Dominant-negative variants in CBX1 cause a neurodevelopmental disorder.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish variants in CBX1, encoding heterochromatin protein 1ß (HP1ß), as a cause of a novel syndromic neurodevelopmental disorder. METHODS: Patients with CBX1 variants were identified, and clinician researchers were connected using GeneMatcher and physician referrals. Clinical histories were collected from each patient. To investigate the pathogenicity of identified variants, we performed in vitro cellular assays and neurobehavioral and cytological analyses of neuronal cells obtained from newly generated Cbx1 mutant mouse lines. RESULTS: In 3 unrelated individuals with developmental delay, hypotonia, and autistic features, we identified heterozygous de novo variants in CBX1. The identified variants were in the chromodomain, the functional domain of HP1ß, which mediates interactions with chromatin. Cbx1 chromodomain mutant mice displayed increased latency-to-peak response, suggesting the possibility of synaptic delay or myelination deficits. Cytological and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the reduction of mutant HP1ß binding to heterochromatin, whereas HP1ß interactome analysis demonstrated that the majority of HP1ß-interacting proteins remained unchanged between the wild-type and mutant HP1ß. CONCLUSION: These collective findings confirm the role of CBX1 in developmental disabilities through the disruption of HP1ß chromatin binding during neurocognitive development. Because HP1ß forms homodimers and heterodimers, mutant HP1ß likely sequesters wild-type HP1ß and other HP1 proteins, exerting dominant-negative effects.

Contribution of GlyR α3 Subunits to the Sensitivity and Effect of Ethanol in the Nucleus Accumbens.

The glycine receptor (GlyR), a ligand-gated ion channel, is critical for inhibitory neurotransmission in brainstem, spinal cord, and in supraspinal regions. Recent data from several laboratories have shown that GlyRs are expressed in the brain reward circuitry and that α1 and α2 are the principal subunits expressed in the nucleus accumbens (nAc). In the present study, we studied the sensitivity to ethanol of homomeric and heteromeric α3 GlyR subunits in HEK293 cells and dissociated neurons from the nAc. Finally, we explored ethanol-related behaviors in a Glra3 knockout mouse (Glra3 -/-). Studies in HEK293 cells showed that while homomeric α3 GlyR subunits were insensitive to ethanol, heteromeric α3ß GlyR subunits showed higher sensitivity to ethanol. Additionally, using electrophysiological recordings in dissociated accumbal neurons, we found that the glycine current density increased in Glra3 -/- mice and the GlyRs were less affected by ethanol and picrotoxin. We also examined the effect of ethanol on sedation and drinking behavior in Glra3 -/- mice and found that the duration in the loss of righting reflex (LORR) was unchanged compared to wild-type (WT) mice. On the other hand, using the drinking in the dark (DID) paradigm, we found that Glra3 -/- mice have a larger ethanol consumption compared to WT mice, and that this was already high during the first days of exposure to ethanol. Our results support the conclusion that heteromeric α3ß, but not homomeric α3, GlyRs are potentiated by ethanol. Also, the increase in GlyR and GABA A R mediated current densities in accumbal neurons in the KO mice support the presence of compensatory changes to α3 knock out. The increase in ethanol drinking in the Glra3 -/- mice might be associated to the reduction in ß and compensatory changes in other subunits in the receptor arrangement.

