Impairments and compensation in string-pulling after middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat.

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability in humans, and it is frequently associated with impairments in the skilled use of the arms and hands. Many human upper limb impairments and compensatory changes have been successfully modeled in rodent studies of neocortical stroke, especially those that evaluate single limb use in tasks, such as reaching for food. Humans also use their hands for bilaterally coordinated movements, dependent upon interhemispheric cortical projections, which are also compromised by unilateral stroke. This study describes middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) dependent changes in the bilaterally dependent hand use behavior of string-pulling in the rat. The task involves making hand-over-hand movements to pull down a string that contains a food reward attached to its end. MCAO rats missed the string more often with both hands than Sham rats. When the string was missed on the contralateral to MCAO body side, rats continued to cycle through subcomponents of string-pulling behavior as if the string were grasped in the hand. Rats also failed to make a grasping motion with the contralateral to MCAO hand when the string was missed and instead, demonstrated an open-handed raking-like motions. Nevertheless, with repeated attempts, rats performed components of string-pulling well enough to obtain a reward on the end of the string. Thus, string-pulling behavior is sensitive to bilateral impairments but is achieved with compensatory adjustments following MCAO. These aspects of MCAO string-pulling provide a foundation for studies that investigate the efficacy of therapeutic intervention which might enhance neuroplasticity and recovery.

Population-based analysis of CNS tumor diagnoses, treatment, and survival in congenital and infant age groups.

BACKGROUND: Congenital (< 3 months) and infant (3 to 11 months) brain tumors are biologically different from tumors in older children, but their epidemiology has not been studied comprehensively. Insight into epidemiological differences could help tailor treatment recommendations by age and increase overall survival (OS). METHODS: Population-based data from SEER were obtained for 14,493 0-19-year-olds diagnosed with CNS tumors 1990-2015. Congenital and infant age groups were compared to patients aged 1-19 years based on incidence, treatment, and survival using Chi-square and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Hazard ratios were estimated from univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards survival analyses. RESULTS: Between the < 3-month, 3-5-month, 6-11 month, and 1-19-year age groups, tumor type distribution differed significantly (p < 0.001). 5-year OS for all tumors was 36.7% (< 3 months), 56.0% (< 3-5 months), 63.8% (6-11 months), and 74.7% (1-19 years) (p < 0.001). Comparing between age groups by tumor type, OS was worst for < 3-month-olds with low-grade glioma, medulloblastoma, and other embryonal tumors; OS was worst for 3-5-month-olds with ependymoma, < 1-year-olds collectively with atypical teratoid-rhabdoid tumor, and 1-19-year-olds with high-grade glioma (HGG) (log rank p < 0.02 for all tumor types). Under 3-month-olds were least likely to receive any treatment for each tumor type and least likely to undergo surgery for all except HGG. Under 1-year-olds were far less likely than 1-19-year-olds to undergo both radiation and chemotherapy for embryonal tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Subtype distribution, treatment patterns, and prognosis of congenital/infant CNS tumors differ from those in older children. Better, more standardized treatment guidelines may improve poorer outcomes seen in these youngest patients.

Population-Based Analysis of Demographic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Pediatric CNS Cancer Survival in the United States.

Previous studies have demonstrated effects of racial and socioeconomic factors on survival of adults with cancer. While less studied in the pediatric population, data exist demonstrating disparities of care and survival in pediatric oncology patients based on socioeconomic and racial/ethnic factors. Brain cancers recently overtook leukemia as the number one cause of childhood cancer fatalities, but demographic and socioeconomic disparities in these tumors have not been adequately studied. We obtained data from the SEER Program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI). We selected patients under 19 years of age with central nervous system (CNS) cancers diagnosed between 2000 and 2015. We included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and socioeconomic characteristics as covariates in the analysis. We measured overall survival and extent of disease at diagnosis. We saw that Black and Hispanic patients overall had a higher risk of death than non-Hispanic White patients on multivariable analysis. On stratified analysis, Black and Hispanic patients with both metastatic and localized disease at diagnosis had a higher risk of death compared to White, non-Hispanic patients, although the difference in Black patients was not significant after adjusting for mediating factors. However, our findings on extent of disease at diagnosis demonstrated that neither Black race nor Hispanic ethnicity increased the chance of metastatic disease at presentation when controlling for mediating variables. In summary, racial and ethnic disparities in childhood CNS tumor survival appear to have their roots at least partially in post-diagnosis factors, potentially due to the lack of access to high quality care, leading to poorer overall outcomes.