velocity of 180 degrees /s and the isokinetic hamstring peak torque 2% higher in the BPTB group than in the STG group at the velocity of 60 degrees /s and 2.5% higher at the velocity of 180 degrees /s. In both groups the subjects had weaker quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength in the injured extremity compared with the uninjured one. In the single-leg hop test (according to the IKDC recommendations) there was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.040) between the groups. In the STG group, 68% of the patients had the single-leg hop ratio (injured vs. uninjured extremity) > or =90%, 31% of the patients 75-89% and 1% of the patients <75%, while in the BPTB group the corresponding percentages were 72, 21 and 7%. However, no statistically significant differences in clinical outcome were found between the groups as determined by the IKDC, Tegner activity level, Lysholm knee and Kujala patellofemoral scores.

Ankle osteoarthritis is associated with knee osteoarthritis. Conclusions based on mechanical axis radiographs.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the ankle with an unknown etiology (primary OA) is rare, whereas a secondary OA due to a known cause is not uncommon. OA of the knee can, when it progresses, change the alignment of the whole extremity including the ankle joint. Since we had observed in patients coming for OA knee surgery coexisting OA in the ankle joint, our objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of abnormal alignment and degenerative changes in the ankle joint and to determine if degenerative changes in the knee and ankle correlated. These aims were assessed retrospectively, utilizing mechanical axis (MA) radiographs of subjects with knee OA prior to surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 104 patients who had undergone surgery of the knee due to OA. A musculoskeletal radiologist and an orthopedic surgeon reviewed in consensus the preoperative and postoperative MA radiographs. We analyzed and measured the tibiofemoral (TF) angle, the mediolateral tibial translation, the deviation of the MA, the tilt of the talocrural joint and the degree of OA in the knee and ankle. RESULTS: The severity of OA of the TF joint correlated with the preoperative TF translation and moderately with the deviation of the MA and abnormal TF angle. Of the 104 patients, 30 showed coexisting OA of the ankle: the greater the tilt in the ankle, the more degenerative were the changes in the joint. The MA was corrected with surgery from a mean preoperative 5.4 degrees varus to a postoperative mean 1.2 degrees valgus, and the ankle tilt was changed significantly at the same time. CONCLUSION: Ankle OA and tilt were not uncommon in our patients with knee OA. The assumption that associations may exist between knee and ankle OA and joint malalignment was confirmed.

Knee arthroscopy and exercise versus exercise only for chronic patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopy is often used to treat patients with chronic patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). As there is a lack of evidence, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to study the efficacy of arthroscopy in patients with chronic PFPS. METHODS: A total of 56 patients with chronic PFPS were randomized into two treatment groups: an arthroscopy group (N = 28), treated with knee arthroscopy and an 8-week home exercise program, and a control group (N = 28), treated with the 8-week home exercise program only. The arthroscopy included finding-specific surgical procedures according to current recommendations. The primary outcome was the Kujala score on patellofemoral pain and function at 9 months following randomization. Secondary outcomes were visual analog scales (VASs) to assess activity-related symptoms. We also estimated the direct healthcare costs. RESULTS: Both groups showed marked improvement during the follow-up. The mean improvement in the Kujala score was 12.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2-17.6) in the arthroscopy group and 11.4 (95% CI 6.9-15.8) in the control group. However, there was no difference between the groups in mean improvement in the Kujala score (group difference 1.1 (95% CI -7.4 - 5.2)) or in any of the VAS scores. Total direct healthcare costs in the arthroscopy group were estimated to exceed on average those of the control group by euro901 per patient (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this controlled trial involving patients with chronic PFPS, the outcome when arthroscopy was used in addition to a home exercise program was no better than when the home exercise program was used alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 41800323.

The effect of graft placement on the clinical outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study.

The effect of the graft placement on the clinical outcome of patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been studied sparsely. We conducted a prospective follow-up of 140 patients who underwent an arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft. One hundred and four of them (74%) could be examined at the 2-year follow-up. Clinical examination included Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee rating scores, arthrometric anterior-posterior knee laxity assessment, and muscle strength assessments. The graft placement was measured from lateral radiographs using a system recommended for measuring the attachment positions of the cruciate ligaments as well as a method called 'the sumscore of the graft placement', which takes into account both the femoral and the tibial graft placements simultaneously. The sumscore was smaller in knees with normal anterior-posterior knee laxity in the Lachman test (P = 0.002) and normal rotational knee laxity in the pivot shift test (P = 0.01) than in those with abnormal laxity. The tibial graft placement was more anterior when the Lachman test was normal (P = 0.04). The Lysholm score was better when the femoral graft placement was more posterior (r = -0.20, P = 0.04). The optimal femoral graft placement was between 25 and 29% of length of the femoral condyle along the Blumensaat's line from posterior to anterior. The optimal tibial graft placement was between 32 and 37% of the length of the tibial plateau from the anterior corner, and the optimal sumscore was between 61 and 66. The sumscore and its components (the femoral and tibial graft placements) showed a clear association with the clinical outcome of the patients. The best outcome was achieved when the sumscore was small; that is the graft placement showed posterior enough in the femur, and anterior enough in the tibia.

Randomized prospective study of ACL reconstruction with interference screw fixation in patellar tendon autografts versus femoral metal plate suspension and tibial post fixation in hamstring tendon autografts: 5-year clinical and radiological follow-up results.

Patellar tendon graft has been the most frequently used material in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but the hamstring tendons have been increasingly used as well; however, which graft is to be preferred is not adequately supported by existing clinical studies. In this prospective randomized clinical trial, the study hypothesis was that the hamstring tendons are equally good graft material as the patellar tendon in ACL reconstruction. Ninety-nine patients with laxity due to a torn ACL underwent arthroscopically assisted reconstruction with graft randomization according to their birth year to either patellar tendon with metal interference screw fixation or double looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendons with fixation similar to the Endobutton technique using a titanium metal plate suspension proximally and screw-washer postdistally. Excluding preoperative Lysholm knee score, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the preoperative and operative data. A standard rehabilitation regimen was used for all the patients, including immediate postoperative mobilization without a knee brace, protected weight bearing for 2 weeks, and return to full activity at 6-12 months postoperatively. Forty patients in the patellar tendon group and 39 patients in the hamstring tendon group were available for clinical evaluation at median 5 years after surgery (ranges 3 years 11 months-6 years 7 months). The results revealed no statistically significant differences with respect to clinical and instrumented laxity testing, isokinetic muscle torque measurements, International Knee Documentation Committee ratings, Lysholm (knee score), Tegner (activity level) and Kujala patellofemoral knee scores. There was an enlargement of the drill tunnels, statistically more in the hamstring tendon group, but no increase from 2 to 5 years in either group. Narrowing of the joint spaces (IKDC measurement method) from 2 to 5 years postoperatively was seen in both the groups, however, without difference between the two groups.