Presence of ethanol-sensitive and ethanol-insensitive glycine receptors in the ventral tegmental area and prefrontal cortex in mice.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Glycine receptors composed of α1 and ß subunits are primarily found in the spinal cord and brainstem and are potentiated by ethanol (10-100 mM). However, much less is known about the presence, composition and ethanol sensitivity of these receptors in higher CNS regions. Here, we examined two regions of the brain reward system, the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the prefrontal cortex (PFC), to determine their glycine receptor subunit composition and sensitivity to ethanol. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We used Western blot, immunohistochemistry and electrophysiological techniques in three different models: wild-type C57BL/6, glycine receptor subunit α1 knock-in and glycine receptor subunit α2 knockout mice. KEY RESULTS: Similar levels of α and ß receptor subunits were detected in both brain regions, and electrophysiological recordings demonstrated the presence of glycine-activated currents in both areas. Sensitivity of glycine receptors to glycine was lower in the PFC compared with VTA. Picrotoxin only partly blocked the glycine-activated current in the PFC and VTA, indicating that both regions express heteromeric αß receptors. Glycine receptors in VTA neurons, but not in PFC neurons, were potentiated by ethanol. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Glycine receptors in VTA neurons from WT and α2 KO mice were potentiated by ethanol, but not in neurons from the α1 KI mice, supporting the conclusion that α1 glycine receptors are predominantly expressed in the VTA. By contrast, glycine receptors in PFC neurons were not potentiated in any of the mouse models studied, suggesting the presence of α2/α3/α4, rather than α1 glycine receptor subunits.

Ethanol consumption and sedation are altered in mice lacking the glycine receptor α2 subunit.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The precise mechanism/s of action of ethanol, although studied for many years, are not well understood. Like other drugs of abuse, ethanol affects dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens (nAc), an important region of the mesolimbic system, causing a reinforcing effect. It has been shown that glycine receptors (GlyRs) present in the nAc are potentiated by clinically relevant concentrations of ethanol, where α1 and α2 are the predominant subunits expressed. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Using a combination of electrophysiology and behavioural assays, we studied the involvement of GlyR α2 subunits on the effects of low and high doses of ethanol, as well as on consumption using mice lacking the GlyR α2 subunit (male Glra2-/Y and female Glra2-/- ). KEY RESULTS: GlyR α2 subunits exist in accumbal neurons, since the glycine-evoked currents and glycinergic miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) in Glra2-/Y mice were drastically decreased. In behavioural studies, differences in ethanol consumption and sedation were observed between wild-type (WT) and Glra2 knockout (KO) mice. Using the drinking in the dark (DID) paradigm, we found that Glra2-/Y mice presented a binge-like drinking behaviour immediately when exposed to ethanol rather than the gradual consumption seen in WT animals. Interestingly, the effect of knocking out Glra2 in female (Glra2-/- ) mice was less evident, since WT female mice already showed higher DID. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The differences in ethanol consumption between WT and KO mice provide additional evidence supporting the conclusion that GlyRs are biologically relevant targets for the sedative and rewarding properties of ethanol.

Control of ethanol sensitivity of the glycine receptor α3 subunit by transmembrane 2, the intracellular splice cassette and C-terminal domains.

Previous studies have shown that the effect of ethanol onglycine receptors (GlyRs) containing the a1 subunit is affected by interaction with heterotrimeric G proteins (Gßγ). GlyRs containing the α3 subunit are involved in inflammatory pain sensitization and rhythmic breathing and have received much recent attention. For example, it is unknown whether ethanol affects the function of this important GlyR subtype. Electrophysiologic experiments showed that GlyR α3 subunits were not potentiated by pharmacologic concentrations of ethanol or by Gßγ. Thus, we studied GlyR α1­α3 chimeras and mutants to determine the molecular properties that confer ethanol insensitivity. Mutation of corresponding glycine 254 in transmembrane domain 2 (TM2) found in a1 in the α3(A254G) ­α1 chimera induced a glycine-evoked current that displayed potentiation during application of ethanol (46 ± 5%, 100 mM) and Gßγ activation (80 ± 17%). Interestingly,insertion of the intracellular α3L splice cassette into GlyR α1 abolished the enhancement of the glycine-activated current by ethanol (5 ± 6%) and activation by Gßγ (21 6 7%). In corporation of the GlyR α1 C terminus into the ethanol-resistant α3S(A254G) mutant produced a construct that displayed potentiation of the glycine-activated current with 100 mM ethanol (40 ± 6%)together with a current enhancement after G protein activation (68 ± 25%). Taken together, these data demonstrate that GlyRα3 subunits are not modulated by ethanol. Residue A254 in TM2, the α3L splice cassette, and the C-terminal domain of α3GlyRs are determinants for low ethanol sensitivity and form the molecular basis of subtype-selective modulation of GlyRs by alcohol.